Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Rios39  
#1 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 11:07:50 PM(UTC)
As of right now I would say the Bears are the team to beat in the north. lol and we all know the vikings will come down to earth when facing some tough teams.

The Packers did beat the bears, which matters but I would say taking defense/offense consistency into account the Packers haven't played as well as the Bears have in those phases all 4 games. Lots of time to get better though, it wasn't till week 6 or 7 for the Packers till they started firing on all cylinders offensively in 2010.
Rios39  
#2 Posted : Monday, October 1, 2012 11:11:50 PM(UTC)
On second thought, the Vikings did beat the 49ers. But, even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then lol
gbguy20  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 5:13:34 AM(UTC)
Da Bears

you people sure do talk funny
Wade  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:40:02 AM(UTC)
If 1 = outstanding/dominant/excellent, 2 = good/dependable/sufficient, and 3 is fair/mediocre/undependable, and 4= bad/awful/sucks.
QB:
1. Packers. 2A. Detroit 2B. Bears 2C. Vikings.

RB
1A. Vikings. 1B. Bears. 2. Packers. 3 Lions

WR/TE:
1. Green Bay. 2. Detroit. 3A. Bears. 3B. Vikings.

OL:
2A. Minnesota. 2B Detroit. 3A Packers. 4. Bears.

DL:
1. Detroit. 2A. Minnesota. 2B Bears. 3. Packers.

LB:
2A Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 2D. Detroit.

DB.
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 3. Detroit.

ST.
1A. Green Bay. 1B. Minnesota 2. Bears. 4. Detroit.

Coaching -- head:
1. Green Bay. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Bears. 3C. Detroit.

Coaching -- assistant:
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Chicago. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Detroit.

With 4 points given for a 1, 3 for a 2, 2 for a 3, and 1 for a 4, with QB counted twice, that leaves possible points being between 10 and 40:

Division prediction based on first four games:

First place: GB 34 pts. Percentage of possible: 85%. Projected record: 11-5.
Second place: Chi 30 points. Percentage of possible: 75%. Projected record: 10-6.
Third place: Minn 29 pts. Percentage of possible: 72.5%. Projected record: 9-7.
Fourth place: Detroit. 27 pts. Percentage of possible: 67.5% Projected record: 8-8.
Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:50:15 AM(UTC)
Adrian Peterson as my running back, I'd rather Ponder over Cutler.
nyrpack  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 4:25:35 PM(UTC)
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
If 1 = outstanding/dominant/excellent, 2 = good/dependable/sufficient, and 3 is fair/mediocre/undependable, and 4= bad/awful/sucks.
QB:
1. Packers. 2A. Detroit 2B. Bears 2C. Vikings.

RB
1A. Vikings. 1B. Bears. 2. Packers. 3 Lions

WR/TE:
1. Green Bay. 2. Detroit. 3A. Bears. 3B. Vikings.

OL:
2A. Minnesota. 2B Detroit. 3A Packers. 4. Bears.

DL:
1. Detroit. 2A. Minnesota. 2B Bears. 3. Packers.

LB:
2A Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 2D. Detroit.

DB.
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Bears. 2C. Minnesota. 3. Detroit.

ST.
1A. Green Bay. 1B. Minnesota 2. Bears. 4. Detroit.

Coaching -- head:
1. Green Bay. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Bears. 3C. Detroit.

Coaching -- assistant:
2A. Green Bay. 2B. Chicago. 3A Minnesota. 3B. Detroit.

With 4 points given for a 1, 3 for a 2, 2 for a 3, and 1 for a 4, with QB counted twice, that leaves possible points being between 10 and 40:

Division prediction based on first four games:

First place: GB 34 pts. Percentage of possible: 85%. Projected record: 11-5.
Second place: Chi 30 points. Percentage of possible: 75%. Projected record: 10-6.
Third place: Minn 29 pts. Percentage of possible: 72.5%. Projected record: 9-7.
Fourth place: Detroit. 27 pts. Percentage of possible: 67.5% Projected record: 8-8.


somebody did there homework, lol good job though !!
wpr  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 2, 2012 5:38:09 PM(UTC)
lot of hard work Wade. Well done young man. With Gold as the K and Hester on returns you can never count the Bears out. I know you have them "good".
Rios39  
#8 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:54:11 PM(UTC)
Packers looking very weak still. At the same time the Vikings and Bears are dominating. It's frustrating the Packers have yet to take that step into a legit consistent team under McCarthy. Way too mean peaks and valleys
zombieslayer  
#9 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 4:00:56 PM(UTC)
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Packers looking very weak still. At the same time the Vikings and Bears are dominating. It's frustrating the Packers have yet to take that step into a legit consistent team under McCarthy. Way too mean peaks and valleys


My wife is at the sports bar. I keep getting txt's from her saying "da Bears scored again!"

Geez. I wish I could be sending txt's to someone saying "the Packers scored again!"
Zero2Cool  
#10 Posted : Sunday, October 7, 2012 5:28:16 PM(UTC)
Adrian Peterson I think is one of three players who can single handedly change a game. Dude is a train. Vikings and Bears both look like superior teams than the Packers, even though the Packers beat the Bears. It looks like that game was just an off game.
Formo  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, October 9, 2012 7:20:33 PM(UTC)
The OP in this thread makes me smile.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (13h) : Mike Mayock says this is one of the best defensive drafts he's ever seen, especially at DE, CB & S.
Smokey (15h) : Yellow as the background color for such blocks as Lambeau Field & Lombardi Ave & Recent Topics & Fan Shout .
Zero2Cool (16h) : and thanks FP88 ... glad you enjoy it. :-)
Zero2Cool (16h) : Finally, got my avatar back! Weird!
Zero2Cool (18h) : FP88, :-) its okay. Smokey, yellow where?
FLORIDA PACKER88 (19h) : Didnt realize how much I needed this site in my life until it wasn't available haha! Looks great Zero!
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Click the Clear link to force new files to load for style.
Smokey (26-Feb) : A little yellow for contrast maybe ?
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Thanks. Took about 16-20 hours.
wpr (26-Feb) : looks great.
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : avatars aren't displaying
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : plain look
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Feb / Announcements / dhazer

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Community Welcome! / wpr

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines