Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
6 Pages«<23456>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline DakotaT  
#46 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 6:23:31 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 751
Applause Received: 1,522
vikesrule said: Go to Quoted Post
Fran Tarkenton....



Geez that's a long time ago. I don't think I even had pubes then.

Offline zombieslayer  
#47 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 7:42:30 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
And the last Minnesota Viking league MVP is ???????????????????

Zombie, you have to use the sarcasm smiley for the sake of the dumbasses. [grin1]


I whapped myself on the forehead. How obvious does my sarcasm have to be? Oh yeah, wasn't VR a teacher in his non-retired years? That would explain it.

My word. The Green Bay Packers have NEVER scored 500+ points. Then [ar] leads us to 560 points and people are bitching about our O.

That's equivalent of a rock star bitching about only having 15 hot groupies a night. Where's the 16th? God dammit! Where's the 16th?
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#48 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 8:50:04 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
I whapped myself on the forehead. How obvious does my sarcasm have to be? Oh yeah, wasn't VR a teacher in his non-retired years? That would explain it.

My word. The Green Bay Packers have NEVER scored 500+ points. Then [ar] leads us to 560 points and people are bitching about our O.

That's equivalent of a rock star bitching about only having 15 hot groupies a night. Where's the 16th? God dammit! Where's the 16th?


The offense could easily have been better without even improving the running game.

Just cut the drops in half.

Rodgers could have completed 72.3% of his passes (Single season league record) had 51 TDs (single season league record) 3 picks (single season league record) and a rating in the 130s (beating the single season league record he set anyway).

I don't think many people understand how incredible of a season he had. He had one of the best single seasons of all time. At least top 6. And definitely best in the super bowl era.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 5/7/2012(UTC)
Offline zombieslayer  
#49 Posted : Monday, May 7, 2012 9:15:50 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Yup, and if we added runs, we wouldn't have scored 560 points. Not the O's fault that the D couldn't get sacks or tackle people.

[tt] and [mm] realize this. That's why we went D in the draft and we didn't waste any picks on the running game.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#50 Posted : Tuesday, May 8, 2012 5:12:12 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,055
Applause Received: 2,531
<-- meet the 16th.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#51 Posted : Tuesday, May 8, 2012 5:33:19 PM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister

Rank: Registered
Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Yup, and if we added runs, we wouldn't have scored 560 points. Not the O's fault that the D couldn't get sacks or tackle people.

[tt] and [mm] realize this. That's why we went D in the draft and we didn't waste any picks on the running game.


I would say the drops hurt us more than the D.
Offline PackerTraxx  
#52 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 8:36:45 AM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 23
Applause Received: 130
...especially in the Playoff game.
Offline zombieslayer  
#53 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 12:43:44 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
That D completely relied on takeaways. Against the Giants, we got one INT and no forced fumbles and promptly lost, allowing 37 points.

How is it the O's fault when the D allows 37 points?
Offline Wade  
#54 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 12:51:52 PM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 771
Applause Received: 761
I want to see every play a running play ...

... but only if our RB is Kate Becksindale and she's wearing the shorts from that picture.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#55 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:01:37 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,055
Applause Received: 2,531
I think it matters little who the running back is as long as Aaron Rodgers is the quarterback ... he'll get 4 yards more a carry on average.
Offline Wade  
#56 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:22:00 PM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 771
Applause Received: 761
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think it matters little who the running back is as long as Aaron Rodgers is the quarterback ... he'll get 4 yards more a carry on average.


But if it's Kate, who cares about what Aaron Rodgers does or does not do?

[grin1]

Offline play2win  
#57 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:23:59 PM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725
I'm with Wade. Who cares if we run the ball... or, about football for that matter...?
Offline PackerTraxx  
#58 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:03:05 PM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 23
Applause Received: 130
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
That D completely relied on takeaways. Against the Giants, we got one INT and no forced fumbles and promptly lost, allowing 37 points.

How is it the O's fault when the D allows 37 points?


Because the O had 8 dropped passes and turned the ball over 4 times. Those stopped drives and gave the Giants a short field. Granted our D was weak, but with the O's performance(or lack there of) I'm surprised the D kept us in it til the 4th quarter.

Offline Cheesey  
#59 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:10:17 PM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 353
Applause Received: 538
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah imagine how good rodgers would have it when defenses are selling out to stop a consistent ground attack on 3rd and short situations. I find a lot of it is line play, we need to push the pile.


True, and being able to use up the clock instead of fast passing drives takes the ball away from the other team's offense.
Offline zombieslayer  
#60 Posted : Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:17:56 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
Because the O had 8 dropped passes and turned the ball over 4 times. Those stopped drives and gave the Giants a short field. Granted our D was weak, but with the O's performance(or lack there of) I'm surprised the D kept us in it til the 4th quarter.



Yeah, we already discussed this though. I'm in agreement about the drops. Had the D done their job, we would have won the game. Had our receivers caught Aaron's passes, we would have won the game.

The Giants were the hungrier team. I think we were looking past them.

That said, I'm thinking in the grand scheme of things. #1 O. #19 D. Doesn't take a genius to figure out which one needs the most improvement.

As for Wade, we're usually in agreement about babes. However, Ms. Kate doesn't do it for me as much as some of the others he has the hots for.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages«<23456>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey


Tweeter