Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 7:53:22 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,085
Applause Received: 2,610
I can't recall being a huge fan of it when we first adopted it. I know after seeing the Cowboys game I'm far less fond of it.

I don't know a whole lot about the zone blocking scheme, however, I do know not many teams use it. That says a lot to me especially since this is a copy cat league.

But, every team uses a flavor of it in some capacity.


I miss the days when we had a power oriented OL. One that just manhandled people. You know what, we still have those two tackles that anchored that line too. I'm not convinced that Colledge will be the answer at LT be it zone or power scheme.


It's impossible to switch now, mid season. I just kind of hope we draft some big OL this next off season and start moving for a OL that just punishes people instead of the one we have now that tries to finesse people into not tackling our RB's.


I'm ignorant to the knowledge of a OL and how one works so this isn't some educated rant or anything like that. I just don't like our OL being smaller than 85% of the DL's we face.
Sponsor
Offline TengoJuego  
#2 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 8:06:39 PM(UTC)
TengoJuego

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2010

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 8/16/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 1
Well we saw the zone scheme have success last season... obviously. But I am like you, I'm not very educated on O-line schemes.
Offline Greg C.  
#3 Posted : Monday, September 22, 2008 9:34:42 PM(UTC)
Greg C.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan
Applause Received: 48
Zero: I've had the same thought as you about the ZBS. McCarthy emphasizes that he does not run a pure ZBS, he mixes it up, but it does have a big effect on what kind of players the Packers use. The emphasis is on getting linemen who are more nimble, which usually means sacrificing some strength. The downside is that linemen of this type tend to have problems in pass protection, as they get overpowered at times.

When Josh Sitton won a starting spot in the preseason, that may have been a move away from the ZBS. At 317, Sitton is about 15 pounds heavier than our other interior O-linemen, and he is supposedly stronger. I think the coaches were ready to go with more of a mauler-type lineman. Unfortunately, Sitton got hurt and hasn't been able to play yet.

The fact remains that the interior O-line is the one area of the team that continues to be an Achilles' heel for Ted Thompson and the coaching staff. And it says something that our best interior O-lineman is Scott Wells, who is a holdover from the Mike Sherman era. It may be time to move back toward more of a power running scheme. I'm not expecting anything dramatic, but when Sitton returns we may see this trend begin to play out on the field during the course of this season.
Offline agopackgo4  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:38:28 PM(UTC)
agopackgo4

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
I dont like it. There is a reason that not many teams around the league run one. I just dont get why a team goes away from what has always worked...Doesnt make sense to me.
Offline Cheesey  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:42:08 PM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 363
Applause Received: 545
I'll wait till this season is over before passing judgement on it. We haven't had our O-line healthy, or for that matter our starting RB yet.
So it's hard to say how good it CAN or CAN'T be until we have the pieces in place to properly judge it.
JMO
Offline WhiskeySam  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:47:01 PM(UTC)
WhiskeySam

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Received: 1
The zone blocking scheme has really only worked when Alex Gibbs was coaching it Denver or Atlanta. The concept is simple: smaller, faster linemen move around and block a zone instead of straight man up blocking. You have to have the right personnel for it, though. You have to have guys who can work in space but are also smart enough to recognize where the pressure is coming from and shift to it. My personal preference agrees with most of you, in that I'd much rather line up behind some monsters and just smash the ball down the defense's throat.
Offline agopackgo4  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 12:51:55 PM(UTC)
agopackgo4

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
I wish we could trade for the Badgers O line...and plow people over.
Online MassPackersFan  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:21:02 PM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.
Offline zombieslayer  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:28:18 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I dont like it. There is a reason that not many teams around the league run one. I just dont get why a team goes away from what has always worked...Doesnt make sense to me.


Yeah. That's what I don't get. The scheme we had before the ZBS was working great from '01-04. Why fix something that's not broken?
Offline zerowley  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:12:34 PM(UTC)
zerowley

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/28/2008(UTC)
I think we'll be fine. We've been banged up on the offensive line and Favre's pocket presence masked some of the problems we had in the interior. I expected a slight drop in the line play and the injuries have exacerbated it.

About the scheme, multiple teams are using it. Us, Denver, Oakland, and Houston all use it, and Atlanta used it with success as well. From what I understand it places even more emphasis on communication than a typical blocking scheme, and injuries make that more difficult.

Here's an excellent article explaining it (most analysts and commentators have no idea what they're talking about): http://www.atexansblog.c...bout-that-zone-blocking/
Offline Zero2Cool  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:22:05 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,085
Applause Received: 2,610
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.


We weren't giving up many sacks with the old Power OL either.
Offline Since69  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:39:53 PM(UTC)
Since69

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/2/2006(UTC)
Applause Given: 83
Applause Received: 83
" said: Go to Quoted Post
McCarthy emphasizes that he does not run a pure ZBS, he mixes it up, but it does have a big effect on what kind of players the Packers use. The emphasis is on getting linemen who are more nimble, which usually means sacrificing some strength. The downside is that linemen of this type tend to have problems in pass protection, as they get overpowered at times.


I sincerely hope this is McCarthy putting his best spin on the personnel moves that Thompson has made. It makes no sense otherwise. Either you zone block or you don't. Either your personnel are nimble enough to zone block or they're bulky enough to push people out of the way. We have to pick a side and stay with it. Offensive linemen don't have time to think. They have to react. What they do in any given situation must be second nature to them. It has to be practiced and repeated until it can be done without thought.

This half-assed "this week you'll be a road grader and next week you'll be throwing yourself at the other guys legs" crap has to stop. McCarthy has preached cohesiveness and consistency since his tenure began and this part-time zone blocking Madcensoredx: isn't going to allow that to happen - especially with young, inexperienced linemen.

On a personal note, zone blocking - and especially cut blocking - seems dirty to me. Its a good way to cause injuries. The only reason it works is because by the 3rd or 4th quarter the other team's defensive line is so beaten up they tend to slack off.


" said: Go to Quoted Post
Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.


Rodgers was sacked five times Sunday night.
Offline zombieslayer  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:49:07 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
" said: Go to Quoted Post


We weren't giving up many sacks with the old Power OL either.


That's the thing. If you look at Favre's sack totals, they started getting really low with Sherman. I'm no fan of Sherman, but he got one thing right - a good, solid OL. Why fix something that's not broken?
Online MassPackersFan  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 3:21:19 PM(UTC)
MassPackersFan

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/16/2007(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 7
" said: Go to Quoted Post

Rodgers was sacked five times Sunday night.


I refuse to judge this O-line while Tony Moll is in there.
Offline agopackgo4  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 3:36:17 PM(UTC)
agopackgo4

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Received: 3
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Say what you want about the ZBS and the types of blockers it gives us, but since we've switched we have had extremely low sack numbers given up by these "smaller, mobile linemen." I don't have a problem with it in the running game either.


We weren't giving up many sacks with the old Power OL either.


Not only that, but Like Larry McCarrin said in the lion game during the radio broadcast.. "Normally the QB takes the O line out to eat, but in the packers case the O line should take Rodgers out" Rodgers is definitily doing a great job avoiding pressure. And he is making that O lines stats look a lot better than how they have played.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Nice, thanks!
gbguy20 (4h) : no i've seen it the right way all along. I just wanted to let you know it looks good.
Zero2Cool (6h) : thanks btw
Zero2Cool (6h) : Did you just try it on larger resolution now? Hit CTRL F5, tweaked something earlier lol
gbguy20 (7h) : the site looks fantastic on a larger resolution. zero, you have done a fantastic job with this site.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Probably 1024x768 which is fine, I was just curious.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Oh, so you only see one column, instead of three? You have your screen set to small resolution.
texaspackerbacker (22h) : too answer your question, long overdue, Z2C, it comes in at the bottom of posts next to "Recent Topics" and just above the 2015 schedule and
Zero2Cool (3-May) : No reason to single someone out like that. And every one is loooooooooose
greengold (3-May) : How to respond to a thread titled "Packers doomed to loose."? It's uffda without spelling or punctuation.
Zero2Cool (3-May) : It's up to coaches to make rookies into something.
beast (3-May) : I think I remember fans giving an F for Rodgers draft as well
Smokey (3-May) : TT's Draft rates F-
beast (2-May) : And the race to sign UDFA is officially on!
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Finally, folks are USING the REPORT feature. THANK YOU. Makes it soo much easier and more efficient.
Smokey (2-May) : Through 3 rounds, GB=F- draft grade
Smokey (2-May) : Z2C, you live in GB, please punch TT in the nose for me. Please !
Smokey (2-May) : AHHHHH !!
Mucky Tundra (1-May) : tbh i'd be more concerning about his weight than him blazing up
Zero2Cool (1-May) : More than just the weed/weight. Off some boards. Problematic to pick.
Zero2Cool (1-May) : andy Gregory's issues: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000488780/article/concern-exists-on-gregory-handling-pro-footballs-mental-rigors
dhazer (1-May) : so what tweener will we draft tonight?
Cheesey (1-May) : Happy B-day Sincity!
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Denzel Perryman falling to Packers at #62 = goodpoop
uffda udfa (1-May) : Dawson's Creek and his 4.9 40 is coming to GB in R2
uffda udfa (1-May) : DL and LB are WEAK but do you want TT trying to fix it?
Smokey (1-May) : Round 2, let us hope for better !
Smokey (30-Apr) : Yes ! The Chat Room is very OPEN !!
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Today's Birthdays: SINCITYCHEEZE (54)
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Fantasy Sports Talk
Mucky Tundra (30-Apr) : where is the predict the pick at?
Rockmolder (30-Apr) : Come and join our Predicht the Pick group! So far it's just Z2C who joined up and we're looking really pitiful with just the two of us.
Smokey (30-Apr) : How are you dhazer ? Hope your up and streaming ASAP. NFL Network !
Smokey (29-Apr) : The lunatics are here ! Just a short time every year !
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Where is Fan shout located for you texas?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2015 Schedule
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Recent Topics
10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

38m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

43m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Gilligan

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackerTraxx

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackerTraxx

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter