Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 9:20:37 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: Administration
United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 102
JSOnline said:
Green Bay --- No change of allegiance will ever top what happened in 2009. When Brett Favre played for the Minnesota Vikings, well, it felt personal to fans. That's not a flyover you hear. It's the sound of 70,000-plus feeling betrayed.
Sponsor
Offline rabidgopher04  
#2 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 9:30:52 AM(UTC)
rabidgopher04

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 122
Applause Received: 141
Jennings didn't go to the Vikings to spite the Packers like Favre. I don't think Jennings will get nor deserves any negative reaction.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Glorydays on 3/19/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 9:55:56 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,168
Applause Received: 783
rabidgopher04 said: Go to Quoted Post
Jennings didn't go to the Vikings to spite the Packers like Favre. I don't think Jennings will get nor deserves any negative reaction.


He's probably not going to be faxing our playbook to our opponent every week or attempting to divide the loyalty of the fan base.
Offline PackerTraxx  
#4 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 10:02:29 AM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 23
Applause Received: 130
rabidgopher04 said: Go to Quoted Post
Jennings didn't go to the Vikings to spite the Packers like Favre. I don't think Jennings will get nor deserves any negative reaction.


So who should have Favre went to that would have been a better situation? I don't see where Jennings situation is that much different except for reasons. Favre's was for a shot at the SB and Jennings was most likely money. Both good reasons.
Offline nerdmann  
#5 Posted : Monday, March 18, 2013 3:36:18 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,168
Applause Received: 783
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
So who should have Favre went to that would have been a better situation? I don't see where Jennings situation is that much different except for reasons. Favre's was for a shot at the SB and Jennings was most likely money. Both good reasons.


Brent was a scorned little girl.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey


Tweeter