Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
JustinAVA182  
#41 Posted : Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:34:38 PM(UTC)
What a tease this has been!Confused
SINCITYCHEEZE  
#42 Posted : Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:49:09 PM(UTC)
If signing Jackson can get us out of passing deep on 3rd and 1,I say GO FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DakotaT  
#43 Posted : Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:07:15 PM(UTC)
SINCITYCHEEZE said: Go to Quoted Post
If signing Jackson can get us out of passing deep on 3rd and 1,I say GO FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I have to watch Packer games alone because of shit like that. Makes me want to strangle somebody.
blueleopard  
#44 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 12:05:27 AM(UTC)
If this actually happens, I wouldn't be surprised if it was Ted delivering a message to Mike.

"Don't tell me I never provided you with anybody, Mike. Now run the goddamn ball."
Zero2Cool  
#45 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 5:48:37 AM(UTC)
Steven Jackson one year had 90 receptions. That's impressive for WR and he's a RB. Damn.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#46 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 12:14:54 PM(UTC)
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
Push? Puleeze. I'll settle for some small improvement over the "crack" we try to give our RB. I have forsaken the concept of a "hole", as under this administration. the linemen are not required to do...

what?


anything in the run game? These guys have not been earning their pay or position, and their coach should be gassed, but I digress...


Amazing what happens when we - accidentally, by my best analysis- create a hole---

We seem to have AWESOME running backs when they are not running into the back of our offensive linemen!

THIS is what I'm worried about regarding Jackson, not his ability. I'm worried we already have the ability in that position, just unheralded due to o-line and scheme suckiness (it's an industry term)

...But I liked how Ahman Green ran under this shit-box system, he found sunshine often when clouded in complete shit, so I'm optimistic if Jackson signs. He SEEMS like a guy that could find a hole where we have none.

Face it. We are a "soft" team. Yes. The GD Green Bay Packers-my boys- my Lombardi boys- are S O F T. aka PUSSIES! (or should be known as such) We have NO CONTROL over the trenches against anyone worth talking about. HOW EMBARRASSING! Your Ted Thompson (and I like Ted, mostly) has a plan, we win many games, but they are SOFT SOFT SOFT. GET 'EM ON THE LINE, physically and mentally (our opponent) Cold-weather Green Bay Packers. Pisses me off. Doesn't he even know where he LIVES? He built a friggin' astrograss plastograss whatever girly-man flim-flam D O M E team!

Those homos in SF have a physical - team we must aspire to, (not that there is anything wrong with that) and our President is B. Obama. The world is definitely so upside-down, lol


HEY TED! GET THE BEST FUCKING LINE IN THE NFL AND BE DONE WITH IT, DO THAT, hang onto Rodgers, and we can get UDFA's for the skill positions. DO THE SAME THING for the pass rush folk. Christ, I should run this team, lol


All true, but if Jackson could be gotten for $2-3 million a season, I'd still get him. Face it, even if a major effort was made, we couldn't get that "best O Line" overnight. It galls me to see the wimpiness in our D Line and LBs too (other than Matthews), but face it, other than Nitschke, Lombardi's boys were kinda finessey too - Henry Jordan, Willie Davis, Dave Robinson, Fred Carr - excellent as they were, were not exactly bully boys.

gbguy20  
#47 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 12:49:19 PM(UTC)
whats the hold up
nerdmann  
#48 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 12:52:03 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
All true, but if Jackson could be gotten for $2-3 million a season, I'd still get him. Face it, even if a major effort was made, we couldn't get that "best O Line" overnight. It galls me to see the wimpiness in our D Line and LBs too (other than Matthews), but face it, other than Nitschke, Lombardi's boys were kinda finessey too - Henry Jordan, Willie Davis, Dave Robinson, Fred Carr - excellent as they were, were not exactly bully boys.



We're not that far from an elite OL. Bulaga's coming back. We got Sherrod/Newhouse/Datko at LT.

Really what we need is a C.

Then we can talk about the position coach at the zBS.

But it could happen faster than you think. Remember how shitty our ST used to be?
wpr  
#49 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:00:37 PM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
lets make this happen damnit




it's not that difficult guys.

sit down
dump your load
do the paperwork
get off and move on.
JustinAVA182  
#50 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:20:06 PM(UTC)
Falcons agreed to terms with RB Steven Jackson, formerly of the Rams
Quote:
The Falcons get their man, replacing a diminished Michael Turner with the top back on the market. Although he's going on 30 and is parked at 2,802 career touches, S-Jax had plenty left in the tank in 2012, and is a perfect fit for the Falcons offense. Turner made it nearly impossible for Atlanta to move the chains on the ground last season, fouling up an otherwise elite offense. Jackson should be good for more than four yards per pop, and is an asset in the passing game. He should get infinite more chances to finish around the goal-line than he did his final few seasons in St. Louis, making him a strong RB2 for the 2013 fantasy season.
http://www.rotoworld.com.../nfl/1663/steven-jackson
Zero2Cool  
#51 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:25:00 PM(UTC)
"WesHod Per @AdamSchefter, the Atlanta Falcons have won the Steven Jackson sweepstakes over the #Packers"
nerdmann  
#52 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:29:04 PM(UTC)
Not a shocker.
Packers_Finland  
#53 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:34:21 PM(UTC)
AAAHHH! So much fail. I wanted this guy so bad.
shield4life  
#54 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:45:44 PM(UTC)
Why am I not surprised, we should of locked him up yesterday night. The longer this was going to more I was leaning into him signing with a different team. Really sad tho because he could of gave this offense a much needed boost in the running game.
Zero2Cool  
#55 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:45:52 PM(UTC)
I'm interested to see what he signed for.
shield4life  
#56 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:48:22 PM(UTC)
Probably a 3/4 year around 5-6 where the packers probably didn't offer more then 4.
Yerko  
#57 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:11:10 PM(UTC)
shield4life said: Go to Quoted Post
Probably a 3/4 year around 5-6 where the packers probably didn't offer more then 4.


And if that is the case, the Packers are smart for it. Reggie Bush isn't even getting $4 million a year and I'd rather him in the backfield than Jackson simply due to age and mileage.

Your loss Mr. Jackson.
shield4life  
#58 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:23:39 PM(UTC)
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
And if that is the case, the Packers are smart for it. Reggie Bush isn't even getting $4 million a year and I'd rather him in the backfield than Jackson simply due to age and mileage.

Your loss Mr. Jackson.


It's a hundred percent loss for Mr. Jackson. He will never win a SB with the falcons.
Packers_Finland  
#59 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:55:34 PM(UTC)
shield4life said: Go to Quoted Post
It's a hundred percent loss for Mr. Jackson. He will never win a SB with the falcons.


Well the Falcons did go further than us in the playoffs last year, so I can see how he made that mistake.

The Falcons are a great team. If he got more salary, he made a great move.
porky88  
#60 Posted : Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:06:30 PM(UTC)
It was always Packers or Falcons. I'm guessing Tony Gonzalez returning to Atlanta played a role in his decision. Their offense looks outstanding on paper with Matt Ryan, Steven Jackson, Jacquizz Rodgers, Tony Gonzalez, Roddy White, and Julio Jones.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Smokey (9m) : A little yellow for contrast maybe ?
Zero2Cool (6h) : Thanks. Took about 16-20 hours.
wpr (9h) : looks great.
Zero2Cool (15h) : avatars aren't displaying
Zero2Cool (16h) : plain look
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

11h / Announcements / dhazer

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Community Welcome! / wpr

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Feb / Around The NFL / uffda udfa

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

Headlines