Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
8 Pages«<78
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Wade  
#121 Posted : Monday, October 15, 2012 7:58:53 PM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,754
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 618
Applause Received: 637

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules Go to Quoted Post
Do you guys think that Raji is overvalued as a run defender? Pickett seemed much more effective in there and even our nickel seems well equipped to step up over that with Neal and Worthy together.


Yes.

IMO a nose tackle should routinely occupy two blockers. Far too often, Raji was getting stoned by just one.

Pickett's only problem is that with his age/weight, he can't do the volume of plays without wearing down.

I have to admit Worthy has looked better than I thought he would.

None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
Offline Wade  
#122 Posted : Monday, October 15, 2012 8:00:00 PM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,754
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 618
Applause Received: 637

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Raji's not known as a run defender. He's a pass rushing NT.

Pickett is the run stuffer of the group.


Except that Raji hasn't been doing either one particularly well (except for the second half of 2010).

None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
Offline zombieslayer  
#123 Posted : Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:03:47 AM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 9,919
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco

Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495

Raji has been solid when Cullen Jenkins was in the lineup. Post-Cullen Jenkins, he's been quite average; definitely not first round material. I think one of Ted Thompson's priorities in the 2012 off-season (via draft, trade, waivers, or whatever) would be to replace Cullen Jenkins.

I've said elsewhere that the 2011 D was so bad that it may take 2 off-seasons to bring us back to elite status (as we were in 2010).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)

2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. Ted Thompson Mike McCarthy Aaron Rodgers
Offline DarkaneRules  
#124 Posted : Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:25:06 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,647
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 155
Applause Received: 257

I see a Raji dilemma honestly. Wish we had another Pickett. Raji is not that. Thought he would be.
Offline Rios39  
#125 Posted : Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:18:49 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 592
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer Go to Quoted Post
Raji has been solid when Cullen Jenkins was in the lineup. Post-Cullen Jenkins, he's been quite average; definitely not first round material. I think one of Ted Thompson's priorities in the 2012 off-season (via draft, trade, waivers, or whatever) would be to replace Cullen Jenkins.

I've said elsewhere that the 2011 D was so bad that it may take 2 off-seasons to bring us back to elite status (as we were in 2010).


Well we have Worthy and Daniels as well as Wilson doing good in pass rush. What we need more of is a stout MLB. Bishop is without a doubt solid and Hawk is playing much more fast and aggressive/except in coverage. So I think we either draft a stout MLB Safety or maybe CB. All in all I'm happy with our defense but when we have to rely on our MLB's to cover. When the right plays have been called we have looked good.
blank
Offline Pack93z  
#126 Posted : Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:23:09 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,698
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 377
Applause Received: 996

No, I don't think Pickett should be there full time. IMO, though, he should be rotated in there in combination with Raji. Raji gives you something Pickett does not.. pass rush push. So I think Pickett should be in a rotation at both nose and end. Either that or you put Pick at the nose and rotate in Raji from end to nose in passing downs.

Another point.. Pickett will wear down at the nose.. he has worn down at end already towards the end of the season. Summary.. it should be a rotation of some sorts between Raji and Pick at nose.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline PackerTraxx  
#127 Posted : Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:25:30 PM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,783
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 127

I think Raji has the talent but for some reason, his, scheme, coaches, it's not being realized. Possibly he could use a little more of a mean streak like Nagota.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Offline Rios39  
#128 Posted : Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:33:56 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 592
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30

well you draft him expecting him to be impact. The better NT's in the game barely get any sacks maybe 1-3 but they push the pile forward and devastate a running game. If he got push up the middle more Clay and Perry could eat up. It's been more our athletic DE's like Worthy and Neal that have been causing problems up the middle.

Oddly we lead the league in sacks this year but still giving up too many points. Yards are about normal. We are getting no picks either. We are good at most positions on the field so this is something that needs to be addressed as a coaching staff. Got to find a way to cover the first soft zone over the middle, that's where the yards are coming from (Hawk, DJ)Hopefully Brad Jones can be decent in coverage, that could help there.

Now Houston is a very good offensive team and we shut them down to 17 points. Chicago was also a very good offensive team that we shut down but haven't played as well against some teams that we are better then.

Shouldn't have given up 32 points to the 49ers, shouldn't have given up 28 points to the colts. Those are the big ones for me. Vs the Saints and Texans you can pretty much guarantee they'll put some kind of offense on you no matter how good your D is.
blank
Offline wpr  
#129 Posted : Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:43:25 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,280
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,701
Applause Received: 1,303

Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
No, I don't think Pickett should be there full time. IMO, though, he should be rotated in there in combination with Raji. Raji gives you something Pickett does not.. pass rush push. So I think Pickett should be in a rotation at both nose and end. Either that or you put Pick at the nose and rotate in Raji from end to nose in passing downs.

Another point.. Pickett will wear down at the nose.. he has worn down at end already towards the end of the season. Summary.. it should be a rotation of some sorts between Raji and Pick at nose.


I was glancing through your post and thought you said "Pick you nose." I have to slow down and read it again. d'oh!

