Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages«<23
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#46 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 7:36:30 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,656
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 352

It still a wonder on how he is going to be worked back in. How would you rank our Secondary overall.

When Woodson returns, our best 4 are Williams, Shields, Burnett and Woodson. Where it becomes tricky is who is better for the team, Hayward, House, Jennings and McMillian. If Jennings is better than Hayward, there isn't much of a question. On sub packages move Woodson to the slot and bring in Jennings for Safety. But if Hayward is our next best, do we want to have him on the pine except in dime situations, because that is what Woodson playing slot will do.
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!
UserPostedImage
Offline DakotaT  
#47 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:28:57 AM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 7,164
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 615
Applause Received: 1,269

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins Go to Quoted Post
It still a wonder on how he is going to be worked back in. How would you rank our Secondary overall.

When Woodson returns, our best 4 are Williams, Shields, Burnett and Woodson. Where it becomes tricky is who is better for the team, Hayward, House, Jennings and McMillian. If Jennings is better than Hayward, there isn't much of a question. On sub packages move Woodson to the slot and bring in Jennings for Safety. But if Hayward is our next best, do we want to have him on the pine except in dime situations, because that is what Woodson playing slot will do.


Actually, I think playing Wood at linebacker makes a lot of sense. It really depends on what team you are playing, and what kind of offensive package is on the field. What I don't want to ever see again is Woodsen running with the receivers, that is his ultimate weakness right now. Fortunately, it's Dom's job to use the pieces of his defense.
UserPostedImage
Offline Pack93z  
#48 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:38:53 AM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Posts: 12,693
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 375
Applause Received: 995

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins Go to Quoted Post
It still a wonder on how he is going to be worked back in. How would you rank our Secondary overall.

When Woodson returns, our best 4 are Williams, Shields, Burnett and Woodson. Where it becomes tricky is who is better for the team, Hayward, House, Jennings and McMillian. If Jennings is better than Hayward, there isn't much of a question. On sub packages move Woodson to the slot and bring in Jennings for Safety. But if Hayward is our next best, do we want to have him on the pine except in dime situations, because that is what Woodson playing slot will do.


I would slide McMillian back to the deep spot and put Woody up in that spot near the LOS. I think our weakest link currently in the secondary is MD Jennings. And that is not even close. Also, I still am leery of Burnett back there.. seems to inconsistent for my tastes.

But I would run the base package, with the light in the box numbers Dom seems to run often, Shields, Burnett, McMillian, Williams, Woody. Dime would bring in Hayward.

My opinion, I think House morphs into that physical entity that Woodson has been in his career and becomes that close to the LOS corner/Nickel/Safety/Backer roaming entity.

Edited by user Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:07:19 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline DarkaneRules  
#49 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:42:48 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,637
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 154
Applause Received: 248

I like him as a linebacker actually :)
Online play2win  
#50 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:08:10 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,779
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee

Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 721

Yeah, Woodson has that ability to play the hybrid LB/3rd Safety, and that is where I suspect he will be used. Hayward stays on the field. Loser on field may be any of Moses, Zombo, Walden.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#51 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:27:33 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,637
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 154
Applause Received: 248

Originally Posted by: play2win Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, Woodson has that ability to play the hybrid LB/3rd Safety, and that is where I suspect he will be used. Hayward stays on the field. Loser on field may be any of Moses, Zombo, Walden.


And that is okay, because they each have some pretty glaring weaknesses in game. Particularly protecting the edge in run defense.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#52 Posted : Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:05:54 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,656
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 352

Originally Posted by: play2win Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, Woodson has that ability to play the hybrid LB/3rd Safety, and that is where I suspect he will be used. Hayward stays on the field. Loser on field may be any of Moses, Zombo, Walden.


I think we should drop lbers instead of dlineman to go into coverage.

Rush Neal,Raji,Worthy,Matthews
Using Woodson and Burnett in MLB positions. Unless there is a RB, where Hawk or Jones can come in.
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!
UserPostedImage
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages«<23
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error



2014 Schedule
Thu, Sep 4 at Seahawks 7:30 PM
Sun, Sep 14 JETS 3:25 PM
Sun, Sep 21 at Lions 12:00 PM
Sun, Sep 28 at Bears 7:25 PM
Thu, Oct 2 VIKINGS 7:25 PM
Sun, Oct 12 at Dolphins 12:00 PM
Sun, Oct 19 PANTHERS 12:00 PM
Sun, Oct 26 at Saints 7:20 PM
Sun, Nov 2 bye 12:00 AM
Sun, Nov 9 BEARS 7:30 PM
Sun, Nov 16 EAGLES 12:00 PM
Sun, Nov 23 at Vikings 12:00 PM
Sun, Nov 30 PATRIOTS 3:25 PM
Mon, Dec 8 FALCONS 7:30 PM
Sun, Dec 14 at Bills 12:00 PM
Sun, Dec 21 at Buccaneers 12:00 PM
Sun, Dec 28 LIONS 12:00 PM

Recent Topics
7m / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / StarrMax1

1h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / nerdmann

2h / Random Babble / wpr

2h / Announcements / Mucky Tundra

13h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / DakotaT

13h / Random Babble / sschind

14h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / Tezzy

14h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / Tezzy

15h / Random Babble / DakotaT

18h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / play2win

18h / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / DarkaneRules

09-Jul / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / sschind

09-Jul / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / play2win

09-Jul / Random Babble / DakotaT

09-Jul / Let's Talk Green Bay Packers! / dfosterf



Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.