Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
play2win  
#21 Posted : Friday, March 15, 2013 2:03:35 PM(UTC)
One of my weaknesses is numbers, especially the cap related kind of stuff. I may have misspoke in this, and my apologies, as I was thinking of front loaded deals.

All I know is stopping for a moment in all the FA hype, and looking at Flacco's numbers, looking at Mario Williams' numbers of a year ago, and gauging what Ted is up against in getting all 3 of our guys signed is a very large task. As a fan, I'm changing my perspective with regards to our FA approach after considering this, and those insane Flacco/Williams #s.

Witnessing BAL's purge in order to re-sign Flacco looks very similar to what we are experiencing ourselves right now. Maybe our plan this season is just to line up who we have and see what happens.
Zero2Cool  
#22 Posted : Wednesday, January 8, 2014 6:36:07 AM(UTC)
Yesterday Aaron Rodgers said the window has closed and now it's time to open a new window that will be open for the next four or five years. With that being said, I thought maybe the Packers will be active in free agency?
DarkaneRules  
#23 Posted : Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:29:19 AM(UTC)
As long as we have Aaron Rodgers, the window doesn't close.
musccy  
#24 Posted : Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:38:36 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Yesterday Aaron Rodgers said the window has closed and now it's time to open a new window that will be open for the next four or five years. With that being said, I thought maybe the Packers will be active in free agency?


I listened to Jason Wilde's program as well and I think he was referring to the transition on the DLine most notably, but also Kuhn and Jones.

Zero2Cool  
#25 Posted : Wednesday, January 8, 2014 7:59:58 AM(UTC)
musccy said: Go to Quoted Post
I listened to Jason Wilde's program as well and I think he was referring to the transition on the DLine most notably, but also Kuhn and Jones.



Aaron Rodgers said:
I think this is the end of a window and the beginning of a new one. This is the year when we can really open up a new window that can last for four or five years. It looks really bright. I think if you look at the core of our team, our offensive line is looking the way we want it, the receivers look incredible. We have a big-time back in Eddie (Lacy). Not sure what James Starks will do, (DuJuan Harris) is coming back.

We have a lot of things that are setting up to be really good for a long time. A lot of really good young players with Sam (Shields), Micah Hyde, Casey (Hayward), when Casey comes back (from a hamstring injury) and Morgan Burnett and Sean Richardson, and veteran guys playing well, A.J. (Hawk) had his best season, Clay (Matthews), (Ryan) Pickett, (B.J.) Raji, Johnny Jolly coming back.

This window has a chance to open up and be really bright for four or five years if you can get guys signed and keep them around. My contract is for six more years. I expect to be playing at a high level for all six of those years. We’ll see what happens after that. Maybe I’ll be able to go another three or four after that.
musccy  
#26 Posted : Wednesday, January 8, 2014 8:11:47 AM(UTC)
In AR's interview, he basically acknowledged that they may not be able to keep a few guys, most notably Kuhn and Jolly who he had/has become very close with.

He obviously said he sees Pickett, Raji, Hawk, etc. sticking around, but that's just PC lip service.

MintBaconDrivel  
#27 Posted : Wednesday, January 8, 2014 10:22:21 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:20:43 PM(UTC)
Aaron Rodgers has played seven seasons (minus the three on the bench) and is just 31 years old. 103 regular + 11 post season games as starter.

Tom Brady has played 13 seasons (minus two -- bench & IR) and is 37 years old. 207 regular + 28 post season games as starter.

If Tom Brady can still sling it that well after 14 seasons, I'm confident we have at least five good to great years of Aaron yet.
buckeyepackfan  
#29 Posted : Wednesday, January 21, 2015 1:48:19 AM(UTC)
I disagree that the window is closing.

Even now.

The Packers will continue to develop their young players, they will keep their core veterans, and they will be in the hunt for The SB every year until Aaron Rodgers decides to hang up the cleats.

Hopefully by then his replacement has been with the team and is ready to tame over.
RaiderPride  
#30 Posted : Wednesday, January 21, 2015 3:12:17 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
Aaron Rodgers has played seven seasons (minus the three on the bench) and is just 31 years old. 103 regular + 11 post season games as starter.

Tom Brady has played 13 seasons (minus two -- bench & IR) and is 37 years old. 207 regular + 28 post season games as starter.

If Tom Brady can still sling it that well after 14 seasons, I'm confident we have at least five good to great years of Aaron yet.


Well stated Kevin. (Two Thumbs Up.)

There is no window at this point, and if there was a window it sure as hell is not closing.

The fact is, it is not a window at all. It is a big ass sliding glass door, and it is wide open.

Packers win it all next year.
PackFanWithTwins  
#31 Posted : Wednesday, January 21, 2015 7:02:01 AM(UTC)
The idea of this thread was not about Rodgers age or ability. It is about how much better or worse the team around him will be because of the contracts that He and Matthews and at the time, Raji was expected to get in the near future. Right now we are looking, can the team afford to keep Cobb, Bulaga, Williams and the other FA on the team. If we had more money, that wouldn't be an issue and we could keep more better players.

The task of putting the most talented team around Rodgers was easier before Rodgers and Matthews got paid.
68md  
#32 Posted : Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:02:44 PM(UTC)
Interesting thread. Here is a stat making the 'window' look a little smaller still. NFCC Championship losers the following year. It is super tough to lose the game and come back which adds a year to Rodgers and even Matthews and Nelson. The window is small indeed.




2004 Falcons (2005 out of playoffs);
2005 Panthers (2006 out of playoffs);
2006 Saints (2007 out of playoffs);
2007 Packers (2008 out of playoffs);
2008 Eagles (2009 lost wildcard round);
2009 Vikings (2010 out of playoffs);
2010 Bears (2011 out of playoffs);
2011 49ers (2012 made Super Bowl);
2012 Falcons (2013 out of playoffs);
2013 49ers (2014 out of playoffs);
2014 Packers (2015??).
hardrocker950  
#33 Posted : Thursday, January 22, 2015 6:17:35 PM(UTC)
wideside said: Go to Quoted Post
Interesting thread. Here is a stat making the 'window' look a little smaller still. NFCC Championship losers the following year. It is super tough to lose the game and come back which adds a year to Rodgers and even Matthews and Nelson. The window is small indeed.




2004 Falcons (2005 out of playoffs);
2005 Panthers (2006 out of playoffs);
2006 Saints (2007 out of playoffs);
2007 Packers (2008 out of playoffs);
2008 Eagles (2009 lost wildcard round);
2009 Vikings (2010 out of playoffs);
2010 Bears (2011 out of playoffs);
2011 49ers (2012 made Super Bowl);
2012 Falcons (2013 out of playoffs);
2013 49ers (2014 out of playoffs);
2014 Packers (2015??).


That is interesting, but I don't think that necessarily means they will miss the playoffs next season. I am more concerned with the effect that paying Cobb amd Bulaga (assuming they return) will have on the cap status. Due to large contracts, it makes it hard to have a complete team - Seattle will likely fall victim to this soon as well.

The deck is stacked against high caliber teams to keep things competitive, which unfortunately makes it tougher for teams like GB to stay top tier.
Pack93z  
#34 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2015 6:11:16 AM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Much like Flacco's deal.. or Brady's.. Rodgers deal will be structured so that it allows the cap hit yearly to be manageable and something that will be reworked in the future.

That is not minimizing the impacts those contracts will have on our future, but it will be more in the terms of exchanging a Woodson and Pickett for a Matthews and Raji in terms of consumed cap hit. Additionally, Ted has married this team to his more or less building through the draft approach.. so for that window to be pushed even more open again.. he has to hit again this draft for fill in pieces and Mike McCarthy and co need to continue to develop from the past two draft classes.

