You are not logged in. Join Free! | Log In Thank you!    

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Monday, March 11, 2013 6:12:00 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 1,230
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 70

PackersNews wrote:
To save salary cap space, the Packers are taking a calculated risk by offering center Evan Dietrich-Smith the lowest restricted free agent tender.
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Online wpr  
#2 Posted : Monday, March 11, 2013 9:06:16 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

United States
Posts: 11,866
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,405
Applause Received: 1,192

a little bit of a surprise. I thought they would go for the middle tender.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Online DakotaT  
#3 Posted : Monday, March 11, 2013 9:10:30 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,970
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 568
Applause Received: 1,190

Originally Posted by: wpr Go to Quoted Post
a little bit of a surprise. I thought they would go for the middle tender.


A classic example of Packer fans overvaluing our players. Just because EDS was an upgrade over Saturday isn't indicative of the talent of EDS - it is indicative of how shitty Saturday had become. We could draft a second round center in this draft and make a major upgrade over EDS. I think Van Roten just may be our center next year.
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 3/11/2013(UTC)
Online wpr  
#4 Posted : Monday, March 11, 2013 9:15:24 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

United States
Posts: 11,866
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,405
Applause Received: 1,192

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
A classic example of Packer fans overvaluing our players. Just because EDS was an upgrade over Saturday isn't indicative of the talent of EDS - it is indicative of how shitty Saturday had become. We could draft a second round center in this draft and make a major upgrade over EDS. I think Van Roten just may be our center next year.


C is one of the top requests on my list. 2nd or 3rd round is just fine.
I figure they would go a little higher on their tender to hedge against coming away it no C once again.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Offline Rockmolder  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:17:04 AM(UTC)
Rockmolder

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Netherlands
Posts: 6,343
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 143
Applause Received: 215

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
A classic example of Packer fans overvaluing our players. Just because EDS was an upgrade over Saturday isn't indicative of the talent of EDS - it is indicative of how shitty Saturday had become. We could draft a second round center in this draft and make a major upgrade over EDS. I think Van Roten just may be our center next year.


This is true, but you have to take in account that EDS was an UDFA... Meaning that they wouldn't have to give up a draft pick to sign him.

As average as EDS has proven to be, he's better than a lot of back-ups at C/G that are earning the same kind of money. I'd give him a look, at least.

That said, he obviously wasn't worth the 2nd round tender, either. Like the article says, they're taking a calculated risk. Let's just hope that we won't regret it later on.

Shields for a 2nd... With a guy like Alex Smith being worth more than a 2nd, a guy like Percy Harvin going for a 1st + 7th + Mid-round next year... I wouldn't rule it out completely that someone would make an offer to him.

I know there's quite a big chance that he won't get an offer, especially since you can get a pretty decent CB on the FA market for whom you wouldn't have to give up a high draft pick, but they won't come as cheap as Shield. Or as good at just age 25.
UserPostedImage
Offline Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:29:55 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

United States
Posts: 25,223
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,740
Applause Received: 1,790

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder Go to Quoted Post
Shields for a 2nd... With a guy like Alex Smith being worth more than a 2nd, a guy like Percy Harvin going for a 1st + 7th + Mid-round next year... I wouldn't rule it out completely that someone would make an offer to him.


It wouldn't be the first time the Packers let another team write up a contract, matched it and kept the player, lol. Why use your negotiation time when you can waste another teams? :)

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
thanks Post received 1 applause.
play2win on 3/12/2013(UTC)
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:35:12 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 1,230
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 70

ProFootballTalk wrote:
Packers defensive back Sam Shields can be had for a second-round draft pick. The Packers have placed the second-round tender on Shields, a restricted free agent, a league source tells PFT. TThat means any team that wants Shields can sign him to an offer sheet, and if the Packers don’t match it, that team would get Shields and the Packers would get that team’s second-round draft pick.
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Offline Rockmolder  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, March 12, 2013 5:43:31 AM(UTC)
Rockmolder

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Netherlands
Posts: 6,343
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 143
Applause Received: 215

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
It wouldn't be the first time the Packers let another team write up a contract, matched it and kept the player, lol. Why use your negotiation time when you can waste another teams? :)


Because a team with some cap space could front-load a Shields contract pretty heavily... Which is not something we could use right now.
UserPostedImage
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:54:25 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 1,230
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 70

JSOnline wrote:
The Packers made it more difficult for restricted free agent CB Sam Shields to find his pot of gold after slapping the second-round tender on him, according to multiple reports.
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.0 | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.249 seconds.