BTW Darth Vader is not a bass guitar player. He would like to be up front in the lights. he is more of a lead guitarist.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Offline nerdmann  
#130 Posted : Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:09:09 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,842
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,276
Applause Received: 559

Originally Posted by: Rios39 Go to Quoted Post
well you draft him expecting him to be impact. The better NT's in the game barely get any sacks maybe 1-3 but they push the pile forward and devastate a running game. If he got push up the middle more Clay and Perry could eat up. It's been more our athletic DE's like Worthy and Neal that have been causing problems up the middle.

Oddly we lead the league in sacks this year but still giving up too many points. Yards are about normal. We are getting no picks either. We are good at most positions on the field so this is something that needs to be addressed as a coaching staff. Got to find a way to cover the first soft zone over the middle, that's where the yards are coming from (Hawk, DJ)Hopefully Brad Jones can be decent in coverage, that could help there.

Now Houston is a very good offensive team and we shut them down to 17 points. Chicago was also a very good offensive team that we shut down but haven't played as well against some teams that we are better then.

Shouldn't have given up 32 points to the 49ers, shouldn't have given up 28 points to the colts. Those are the big ones for me. Vs the Saints and Texans you can pretty much guarantee they'll put some kind of offense on you no matter how good your D is.


The INTs are there, we just haven't been getting them. Until this past game.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline Wade  
#131 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:00:59 AM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,754
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 618
Applause Received: 637

Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
I was glancing through your post and thought you said "Pick you nose." I have to slow down and read it again. d'oh!

BTW Darth Vader is not a bass guitar player. He would like to be up front in the lights. he is more of a lead guitarist.


No. He's the cellist. :)

None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
Offline Wade  
#132 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:01:44 AM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,754
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 618
Applause Received: 637

Originally Posted by: Wade Go to Quoted Post
No. He's the cellist. :)

(Obscure Harry Chapin allusion.)



None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes.
Offline Rios39  
#133 Posted : Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:46:00 PM(UTC)
Rios39

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 592
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 30

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer Go to Quoted Post
Raji has been solid when Cullen Jenkins was in the lineup. Post-Cullen Jenkins, he's been quite average; definitely not first round material. I think one of Ted Thompson's priorities in the 2012 off-season (via draft, trade, waivers, or whatever) would be to replace Cullen Jenkins.

I've said elsewhere that the 2011 D was so bad that it may take 2 off-seasons to bring us back to elite status (as we were in 2010).


What's worth noting is that Jenkins doesn't have a sack in his last 16 games as a starter. They have a large rotation but so do the packers now when at full strength.

We need to start seeing more push from Raji though, he has more than adequate talent around him with Worthy (2 sacks)Wilson (2 sacks)Neal (1 sack/2 games) Pickett who kills is our best run defender on the line. Even Daniels has looked good playing rarely (1 sack). Over the course of the year if those stats continue it'll be one of the more dominant lines in the NFL as far as 3-4 D's go.

Raji has 0 sacks on the year and most NT only get about 0-3 on the year but when watching good defenses you usually always see the line moving towards the QB. We showed some push last week. Against the Bears I believe Raji looked half decent but other than that it's only been outside pressure unless it's a creative stunt blitz. It's time Raji starts dominating upfront or it's time to start looking at other potential NT's within the next few years.

Also, sometimes it looks like Raji is trying to beat guys more than take on blocks and push through, actually looking to show quickness to get a sack. Which worked in 2010 but since he's shown barely anything (probably an adjustment from the offense). You'd think for the amount of times we blitz he could get a one on one and blow a guy up with his strength/speed but that's been more the case with Worthy, Neal, Wilson ect..
blank
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
8 Pages«<78
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error



2014 Schedule
Thu, Sep 4 at Seahawks 7:30 PM
Sun, Sep 14 JETS 3:25 PM
Sun, Sep 21 at Lions 12:00 PM
Sun, Sep 28 at Bears 7:25 PM
Thu, Oct 2 VIKINGS 7:25 PM
Sun, Oct 12 at Dolphins 12:00 PM
Sun, Oct 19 PANTHERS 12:00 PM
Sun, Oct 26 at Saints 7:20 PM
Sun, Nov 2 bye 12:00 AM
Sun, Nov 9 BEARS 7:30 PM
Sun, Nov 16 EAGLES 12:00 PM
Sun, Nov 23 at Vikings 12:00 PM
Sun, Nov 30 PATRIOTS 3:25 PM
Mon, Dec 8 FALCONS 7:30 PM
Sun, Dec 14 at Bills 12:00 PM
Sun, Dec 21 at Buccaneers 12:00 PM
Sun, Dec 28 LIONS 12:00 PM

Recent Topics
7h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / beast

8h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / beast

9h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / Zero2Cool

9h / Random Babble / wpr

9h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / uffda udfa

10h / Random Babble / wpr

12h / Random Babble / mi_keys

14h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / wpr

15h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / uffda udfa

19h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / nerdmann

22h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / StarrMax1

13-Jul / Random Babble / Dulak

13-Jul / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / Zero2Cool

12-Jul / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / DarkaneRules

12-Jul / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool



Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.