[ Sign In ]
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
The Bears/NFC North
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
Offline Rios39  
#1 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 11:07:50 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 588
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 30
As of right now I would say the Bears are the team to beat in the north. lol and we all know the vikings will come down to earth when facing some tough teams.

The Packers did beat the bears, which matters but I would say taking defense/offense consistency into account the Packers haven't played as well as the Bears have in those phases all 4 games. Lots of time to get better though, it wasn't till week 6 or 7 for the Packers till they started firing on all cylinders offensively in 2010.
blank
Back to top
thanks 1 user applaud's Rios39 for this useful post.
Sponsors
Back to top  
Offline Rios39  
#2 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 11:11:50 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 588
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 30
On second thought, the Vikings did beat the 49ers. But, even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then lol
blank
Back to top
thanks 1 user applaud's Rios39 for this useful post.
Online gbguy20  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 5:13:34 AM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,929
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 128
Applause Received: 178
Da Bears

you people sure do talk funny
blank
Back to top
Offline Wade  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:40:02 AM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,021
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 325
Applause Received: 372
If 1 = outstanding/dominant/excellent, 2 = good/dependable/sufficient, and 3 is fair/mediocre/undependable, and 4= bad/awful/sucks.
QB:
1. Packers. 2A. Detroit 2B. Bears 2C. Vikings.

RB
1A. Vikings. 1B. Bears. 2. Packers. 3 Lions

WR/TE:
1. Green Bay. 2. Detroit. 3A. Bears. 3B. Vikings.

OL:
2A. Minnesota. 2B Detroit. 3A Packers. 4. Bears.

DL:
1. Detroit. 2A. Minnesota. 2B Bears. 3. Packers.

LB:
2A Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 2D. Detroit.

DB.
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 3. Detroit.

ST.
1A. Green Bay. 1B. Minnesota 2. Bears. 4. Detroit.

Coaching -- head:
1. Green Bay. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Bears. 3C. Detroit.

Coaching -- assistant:
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Chicago. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Detroit.

With 4 points given for a 1, 3 for a 2, 2 for a 3, and 1 for a 4, with QB counted twice, that leaves possible points being between 10 and 40:

Division prediction based on first four games:

First place: GB 34 pts. Percentage of possible: 85%. Projected record: 11-5.
Second place: Chi 30 points. Percentage of possible: 75%. Projected record: 10-6.
Third place: Minn 29 pts. Percentage of possible: 72.5%. Projected record: 9-7.
Fourth place: Detroit. 27 pts. Percentage of possible: 67.5% Projected record: 8-8.

Edited by member Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:59:55 AM(UTC)  | Reason: changed to four point scale and added explanation bits.

None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
Back to top
BLOG
thanks 1 user applaud's Wade for this useful post.
wpr
Offline Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:50:15 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Posts: 22,894
Joined: 10/14/2006(UTC)
Location: United States

Applause Given: 1,295
Applause Received: 906
Adrian Peterson as my running back, I'd rather Ponder over Cutler.
UserPostedImage
Back to top
WWW
Offline nyrpack  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 4:25:35 PM(UTC)
nyrpack

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 532
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Location: long island, ny

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 13
Originally Posted by: Wade Go to Quoted Post
If 1 = outstanding/dominant/excellent, 2 = good/dependable/sufficient, and 3 is fair/mediocre/undependable, and 4= bad/awful/sucks.
QB:
1. Packers. 2A. Detroit 2B. Bears 2C. Vikings.

RB
1A. Vikings. 1B. Bears. 2. Packers. 3 Lions

WR/TE:
1. Green Bay. 2. Detroit. 3A. Bears. 3B. Vikings.

OL:
2A. Minnesota. 2B Detroit. 3A Packers. 4. Bears.

DL:
1. Detroit. 2A. Minnesota. 2B Bears. 3. Packers.

LB:
2A Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 2D. Detroit.

DB.
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 3. Detroit.

ST.
1A. Green Bay. 1B. Minnesota 2. Bears. 4. Detroit.

Coaching -- head:
1. Green Bay. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Bears. 3C. Detroit.

Coaching -- assistant:
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Chicago. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Detroit.

With 4 points given for a 1, 3 for a 2, 2 for a 3, and 1 for a 4, with QB counted twice, that leaves possible points being between 10 and 40:

Division prediction based on first four games:

First place: GB 34 pts. Percentage of possible: 85%. Projected record: 11-5.
Second place: Chi 30 points. Percentage of possible: 75%. Projected record: 10-6.
Third place: Minn 29 pts. Percentage of possible: 72.5%. Projected record: 9-7.
Fourth place: Detroit. 27 pts. Percentage of possible: 67.5% Projected record: 8-8.


somebody did there homework, lol good job though !!
jimmy b.
Back to top
Offline wpr  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 5:38:09 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,617
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1,364
Applause Received: 727
lot of hard work Wade. Well done young man. With Gold as the K and Hester on returns you can never count the Bears out. I know you have them "good".
One does not simply walk into Mordor.


UserPostedImage

Back to top
Offline Rios39  
#8 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:54:11 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 588
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 30
Packers looking very weak still. At the same time the Vikings and Bears are dominating. It's frustrating the Packers have yet to take that step into a legit consistent team under McCarthy. Way too mean peaks and valleys
blank
Back to top
Offline zombieslayer  
#9 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 4:00:56 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,922
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 493
Originally Posted by: Rios39 Go to Quoted Post
Packers looking very weak still. At the same time the Vikings and Bears are dominating. It's frustrating the Packers have yet to take that step into a legit consistent team under McCarthy. Way too mean peaks and valleys


My wife is at the sports bar. I keep getting txt's from her saying "da Bears scored again!"

Geez. I wish I could be sending txt's to someone saying "the Packers scored again!"
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Back to top
WWW
thanks 1 user applaud's zombieslayer for this useful post.
wpr
Offline Zero2Cool  
#10 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:28:16 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Posts: 22,894
Joined: 10/14/2006(UTC)
Location: United States

Applause Given: 1,295
Applause Received: 906
Adrian Peterson I think is one of three players who can single handedly change a game. Dude is a train. Vikings and Bears both look like superior teams than the Packers, even though the Packers beat the Bears. It looks like that game was just an off game.
UserPostedImage
Back to top
WWW
Online Formo  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 7:20:33 PM(UTC)
Formo

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,431
Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 190
Applause Received: 134
The OP in this thread makes me smile.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.0.0 BETA 2 | YAF © 2003-2013, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.337 seconds.