Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
5 Pages<12345>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
zombieslayer  
#41 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 5:12:40 PM(UTC)
Yes. Aaron Rodgers had a suck ass 2011 season. It was horrible.

My word. If only we had a run game he wouldn't have sucked so much.

Ted Thompson will probably cut Aaron if Aaron has another season like last year. But if only we had a running game, Aaron wouldn't have been such a crappy QB. [palm]
vikesrule  
#42 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 5:28:04 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Yes. Aaron Rodgers had a suck ass 2011 season. It was horrible.

My word. If only we had a run game he wouldn't have sucked so much.

Ted Thompson will probably cut Aaron if Aaron has another season like last year. But if only we had a running game, Aaron wouldn't have been such a crappy QB.




And the truth shall set you free. =d>

DakotaT  
#43 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 5:37:14 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
And the truth shall set you free. =d>



And the last Minnesota Viking league MVP is ???????????????????

Zombie, you have to use the sarcasm smiley for the sake of the dumbasses. [grin1]
vikesrule  
#44 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 5:44:31 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
And the last Minnesota Viking league MVP is ???????????????????


Fran Tarkenton....

wpr  
#45 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 6:05:54 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
And the last Minnesota Viking league MVP is ???????????????????

Zombie, you have to use the sarcasm smiley for the sake of the dumbasses. [grin1]


and yet he still wouldn't understand. A bridge too far.
DakotaT  
#46 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 6:23:31 PM(UTC)
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Fran Tarkenton....



Geez that's a long time ago. I don't think I even had pubes then.

zombieslayer  
#47 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 7:42:30 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
And the last Minnesota Viking league MVP is ???????????????????

Zombie, you have to use the sarcasm smiley for the sake of the dumbasses. [grin1]


I whapped myself on the forehead. How obvious does my sarcasm have to be? Oh yeah, wasn't VR a teacher in his non-retired years? That would explain it.

My word. The Green Bay Packers have NEVER scored 500+ points. Then Aaron Rodgers leads us to 560 points and people are bitching about our O.

That's equivalent of a rock star bitching about only having 15 hot groupies a night. Where's the 16th? God dammit! Where's the 16th?
Dexter_Sinister  
#48 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 8:50:04 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I whapped myself on the forehead. How obvious does my sarcasm have to be? Oh yeah, wasn't VR a teacher in his non-retired years? That would explain it.

My word. The Green Bay Packers have NEVER scored 500+ points. Then Aaron Rodgers leads us to 560 points and people are bitching about our O.

That's equivalent of a rock star bitching about only having 15 hot groupies a night. Where's the 16th? God dammit! Where's the 16th?


The offense could easily have been better without even improving the running game.

Just cut the drops in half.

Rodgers could have completed 72.3% of his passes (Single season league record) had 51 TDs (single season league record) 3 picks (single season league record) and a rating in the 130s (beating the single season league record he set anyway).

I don't think many people understand how incredible of a season he had. He had one of the best single seasons of all time. At least top 6. And definitely best in the super bowl era.
zombieslayer  
#49 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 9:15:50 PM(UTC)
Yup, and if we added runs, we wouldn't have scored 560 points. Not the O's fault that the D couldn't get sacks or tackle people.

Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy realize this. That's why we went D in the draft and we didn't waste any picks on the running game.
Zero2Cool  
#50 Posted : Tuesday, May 8, 2012 5:12:12 AM(UTC)
<-- meet the 16th.
Dexter_Sinister  
#51 Posted : Tuesday, May 8, 2012 5:33:19 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Yup, and if we added runs, we wouldn't have scored 560 points. Not the O's fault that the D couldn't get sacks or tackle people.

Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy realize this. That's why we went D in the draft and we didn't waste any picks on the running game.


I would say the drops hurt us more than the D.
PackerTraxx  
#52 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 8:36:45 AM(UTC)
...especially in the Playoff game.
zombieslayer  
#53 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 12:43:44 PM(UTC)
That D completely relied on takeaways. Against the Giants, we got one INT and no forced fumbles and promptly lost, allowing 37 points.

How is it the O's fault when the D allows 37 points?
Wade  
#54 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 12:51:52 PM(UTC)
I want to see every play a running play ...

... but only if our RB is Kate Becksindale and she's wearing the shorts from that picture.
Zero2Cool  
#55 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:01:37 PM(UTC)
I think it matters little who the running back is as long as Aaron Rodgers is the quarterback ... he'll get 4 yards more a carry on average.
Wade  
#56 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:22:00 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think it matters little who the running back is as long as Aaron Rodgers is the quarterback ... he'll get 4 yards more a carry on average.


But if it's Kate, who cares about what Aaron Rodgers does or does not do?

[grin1]

play2win  
#57 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:23:59 PM(UTC)
I'm with Wade. Who cares if we run the ball... or, about football for that matter...?
PackerTraxx  
#58 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:03:05 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
That D completely relied on takeaways. Against the Giants, we got one INT and no forced fumbles and promptly lost, allowing 37 points.

How is it the O's fault when the D allows 37 points?


Because the O had 8 dropped passes and turned the ball over 4 times. Those stopped drives and gave the Giants a short field. Granted our D was weak, but with the O's performance(or lack there of) I'm surprised the D kept us in it til the 4th quarter.

Cheesey  
#59 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:10:17 PM(UTC)
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah imagine how good rodgers would have it when defenses are selling out to stop a consistent ground attack on 3rd and short situations. I find a lot of it is line play, we need to push the pile.


True, and being able to use up the clock instead of fast passing drives takes the ball away from the other team's offense.
zombieslayer  
#60 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:17:56 PM(UTC)
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
Because the O had 8 dropped passes and turned the ball over 4 times. Those stopped drives and gave the Giants a short field. Granted our D was weak, but with the O's performance(or lack there of) I'm surprised the D kept us in it til the 4th quarter.



Yeah, we already discussed this though. I'm in agreement about the drops. Had the D done their job, we would have won the game. Had our receivers caught Aaron's passes, we would have won the game.

The Giants were the hungrier team. I think we were looking past them.

That said, I'm thinking in the grand scheme of things. #1 O. #19 D. Doesn't take a genius to figure out which one needs the most improvement.

As for Wade, we're usually in agreement about babes. However, Ms. Kate doesn't do it for me as much as some of the others he has the hots for.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (11m) : I see JT, you should tell JT to post.
hardrocker950 (13h) : Nice to see that Dorleant got arrested just a few miles from here...
Cheesey (15h) : Sanchez with the Bears....LOLOLOL!!!!
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : We should hope it does not happen.
hardrocker950 (25-Mar) : I doubt that happens...
Smokey (24-Mar) : GB needs to trade up in the draft to get THE Ohio State CB - Marshon Lattimore !
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : QB Mark Sanchez joining the Bears.
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : double it up
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : I'm kidding, relax....
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : and now he has been cut
uffda udfa (23-Mar) : Per Schefter: Former Skins DT Ricky Jean Francois signed a one-year, $3M deal with Packers, per source.
uffda udfa (23-Mar) : Per Schefter: FormerSkins DT Ricky Jean Francois signed a one-year, $3M deal with Packers, per source.
Zero2Cool (23-Mar) : lol by .01 not what i thought
Zero2Cool (23-Mar) : he's faster than Montgomery
uffda udfa (22-Mar) : Packers re-sign Christine Michael
Smokey (22-Mar) : Easier said than fixed .
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : The web version lists who started the thread; the mobile version lists who last updated it.
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : Also, there's a weird disparity between the web version and online version of this site.
Nonstopdrivel (22-Mar) : ;-)
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : Packers wanted D. Ware in 2005. Thank you Cowboys!
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : lol Rourke
Nonstopdrivel (21-Mar) : I HATE HATE HATE the way all threads get marked as read after viewing a few of them in one session. It's obnoxious.
Smokey (21-Mar) : Check out this site, NFLdraftscout.com , a great resource site.
Smokey (20-Mar) : Jared Cook signs with Raiders .
Smokey (20-Mar) : I did watch SB 45 on YouTube the other night, very eye opening .
Smokey (20-Mar) : Watching Spring Training Baseball, Nationals vs Yankees, very interesting .
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : B1G making some noise in that bracket
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : The more join, the more talk, the better. including John
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : no forum should need one person, we have others, speak up!
gbguy20 (19-Mar) : slow forum needs more uffda
Smokey (19-Mar) : There's always next year .
Smokey (18-Mar) : Virginia is still in it !
Smokey (18-Mar) : On Wisconsin
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Down goes Villanova!! Badgers!!!
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Might have went into your SPAM or JUNK folder??
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
10m / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

26-Mar / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

24-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

23-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

23-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

23-Mar / Announcements / Zero2Cool

23-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Mar / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

Headlines