Green Bay Packers Forum
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Timmons  
#1 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 4:27:39 PM(UTC)
So, at this point, what do you think our biggest needs are?

I think our D-line is the biggest concern. I would not be unhappy if we addressed this with some of our fun money.
Sponsor
Offline walleye  
#2 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 5:00:47 PM(UTC)
I thing maybe D-fense needs to step up a bit more but outher than that im content!!!
Offline twebdonny  
#3 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 5:45:36 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I thing maybe D-fense needs to step up a bit more but outher than that im content!!!


I agree, think the D needs some motivation.

I Live in a Van....

They seem tired and actually
a bit lazy of late. No intensity.
Offline mi_keys  
#4 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 7:07:52 PM(UTC)
Depth at defensive tackle and to get healthy. Those two things would help us quite a bit.
Offline bozz_2006  
#5 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 7:16:06 PM(UTC)
interior offensive line. hands down.
Offline zombieslayer  
#6 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 7:20:45 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
interior offensive line. hands down.


Agreed.
Offline strobl2  
#7 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 9:41:03 PM(UTC)
I think we need to improve our OL and DL play. Our OL has some injuries (Sitton, Wells). Colledge isnt consistent. Barbre doesnt have enough experience. So if spitz has to play center because Wells is out we will have a problem at guard with either barbre or sitton having to start.

DT doesn't have a lot of depth especially now that Harrel is on the PUP list.

I also agree that the defense needs one of the leaders to step up the intensity and spark the rest of the D.
Offline chibiabo  
#8 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 9:53:25 PM(UTC)
Neutral If I were to worry now it would definitely be our "D" line. Lack of intensity and inability to stop runs and get to QB. Hope this is just pre-season vanilla shows but, certainly wouldn't hurt to have another DT with some get go.
Offline mkapp  
#9 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 10:04:58 PM(UTC)
DL Free Agents

OL Free Agents

still looks like some decent big boys out there.
Offline TengoJuego  
#10 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 10:20:55 PM(UTC)
I wouldn't mind Grady Jackson coming back. Plug up the middle.
Offline bozz_2006  
#11 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 10:33:18 PM(UTC)
i would be very very surprised if we signed anyone now. 1. O-lineman takes sooooo long to gel, i don't think Ted Thompson would feel that signing a new guy would pay off. 2. DL would not take as long to gel, but i'd say it would take about 6 weeks. and in 6 weeks, hopefully harrell can contribute, so a new d lineman would only start contributing about the same time as harrell comes back.
Offline agopackgo4  
#12 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 10:42:41 PM(UTC)
Im not worried about our D line. Heres why: Ryan Pickett gets healthy..Those probablems become a lot smaller. Dropped passes is what concerns me. I know they are just a lack of concentration..But that is a drive killer, and more importantly a game killer..When you drop passes like they have been. Thats gotta get solved. But the nice thing is that there are no glaring weaknesses on this team. Good deal.
Offline TengoJuego  
#13 Posted : Monday, August 25, 2008 10:44:59 PM(UTC)
there are no glaring weaknesses on this team.

Definitely. Its nice when you know coming into a season that you're team is capable.
Offline porky88  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:42:12 AM(UTC)
Defensive Line and backup QB but I don't expect anything happening now. I'm sure we'll see something happen when teams including the Packers have to cut it down to 53 guys but the Packers aren't going to get any big name players or anything in my opinion.
Offline mkapp  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:05:28 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Defensive Line and backup QB but I don't expect anything happening now. I'm sure we'll see something happen when teams including the Packers have to cut it down to 53 guys but the Packers aren't going to get any big name players or anything in my opinion.


I dont expect big names. Its not TT's style and big names mean big money usually. I look for Ted Thompson to bring in some solid "no namer" vets who can contribute. 8)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter