Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Nonstopdrivel  
#1 Posted : Friday, February 11, 2011 12:23:03 PM(UTC)
Quote:
[size=18]Kawakami: Green Bay Packers have all the makings of a dynasty
[/size]
By Tim Kawakami
Mercury News Columnist

San Jose Mercury News
Posted:02/07/2011 04:42:32 AM PST

[img_r]http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site568/2011/0207/20110207__superbowl4~3_VIEWER.JPG[/img_r]The Green Bay Packers won Super Bowl XLV on Sunday and might keep winning titles for a little while, maybe for a long while.

Maybe two in a row by next February, if there is labor peace and a season.

Maybe three for three by Super Bowl XLVII. Maybe four out of five.

Yes, I think the Packers are more solidly set up for a dynastic display than
any team since the New England Patriots of the early 2000s.

And I think the Packers might be able to extend their success longer than New England's run of three championships in four seasons.

First, let's get to their interesting 31-25 victory over Pittsburgh in Arlington, Texas, on Sunday.

The Packers surely weren't dominant -- they bolted to a 21-3 lead, then almost let Pittsburgh come all the way back -- but Green Bay was good enough.

The Packers made errors, but they forced a tough Steelers team into many more of their own.

Green Bay lost cornerback Charles Woodson and receiver Donald Driver to injury during the game but held it together at the end.

Green Bay could have succumbed to a Pittsburgh team that has its own claim to a mini-dynasty, and Green Bay prevailed.

Those are all signs. Those things tell us that Green Bay is not likely to be a one-Supe wonder. They are indicators that the Packers probably won't peak for another year or two.

The Packers won this game because they were more talented than Pittsburgh, because they had the deeper roster, because the time was right, and because of one gigantic factor:

Green Bay has quarterback Aaron Rodgers, who threw three touchdown passes, zero interceptions, won the MVP and burnished his case as the league's most important, and possibly best, player.

Pittsburgh's Ben Roethlisberger was the QB who came into this game with two previous Super Bowl victories. But he ended up throwing two interceptions and was far from cool and precise at the desperate end.

Rodgers was better Sunday. He will be better than Roethlisberger -- again, one of the NFL's biggest winners -- for the rest of their careers.

Oh, and Rodgers is 27 and just completed only his third full season in the NFL, after sitting for three seasons behind Brett Favre.

So the Packers are set at QB for the long term. Check.

The Packers have a defense packed with young talent, as evidenced by linebacker Clay Matthews Jr.'s pivotal hit on Rashard Mendenhall in the fourth quarter that forced a fumble. Double-check.

The Packers have a tough, imaginative young coach, Mike McCarthy, who seems well-built for the long haul. Triple-check.

And the Packers have a management team, keyed by general manager Ted Thompson, that has proved it can find gems in the draft and via free agency. Check.

In fact, Green Bay won the title this season with some emergency fill-ins in big roles, after injuries blew out their running game and parts of their receiving corps.

And they won this Super Bowl on a day when their talented receivers all started dropping passes.

What will this team be like when Thompson finds two or three powerful running backs? And adds a few more offensive linemen and receivers?

This Packers team could be at least as good as the Packers of the late-1990s, when Favre, Reggie White and Mike Holmgren led them to one title and to the brink of another.

But I think Green Bay can do better this time -- White was at the end of his career, and Holmgren was growing weary of his time in Green Bay.

The current Packers are already the best team in the league. And like the 2001 Patriots, they won the title at the beginning of an upswing, not at the very peak of their powers.

New Orleans won it all as a peaking team last season. Then fell back a bit this season.

Same thing happened with the New York Giants in Super Bowl XLII and the Indianapolis Colts the year before that.

The Packers are set up for a run. In fact, I think the only other team as well positioned for continued success is Pittsburgh -- young QB, young coach, a lot of key young talent.

I wouldn't be shocked at all if these two teams meet again in a Super Bowl or two over the next few Roman numerals.

Still, Green Bay just beat Pittsburgh, head to head, with the superior QB and the chance to get so much better.

If Green Bay doesn't win three titles in the next five or six seasons, I think it will have underachieved. That's a high bar, but the Packers are worthy to aim for it.

Read Tim Kawakami's Talking Points blog at blogs.mercurynews.com/kawakami. Contact him at tkawakami@mercurynews.com or 408-920-5442.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Barfarn (1h) : Perhaps no or inadequte coverage in general
Barfarn (1h) : I’d guess “no help” refers to men not being covered for breast cancer
wpr (4h) : O no. Sorry to hear this NSD.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Rourke, sorry to hear that, but who doesn't want to help you?
Cheesey (14h) : Oh geez, nonstop. Like was said, we have your back.
TheKanataThrilla (14h) : NSD sorry your post is a bit of a mind fuck, but obviously brother those here have your back.
Nonstopdrivel (15h) : I got the test results back! I definitely have breast cancer.
Nonstopdrivel (15h) : Everything goes wrong at once. Nobody wants to help me, and I'm dying!
Zero2Cool (21h) : Zone defenses always must answer this question: is it better to invest in top CBs, or better to invest in pass rushers who can make a CB’s job easier?
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers giving away $500 Pro Shop gift card and 11 2018 Official Draft Caps
Zero2Cool (21h) : can't restrict
Zero2Cool (21h) : you did it now
Zero2Cool (21h) : 123456
Zero2Cool (21h) : too bad you gonna cry
Zero2Cool (22h) : don't break it
Zero2Cool (22h) : something here
Zero2Cool (22h) : You can do it too!
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Who the hell gives a shit about Sat/Sun now? 3rd to 7th round? F U
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : I thought Sat/Sun was great. You make a weekend of it. Have buddies over, cookout, etc.
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : During the afternoons I tend to get caught up in family routines. I don't mind that for the later rounds.
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I now take Friday off work. It is a bit annoying, but I do find it fun at night as I can crack a few beers and enjoy. Sucks if they trade out of the first round though.
wpr (24-Apr) : I liked the Sat Sun version.
beast (23-Apr) : HELL YEAH! ... the draft was SOOOO MUCH BETTER in the ol Saturday/Sunday format... only people that I've heard disagree are those that don't really follow the draft and just random get updates on thei
beast (23-Apr) : Key word there is "proven"... not if they're true, but if you can prove it. Jerry Jones said the same thing for Greg Hardy, it wasn't "proven".
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Flat out honesty from 49ers GM
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : John Lynch: “if these charges are proven true, if Reuben did hit this young lady, he won’t be part of our organization moving forward.”
Smokey (23-Apr) : 49ers / Bye Week / Rams
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Brian Gutekunst: “Draft was way better when it was Saturday and Sunday.”
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : With pick #14, @CFD22 has the @Packers selecting UTSA DE Marcus Davenport.
Porforis (23-Apr) : He'll probably resort to buying and using Chicago Bears tickets.
Smokey (22-Apr) : Restrict Zero's toilet paper !
buckeyepackfan (22-Apr) : You gonna withhold your monthly dues until Zero gets the schedule posted Smokey? Lol
Smokey (22-Apr) : Zero, please post the new 2018 Packers Schedule. Thank You
Smokey (22-Apr) : DRAFT "CHAT" this Thursday night !
gbguy20 (20-Apr) : you're probably right
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

20h / Around The NFL / dhazer

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

20h / Random Babble / Cheesey

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

20-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

Headlines