Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
play2win  
#41 Posted : Monday, January 21, 2013 1:54:42 PM(UTC)
doddpower said: Go to Quoted Post
It's funny how talented teams seem to have more 'attitude'. The way I see it, bring in more talent and the attitude comes with it. The desired "attitude" is often a part of a great players game.


Remember when we needed a RB and Ted decided not to bring in Marshawn Lynch? How dumb was that? Huge blow to the team from an attitude standpoint.

I know we won the SB with Starks coming in late in the year, but I recall Woodson being pretty disappointed. I am sure Rodgers was too. Just think how differently last season might have been. We may have won back to back SBs... and may have been vying for a 3-peat.
doddpower  
#42 Posted : Monday, January 21, 2013 8:09:56 PM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Remember when we needed a RB and Ted decided not to bring in Marshawn Lynch? How dumb was that? Huge blow to the team from an attitude standpoint.

I know we won the SB with Starks coming in late in the year, but I recall Woodson being pretty disappointed. I am sure Rodgers was too. Just think how differently last season might have been. We may have won back to back SBs... and may have been vying for a 3-peat.


As long as the Packers would be willing to lose whatever player/players Lynch's long-term deal would inevitably cause. The net effect could easily do more harm than good in the long-term. Besides, Lynch's impact wouldn't have been nearly the same behind this offensive line and in this scheme. More importantly than anything else, this team needs a better offensive line and more disciplined coaching. The way things are now, a super star RB would only minimally improve the team, imo.

Zero2Cool  
#43 Posted : Tuesday, January 22, 2013 6:24:51 AM(UTC)
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Remember when we needed a RB and Ted decided not to bring in Marshawn Lynch? How dumb was that? Huge blow to the team from an attitude standpoint.

I know we won the SB with Starks coming in late in the year, but I recall Woodson being pretty disappointed. I am sure Rodgers was too. Just think how differently last season might have been. We may have won back to back SBs... and may have been vying for a 3-peat.


The Packers and Seahawks offered the same round pick, however, the Bills felt the Seahawks pick would be higher (the Packers were going to finish with a better record) so they took the Seahawks pick. Did they offer the Packers a chance to trump the 4th round with a 3rd? I can't remember, but even though I liked Lynch, I didn't think he was worth a 3rd.

The Bills got a 2011 fourth-round pick and a 2012 conditional pick. That means to trump the Bills, the Packers would have had to give up their 3rd round pick, Alex Green. Then you got the 2012 conditional pick, which I believe turned out to be a 5th round selection. I'm not going to go through all of those steps, because you should have the point by now, lol.


The Packers do not need an elite running back (Paul would be proud) to win games. They need a back who is pass protection sure, is average or above at receiving and can average 4 yards a carry without ever fumbling the ball. Does this sound like someone on the roster already? DuJuan Harris and he didn't cost the Packers a draft pick.


btw, that year you're talking about the Packers needing a running back ... who won the Super Bowl that year?
Rios39  
#44 Posted : Tuesday, January 22, 2013 11:20:34 AM(UTC)
Towards the end of our year the running game was fine. It was used less against the 49ers and Vikings in the metrodome cause our D could t make stops and we were in chase mode. We could have stuck with the running game more vs the 49ers. But when we had the lead or a close game we were running the ball just fine.
PackFanWithTwins  
#45 Posted : Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:51:05 PM(UTC)
Rios39 said: Go to Quoted Post
Towards the end of our year the running game was fine. It was used less against the 49ers and Vikings in the metrodome cause our D could t make stops and we were in chase mode. We could have stuck with the running game more vs the 49ers. But when we had the lead or a close game we were running the ball just fine.


This is a McCarthy issue. We didn't run in these games not because we were in chase mode. We were never in a position where we had to throw until the very end. McCarthy just brain farts and quits running the ball.

SF, we came out of the 1/2 down by 3. had two series, both with 2 runs each and ended up with a tie after Crosby FG. SF came back and scored and we went into the McCarthy Zone. Not a single run after that, and all but two of the offensive snaps from the shotgun.
doddpower  
#46 Posted : Tuesday, January 22, 2013 2:26:19 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
This is a McCarthy issue. We didn't run in these games not because we were in chase mode. We were never in a position where we had to throw until the very end. McCarthy just brain farts and quits running the ball.

SF, we came out of the 1/2 down by 3. had two series, both with 2 runs each and ended up with a tie after Crosby FG. SF came back and scored and we went into the McCarthy Zone. Not a single run after that, and all but two of the offensive snaps from the shotgun.


Not only that, but the Packers hardly even had a RB on the freakin' field for the entire second half! Yes, I know Cobb was in the backfield sometimes and got a few carries, but I'm sure they 49'er's were willing to concede the limited production he offered. So not only did they not even try to run the ball despite decent success in the 1st quarter, McCarthy essentially removed any remote THREAT of a running game for an entire half. Incredible, and very bad coaching, imo.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
uffda udfa (3h) : Some levity (1 NSFW word) https://twitter.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/922208193819955200
Zero2Cool (7h) : @PGPackersNews Nelson, Adams and Cobb combined for five receptions. That's a formula for losing.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Do you see them not getting separation?
Cheesey (10h) : I'd like to see our WRs get some separation.
Zero2Cool (11h) : McCarthy protecting Hundley: "Our passing game, we can sit here and pick it apart all we want, but let's just blame it on head coach today."
Zero2Cool (11h) : Brett Hundley: "All I can say is don't write us off."
Zero2Cool (12h) : yinzer is als o 8 - 1 ...nice start dudes
Zero2Cool (12h) : dhazer is 8 - 1 this week so far in pick'em ...dayum
Zero2Cool (14h) : @Michael_Cohen13 Kevin King has been standing on the sideline for a few plays now. #Packers have been rolling with House and Hawkins. Not su
Zero2Cool (15h) : Justin McCray will start at LG today. What a ride for him the last two years. Arena Football League, free agent/unemployed, #Packers starter
yooperfan (15h) : Here we go gang!!!!
Zero2Cool (15h) : WR willie snead OUT
musccy (15h) : no worries...appreciate the pointers to find it.
Zero2Cool (16h) : i couldn't find another alternative so ... no more feed here
Zero2Cool (16h) : ya justin.tv flipped their vision on streaming
musccy (16h) : just did, thanks zero. Used to use Justin...not sure they work anymore
Zero2Cool (16h) : sure is gusty winds here i can hear the wind blowing an rain falling
Zero2Cool (16h) : check the top thread in packers forum section
musccy (16h) : Thanks zero!
Zero2Cool (16h) : http://goatdee.net/ <-- usually has good links
Zero2Cool (16h) : muscy, nerdmann usually has al ink in chat
Zero2Cool (16h) : and the tarp is back on the field
musccy (16h) : dumb question...ways to watch game online? Don't want to wait for game pass tonight
uffda udfa (17h) : Bakh and Bulaga active. Linsley, too. Lane Taylor, Out.
buckeyepackfan (17h) : Looks pretty clear after that
buckeyepackfan (17h) : Radar showing another band of showers probably within the hour.
Zero2Cool (17h) : and now its not raining at all
Zero2Cool (18h) : Right now it's just rain. Not light, not pouring.
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Light showers? Or heavy downpour?
Zero2Cool (18h) : It's raining in Green Bay.
uffda udfa (21h) : @RapSheet just said on NFL Morning the org does NOT expect 12 to return due to significant break.
uffda udfa (21h) : Schefter reporting doctors believe 12 can resume throwing in 6 weeks.
uffda udfa (22h) : Since 2008, Packers 3-7-1 without Aaron Rodgers
buckeyepackfan (22h) : The Brett Hundley era starts today! May it be a short successful run!
buckeyepackfan (22h) : GAMEDAY!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / GoPack1984

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

22-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

21-Oct / Around The NFL / Dulak

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

21-Oct / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

Headlines