Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
7 Pages<12345>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#21 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 4:01:39 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,504
Applause Received: 4,062
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
He had over 500 carries over 5 years without any fumbles before his 3 this season. I am saying GB doesn't need Lynch to be successful.


He hasn't had 500 carries this season so that is not relevant to my response. It was a bad player to use.

Packers need a RB who
Always gets positive yards, even if its 1 yard.
Never fumbles
Superb pass protection
Average and above receiving out of backfield


Those are dime a dozen!!! [grin1]
Offline wpr  
#22 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 4:22:40 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,001
Applause Received: 2,051
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
He hasn't had 500 carries this season so that is not relevant to my response. It was a bad player to use.

Packers need a RB who
Always gets positive yards, even if its 1 yard.
Never fumbles
Superb pass protection
Average and above receiving out of backfield


Those are dime a dozen!!! [grin1]


don't be such a fn ass.

I intentionally used an average, vanilla player to say GB can still win with someone like that. They don't need Lynch which was nermann's original premise.

And Green-Ellis' prior career abilities do matter because I say the do. he is my example not yours. you want to twist what I am saying by taking a small sample size. I prefer to use his whole career because it is a better indicator of his abilities and a couple of weeks this year.

Offline Gaycandybacon  
#23 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 4:37:24 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
He hasn't had 500 carries this season so that is not relevant to my response. It was a bad player to use.

Packers need a RB who
Always gets positive yards, even if its 1 yard. Theres not 1 back in the NFL that ALWAYS gets positive yards...
Never fumbles We've never fumbled once this year to my knowledge and rarely fumbled in the past
Superb pass protection Been pretty good so far from a RBs POV
Average and above receiving out of backfield [wallme] We have Cobb that does that, plus Green and Kuhn shown that ablity even todays game
Those are dime a dozen!!! [grin1]
Offline Packfan87  
#24 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 6:36:37 PM(UTC)
Rank: Rookie

United States
Joined: 8/18/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 5
I'm not sure what to take of Green yet. I like what I've seen from him as far as pass protection and receiving out of the backfield but he's also left a lot of yards on the field(tripping etc...).

All in all I don't think we can make a fair assessment of a player after two games in what is essentially his rookie season.
Offline RaiderPride  
#25 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:14:20 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 7/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 271
Applause Received: 335
My opine. I think I am close to being sorta right.

Every team has a structure for what talents and production they need out of a running back. It varies based on the QB, the team strengths, and of course the O-Line that that team has in a particular season, or reign.

For example.. Pretend you could take any running back in history and put him in this years starting line up. Who would you put in as the starter?

Kevin my friend.. Please do not say Barry Sanders. That would be the wrong answer, even though he is the most exciting of all time.

For this present Packer offence, structure, and O line... If I could pick any running back in history to put in the 2012 line up....I would put Earl Campbell in the line up rather than Barry Sanders. Eric Dickerson, Gayle Sayers, O.J. Simpson, most anyone else...

I reckon what I am saying is every Offense has different skills they need out of a running back.

OK.. Go ahead now.. Trash my theory : )

thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 10/21/2012(UTC)
Offline zombieslayer  
#26 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:21:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
he did just enough to by Aaron Rodgers time to throw the ball. We are not looking for a guy who will get 150 yards rushing. He did get some key yards on passes to give them a first down. Don't make him one dimensional.


Exactly. 20 carries for 35 yards is exactly what I want out of a RB.

That way, we'll get our carries and no way in hell he'll ask for more than a million a year with a straight face.
Offline zombieslayer  
#27 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:23:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
haha wow... The guy didn't do half bad. Made some great catches and got us first downs. You're to hard on him, it's his 2nd game starting for crist sake and we've won both times he's carried the rock. He's carried the ball for 40+ times in 2 games that's good enough in my book!

I think Zombie said he'd get 35 on 20 carries? The man is psychic.


Yeah, I said something like that.

He did exactly what I wanted him to do - get 20+ carries. Could care less about the yards.
Offline nerdmann  
#28 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:28:55 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,414
Applause Received: 1,424
zombieslayer said: Go to Quoted Post
Exactly. 20 carries for 35 yards is exactly what I want out of a RB.

That way, we'll get our carries and no way in hell he'll ask for more than a million a year with a straight face.


So Bjack is your ideal RB?
thanks Post received 1 applause.
zombieslayer on 10/21/2012(UTC)
Offline zombieslayer  
#29 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:38:57 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
So Bjack is your ideal RB?


Yes. He's my perfect RB. He can block very well. He's a decent receiver. And he can't run the ball worth a damn but at least he doesn't fumble. And he'll never make much $$$, money that could be used on important positions.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 10/21/2012(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#30 Posted : Sunday, October 21, 2012 8:08:41 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
To rank the problems with the run game. Has to be Scheme, blocking and then backs. And scheme is 1/2 the reason the blocking is bad. We haven't been able to consistently block the scheme since McCarthy took over. Today they went back to what was causing Benson to have not so good production. Too many shotgun draws. It is to predictable and easy to protect against. We don't have counter plays in the zone scheme. If the RB is lined to Rodgers left, the run has to go to the right. So defense does't have to think which way they need to protect.

Get Rodgers under center and run inside, let the oline block more forward instead of this crap sideways blocking. Let the horses up front do what lineman enjoy most. pushing the guy in front of them out of the way.

I have had about enough of being in 3rd and 1 or less, and not even attempting to line up with a threat of running. Teams no matter how good they pass game is, should be able to get 1 yard on the ground, and we never even try.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
nerdmann on 10/21/2012(UTC), wpr on 10/22/2012(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
7 Pages<12345>»
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (1h) : Wow ! The Packers got disrespected too !
Smokey (1h) : Hello ?
uffda udfa (2h) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (2h) : go pack go ?
wpr (2h) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (2h) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (3h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (3h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (3h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (4h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (4h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (4h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (4h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (4h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (5h) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (5h) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Smokey (5h) : This is not your schoolyard to bully others, in fact I was that kid who stood up to the bully and kicked his ass.
Smokey (5h) : In the end the bully ended up in prison as everyone else grew up and moved on with their lives.
Smokey (5h) : I rate you with the hated schoolyard bully that tried to terrorize others to feel himself big.
Smokey (5h) : U2, it is obvious that you don't care if people like you or not. Well people don't.
uffda udfa (7h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (7h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (7h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (7h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (7h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (7h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (7h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (7h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (7h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (7h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (7h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (7h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (7h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (7h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (7h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

23m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Fantasy Sports Talk / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

8h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

14h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis


Packers Headlines