Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick
Posts: 2,656
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 352
|
Jerron McMillian was fined $21K for his hit on Giants WR Bennett. What else is a defender suppose to do now? McMillian turned himself away to try and prevent helmet to helmet contact. He lowered himself down and did't hit high. Besides not trying to play the game, what else is a DB suppose to do?  These fines by the NFL have become a friggin joke. |
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Hall of Famer
 Posts: 12,752 Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC) Location: North Central Wisconsin Applause Given: 380
Applause Received: 1,021
|
Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins  Jerron McMillian was fined $21K for his hit on Giants WR Bennett. What else is a defender suppose to do now?
McMillian turned himself away to try and prevent helmet to helmet contact. He lowered himself down and did't hit high. Besides not trying to play the game, what else is a DB suppose to do?
These fines by the NFL have become a friggin joke. Completely agree with your assessment here... there is nothing more a defensive player can do. Unrealistic expectations. |
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super Bowl MVP
Posts: 7,245
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 622
Applause Received: 1,296
|
Originally Posted by: Pack93z Completely agree with your assessment here... there is nothing more a defensive player can do. Unrealistic expectations. That, or recognize the guy already scored a touchdown, then don't be a dumbass by hitting him and getting a fifteen yard penalty. The cerebral part of this game is underestimated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick
Posts: 2,707 Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC) Location: Visalia, CA Applause Given: 1,770
Applause Received: 417
|
Originally Posted by: DakotaT That, or recognize the guy already scored a touchdown, then don't be a dumbass by hitting him and getting a fifteen yard penalty. The cerebral part of this game is underestimated. Except for the fact that his hit could have jarred the ball lose and potentially made the play incomplete.
|
 Post received 2 applause.
|
|
|
|
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick
Posts: 2,656
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 352
|
Originally Posted by: DakotaT That, or recognize the guy already scored a touchdown, then don't be a dumbass by hitting him and getting a fifteen yard penalty. The cerebral part of this game is underestimated. Well, he didn't score a TD. With the rules "must maintain control through the process". Hitting clean and hard, can dislodge and prevent a TD. And McMillian hit him clean and hard. |
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!! |
Post received 1 applause.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super Bowl MVP
Posts: 7,245
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 622
Applause Received: 1,296
|
Well, I guess if Baltimore could get screwed out of going to the super bowl by a guy stripping the ball after possession then the Giant receiver could have had it jarred loose. Please explain to me why it should be touchdown when a running back reaches the ball over the goal line and has it knocked out of his hands. Shouldn't that be a fumble then? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Legend
Posts: 25,634 Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC) Location: Green Bay, WI Applause Given: 1,835
Applause Received: 1,991
|
Originally Posted by: DakotaT Well, I guess if Baltimore could get screwed out of going to the super bowl by a guy stripping the ball after possession then the Giant receiver could have had it jarred loose. Please explain to me why it should be touchdown when a running back reaches the ball over the goal line and has it knocked out of his hands. Shouldn't that be a fumble then? The ball carrier (this is not relegated to RB's) has possession and control of the ball when reaching it over the pylon or goal line. A receiver in the process of catching a pass in the endzone does not. That's the difference. |
 Click here and find the LATEST Packers News! |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super Bowl MVP
Posts: 7,245
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 622
Applause Received: 1,296
|
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool The ball carrier (this is not relegated to RB's) has possession and control of the ball when reaching it over the pylon or goal line. A receiver in the process of catching a pass in the endzone does not. That's the difference. A catch, possession plus one and second foot down; so why does a defender get the right to come jar the ball out when the catch is in the end zone. If the flimsy ass touchdown by the running back counts, so to should the quick catch in the end zone. My old school thinking tells me the ball carrier or receiver should have to have their body in the end zone for it to count, but then again, this is a pussified league in a pussified world. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick
Posts: 2,238
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 203
Applause Received: 280
|
Originally Posted by: DakotaT A catch, possession plus one and second foot down; so why does a defender get the right to come jar the ball out when the catch is in the end zone. If the flimsy ass touchdown by the running back counts, so to should the quick catch in the end zone. My old school thinking tells me the ball carrier or receiver should have to have their body in the end zone for it to count, but then again, this is a pussified league in a pussified world. ur logic is terrible.... "WHAT THE DEFENDER GETS THE CHANCE TO KNOCK THE BALL OUT FOR AN INCOMPLETION?! THIS IS A PUSSIFIED LEAGUE!" |
call me Dan |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super Bowl MVP
Posts: 7,245
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 622
Applause Received: 1,296
|
Originally Posted by: gbguy20 ur logic is terrible....