Looking around the league, almost every contender past the Niners at the moment are having their windows adjusted more than ours. Maybe the Pats.

The nature of a flat cap and many teams pushing out cap hits over the past couple years. The Packers haven't done much of that.. and I don't expect much of it moving forward other than Rodgers.

The Packers have known these three players were coming up.. and entrust they have a plan to manage it and remain very much in the discussion for the Lombardi yearly.


Still remains valid... we pick our spots of depth and contract weight, and recycle. Jones and Hawk will be adjusted/shed in place of Cobb, Bulaga, etc.

Ted continuously puts a team on the field that has enough pieces and depth to be competitive every season, much like this one. It is up to the players and coaching staff to capitalize on that.

We belonged on that field with the Seahawks, and had every opportunity to close the deal. The window remains kicked open.
PackFanWithTwins  
#35 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2015 1:41:41 PM(UTC)
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Ted continuously puts a team on the field that has enough pieces and depth to be competitive every season,


I agree with this, Ted's strategy has kept this team competitive. But is that good enough?

We ended 2014 with between 7-8 million in cap space which we will be moving forward. Could we have used that money in 2014 to improve a position or two enough to had been the difference. It is to late to really know but looking forward.

With that cap spaced moved forward, based on the projected cap we will have 23 million. If we cut ties with Jones and Hawk, that will kick up to about 30 million. Assume we sign Cobb, Bulaga and Tramon, that will likely eat about 12-13 of that space for 2015. That will leave us in the neighborhood of 15-17 million.

Our hopes for SuperBowl 50 will be tied to improvement of Adams, Barrington and R.Rodgers along with hopefully that ILB we have been looking for happening to be there when we pick. Is being competitive and hoping things fall right for us what we want to settle for.

Or

Would it be better to take that available cap and fill our places of need with some veteran FA. What if the best players remaining when we pick are not ILB. Do we reach and grab a lower ILB to try in plug the whole, passing up on better talent because we have a need to fill.

If we had spent that money this year on an upgrade at ILB or kept James Jones, either is probably enough to have us in the SB. We have the money to be able to go for more than just competitive without risking the long term future of the team.

DoddPower  
#36 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2015 3:32:39 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
If we had spent that money this year on an upgrade at ILB or kept James Jones, either is probably enough to have us in the SB. We have the money to be able to go for more than just competitive without risking the long term future of the team.



The Packers didn't need James Jones or another ILB to get to the Super Bowl. They had the talent to beat the Seahawks, they just imploded and failed to do so. Of course a few better players would help. It always would, but they absolutely should have executed with the unit on the field.

Porforis  
#37 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2015 3:42:15 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
The Packers didn't need James Jones or another ILB to get to the Super Bowl. They had the talent to beat the Seahawks, they just imploded and failed to do so. Of course a few better players would help. It always would, but they absolutely should have executed with the unit on the field.


In fact I think the only position at which the Packers clearly would have been better with someone, anyone but who we have at is TE, primarily this game. But pretty much everyone but Crosby contributed to this loss in a meaningful way. Talking about a 7-8M player making the difference is a huge what-if game.
PackFanWithTwins  
#38 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2015 3:48:25 PM(UTC)
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
The Packers didn't need James Jones or another ILB to get to the Super Bowl. They had the talent to beat the Seahawks, they just imploded and failed to do so. Of course a few better players would help. It always would, but they absolutely should have executed with the unit on the field.



Since they didn't get to the SB it is hard to say they didn't need additional talent.

Speculation, but having Jones as #3 rather than Adams would have improved the offense which might have allowed us to score more resulting in a bigger score gap. Having Jones could have resulted in a better record changing the game from being in Seattle to GB. Same on the defensive side. Better ILB play would have stopped Seattle from scoring some, or giving us a better record.

