Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
18 Pages«<56789>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MassPackersFan  
#61 Posted : Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:44:49 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
I figured we wouldn't get into the mix during the first few days of FA, but I was hopeful for a decent 2nd tier S, OLB, or CB pickup.

Now I'm concerned about C. If we let Wells go, we're in serious trouble there. Shoring up the defensive positions is important, but we'll take a major step back on offense if we let Wells go and don't find a suitable replacement.
Offline porky88  
#62 Posted : Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:19:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2015

Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 250
Applause Received: 494
Stevetarded said: Go to Quoted Post
The problem with all of your "holes" on the team is that you are assuming none of the young players are going to improve and possibly fill those holes. The whole point of the way this team drafts is so they can get guys that eventually can become quality players even if they don't look so hot starting out. Teams like the Packers, Steelers and Giants don't typically make big moves in FA because they expect their homegrown talent to step up and fill in the holes. It doesn't always work no but nothing always works. I wouldn't say you could really argue with the track record of success those 3 teams have had though.

The Packers took a big hit last season because of the lack of progression with their younger guys. This probably was a result of the lack of off-season. Clay Matthews and B.J. Raji both significantly improved in 2010. Raji regressed last year. Morgan Burnett also took a major hit because of the lack of off-season.

There are some quality free agents on the market. I would’ve loved Jarret Johnson and the Mile Tolbert stuff intrigues me, but I generally enjoy the Packers' cautious approach. Some of these contracts are ludicrous, especially at receiver.
Offline shield4life  
#63 Posted : Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:29:36 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Montreal
Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 41
porky88 said: Go to Quoted Post
The Packers took a big hit last season because of the lack of progression with their younger guys. This probably was a result of the lack of off-season. Clay Matthews and B.J. Raji both significantly improved in 2010. Raji regressed last year. Morgan Burnett also took a major hit because of the lack of off-season.

There are some quality free agents on the market. I would’ve loved Jarret Johnson and the Mile Tolbert stuff intrigues me, but I generally enjoy the Packers' cautious approach. Some of these contracts are ludicrous, especially at receiver.


I disagree with your statement if you think Raji regressed then you must also think that Matthews regressed as well. All tho, I don't think they regressed ... everyone keeps forgetting that this defense lost 2 crucial players last year. Jenkins was the first one we lost in the off-season, which he was a great against the pass and the rush. With Jenkins leaving not only did this hurt Raji's year but Matthews as well.

Last year we had the number 1 rush that's because Jenkins + Raji + Matthews we're unstoppable. You double team Matthews & Raji ... they still had Jenkins to deal with. You double team Jenkins & Raji you still had Matthews left to deal with.

Not only we lost our number 1 defensive line pass rush but lost our number 1 pro bowl safety! So imagine losing your number 1 pass rush on the defensive line and your pro bowl safety that reads plays and stops the pass ... what did you expect. We all knew Neal wouldn't provide half the effort Jenkins would of put in.

Now for the people that are blaming Ted Thompson for the loss of Jenkins ... The reason Jenkins was let go was not a question of if his old / health / play ... it was more of saving cap room for the future stars like Finley ... upcoming free agents like Raji Matthews ... GJ will be asking more $$$ so will AR.

By signing FA's you take the risk of losing your own young players. I rather build threw the draft, keep the chemistry in the team and keep our stars in town as long as possible.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DakotaT on 3/15/2012(UTC)
Offline lolleren  
#64 Posted : Thursday, March 15, 2012 3:36:55 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 15
I think the suspension of Neal should make us take a look at a guy like Kendall Langford and what his contract demands are.
I dont know much about him, but he looks the type and the age is right.
Offline porky88  
#65 Posted : Thursday, March 15, 2012 3:56:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2015

Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 250
Applause Received: 494
shield4life said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree with your statement if you think Raji regressed then you must also think that Matthews regressed as well. All tho, I don't think they regressed ... everyone keeps forgetting that this defense lost 2 crucial players last year. Jenkins was the first one we lost in the off-season, which he was a great against the pass and the rush. With Jenkins leaving not only did this hurt Raji's year but Matthews as well.

Last year we had the number 1 rush that's because Jenkins + Raji + Matthews we're unstoppable. You double team Matthews & Raji ... they still had Jenkins to deal with. You double team Jenkins & Raji you still had Matthews left to deal with.

Not only we lost our number 1 defensive line pass rush but lost our number 1 pro bowl safety! So imagine losing your number 1 pass rush on the defensive line and your pro bowl safety that reads plays and stops the pass ... what did you expect. We all knew Neal wouldn't provide half the effort Jenkins would of put in.

Now for the people that are blaming Ted Thompson for the loss of Jenkins ... The reason Jenkins was let go was not a question of if his old / health / play ... it was more of saving cap room for the future stars like Finley ... upcoming free agents like Raji Matthews ... GJ will be asking more $$$ so will AR.

By signing FA's you take the risk of losing your own young players. I rather build threw the draft, keep the chemistry in the team and keep our stars in town as long as possible.

I'm not judging just the sack numbers. I'm judging Raji's overall play. I saw little to no impact in his game. He didn't play the run well, either. Raji was an impact player in 2010. He made an impact against the run and rushing the passer. He didn’t do either last season. Clay Matthews still made an impact. It didn’t show on the stat card, but he was all over the field again this season. He didn’t finish as much, which is one of the reasons why his sack numbers were down, but he still pressured QBs. Raji didn’t and defensive lineman should improve in year No. 3. Frankly, I would blame the lack of an off-season more for Raji’s regression than the departure of any particular player.

Also, you can blame Cullen Jenkins’ departure for only so much. At the end of the day, if Raji needs Jenkins on the field to play at an all-pro level, then it might be time to re-evaluate his overall ability. I did not see an impact player in 2011. I saw an impact player in 2010 with or without Jenkins in the lineup.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#66 Posted : Thursday, March 15, 2012 6:59:54 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
porky88 said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm not judging just the sack numbers. I'm judging Raji's overall play. I saw little to no impact in his game. He didn't play the run well, either. Raji was an impact player in 2010. He made an impact against the run and rushing the passer. He didn’t do either last season. Clay Matthews still made an impact. It didn’t show on the stat card, but he was all over the field again this season. He didn’t finish as much, which is one of the reasons why his sack numbers were down, but he still pressured QBs. Raji didn’t and defensive lineman should improve in year No. 3. Frankly, I would blame the lack of an off-season more for Raji’s regression than the departure of any particular player.

Also, you can blame Cullen Jenkins’ departure for only so much. At the end of the day, if Raji needs Jenkins on the field to play at an all-pro level, then it might be time to re-evaluate his overall ability. I did not see an impact player in 2011. I saw an impact player in 2010 with or without Jenkins in the lineup.


You should also judge Raji by the fact that Capers called a contain type of front more often than a pin your ears back. So Raji was doing what was called. It wasn't as much of a performance drop off as a playing a different style of game.

Matthews also had his best year last year. His pressure, coverage and run support were fantastic. Pressure causes picks. Much more impact than a mere sack.

Where I though we missed Jenkins the most was in defending the screens.
Online nerdmann  
#67 Posted : Thursday, March 15, 2012 7:08:36 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,910
Applause Received: 1,154
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
You should also judge Raji by the fact that Capers called a contain type of front more often than a pin your ears back. So Raji was doing what was called. It wasn't as much of a performance drop off as a playing a different style of game.

Matthews also had his best year last year. His pressure, coverage and run support were fantastic. Pressure causes picks. Much more impact than a mere sack.

Where I though we missed Jenkins the most was in defending the screens.


Raji was spending alot of time out of position at DE last year, plus he never got a play off and as a result may have been wearing down a bit.
Offline porky88  
#68 Posted : Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:00:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2014PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2015

Joined: 4/26/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 250
Applause Received: 494
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
You should also judge Raji by the fact that Capers called a contain type of front more often than a pin your ears back. So Raji was doing what was called. It wasn't as much of a performance drop off as a playing a different style of game.

Matthews also had his best year last year. His pressure, coverage and run support were fantastic. Pressure causes picks. Much more impact than a mere sack.

Where I though we missed Jenkins the most was in defending the screens.

I am with you on Matthews, though teams ran away from him because the Packers were so bad opposite of him. I still worry about his run defense. He certainly has the ability, but he’s a very aggressive player.

Like all players, Raji receives a grade on every single play. You get either a positive grade or a negative grade. This is hardly anything new to football. Coaches and scouts have been doing this for years to evaluate talent. Raji received far more positives than negatives in '10. Frankly, I thought he had an all-pro year. Last year, he received more negatives than positives. That is simply unacceptable. I know it sounds like I'm picking on Raji. I'm not. He's not the only player in that boat, but he stands out simply because year three is normally a very important year for defensive lineman. That's why I think (hope) it was the off-season.
Offline zombieslayer  
#69 Posted : Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:33:59 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Where we missed Jenkins most was QB pressure. With him gone, Raji regressed because OLs focused on Raji and pretty much did away with him last year. When he got the Pro Bowl nod, I was thinking it was a bad call.

Because of the lack of pressure, opposing QBs took apart our secondary. They looked considerably worse because the opposing QB had more time. You can bring up missed tackles but let's be very clear - when a runner is in his stride, he's way more difficult to tackle than when he's not. Opposing QBs were able to hit receivers in their stride and make our secondary look like a joke.

It all starts from up front.

You gotta put the opposing QB on his back. It really is that simple.

Yes, I get it. Jenkins had a history of health problems. Mike McCarthy talked about accountability and availability. Jenkins had the former but not the latter. I get that. But the problem is, nobody stepped up to replace him.

And thus, one and done in the Playoffs.

Jenkins needs to be replaced. That needs to be Ted Thompson's biggest priority. I'm very sure Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy agree with me. The problem of course is finding Jenkins' replacement. Easier said than done.
Online nerdmann  
#70 Posted : Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:34:34 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,910
Applause Received: 1,154
To me, the biggest problem is that asshole Johnny Jolly. Remember when Ted was going to have to decide whether to keep Jenkins or Jolly? Jolly was younger and much more durable. Wouldn't he be still under contract too? C'est la vie.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Similar Topics
2016 Packers Free Agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 1/1/2016 11:11:27 AM(UTC)
Gunter, Harris make the cut as undrafted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 9/6/2015 8:06:32 AM(UTC)
Secret to Packers' success? Re-sign stars, avoid free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 6/14/2015 2:58:41 PM(UTC)
Packers sign 17 rookie free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by greengold 5/8/2015 12:20:19 PM(UTC)
Value of undrafted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 5/2/2015 2:32:00 PM(UTC)
Free agents often not worth the money, Ron Wolf says (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 4/28/2015 12:18:00 PM(UTC)
When to overpay for free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 4/16/2015 2:58:06 PM(UTC)
Mike McCarthy says focus is on draft, not other free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by buckeyepackfan 3/23/2015 12:59:49 AM(UTC)
Michael Crabtree, Tramon Williams among the top free agents left (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 3/15/2015 3:53:42 PM(UTC)
Free agents you like? (that packers will not sign) (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Laser Gunns 2/16/2015 1:22:18 AM(UTC)
Would You Return? (Free Agents) (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 1/19/2015 9:44:28 AM(UTC)
2015 Green Bay Packers free agents (PH Special)
by MintBaconDrivel 1/5/2015 6:13:11 AM(UTC)
Packers prefer compensatory picks over unrestricted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 4/3/2014 4:49:45 AM(UTC)
Packers continue to not pursue free agents from other teams (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 3/14/2014 10:09:08 AM(UTC)
How many tier 1 or high tier 2 free agents does GB need to sign? (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Wade 1/31/2014 10:41:00 AM(UTC)
Packers Free Agents: Top 10 to Re-Sign (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 1/22/2014 6:37:30 AM(UTC)
Starter Pack: Must-sign free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 1/15/2014 6:41:18 AM(UTC)
Packers free agents for 2014 (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 1/6/2014 8:15:34 AM(UTC)
Free Agents, who do you want brought back (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by steveishere 12/12/2013 8:13:21 AM(UTC)
Packers Have Three Free Agents in for Workouts (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by macbob 9/10/2013 5:39:52 PM(UTC)
2014 Packers free agents: who will walk? who will stay? (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 6/2/2013 9:18:35 AM(UTC)
2013 Packers undrafted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by beast 4/27/2013 4:58:22 PM(UTC)
How important are Veteran Free Agents today (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Pack93z 4/1/2013 7:41:49 AM(UTC)
Packers don't tender restricted free agents Francois, Zombo, Crabtree (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by MintBaconDrivel 3/12/2013 9:38:00 AM(UTC)
2013 Free Agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by nerdmann 3/8/2013 2:48:22 PM(UTC)
Comparing Free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 2/16/2013 7:33:54 AM(UTC)
Packer Free Agents for 2013 an 2014 seasons (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 1/14/2013 6:43:20 PM(UTC)
2012 Packers Free Agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by CaliforniaCheez 1/17/2012 9:04:50 AM(UTC)
Top 5 Undrafted Free Agents Most Likely to Make the Roster (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by wpr 8/27/2011 2:59:30 PM(UTC)
Packers sign seven draft choices, two undrafted free agents (Green Bay Packers Talk)
by Zero2Cool 7/29/2011 3:52:32 PM(UTC)
18 Pages«<56789>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa: Nope. Too much pressure for them.
Zero2Cool: NFL MVP's don't seem to win the Super Bowl the same year, do they?
Zero2Cool: Panthers played uninspired and predictable, actually (and sadly) reminded me of the Packers. :(
Zero2Cool: Thanks 68md, good to know some notice and appreciate.
Zero2Cool: Holding a different or less than popular view is perfectly fine. You fail to understand this even though I repeatedly tell you. It's annoyin
uffda udfa: Good night, Smokey.
Smokey: good night uffda.
uffda udfa: Wonder how Colts fans feel, and Mr. Irsay?
uffda udfa: Today, anyway.
Smokey: DEFENSE DOES WIN CHAMPIONSHIPS TT !
uffda udfa: Carolina will never be back to a SB under Cam Newton.
uffda udfa: Denver D just dominated the current MVP and the former this year.
uffda udfa: Cam for LVP in the SB. No character.
uffda udfa: Newton is a wuss. MVP? LOL.
uffda udfa: #VonFire
uffda udfa: People who have passion and expectations aren't A words. Accepting less than the best doesn't make you not one either.
uffda udfa: Sorry, Kevin...maybe you called Dakota an A word and not me? Had to be one of us.
uffda udfa: Marshawn Lynch announced his retirement in a cool way via twitter. What could've been in Green Bay, Marshawn!
uffda udfa: It's okay... you called me the "A" word. All because I don't tickle the ears. I get it.
uffda udfa: So someone like Buck deserves privileges because he's a better fan than me due to his flattering opinions?
68md: wet blanket ? He works his ass off to keep the place going for you ?
Smokey: Zero, Why are you such a wet blanket host ? A real SB "Chat" should have been a priority for this site. Wet Blanket strikes again.
Zero2Cool: BTW, I'm not saying you're an asshole. I'm stating a fact, that's all.
Zero2Cool: You don't get it. You confuse right and privilege. Assholes don't deserve privileges. Get it, got it, good.
uffda udfa: Talib playing a Burfict half so far.
uffda udfa: You have an R rated section on a Packers board. I think moving the guys you really don't want rocking the boat to their own forum is a great
uffda udfa: I think the same was likely said at KFAN when it was suggested they have a Packers show. I believe they still have it. I used to produce it
Zero2Cool: Seriously think what you're asking and do so before asking. Unreal.
uffda udfa: Aaron walking gingerly in that SB MVP introduction thing.
uffda udfa: May I suggest something? How about a "Packers Cynics" sub forum. A place for the Dakota's and me. I would exclusively post there.
Zero2Cool: One way or another, there is going to be a big change coming to PH.
uffda udfa: I don't want to be difficult but you do for some reason. I know you've been dealing with a lot.
Zero2Cool: Precisely what I thought.
uffda udfa: Nah, that's okay. I already asked.
Zero2Cool: If you want your name changed, you need to send me a PM with the name change. Thank you.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

Road To Super Bowl 50
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 3:25 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

49m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

6-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

5-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

4-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey


Tweeter