"WHAT THE DEFENDER GETS THE CHANCE TO KNOCK THE BALL OUT FOR AN INCOMPLETION?! THIS IS A PUSSIFIED LEAGUE!" My point is that if it is an instantanious touchdown for the ball carrier reaching it across the goaline, then the same rule should apply for the pass and reception. If you braniacs can't understand that intense scenario, I guess I'll digress. FFFUUUUUCK!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Legend
Posts: 25,634 Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC) Location: Green Bay, WI Applause Given: 1,835
Applause Received: 1,991
|
Originally Posted by: DakotaT A catch, possession plus one and second foot down; so why does a defender get the right to come jar the ball out when the catch is in the end zone. If the flimsy ass touchdown by the running back counts, so to should the quick catch in the end zone. My old school thinking tells me the ball carrier or receiver should have to have their body in the end zone for it to count, but then again, this is a pussified league in a pussified world. You realize you're the one pussify things right? You don't want the defender to have a chance to dislodge the ball? That's awfully pussy of you. Why you such a pussy? You have no old school way of thinking so quit that high horse right now. You obviously no nothing of the rules of 'old school'. There is no such thing as a quick catch. You either catch it, or don't. Remember Seahawks game? No question, I'm in the room that there are too many rules. It's one thing that's attracting me to College ball more. It seems things are more black/white than in the NFL. I blame money for ruining the NFL. I would love an NFL like the one Jack Lambert played in. You probably don't know who that is do you young buck? He was a fearless middle linebacker who took shit from no one. Google him boy! |
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News! |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,752 Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC) Location: North Central Wisconsin Applause Given: 380
Applause Received: 1,021
|
The act of a catch in the game of football is more complex than 300 level trig formulas.. I think purposely done to give the NFL the grey area needed to explain any blown call. |
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super Bowl MVP
Posts: 7,245
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 622
Applause Received: 1,296
|
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool You realize you're the one pussify things right? You don't want the defender to have a chance to dislodge the ball? That's awfully pussy of you. Why you such a pussy? You have no old school way of thinking so quit that high horse right now. You obviously no nothing of the rules of 'old school'.
There is no such thing as a quick catch. You either catch it, or don't. Remember Seahawks game?
No question, I'm in the room that there are too many rules. It's one thing that's attracting me to College ball more. It seems things are more black/white than in the NFL. I blame money for ruining the NFL. I would love an NFL like the one Jack Lambert played in. You probably don't know who that is do you young buck? He was a fearless middle linebacker who took shit from no one. Google him boy! You are one confused mother fucker. My point is that if you are going to give that pussy touchdown for reaching the ball over the goalline, then you have to give the receiver the touchdown for the catch to be consistent. I don't think Mcmillian deserved the penalty, but even if he had dislodged the ball, they would have ruled it a touchdown cause he had already crossed the goal line with possession. And FYI Zero, every time you give me one of your authority little grandstand gestures, I just giggle. What you're trying to accomplish with those is futile. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Legend
Posts: 25,634 Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC) Location: Green Bay, WI Applause Given: 1,835
Applause Received: 1,991
|
|
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News! |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick
Posts: 2,738 Joined: 8/22/2009(UTC) Location: Milwaukee, WI Applause Given: 168
Applause Received: 333
|
Edited by user Saturday, December 1, 2012 9:23:02 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.