With the amount of talent the team already has, I would rather spending a little more to try and improve our odds before we start losing some of these guys. We only have so long for Peppers. Neal and Perry, Daniels will all be coming up on contracts after this next season. With where this team is at, unless we get lucky we are not going to improve more just drafting and develop. With 22 starting positions, we are drafting to keep restocking. It will take something else to push the team a step further.
DoddPower  
#39 Posted : Friday, January 23, 2015 7:38:41 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Since they didn't get to the SB it is hard to say they didn't need additional talent.

Speculation, but having Jones as #3 rather than Adams would have improved the offense which might have allowed us to score more resulting in a bigger score gap. Having Jones could have resulted in a better record changing the game from being in Seattle to GB. Same on the defensive side. Better ILB play would have stopped Seattle from scoring some, or giving us a better record.

With the amount of talent the team already has, I would rather spending a little more to try and improve our odds before we start losing some of these guys. We only have so long for Peppers. Neal and Perry, Daniels will all be coming up on contracts after this next season. With where this team is at, unless we get lucky we are not going to improve more just drafting and develop. With 22 starting positions, we are drafting to keep restocking. It will take something else to push the team a step further.


I'm not arguing that better talent wouldn't have helped. Of course it would. It always would. My point was that Green Bay had plenty of talent to win the NFC Championship game. But they didn't. I think they should have. Oh well.
gbguy20  
#40 Posted : Sunday, January 25, 2015 4:08:15 AM(UTC)
I don't think the talent of the team had anything to do with our loss.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
uffda udfa (13h) : Packers re-sign Christine Michael
Smokey (14h) : Easier said than fixed .
Nonstopdrivel (15h) : The web version lists who started the thread; the mobile version lists who last updated it.
Nonstopdrivel (15h) : Also, there's a weird disparity between the web version and online version of this site.
Nonstopdrivel (15h) : ;-)
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : Packers wanted D. Ware in 2005. Thank you Cowboys!
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : lol Rourke
Nonstopdrivel (21-Mar) : I HATE HATE HATE the way all threads get marked as read after viewing a few of them in one session. It's obnoxious.
Smokey (21-Mar) : Check out this site, NFLdraftscout.com , a great resource site.
Smokey (20-Mar) : Jared Cook signs with Raiders .
Smokey (20-Mar) : I did watch SB 45 on YouTube the other night, very eye opening .
Smokey (20-Mar) : Watching Spring Training Baseball, Nationals vs Yankees, very interesting .
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : B1G making some noise in that bracket
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : The more join, the more talk, the better. including John
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : no forum should need one person, we have others, speak up!
gbguy20 (19-Mar) : slow forum needs more uffda
Smokey (19-Mar) : There's always next year .
Smokey (18-Mar) : Virginia is still in it !
Smokey (18-Mar) : On Wisconsin
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Down goes Villanova!! Badgers!!!
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Might have went into your SPAM or JUNK folder??
yooperfan (18-Mar) : Funny I never got the invite
wpr (17-Mar) : Ignoring the Signing Bonus, Jones' base is only $725K above the vet min
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Not many seem interested, but I did invite those from last year.
dhazer (16-Mar) : no bracket challenge Kevin?
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Blame twitter on the /home page here lol
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Datone Jones Vikings deal $3.75M, $1.6M signing bonus, $1.5M salary, $31,250 per game active, $150K workout bonus, $1.25M sacks-pt incentive
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Nope. I don't care to read up on Vikings players. :-)
Bnoble (15-Mar) : Anyone see any numbers on Jones deal?
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Datone to Minnesota.
musccy (14-Mar) : A more $ than I'd prefer, but still glad Elliott is back
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Jayrone back on a one year 1.6 deal.
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Martellus Bennett Contract Details: New Packers TE has just $3.85M cap hit in 2017
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Packers have $28 under cap yet
hardrocker950 (13-Mar) : Walden would be a nice pickup...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
52m / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

8h / Announcements / Smokey

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

12h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

17-Mar / Around The NFL / Smokey

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines