Rank: Premier Member
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,385
Applause Received: 3,733
|
DakotaT said:  [mfing]
I figured Woodson for about 180 lbs. Thanks for making a dumbass out of me. [grin1] [wasntme] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Select Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,641
Applause Received: 1,853
|
DakotaT said: I don't understand why people can't comprehend the complete loss of speed and bum shoulder deficiencies Wood has. It is why he wasn't picked up by anybody yet. Now, if you need a dime corner to line up on a slot receiver, or to blitz - then Wood might be our man. But what should the compensation be for a guy like that?
I have confidence that McMillian will seize the job and do well. Charles Woodson is a corner, not a safety - he is too small to be an every down safety. I can not imagine IF they did bring him back that it would be for much more than league min of $940,000 and he would be more than a situational role player. |
sono affamato |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Registered
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
|
I like many players that we have, but if Charles can come in and beat another player for a position fair and square, the staff will have to consider his age vs losing a younger player who just needs time to develop. Tough call.
Regardless, Woodson as a pure Safety could be good with his experience. Good for many of those younger players. If his wheels are too slow to get the job done, I would side with the youth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 729
Applause Received: 755
|
|
I went to the zoo today. They had 1 dog. It was a Shitzu!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)
Applause Received: 134
|
JerseyAl said: For seven years, Charles Woodson was everything Packers fans wanted–a leader and defensive difference-maker.
Oh, and an expensive free agent acquisition.
But scheduled to count $9,437,500 against the salary cap in 2013, the Packers opted to release Woodson and use that money elsewhere. Since then, the Packers have signed Aaron Rodgers and Clay Matthews to lucrative contract extensions and brought in 11 players via the draft.
But one position that wasn’t addressed by the Packers in April’s draft was safety. [...] |
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Select Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,014
Applause Received: 2,042
|
buckeyepackfan said: If you were actually capable of reading between the lines, you would understand that drafting the corner from Iowa would move Bush to safety, leaving no room to sign Woodson. Sorry I didn't connect all the dots for you in actual verbiage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Premier Member
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,385
Applause Received: 3,733
|
DakotaT said: If you were actually capable of reading between the lines, you would understand that drafting the corner from Iowa would move Bush to safety, leaving no room to sign Woodson. Sorry I didn't connect all the dots for you in actual verbiage. There is no world where Jarrett Bush (you're a lazy ass who can't type the players first name so I have to assume) makes Charles Woodson expendable, none, zero, absolutely not possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Select Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,014
Applause Received: 2,042
|
Zero2Cool said: There is no world where Jarrett Bush (you're a lazy ass who can't type the players first name so I have to assume) makes Charles Woodson expendable, none, zero, absolutely not possible. How many more Bush's do we have? And yes, I am a lazy ass when there is absolutely no money on the line. Wood is going to cover all the punts and kickoffs then, cause that's what backup players do? |
|
 Post received 1 applause.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Premier Member
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,385
Applause Received: 3,733
|
DakotaT said: How many more Bush's do we have? And yes, I am a lazy ass when there is absolutely no money on the line. Wood is going to cover all the punts and kickoffs then, cause that's what backup players do? No clue, haven't checked the roster, hence why I had to assume. Making the reader assume is awful and disrespectful ... it's like killing kittens with a rusty spoon anally. I now just checked the roster and I can't find "Wood" on there so I have to once again assume this is a trick question, perhaps even rhetorical? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Select Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1,014
Applause Received: 2,042
|
Zero2Cool said: No clue, haven't checked the roster, hence why I had to assume. Making the reader assume is awful and disrespectful ... it's like killing kittens with a rusty spoon anally. I now just checked the roster and I can't find "Wood" on there so I have to once again assume this is a trick question, perhaps even rhetorical?
[roflmao] I forget about that rapist/rapier wit of yours sometimes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.