Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
16 Pages«<34567>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DoddPower  
#61 Posted : Wednesday, May 2, 2012 8:24:49 AM(UTC)
DoddPower

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 2,326
Applause Received: 583
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, the decision on DD should be quite simple. If he is clearly better you keep him. If not, you keep the younger player who has more upside and costs less.


I agree that above all else it's important to just let it play out. An ACL injury here or a Achilles there and Donald Driver is our #2-3 again (gasp). In my ideal world, however, I want him beat out because that tells me that a younger guy outplayed a player that was already pretty good, thereby improving the team (and special teams), theoretically. I only think this is an option for Driver because I don't think Jones or Nelson can be beat out by any exterior player currently on the roster (although perhaps we have another Donald Driver in training somewhere with one of these guys?). I had the same opinion near the end of Farve's career, especially after the preseason and Dallas game. True, Rodger's was almost totally unproven, but I thought ultimately he was better than Favre at that point in their respective careers and only had room to get better, while the exact opposite was true for Favre. This is despite all of Favre's "leadership" or "experience" he may have brought to the table. As a I said earlier, an old leader leaving only makes room for another to step up in his place. Also, I must admit, I'm giving Ted the benefit of the doubt in some ways, too, because he is as good as they come in evaluating wide receivers. If Ted really likes Gurley and any other of those guys, I trust that they have potential to be significant contributors, even if it's not much outside of special teams.
Offline zombieslayer  
#62 Posted : Wednesday, May 2, 2012 9:58:30 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Will Tori Gurley be our 2012 Brett Swain?

More likely yes than no. I'd LOVE to be wrong.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#63 Posted : Wednesday, May 2, 2012 10:08:24 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 231
Applause Received: 391
I want him to come back pretty badly. We will see how the business end plays out.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Packerchick on 5/13/2012(UTC)
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#64 Posted : Thursday, May 3, 2012 12:29:25 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
I do not want to see Driver back nor do I want to see him gone. I want the best guy in and contributing.

If that is Driver, great. If it isn't, thanks Donald, you have been one of my favorite players and one of my favorite people to cheer for.

If Gurley is an improvement, that is good for the team's overall talent.

But whoever is in there, catch. the. damn. ball.
thanks Post received 5 applause.
Zero2Cool on 5/3/2012(UTC), gbguy20 on 5/3/2012(UTC), zombieslayer on 5/3/2012(UTC), yooperfan on 5/3/2012(UTC), wpr on 5/4/2012(UTC)
Offline dhazer  
#65 Posted : Thursday, May 3, 2012 1:59:02 PM(UTC)
dhazer

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 65
Applause Received: 230
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Will Tori Gurley be our 2012 Brett Swain?

More likely yes than no. I'd LOVE to be wrong.


Don't knock Swain, he is in Seattle and Randy Moss has to beat him out for playing time Shame on you

Online Zero2Cool  
#66 Posted : Thursday, May 3, 2012 2:03:04 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,047
Applause Received: 2,499
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
Don't knock Swain, he is in Seattle and Randy Moss has to beat him out for playing time Shame on you



If Brett Swain is in Seattle, how does Randy Moss (49ers) have to beat him out for playing time?
Offline Cheesey  
#67 Posted : Sunday, May 6, 2012 3:39:07 PM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 339
Applause Received: 527
If i didn't think DD still had "it", i'd say let him go. But i really think he's still a darn good player. He's not afraid to go across the middle, and is dependable when thrown to.
Better to have too many good WR's then not enough. And it seems he's willing to take a pay cut.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#68 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 11:10:35 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 231
Applause Received: 391
That is the business end then. I really think we keep him. The draft put defense on notice more than the offense.
Offline zombieslayer  
#69 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 11:28:30 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
That is the business end then. I really think we keep him. The draft put defense on notice more than the offense.


That's what I think. If I had to slap money down, I'd bet Driver stays in 2012.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#70 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 12:43:24 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
That is the business end then. I really think we keep him. The draft put defense on notice more than the offense.


What message does the UDFA pick ups say. We got a couple TEs, a couple RBs and a couple WRs.
Offline zombieslayer  
#71 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 12:52:56 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
What message does the UDFA pick ups say. We got a couple TEs, a couple RBs and a couple WRs.


UDFAs rarely make the team. Drafted people are more likely to make the team.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DarkaneRules on 5/7/2012(UTC), Zero2Cool on 5/10/2012(UTC)
Online Zero2Cool  
#72 Posted : Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:39:26 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,047
Applause Received: 2,499
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
UDFAs rarely make the team. Drafted people are more likely to make the team.


Wait a minute here! Are you going to try and tell us that players skipped over by 32 teams SEVEN times are less likely to make a roster than those of someone who was picked? HOGWASH!!!

In related news to the topic, it sounds like one Green Bay writer feels Donald Driver's days are ...
Offline DoddPower  
#73 Posted : Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:05:19 AM(UTC)
DoddPower

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 2,326
Applause Received: 583
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
In related news to the topic, it sounds like one Green Bay writer feels Donald Driver's days are ...


Yeah, I still have a hard time imagining a situation where Driver makes this team in 2012 beyond some early injuries at the position.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#74 Posted : Friday, May 11, 2012 8:46:40 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
UDFAs rarely make the team. Drafted people are more likely to make the team.


An average of 27 players drafted in the 6th, 7th or UDFA were on the Packers 45 man roster last year.

Being passed on by other teams doesn't mean much.
Offline PackerTraxx  
#75 Posted : Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:38:13 AM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 23
Applause Received: 129
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
An average of 27 players drafted in the 6th, 7th or UDFA were on the Packers 45 man roster last year.

Being passed on by other teams doesn't mean much.


That may be part of the reason our defense was so bad last year. Much of the draft since Raji and CM3 was on offense. Not complaining since we needed those players also, just saying that's the way it worked out.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
16 Pages«<34567>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Grabacr

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere


Tweeter