Rank: All Pro
Posts: 5,021
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 325
Applause Received: 372
|
Adrian Peterson or Jamaal Charles?
I know consensus is going to say Peterson. But that 5.8 per rush 5-year average is just sick. I mean, it's more than a 1/2 yard bigger than Jim Brown's career ave. And 3/4 of a yard bigger than Peterson's.
And it's not like KC has any better "complementary offensive players" than Minnesota has. |
None of the above. It wouldn't have been a wasted vote. Obama and Romney -- Those were the wasted votes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Bowl MVP
Posts: 4,395
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 996
Applause Received: 188
|
Which one's a better receiver? |
It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get back up again. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick
Posts: 510
Joined: 11/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 17
Applause Received: 46
|
Neither of them, with Aaron Rodgers under center there's just no need to spend big bucks on an elite RB. That said, if I really HAVE to take one, I'd take AD 24/7. The Chiefs produced some elite RBs in the last couple of years (Priest Holmes, Larry Johnson, Jamaal Charles), so that might also be a system thing like with the Broncos a couple of years ago. AD in contrast is just outstanding because he's AD. |
blank |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Pro Bowl MVP
Posts: 4,395
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 996
Applause Received: 188
|
Originally Posted by: GermanGilbert  Neither of them, with Aaron Rodgers under center there's just no need to spend big bucks on an elite RB. That said, if I really HAVE to take one, I'd take AD 24/7. The Chiefs produced some elite RBs in the last couple of years (Priest Holmes, Larry Johnson, Jamaal Charles), so that might also be a system thing like with the Broncos a couple of years ago. AD in contrast is just outstanding because he's AD. Which one is better at pass pro? |
It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get back up again. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick
Posts: 1,929
Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 128
Applause Received: 178
|
|
blank |
 1 user applaud's gbguy20 for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick
Posts: 1,638
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 11
Applause Received: 87
|
Which one earns less money. |
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame? |
1 user applaud's PackerTraxx for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Hall of Famer
Posts: 12,114
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 268
Applause Received: 695
|
I might not pick either and go with Lynch.
Anyway.. it is truly sad that neither Charles nor Peterson have a QB that can exploit the defense at the moment off their efforts. Minnesota at least has someone that may grow into the position, KC is just a freaking mess. |
People gather bundles of sticks to build bridges they never cross.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick
Posts: 2,172
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 142
|
If this is which over their career, the answer is Peterson without a doubt. If the question is from today forward it would be tougher. Peterson does have a lot more miles on his tires. I still think I would go with Peterson, I think he has the better ability to gain when there is not a hole. And more of his big runs seem to happen through the middle and then bouncing to open ground, where Charles seems to me to do more of his on edge runs. |
The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.