Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
4 Pages«<234
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#31 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 7:36:30 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
It still a wonder on how he is going to be worked back in. How would you rank our Secondary overall.

When Woodson returns, our best 4 are Williams, Shields, Burnett and Woodson. Where it becomes tricky is who is better for the team, Hayward, House, Jennings and McMillian. If Jennings is better than Hayward, there isn't much of a question. On sub packages move Woodson to the slot and bring in Jennings for Safety. But if Hayward is our next best, do we want to have him on the pine except in dime situations, because that is what Woodson playing slot will do.
Offline DakotaT  
#32 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:28:57 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,049
Applause Received: 2,116
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
It still a wonder on how he is going to be worked back in. How would you rank our Secondary overall.

When Woodson returns, our best 4 are Williams, Shields, Burnett and Woodson. Where it becomes tricky is who is better for the team, Hayward, House, Jennings and McMillian. If Jennings is better than Hayward, there isn't much of a question. On sub packages move Woodson to the slot and bring in Jennings for Safety. But if Hayward is our next best, do we want to have him on the pine except in dime situations, because that is what Woodson playing slot will do.


Actually, I think playing Wood at linebacker makes a lot of sense. It really depends on what team you are playing, and what kind of offensive package is on the field. What I don't want to ever see again is Woodsen running with the receivers, that is his ultimate weakness right now. Fortunately, it's Dom's job to use the pieces of his defense.
Offline Pack93z  
#33 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:38:53 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
It still a wonder on how he is going to be worked back in. How would you rank our Secondary overall.

When Woodson returns, our best 4 are Williams, Shields, Burnett and Woodson. Where it becomes tricky is who is better for the team, Hayward, House, Jennings and McMillian. If Jennings is better than Hayward, there isn't much of a question. On sub packages move Woodson to the slot and bring in Jennings for Safety. But if Hayward is our next best, do we want to have him on the pine except in dime situations, because that is what Woodson playing slot will do.


I would slide McMillian back to the deep spot and put Woody up in that spot near the LOS. I think our weakest link currently in the secondary is MD Jennings. And that is not even close. Also, I still am leery of Burnett back there.. seems to inconsistent for my tastes.

But I would run the base package, with the light in the box numbers Dom seems to run often, Shields, Burnett, McMillian, Williams, Woody. Dime would bring in Hayward.

My opinion, I think House morphs into that physical entity that Woodson has been in his career and becomes that close to the LOS corner/Nickel/Safety/Backer roaming entity.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#34 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:42:48 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 334
Applause Received: 763
I like him as a linebacker actually :)
Offline play2win  
#35 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:08:10 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
Yeah, Woodson has that ability to play the hybrid LB/3rd Safety, and that is where I suspect he will be used. Hayward stays on the field. Loser on field may be any of Moses, Zombo, Walden.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#36 Posted : Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:27:33 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 334
Applause Received: 763
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, Woodson has that ability to play the hybrid LB/3rd Safety, and that is where I suspect he will be used. Hayward stays on the field. Loser on field may be any of Moses, Zombo, Walden.


And that is okay, because they each have some pretty glaring weaknesses in game. Particularly protecting the edge in run defense.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#37 Posted : Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:05:54 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 962
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, Woodson has that ability to play the hybrid LB/3rd Safety, and that is where I suspect he will be used. Hayward stays on the field. Loser on field may be any of Moses, Zombo, Walden.


I think we should drop lbers instead of dlineman to go into coverage.

Rush Neal,Raji,Worthy,Matthews
Using Woodson and Burnett in MLB positions. Unless there is a RB, where Hawk or Jones can come in.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages«<234
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (1h) : Wow ! The Packers got disrespected too !
Smokey (1h) : Hello ?
uffda udfa (2h) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (2h) : go pack go ?
wpr (3h) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (3h) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (3h) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (3h) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (3h) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Smokey (4h) : yes I was, but he just ...
Zero2Cool (4h) : We all have the same ability to ignore someone. Exercise that. GO PACK GO!!!
Smokey (4h) : NOT YOUR FIGHT NONSTOP
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : ving again.
Nonstopdrivel (5h) : Calling him a bully? Telling him to leave? Seriously? This is the kind of shit that drove me away last time and is making me contemplate lea
Smokey (6h) : Be a good fellow and go pester another forum.
Smokey (6h) : It amazes me that you've remained in this forum for as long as you have.
Smokey (6h) : This is not your schoolyard to bully others, in fact I was that kid who stood up to the bully and kicked his ass.
Smokey (6h) : In the end the bully ended up in prison as everyone else grew up and moved on with their lives.
Smokey (6h) : I rate you with the hated schoolyard bully that tried to terrorize others to feel himself big.
Smokey (6h) : U2, it is obvious that you don't care if people like you or not. Well people don't.
uffda udfa (8h) : It's the same day every day at 1265. They crave sameness.
uffda udfa (8h) : Didn't care u were talking cooking just that u tried censoring GM talk.
mojaveson (8h) : Tough loss, but it's now Monday and time to move forward. I hope the front office feels the same way and gets right to work on filling the h
uffda udfa (8h) : I'm going to start a favorite Pixar movie right before opening day 2017.
uffda udfa (8h) : Don't discuss Packers brass during game week. Cooking appliances are more interesting.
uffda udfa (8h) : I grew up in Wisconsin. Don't u see you created your own irony?
uffda udfa (8h) : Or pecans or walnuts? That is nuts.
uffda udfa (8h) : That's hilarious. No GM talk says u but let's talk cooking appliances?
uffda udfa (8h) : Meanwhile, you're talking turkeys, crock pots and pressure cookers.
uffda udfa (8h) : Smokey...U complained about too much Eliot Wolf talk not game talk.
uffda udfa (8h) : Disagree. He choose to roll into endzone. Safety was right call.
Smokey (8h) : U2, take your Texas redneck thinking and serve it with your pot of beans .
uffda udfa (8h) : Said maybe 1 yard line but no control until on goal line.
uffda udfa (8h) : Claimed momentum carried into endzone.
uffda udfa (8h) : Claimed it could never been ruled a safety.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

28m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

44m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

47m / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

4h / Fantasy Sports Talk / mojaveson

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

8h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

14h / Around The NFL / mojaveson

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis


Packers Headlines