Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#11 Posted : Friday, February 25, 2011 2:41:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,973
Applause Received: 2,040
Yeah this is just more BS. I posted most of the things cubez said awhile back after someone said GB backed into the playoffs.

I added the Miami game. If the official would have gotten the call right and not thrown the flag on Johnson for being lined up over center when he was clearly more than a yard back they would not have lost that game either.

I really don't mind it when the games that went in favor of GB are pointed out as long as they point out the ones what went against GB too.
Offline TheKanataThrilla  
#12 Posted : Friday, February 25, 2011 3:11:03 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Canada
Joined: 9/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 480
Applause Received: 504
The problem with this article is it lacks all the gifts which were given to Chicago to win the division starting with the joke win against Detroit. I still don't know why somebody with possession of the ball over the goal line has to not lose control of it going down. It is dfferent rules for WRs than RBs in my opinion.

Nobody had a horseshoe like the Bears this year.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#13 Posted : Friday, February 25, 2011 3:41:05 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,499
Applause Received: 4,035
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Personally... it proves just how close the margin is in this league to winning it all and sitting an watching another team win it.

That isn't anything new.. just a very solid illustration of that point, IMO.


How is it solid? It's not even accurate. You can't change one outcome without having a domino effect. Surely you remember playing and how winning and losing effected you, your team and how your coaches coached.

The article is 'un' solid and comes off whimsical in my view. ;)

A thorough article would have outlined the what if's for the Packers as well. This just points out that basically the Packers were 'lucky'. I strongly disagree, the game is of inches, everyone knows this and the Packers have lost by inches and won by inches.

He's only looking at one side of the coin, and only glancing at it.
Offline Dulak  
#14 Posted : Friday, February 25, 2011 3:46:54 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)
Applause Given: 297
Applause Received: 151
" said: Go to Quoted Post
The problem with this article is it lacks all the gifts which were given to Chicago to win the division starting with the joke win against Detroit. I still don't know why somebody with possession of the ball over the goal line has to not lose control of it going down. It is dfferent rules for WRs than RBs in my opinion.

Nobody had a horseshoe like the Bears this year.


That always stumps me too ... so a guy can run in like rodgers or a rb and alls he has to do is be 1 cm over the line and its a TD; but a dude catching the ball has to hold onto it even when he is drilled and he cant let go of it even if he is hit by a mack truck.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#15 Posted : Friday, February 25, 2011 4:07:53 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,499
Applause Received: 4,035
Exactly, the Bears had how many injuries, home field advantage (-Falcons) and how'd that work for them? Not to mention the Lions game as just mentioned above.
Offline wpr  
#16 Posted : Friday, February 25, 2011 4:15:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,973
Applause Received: 2,040
King has a deadline and needed a story. Any story. He didn't care how accurate he was. Wasn't he a Favre-ite anyway? Like Madden, he probably is sore that GB won without ol #4.
Offline Pack93z  
#17 Posted : Friday, February 25, 2011 4:52:58 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 436
Applause Received: 1,232
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Personally... it proves just how close the margin is in this league to winning it all and sitting an watching another team win it.

That isn't anything new.. just a very solid illustration of that point, IMO.


How is it solid? It's not even accurate. You can't change one outcome without having a domino effect. Surely you remember playing and how winning and losing effected you, your team and how your coaches coached.

The article is 'un' solid and comes off whimsical in my view. ;)

A thorough article would have outlined the what if's for the Packers as well. This just points out that basically the Packers were 'lucky'. I strongly disagree, the game is of inches, everyone knows this and the Packers have lost by inches and won by inches.

He's only looking at one side of the coin, and only glancing at it.


How does it not illustrate that the margin between qualifying for the playoffs and not is oh so small?

A play here or a play there.. of course there is the totality of effects from that point out.. but I stand by my comment, the margin between winning and losing in this league is tiny.. and the Packers getting in based on a number of factors over two other teams with the same record and a accumulation of events that separates them.

And of course it doesn't outline all other factors.. King was trying to point out, IMO, that tiny margin between sitting home and getting into the playoffs and earning it from there.
Offline Greg C.  
#18 Posted : Friday, February 25, 2011 6:06:53 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan
Applause Received: 48
" said: Go to Quoted Post
The article is 'un' solid and comes off whimsical in my view.


"Whimsical" is a good word for it, and that's why it doesn't bother me much. It's not a stand-alone article anyway; it's just a little prelude to his weekly mailbag column. I haven't yet heard anybody discrediting the Packers for their championship, and that's not what this is.

By the way, Peter King predicted the Packers to go to the Super Bowl, and he was highly skeptical of year two of the Vikings' Favre experiment, so I don't see any evidence to support wpr's theory that King didn't want the Packers to win it without Favre.
Offline Dulak  
#19 Posted : Tuesday, March 1, 2011 10:44:01 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)
Applause Given: 297
Applause Received: 151
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
The article is 'un' solid and comes off whimsical in my view.


"Whimsical" is a good word for it, and that's why it doesn't bother me much. It's not a stand-alone article anyway; it's just a little prelude to his weekly mailbag column. I haven't yet heard anybody discrediting the Packers for their championship, and that's not what this is.

By the way, Peter King predicted the Packers to go to the Super Bowl, and he was highly skeptical of year two of the Vikings' Favre experiment, so I don't see any evidence to support wpr's theory that King didn't want the Packers to win it without Favre.


I dont give too much credence to kings article - many many people picked the pack winning it all or going to the big game preseason. I didnt hear too much talk after we started suffering injuries thou.
Offline pacmaniac  
#20 Posted : Thursday, March 10, 2011 10:29:11 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 3/5/2011(UTC)
Applause Given: 12
Applause Received: 9
The Pack also should thank the refs in the first Vikings game - they blew a couple TD calls that should have been in favor of the Vikings (and I'm not talking about the late Harvin TD that was correctly reversed).
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (2m) : WELCOME to the forum crixus.
Smokey (3h) : Coffee or Hot Chocolate ?
Smokey (3h) : French Toast or Pancakes ?
Smokey (3h) : Sausage or Bacon ?
Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons have officially placed DL Adrian Clayborn on IR
Zero2Cool (10h) : Why? What's the difference? Can you cook same meals with one?
hardrocker950 (10h) : Get a pressure cooker and your crock pot will collect dust lol
Zero2Cool (11h) : Bill Vinovich is our ref. You might remember him from 4th and 26.
Smokey (12h) : They were chicken livers, and they are fabulous . LOL
uffda udfa (12h) : Not if Matt Ryan puts up a 40 passer rating. :) The last two were unfavorable conditions. This is dome time.
Cheesey (12h) : Smokey, went to fire up the crock pot to slow cook some chicken gizzards, it burned out!
Zero2Cool (12h) : Aaron Rodgers' passer rating in his 4 career games at the Georgia Dome: 114.5, 136.8, 117.0, 125.5.
Zero2Cool (17h) : from Rob Reischel @robreischel
Zero2Cool (17h) : Rodgers has played in 2 NFC Championship games. QB ratings were 56.7 and 55.9. That's won't cut it Sunday
Porforis (17h) : Have to fill the 24/7 news cycle with something.
Smokey (17h) : True, Zero
Zero2Cool (17h) : Rodgers didn't draw it up, it was selected from options. Duh.
uffda udfa (19h) : Zeke Elliott tired of domestic violence investigation. NFL moving forward now.
Smokey (17-Jan) : Did u fire up the crock pot ?
Smokey (17-Jan) : Jolly good show ole chap ! LOL
Cheesey (17-Jan) : Smokey! Darn spell check! LOL!
Cheesey (17-Jan) : Hey smiley! Just saw your shout out! How bout them Packers!
Smokey (17-Jan) : Hello Cheesey !
GoPack1984 (17-Jan) : I hope not. Please be something like 41-28 Packers.
uffda udfa (17-Jan) : I agree with Chmura. This looks like a double 40 burger.
uffda udfa (17-Jan) : The hug on the sidelines?
uffda udfa (17-Jan) : What seemed so emotional?
Zero2Cool (17-Jan) : No, but I am curious why that seemed so emotional. I might be reading into it too much.
uffda udfa (17-Jan) : Anyone ever get confused looking at Alex Van Pelt thinking it's MM?
uffda udfa (17-Jan) : I hope they aren't going to dial it down believing in destiny .
Zero2Cool (17-Jan) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (16-Jan) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
10m / Community Welcome! / Smokey

15m / Around The NFL / crixus

23m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

32m / Green Bay Packers Talk / crixus

59m / Community Welcome! / crixus

3h / Around The NFL / Smokey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / RaiderPride

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis


Packers Headlines