Green Bay Packers Forum
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 11:05:20 AM(UTC)
ProFootballTalk said:
Finesse will not be high on the list of things the Packers are looking for in the draft.

That’s the impression left by Bob McGinn of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, who reports that people close to Packers coach Mike McCarthy and General Manager Ted Thompson say that both men have “freely acknowledged” in the last three months that the team is too soft and small. They are “bound and determined” to get things moving in the other direction, a project that should inform their draft decisions.

Sponsor
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#2 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 11:32:42 AM(UTC)
Sounds good to me. I don't know about small, but lacking toughness for sure.
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 12:09:45 PM(UTC)
Good. I'm sick of this finesse bullshit.
Offline wpr  
#4 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 12:42:31 PM(UTC)
I am glad to hear this. After reading that Mc Carthy was saying the team was tough I was more than a little concerned that he was clueless. I really don't care what he tells the fans as long as he knows what needs to be done and he and Uncle Teddy do it.

jsonline said:
But some people close to Mike McCarthy and Ted Thompson say the Green Bay Packers' football leaders have freely acknowledged that perception in private over the past three months, and now are bound and determined to do something about it.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 4/21/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#5 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 12:57:43 PM(UTC)
With this article, I am curious to see how the Packers attack the draft. If they truly want to get bigger and tougher, they will probably accumulate draft picks. After the last 49ers game, Charles Woodson said the Packers needed to get bigger and faster.
Offline DakotaT  
#6 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 1:28:14 PM(UTC)
On defense, I say halleluiah!!!!!!! On offense, I'm okay with more power run blocking, but keep in mind, we have the best quarterback in the league and one of the brightest offensive minded coaches. Why would we want to go all in on a power running game, when our offense is pretty potent as is?
Offline wpr  
#7 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:04:18 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
On defense, I say halleluiah!!!!!!! On offense, I'm okay with more power run blocking, but keep in mind, we have the best quarterback in the league and one of the brightest offensive minded coaches. Why would we want to go all in on a power running game, when our offense is pretty potent as is?


stat whore. you just want to break Favre's records. [laughing]
Offline Mucky Tundra  
#8 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:15:20 PM(UTC)
For me getting more physical on offense means running the ball more, proving you got more will and determination than the other team. Even if it's just straight up the gut for a 3 yards. Take a for example the playoff game last year when they kicked a FG from the 1 yard line. If that same situation comes again this year I want to see us going for it. On the other hand, if we get down to the goal line and we're lining up shotgun spread like we have the past few years, then I'll know [mm] is just talking out of his ass.

In short: talking tough is one thing, but proving it out on the field is another
Offline rabidgopher04  
#9 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:35:48 PM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra said: Go to Quoted Post
For me getting more physical on offense means running the ball more, proving you got more will and determination than the other team. Even if it's just straight up the gut for a 3 yards. Take a for example the playoff game last year when they kicked a FG from the 1 yard line. If that same situation comes again this year I want to see us going for it. On the other hand, if we get down to the goal line and we're lining up shotgun spread like we have the past few years, then I'll know [mm] is just talking out of his ass.

In short: talking tough is one thing, but proving it out on the field is another


To me it's just winning on the line of scrimmage whether on pass plays or run plays. We need a dominant line that can protect the QB. That's being more physical.
Offline steveishere  
#10 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 3:41:06 PM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra said: Go to Quoted Post
For me getting more physical on offense means running the ball more, proving you got more will and determination than the other team. Even if it's just straight up the gut for a 3 yards. Take a for example the playoff game last year when they kicked a FG from the 1 yard line. If that same situation comes again this year I want to see us going for it. On the other hand, if we get down to the goal line and we're lining up shotgun spread like we have the past few years, then I'll know [mm] is just talking out of his ass.

In short: talking tough is one thing, but proving it out on the field is another


They don't really need to run more they just need to run more effectively. Last year they were about 16th in total offensive drives and 16th in rushing attempts so they had a good balance. Especially when you consider how bad they were at running. I don't care what the perception is it takes some sort of commitment to get that many attempts with the best QB and a very bad rushing attack.

Until they get more effective running the ball it simply makes more sense to lean on Rodgers in critical and short yardage situations instead of the inconsistent and unreliable running game.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 4/21/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#11 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 4:12:37 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
On defense, I say halleluiah!!!!!!! On offense, I'm okay with more power run blocking, but keep in mind, we have the best quarterback in the league and one of the brightest offensive minded coaches. Why would we want to go all in on a power running game, when our offense is pretty potent as is?


To bring the safeties up, so that Aaron can continue to throw deep constantly.
Offline DakotaT  
#12 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 4:25:15 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
stat whore. you just want to break Favre's records. [laughing]


Shame on you

Aren't you the stat whore?
Offline DakotaT  
#13 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 4:27:55 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
To bring the safeties up, so that Aaron can continue to throw deep constantly.


You can accomplish that with the slant passes, screen passes, and quick checkdowns too. The Packers just got a little greedy and arrogant over the last couple years.
Offline Mucky Tundra  
#14 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 5:06:54 PM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
They don't really need to run more they just need to run more effectively. Last year they were about 16th in total offensive drives and 16th in rushing attempts so they had a good balance. Especially when you consider how bad they were at running. I don't care what the perception is it takes some sort of commitment to get that many attempts with the best QB and a very bad rushing attack.

Until they get more effective running the ball it simply makes more sense to lean on Rodgers in critical and short yardage situations instead of the inconsistent and unreliable running game.


They're never gonna get better at running the ball until they decide to stick with it even when it's not working. This team only runs the ball in the 1st quarter and when it's milking the clock in the 4th. When the game is on the line [mm] morphs into Andy Reid 2.0 and the offense becomes one-dimensional and predictable. It requires patience and the will to stick with it over four quarters, not just when it's convenient.
Offline nerdmann  
#15 Posted : Sunday, April 21, 2013 5:25:56 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
You can accomplish that with the slant passes, screen passes, and quick checkdowns too. The Packers just got a little greedy and arrogant over the last couple years.


This would require a QB who is willing to throw slant passes, screens and checkdowns consistently.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
46m / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT


Tweeter