Green Bay Packers Forum
8 Pages«<34567>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#61 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:07:56 AM(UTC)
stevegb said: Go to Quoted Post
It would be pretty funny to see them all called back to replay the last 10 seconds of the game.


why? GB won it already. just because the refs blew the call doesn't mean Seattle gets a do over like a 5th grader.
Offline stevegb  
#62 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:15:12 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
why? GB won it already. just because the refs blew the call doesn't mean Seattle gets a do over like a 5th grader.


We'll I'd prefer replay 1 play than have the L.
Offline Pack93z  
#63 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:18:20 AM(UTC)
TwinkieGorilla said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm officially on football-watching strike until the ref strike is over. This is fucking ridiculous.


Want change.. this is how you control change. IMO, should have been done prior to the player lockout and new CBA.
Offline wpr  
#64 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:32:52 AM(UTC)
stevegb said: Go to Quoted Post
We'll I'd prefer replay 1 play than have the L.


Instead of flying 4 hours each way, an hour to get suited up and then stretch, the possibility of injury, the time that Seattle would have to prepare for the one play, I think Mike McCarthy would take the loss.
Offline stevegb  
#65 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:36:14 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Instead of flying 4 hours each way, an hour to get suited up and then stretch, the possibility of injury, the time that Seattle would have to prepare for the one play, I think Mike McCarthy would take the loss.


I'm sure they wouldn't mind doing it at the end of the season and a game out of the top 6 for the conference. It would remind me of the time in the NBA where (I can't specifically remember when or what happened) but they replayed the last 5 mins of a heat game if I'm not mistaken due to shaq getting wrongfully ejected.
Offline yooperfan  
#66 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:03:02 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Want change.. this is how you control change. IMO, should have been done prior to the player lockout and new CBA.


With the exception of Packers games I'm done with NFL football even after the owners lockout is broken (if it ever is).
The owners by going down this road has made their product unwatchable.

Offline Rockmolder  
#67 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:05:08 AM(UTC)
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 2 applause.
Packerchick on 9/25/2012(UTC), wpr on 9/25/2012(UTC)
Offline zombieslayer  
#68 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:16:03 AM(UTC)
yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
With the exception of Packers games I'm done with NFL football even after the owners lockout is broken (if it ever is).
The owners by going down this road has made their product unwatchable.



I'll continue watching the Packers. But I had real $$$ to spend on jerseys this year. I'm going to take a picture of the $$$ and let the NFL know that I'll be giving it to one lucky waiter or waitress or bartender as a tip instead. It will be at a place that is NOT showing an NFL game.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
Packerchick on 9/25/2012(UTC), play2win on 9/25/2012(UTC)
Offline Wade  
#69 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:48:07 AM(UTC)
According to the NFL press release, possession IS reviewable if it is in the end zone, but not if it is in the rest of the field of play.

And according to same, the reason for no reversal was "a lack of indisputable evidence." Let's be honest, how many times have we seen the regular refs weasel out of something using that same phrase.

I think the Packers got hosed (though I'm more bothered by the Walden roughing and the Shields/Rice interference calls than the TD/interception/no-interference call). But I just think people are acting as if the regular refs never make such egregious mistakes. Which is silly. Heck, I can virtually guarantee that the Triplett or Hochuli crews are going to have major screw-ups in any Packer game they do.

And lets not forget that the reason Seattle was in position to make that last play is how many times the Packers rushed just three players on that last possession.
Offline Porforis  
#70 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9:52:22 AM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
According to the NFL press release, possession IS reviewable if it is in the end zone, but not if it is in the rest of the field of play.

And according to same, the reason for no reversal was "a lack of indisputable evidence." Let's be honest, how many times have we seen the regular refs weasel out of something using that same phrase.

I think the Packers got hosed (though I'm more bothered by the Walden roughing and the Shields/Rice interference calls than the TD/interception/no-interference call). But I just think people are acting as if the regular refs never make such egregious mistakes. Which is silly. Heck, I can virtually guarantee that the Triplett or Hochuli crews are going to have major screw-ups in any Packer game they do.

And lets not forget that the reason Seattle was in position to make that last play is how many times the Packers rushed just three players on that last possession.


What we don't get with the regular officials is this debacle as a whole. We might get one or two terrible penalties, OR a blatant missed call like this that screws us, but all three? And the communication issues, and a screwup on the review? I don't like that the media is focusing on the final play, because it doesn't really examine what made the last 3 minutes or so horrifically terrible.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
Wade on 9/25/2012(UTC), wpr on 9/25/2012(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#71 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:12:16 AM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
According to the NFL press release, possession IS reviewable if it is in the end zone, but not if it is in the rest of the field of play.

And according to same, the reason for no reversal was "a lack of indisputable evidence." Let's be honest, how many times have we seen the regular refs weasel out of something using that same phrase.

I think the Packers got hosed (though I'm more bothered by the Walden roughing and the Shields/Rice interference calls than the TD/interception/no-interference call). But I just think people are acting as if the regular refs never make such egregious mistakes. Which is silly. Heck, I can virtually guarantee that the Triplett or Hochuli crews are going to have major screw-ups in any Packer game they do.

And lets not forget that the reason Seattle was in position to make that last play is how many times the Packers rushed just three players on that last possession.


Say what you want about the three man rush, but the fact is IT WORKED.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#72 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:47:42 AM(UTC)
They were in position because Tate pushed off with both hands square in the back. I was actually laughing at that point to be honest. I have a very cynical attitude about all this.
Offline nerdmann  
#73 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:54:00 AM(UTC)
Offline GermanGilbert  
#74 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:56:10 AM(UTC)
Call it maybe

Don't get it done to embed the video :-"
Offline Packerchick  
#75 Posted : Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:09:08 AM(UTC)
Maybe these guys should be on the campaign trail running for public office, Obama and Romney are both looking better than the refs right now.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
zombieslayer on 9/25/2012(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
8 Pages«<34567>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter