Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 6:57:06 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: Administration
United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 105
ProFootballTalk said:
The Packers and Aaron Rodgers are a couple million dollars a year apart as they continue discussing a new contract that would keep him in Green Bay into his mid-30s. Ian Rapoport of NFL Network reports that the two sides are roughly $2 million a year apart. That might sound like a lot, but when

Ian Rapoport of NFL Network reports that the two sides are roughly $2 million a year apart. That might sound like a lot, but when we’re talking about adding another four years and somewhere around $100 million in new money to Rodgers’ deal, a $2 million a year difference is something that the sides can work through.

The Packers would need to go a little beyond $100 million in new money over four additional years if they’re going to pay Rodgers more over the next six seasons than the $120 million deal Joe Flacco signed. Rapoport reports that the Packers are currently offering more than $21 million a year, and that Rodgers will end up with a better deal than Flacco got.

Flacco, of course, got his great deal in large part because he bet on himself, turned the Ravens down last year and proved himself worthy of more money by winning the Super Bowl MVP award. If the Packers don’t add another $2 million a year to their offer, Rodgers may try to do the same.
Sponsor
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#2 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 10:51:08 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 542
Applause Received: 377
I'll be very disappointed if the duration is that short. I want to see a "to the end of his career" contract similar to what Favre got - 10 years or so. That same $25 million a year is about right, but it would be a cap killer if the duration is just 4 years, even in the form of an extension. Make it ten years and we have the peace of mind to not need to go through the process again while he is in his prime, and with a ten year deal, the cap hit can be very manageable for the first few years. I'm sure Thompson and Ball know all that, but the media types reporting about it, maybe not so much.
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 10:54:35 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,246
Applause Received: 806
Incentives based on number of first downs and TIME OF POSSESSION.
Offline Laser Gunns  
#4 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 12:02:12 PM(UTC)
Laser Gunns

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 45
Applause Received: 297
Bye bye cap room.

Nice knowin' ya.
Offline yooperfan  
#5 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 2:14:37 PM(UTC)
yooperfan

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 874
Applause Received: 406
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Incentives based on number of first downs and TIME OF POSSESSION.


I like that time of possession thing.
Forty two second drives don't thrill me even if it's for a TD.
That just puts a tired defense back on the field without much rest.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 4/1/2013(UTC)
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#6 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 2:16:30 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 542
Applause Received: 377
RajiRoar said: Go to Quoted Post
Bye bye cap room.

Nice knowin' ya.


Rodgers could get $250 million or so for 10 years, and the cap hit would be $10 million or less the first year and still manageable for 3-5 years after that. By then, either the cap is a lot higher or he restructures for the good of the team and some incentive to himself or, heaven forbid, he has faded or gotten injured, and gets cut. Cap issues are usually overrated and solveable.

Offline DoddPower  
#7 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 3:43:42 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 2,461
Applause Received: 636
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Rodgers could get $250 million or so for 10 years, and the cap hit would be $10 million or less the first year and still manageable for 3-5 years after that. By then, either the cap is a lot higher or he restructures for the good of the team and some incentive to himself or, heaven forbid, he has faded or gotten injured, and gets cut. Cap issues are usually overrated and solveable.



What COULD happen and what actually WILL happen are completely different things. I get what you're saying, but just because a scenario like that could happen, doesn't mean it's going to, at all. We shall see.
Offline dfosterf  
#8 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 4:00:37 PM(UTC)
dfosterf

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 224
Applause Received: 450
We could trade him.

Can the Green Bay Packers afford to have the highest paid player in the NFL?

I watched "moneyball" for the 4th time last night.

I wonder what we could get for him?

It's gonna be the big number, why wouldn't it?

I cannot help but reflecting upon Dhazer bitchin' about his previous contract.

Many posted that he might sign for a "discount", or a "team friendly" contract...

How quaint! lol

Those were the good times! Our "window", imo----

You might consider forgetting many of the names of players you like on this team if we do this deal, which we will do, imo.

Maybe we should drop a tier at the position...
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#9 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 5:04:38 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 542
Applause Received: 377
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
We could trade him.

Can the Green Bay Packers afford to have the highest paid player in the NFL?

I watched "moneyball" for the 4th time last night.

I wonder what we could get for him?

It's gonna be the big number, why wouldn't it?

I cannot help but reflecting upon Dhazer bitchin' about his previous contract.

Many posted that he might sign for a "discount", or a "team friendly" contract...

How quaint! lol

Those were the good times! Our "window", imo----

You might consider forgetting many of the names of players you like on this team if we do this deal, which we will do, imo.

Maybe we should drop a tier at the position...


I'm with you on a lot of things, Gunny, but not this. No way in hell! It is absolutely unthinkable to trade Rodgers for any price.

Dodd, I think it's a given that Thompson is gonna work out a deal that keeps Rodgers and doesn't ruin the cap situation. In a couple different threads, I posted examples of how that could be done. The key is a large bonus and a very long term - ten years or so. Doing the numbers leads only to that conclusion IMO. "Team friendly" only works when it is good for the player too, you got that right, but what I'm talking about certainly is.
Offline dfosterf  
#10 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 5:11:56 PM(UTC)
dfosterf

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 224
Applause Received: 450
If we traded away Aaron Rodgers, I'd go postal. I'm messin' with old posts, and old posters.

Offline texaspackerbacker  
#11 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 5:18:01 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 542
Applause Received: 377
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
If we traded away Aaron Rodgers, I'd go postal. I'm messin' with old posts, and old posters.



Good - My Faith is restored hahaha.

Offline steveishere  
#12 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 5:40:41 PM(UTC)
steveishere

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 53
Applause Received: 1,157
yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
I like that time of possession thing.
Forty two second drives don't thrill me even if it's for a TD.
That just puts a tired defense back on the field without much rest.



Well GB was 6th in the league in passing first downs despite being 16th in attempts. Sure scoring really quickly can possible be a negative for the defense but that isn't the main problem on GBs defense. The main problem is the defense isn't very good at stopping teams on 3rd downs or preventing 1st downs in general. They tend to tighten up in the red zone but you can't just blame the offense for why the defense cannot get themselves off the field.

GB runs one of the most efficient offenses in the league. They convert 3rd downs well, they don't have to punt that often, they don't turn the ball over. All of these things greatly outweigh the negatives of a quick scoring drive every now and then. If the defense wants to rest they need to get their own asses off the field every once in a while instead of giving up 5-6 minute FG drives.
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#13 Posted : Monday, April 1, 2013 7:09:03 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: Administration
United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 105
JSOnline said:
When - not if - the Packers reach agreement with QB Aaron Rodgers on a record-setting contract extension, they will have some flexibility in managing the impact it has on their salary cap.
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, April 2, 2013 5:41:03 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 542
Applause Received: 377
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post


Good Article - it says virtually the same as what I have been saying all along hahaha. Longer is better. They are saying 6 instead of 4. I say 10 instead of either 6 or 4. It also says the Ravens and Saints are counting on big cap increases in the future - the Flacco and Brees contracts are very similar to the example I wrote up about Rodgers in structure. JSOnline says they are between 23 and 25 million per year. Just make it an average of 24 million and get the job done. We actually could be better off cap-wise if the Rodgers and Matthews deals go throw, as instead of the well known $18 million figure under now, there is actually about $32 million to work with including what those two will count this year based on current contracts. This is NOT the mess some make it out to be.

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
gbguy20 (16h) : i think its fixed now :)
Zero2Cool (5-May) : lol
gbguy20 (4-May) : century link is a bunch of idiots
gbguy20 (4-May) : definitely my end.
gbguy20 (4-May) : *to get my last post to go thru
gbguy20 (4-May) : Is the problem with this site on my end or your end? Everytime I try to post the "Connection resets" it took me 20 minutes to get my lost t
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Nice, thanks!
gbguy20 (4-May) : no i've seen it the right way all along. I just wanted to let you know it looks good.
Zero2Cool (4-May) : thanks btw
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Did you just try it on larger resolution now? Hit CTRL F5, tweaked something earlier lol
gbguy20 (4-May) : the site looks fantastic on a larger resolution. zero, you have done a fantastic job with this site.
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Probably 1024x768 which is fine, I was just curious.
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Oh, so you only see one column, instead of three? You have your screen set to small resolution.
texaspackerbacker (3-May) : too answer your question, long overdue, Z2C, it comes in at the bottom of posts next to "Recent Topics" and just above the 2015 schedule and
Zero2Cool (3-May) : No reason to single someone out like that. And every one is loooooooooose
greengold (3-May) : How to respond to a thread titled "Packers doomed to loose."? It's uffda without spelling or punctuation.
Zero2Cool (3-May) : It's up to coaches to make rookies into something.
beast (3-May) : I think I remember fans giving an F for Rodgers draft as well
Smokey (3-May) : TT's Draft rates F-
beast (2-May) : And the race to sign UDFA is officially on!
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Finally, folks are USING the REPORT feature. THANK YOU. Makes it soo much easier and more efficient.
Smokey (2-May) : Through 3 rounds, GB=F- draft grade
Smokey (2-May) : Z2C, you live in GB, please punch TT in the nose for me. Please !
Smokey (2-May) : AHHHHH !!
Mucky Tundra (1-May) : tbh i'd be more concerning about his weight than him blazing up
Zero2Cool (1-May) : More than just the weed/weight. Off some boards. Problematic to pick.
Zero2Cool (1-May) : andy Gregory's issues: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000488780/article/concern-exists-on-gregory-handling-pro-footballs-mental-rigors
dhazer (1-May) : so what tweener will we draft tonight?
Cheesey (1-May) : Happy B-day Sincity!
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Denzel Perryman falling to Packers at #62 = goodpoop
uffda udfa (1-May) : Dawson's Creek and his 4.9 40 is coming to GB in R2
uffda udfa (1-May) : DL and LB are WEAK but do you want TT trying to fix it?
Smokey (1-May) : Round 2, let us hope for better !
Smokey (30-Apr) : Yes ! The Chat Room is very OPEN !!
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Today's Birthdays: SINCITYCHEEZE (54)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2015 Schedule
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Recent Topics
40m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Gilligan

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules


Tweeter