Green Bay Packers Forum
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline eap33  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:49:27 PM(UTC)
[align=center]Rouse

Woodson - Hawk - Barnett - Poppinga - Chillar - Harris

Jenkins - Jolly - Pickett - Kampman

I love having depth in the depth chart Wink[/align]

Think thumbleft: thumbrightt: wav
Sponsor
Offline pack_in_black  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:56:39 PM(UTC)
Just slide Poppy onto Jenkins' right side @ the LOS and you've got out likely short-yardage situation package, IMO. If they trot out only one WR, throw in Hodge or Bishop for Woody or Al, and it's a stout group.
Offline eap33  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 6:02:00 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Just slide Poppy onto Jenkins' right side @ the LOS and you've got out likely short-yardage situation package, IMO. If they trot out only one WR, throw in Hodge or Bishop for Woody or Al, and it's a stout group.


Indeed Smile I'm pretty excited for our D this year. Soooooooo deep.
Offline wils0646  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 6:20:14 PM(UTC)
Isn't this the old 46 Defense the Bears used a while back?
Offline Since69  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 6:52:54 PM(UTC)
scratch scratch scratch



UserPostedImage
Offline Since69  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 6:53:37 PM(UTC)
scratch scratch thumbleft:


UserPostedImage
Offline Bigbyfan  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 7:20:41 PM(UTC)
What no Bigby? I'm insulted... Smile

That would be nice, but I just don't think that we could consistently use that because the league is now a pass happy league. So that could not be our base defense, but it would be nice to see it thrown out there once and awhile.
Offline zombieslayer  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 7:26:27 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
What no Bigby? I'm insulted... Smile

That would be nice, but I just don't think that we could consistently use that because the league is now a pass happy league. So that could not be our base defense, but it would be nice to see it thrown out there once and awhile.


I'd take Rouse out and put in Bigby.
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:43:44 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
scratch scratch thumbleft:


UserPostedImage


icon_smilee: icon_smilee: icon_smilee: icon_smilee:

Best 44 D I have seen yet.
Offline Tiger  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:52:09 PM(UTC)
The defense my Amateur team here runs is a 4-4. The rover is a hyprid linebacker/safety. Aaron Rouse played this role at V-Tech.
eap33 you have Rouse playing the FS but in the 4-4 the Rover lines up as a weak side 4th Linebacker away from the TE. Its a good formation for running against heavy running teams, the triple option etc but any sort of spread offense will usually cause it problems.
Offline WhiskeySam  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:04:13 PM(UTC)
Yep, you are begging a team to go three or four wide if you do that, and your linebackers will get burned trying to cover receivers out of the slot.
Offline porky88  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:56:56 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Yep, you are begging a team to go three or four wide if you do that, and your linebackers will get burned trying to cover receivers out of the slot.


This is a package you use in short yardage situation and you can bet the Packers would watch from the sideline on who the offense is subbing in. Green Bay obviously won't use this when teams go 4 and 5 wide which is normally on longer downs.

Against the teams in our division it'd be effective. Against a team like Indianapolis or Dallas it'd get torn apart. I think the Packers coaches are smart enough to know that.
Offline TengoJuego  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, August 27, 2008 4:58:07 AM(UTC)
I wouldn't mind seeing it. 8 in the box with our roster...MAN!
Offline eap33  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, September 2, 2008 7:12:10 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Yep, you are begging a team to go three or four wide if you do that, and your linebackers will get burned trying to cover receivers out of the slot.


This is a package you use in short yardage situation and you can bet the Packers would watch from the sideline on who the offense is subbing in. Green Bay obviously won't use this when teams go 4 and 5 wide which is normally on longer downs.

Against the teams in our division it'd be effective. Against a team like Indianapolis or Dallas it'd get torn apart. I think the Packers coaches are smart enough to know that.


Exaaaactly. Short yardage situations against a 2 TE Set or some other type of Jumbo package. Beastly. Of course I wouldn't expect them to throw a 4-4 D on the field against even a 3 wide set. That's just stupid. Just looking at the possibilities Smile

And yeah, I love Atari Bigby. I was just going off of the assumption that Rouse was gonna get the start. I may be wrong Smile
Offline Cheesey  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, September 2, 2008 7:44:12 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
scratch scratch scratch



UserPostedImage
]
That is EXACTLY what came to mind for me!!!! thumbleft:
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884


Tweeter