Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Thursday, September 18, 2008 4:56:42 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,911
Applause Received: 2,117

I doubt this would ever work, but I was sitting here and my mind wondered. Thought I'd share my ADD benefits with ya.


Say the team that wins the Super Bowl is subject to losing any one player to the team with the worst record and in turn would get their overall #1 pick.


So, last year the Giants would have lost a player to the Dolphins. Probably Eli Manning and would have gotten the overall first pick in the draft from the Dolphins in return. The Dolphins would choose the player or elect not to choose a player an use the 1st overall draft pick.


I think that would level the playing field more. Not that its not really level already. But I thought it was interesting, and like I said, really unlikely to ever be considered.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline Pack93z  
#2 Posted : Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:32:13 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 390
Applause Received: 1,057

I guess I don't see the complete parity in that scheme.. yes it would allow the worst team to cherry pick a player off the champs.. but they are champs for a reason.

They probably draft pretty well.. so giving them a number one pick in the draft and the last pick of the 1st round will just let them constantly reload.

It would however allow the struggling team rights to probably a franchise QB and the revenue hike too boot... until their depleted offensive line got said QB killed. :lol:

But I like the outside the box thinking.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET | YAF.NET © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.092 seconds.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
13m / Around The NFL / wpr

16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

25m / Random Babble / Smokey

26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

3h / Random Babble / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / QCHuskerFan

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

9h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

17h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf


Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.