Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Pack93z  
#11 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 11:47:30 AM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin
Applause Given: 437
Applause Received: 1,237
For me.. watching every Badger game each season vs a collection of 5 games of Bama this year, I think Ball has the better overall career in the pros.

Now would Ball fit in with the Packers or Lacy with the Broncos better than where they landed, we shall never know. But based on the talents they bring to the field, I would put Ball ahead of Lacy.

And that is not homerism.. I haven't like many Badger backs as pros.. Dayne included. Just think Balls talents will be more productive at this level and for a longer duration.

I like my crow served cold... thank you very much. That is if Lacy can serve it.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
play2win on 5/2/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#12 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 12:22:01 PM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,503
Applause Received: 4,050
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
For me.. watching every Badger game each season vs a collection of 5 games of Bama this year, I think Ball has the better overall career in the pros.

Now would Ball fit in with the Packers or Lacy with the Broncos better than where they landed, we shall never know. But based on the talents they bring to the field, I would put Ball ahead of Lacy.

And that is not homerism.. I haven't like many Badger backs as pros.. Dayne included. Just think Balls talents will be more productive at this level and for a longer duration.

I like my crow served cold... thank you very much. That is if Lacy can serve it.


I think Eddie Lacy (why do people only use last names?) will be better for the Packers than Montee Ball would have been. I think Ball needs a wider hole than Lacy. I also feel that Lacy is more of a punishing back, which I think will help the Packers offense.

I feel Ball to the Broncos is a better fit than Lacy with the Broncos too.



I just don't think Lacy will live up to the hype. If he can punch it through on * and short, average more than 4 yards a carry, doesn't get the QB killed and doesn't fumble ... I'll put it down as a win for the Packers.
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#13 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:34:17 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
All I have to say is woulda, coulda, shoulda.

He's not on our team, Lacy is. I don't wanna speculate who will be better at the next level. You just don't know till a couple years later. Both have strengths and weaknesses. I think Eddie will bring more to the team, simply because we didn't have that bruiser since Grant was healthy 07-09. And not have to rely on Kuhn to carry the ball every 3rd and short. Monte Ball just isn't that thumper that I like..

Really this RB class was so deep, I don't think we're complaining what we got. At least i'm not. Lets Box!
Offline Dulak  
#14 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:48:59 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)
Applause Given: 299
Applause Received: 153
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post

I just don't think Lacy will live up to the hype. If he can punch it through on * and short, average more than 4 yards a carry, doesn't get the QB killed and doesn't fumble ... I'll put it down as a win for the Packers.



IMO if he doesn't run into his own blockers or repeatedly run into the mass of bodies and repeatedly get 1-2 yards; and then finally gets decent yardage when he doesn't do this (anyone figure out whom Im talking about) ... Ill be happy.

Offline Gaycandybacon  
#15 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:59:04 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
Dulak said: Go to Quoted Post
IMO if he doesn't run into his own blockers or repeatedly run into the mass of bodies and repeatedly get 1-2 yards; and then finally gets decent yardage when he doesn't do this (anyone figure out whom Im talking about) ... Ill be happy.



Alex Green? :-k
Offline dfosterf  
#16 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 2:48:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 228
Applause Received: 478
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I think Eddie Lacy (why do people only use last names?) will be better for the Packers than Montee Ball would have been. I think Ball needs a wider hole than Lacy. I also feel that Lacy is more of a punishing back, which I think will help the Packers offense.

I feel Ball to the Broncos is a better fit than Lacy with the Broncos too.



I just don't think Lacy will live up to the hype. If he can punch it through on * and short, average more than 4 yards a carry, doesn't get the QB killed and doesn't fumble ... I'll put it down as a win for the Packers.





Who amongst us gives a rat's ass about Lacy living up to the hype? All we need is a credible running game, and imo, he looks good enough to provide it, regardless of how bad we are at creating a hole for the running back. [I] like him most because I suspect we need his beef to get through the initial (non) hole.


The fact that he excelled under a ZBS blocking system cannot be overlooked, imo. I think he is the perfect fit for us.
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#17 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 2:54:25 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
Who amongst us gives a rat's ass about Lacy living up to the hype? All we need is a credible running game, and imo, he looks good enough to provide it, regardless of how bad we are at creating a hole for the running back. [I] like him most because I suspect we need his beef to get through the initial (non) hole.


The fact that he excelled under a ZBS blocking system cannot be overlooked, imo.


Him and Franklin will make our Offensive line look like a pro bowl line.Flapper \:d/ Laugh LOL Drool
Offline dfosterf  
#18 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 3:00:38 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 228
Applause Received: 478
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
Him and Franklin will make our Offensive line look like a pro bowl line.Flapper \:d/ Laugh LOL Drool




This is a possibility, also. I frankly doubt it, to be honest... I'm totally fine with our current running backs... If there is no hole, there is no hole...


My minimal hopes rest reflecting upon the the production of Ahman Green and Ryan Grant. They seemed to manage without a hole, to my satisfaction, at least.

Offline Gaycandybacon  
#19 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 3:09:05 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

United States
Joined: 9/17/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 146
Applause Received: 187
dfosterf said: Go to Quoted Post
This is a possibility, also. I frankly doubt it, to be honest... I'm totally fine with our current running backs... If there is no hole, there is no hole...


My minimal hopes rest reflecting upon the the production of Ahman Green and Ryan Grant. They seemed to manage without a hole, to my satisfaction, at least.



Honestly this line isn't that bad, we've just went through some troubles last year. From not running the ball effectively(which has to do with the running backs we've had as well) to not keeping healthy. Imo we have some physical lineman especially our guards. We just need to get some depth and stay healthy which we have gotten through the draft. This is a team game. I'm not blaming it all on the offensive line. Hell two years ago we only gave up 29 sacks. The thing i'll say about this line is that it lacks consistency. It's not like our lines gonna be the same as last years either. There's always room for improvement, no matter how bad the supposed coaching is. I'm very hopeful our line will be better.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
dfosterf on 5/2/2013(UTC)
Offline dfosterf  
#20 Posted : Thursday, May 2, 2013 3:16:33 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

United States
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 228
Applause Received: 478
I applaud you because that is what I want to be true. I want to sense it, and you put me in a better mood about the whole damn thing. Flapper
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 5/2/2013(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (6m) : Ice down the Beer and get the food ready. I'm going Tex/Mex today !
Nonstopdrivel (9m) : Tom Brady has appeared in more conference championships than the Packers franchise has in its entire history.
Nonstopdrivel (11m) : Packers would be the first team in NFL history to make the Super Bowl after starting 4-6 or worse.
Nonstopdrivel (12m) : 5+ straight games.
Nonstopdrivel (12m) : The NFC Championship is the first game (regular season or playoffs) since the 1970 merger featuring two teams that have scored 30+ points in
Zero2Cool (16m) : Good news! @AtlantaFalcons scored more points than anyone this regular season. Bad news? Last 6 teams to do that haven't won Super Bowl
uffda udfa (2h) : Like a night before Christmas or opening Packers weekend...hard to sleep.
uffda udfa (4h) : Staying up late enough so that when U wake up it's game time.
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Exactly! Only a matter of time! GAMEDAY! GO! PACK! GO!
beast (6h) : BOOM!!!!
buckeyepackfan (6h) : TICK, TICK, TICK ????
GoPack1984 (7h) : It's NFC Championship day! Go Pack Go!!!!
uffda udfa (10h) : The Boss picks the Falcons: [TWITTER]788447079446130688[/TWITTER]
uffda udfa (10h) : Is there a prediction thread somewhere on the forum for the Falcons game?
uffda udfa (10h) : Lookout porous Falcons secondary!
Zero2Cool (11h) : uh oh'
uffda udfa (11h) : Jordy, Davante and GMO all playing tomorrow.
uffda udfa (15h) : MM is such a creature of habit that this is going to upset his apple cart.
uffda udfa (15h) : Waited 2 hours than bused 125 miles to Milwaukee.
uffda udfa (15h) : Fog forces Packers to alter flight to Atlanta.
uffda udfa (15h) : Hoping Max McCaffery is the next Adam Thielen and right soon.
uffda udfa (16h) : Everyone knew Tate got away with OPI and even he said so.
uffda udfa (16h) : http://www.packershome.com/forum/posts/m218900-UN-Fucking-Believable#post218900
uffda udfa (16h) : Golden Tate pushed off big time in Seattle. I said it then.
Zero2Cool (16h) : Max McCaffrey Added to Roster, J.C. Tretter Subtracted
Zero2Cool (16h) : Read what I said about Hail Mary plays and referees letting players play. Got it? Good.
Zero2Cool (16h) : I absolutely would not. Don't dare presume to speak for me. WTF.
uffda udfa (16h) : Had it been other way around I would've been screaming and so would u.
uffda udfa (17h) : It's just true. I try hard to see it and tell it like it is. Was OPI.
Zero2Cool (19h) : which is of course ok, i just personally see it as weird.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Just odd that a Packers fan points out when Packers perceived to get away with something, yet ignore opponent. Weird.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers added RB Christine Michael (back) to the injury report as questionable
uffda udfa (20h) : Not diminishing anything. He got away with OPI. Didn't notice before. Was in airport.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Bahahahahahahha GO PACK GO!!!!
Zero2Cool (22h) : when you're buying your Super Bowl LI Champion gear, be critical of that too!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

40m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / The_Green_Ninja

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / flep

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Packers Headlines