Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages<12

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
TOPackerFan  
#41 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:04:37 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
On the sideline route, it was Williams.


I thought it was more on Rouse. Williams looked like he thought he was getting help over the top, which was unfortunate because Rouse was jogging directly sideways, about 5 yards behing Austin.
Zero2Cool  
#42 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:05:29 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are we talking about the same play? You're saying Collins was supposed to have single man coverage on a WR on that play? Most of what I'm talking about happened pre-snap or right after the snap.



Who knows?

I'm talking about the play where we had safety help on Owens with Woodson as primary defender and Collins slid over to help cover Owens as the slot WR ran down near the hash marks and angled in which is about when Collins realized he was giving triple coverage to Owens leaving #19 open in the middle of the field.
Zero2Cool  
#43 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:05:54 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
On the sideline route, it was Williams.


I thought it was more on Rouse. Williams looked like he thought he was getting help over the top, which was unfortunate because Rouse was jogging directly sideways, about 5 yards behing Austin.


Possibly, but that WR did push off a bit on Williams.
MassPackersFan  
#44 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:10:32 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are we talking about the same play? You're saying Collins was supposed to have single man coverage on a WR on that play? Most of what I'm talking about happened pre-snap or right after the snap.



Who knows?

I'm talking about the play where we had safety help on Owens with Woodson as primary defender and Collins slid over to help cover Owens as the slot WR ran down near the hash marks and angled in which is about when Collins realized he was giving triple coverage to Owens leaving #19 open in the middle of the field.


Probably the same play. Who is defender #3 who you don't mention? Another CB? They basically took advantage of our game plan to have Woodson on Owens at all times and a safety over the top by creating confusion about who was covering who. I remember seeing another CB (probably Williams but I'm not sure) pointing at the WR's as they bunched and going with Owens. Woodson also sort of went with Owens. Collins, who was getting read to provide deep support on Owens was left trying to run back to the man who had no CB on him.
Zero2Cool  
#45 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:13:10 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are we talking about the same play? You're saying Collins was supposed to have single man coverage on a WR on that play? Most of what I'm talking about happened pre-snap or right after the snap.



Who knows?

I'm talking about the play where we had safety help on Owens with Woodson as primary defender and Collins slid over to help cover Owens as the slot WR ran down near the hash marks and angled in which is about when Collins realized he was giving triple coverage to Owens leaving #19 open in the middle of the field.


Probably the same play. Who is defender #3 who you don't mention? Another CB? They basically took advantage of our game plan to have Woodson on Owens at all times and a safety over the top by creating confusion about who was covering who. I remember seeing another CB (probably Williams but I'm not sure) pointing at the WR's as they bunched and going with Owens. Woodson also sort of went with Owens. Collins, who was getting read to provide deep support on Owens was left trying to run back to the man who had no CB on him.


Collins is/was defender #3. Obviously the two who were covering him were Woodson and whomever else was at Safety I would presume to be the obvious answer since it was said that we had Woodson trailing Owens with a safety over the top.
MassPackersFan  
#46 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:30:22 PM(UTC)
Checked it out again. Woodson and I think Tramon Williams are up to the line covering the two WR's on that side. Some motion towards the middle (behind Owens) by Austin creates confusion right at the snap. Williams starts running with Owens down the right sideline when he was initially lined up on Austin, before Austin crossed with TO. Woodson ends up covering nobody. Collins runs over to tackle Austin.
DGB454  
#47 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:50:53 PM(UTC)
Driver had a few catches didn't he? I think I remember a few. Ha had a drop though. He did OK.
Zero2Cool  
#48 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 7:08:57 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Checked it out again. Woodson and I think Tramon Williams are up to the line covering the two WR's on that side. Some motion towards the middle (behind Owens) by Austin creates confusion right at the snap. Williams starts running with Owens down the right sideline when he was initially lined up on Austin, before Austin crossed with TO. Woodson ends up covering nobody. Collins runs over to tackle Austin.



Good recap.

I wonder if Woodson was supposed to be shadowing Owens no matter what and Williams thought he should be the help over the top instead of the safety?

The motion looked like it got the best of Woodson there.

I'd have to say from just quickly looking at the play again I put the fault not on Collins, but on Woodson.

I think Collins was supposed to be the cover on top of Owens while Woodson was shallow and Williams was supposed to be man to man on Austin.


I'll post a video of it when I get back home. I have some family matters to tend to and I'll be back with a video.
TheEngineer  
#49 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:29:10 PM(UTC)
There's a quote somewhere that it was in fact partially Woodson's fault, who should have sllid over to cover Austin while Collins was deep on Owens. I think it's on one of the JS Online articles.
Zero2Cool  
#50 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:57:54 PM(UTC)
[video width=640 height=480]http://packershome.com/videos/Packers.Cowboys.9.21.08.c_EDIT0000.AVI[/video]


There's the play. They didn't give us a good replay, jerks. But now I think it was on Woodson, not Collins.
Zero2Cool  
#51 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:05:46 PM(UTC)
At the :35 mark you see Collins hand a little. I think he should have floated to the inside. But thats easy to say now that know whats happened lol
MassPackersFan  
#52 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:46:09 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Checked it out again. Woodson and I think Tramon Williams are up to the line covering the two WR's on that side. Some motion towards the middle (behind Owens) by Austin creates confusion right at the snap. Williams starts running with Owens down the right sideline when he was initially lined up on Austin, before Austin crossed with TO. Woodson ends up covering nobody. Collins runs over to tackle Austin.



Good recap.

I wonder if Woodson was supposed to be shadowing Owens no matter what and Williams thought he should be the help over the top instead of the safety?

The motion looked like it got the best of Woodson there.

I'd have to say from just quickly looking at the play again I put the fault not on Collins, but on Woodson.

I think Collins was supposed to be the cover on top of Owens while Woodson was shallow and Williams was supposed to be man to man on Austin.


I'll post a video of it when I get back home. I have some family matters to tend to and I'll be back with a video.


My guess would be Woodson was supposed to be covering TO all the time and sort of ignored Williams' call for a switch. Give Dallas credit - they took advantage of our gameplan.
Packnic  
#53 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:27:47 PM(UTC)
I think its funny that people are anything but excited about Aaron Rodgers.

It was Aarons 3rd start. against the best team in the NFL and we lost by 11.


If thats as bad as it gets, color me excited.
zombieslayer  
#54 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:39:08 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I think its funny that people are anything but excited about Aaron Rodgers.

It was Aarons 3rd start. against the best team in the NFL and we lost by 11.


If thats as bad as it gets, color me excited.


Packnic - Didn't think of it that way.

With all due respect to R.P., I think that's what he was trying to say but you said it better.
ILikeThePackers39  
#55 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:44:54 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I think its funny that people are anything but excited about Aaron Rodgers.

It was Aarons 3rd start. against the best team in the NFL and we lost by 11.


If thats as bad as it gets, color me excited.



Couldn't agree with you more. Given the various possibilities, I thought he did damn well -- I didn't see anything worse than holding on the ball too long in some situations, but I still say the lack of Martin and JJ had more to do with that than some lack of ability on Rodgers' part.

As I said previously, I was pleased with his performance. Wasn't awesome, but it could have been so much worse. Instead, he stayed cool in a tough situation and did nothing to hurt the team.
Zero2Cool  
#56 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:02:28 PM(UTC)
Well, on NFL Live Mark Schereth or whatever says it was Collins fault. I don't know, I think it was Woodson. I don't know though.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
uffda udfa (7h) : Packers re-sign Christine Michael
Smokey (8h) : Easier said than fixed .
Nonstopdrivel (9h) : The web version lists who started the thread; the mobile version lists who last updated it.
Nonstopdrivel (9h) : Also, there's a weird disparity between the web version and online version of this site.
Nonstopdrivel (9h) : ;-)
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : Packers wanted D. Ware in 2005. Thank you Cowboys!
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : lol Rourke
Nonstopdrivel (21-Mar) : I HATE HATE HATE the way all threads get marked as read after viewing a few of them in one session. It's obnoxious.
Smokey (21-Mar) : Check out this site, NFLdraftscout.com , a great resource site.
Smokey (20-Mar) : Jared Cook signs with Raiders .
Smokey (20-Mar) : I did watch SB 45 on YouTube the other night, very eye opening .
Smokey (20-Mar) : Watching Spring Training Baseball, Nationals vs Yankees, very interesting .
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : B1G making some noise in that bracket
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : The more join, the more talk, the better. including John
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : no forum should need one person, we have others, speak up!
gbguy20 (19-Mar) : slow forum needs more uffda
Smokey (19-Mar) : There's always next year .
Smokey (18-Mar) : Virginia is still in it !
Smokey (18-Mar) : On Wisconsin
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Down goes Villanova!! Badgers!!!
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Might have went into your SPAM or JUNK folder??
yooperfan (18-Mar) : Funny I never got the invite
wpr (17-Mar) : Ignoring the Signing Bonus, Jones' base is only $725K above the vet min
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Not many seem interested, but I did invite those from last year.
dhazer (16-Mar) : no bracket challenge Kevin?
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Blame twitter on the /home page here lol
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Datone Jones Vikings deal $3.75M, $1.6M signing bonus, $1.5M salary, $31,250 per game active, $150K workout bonus, $1.25M sacks-pt incentive
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Nope. I don't care to read up on Vikings players. :-)
Bnoble (15-Mar) : Anyone see any numbers on Jones deal?
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Datone to Minnesota.
musccy (14-Mar) : A more $ than I'd prefer, but still glad Elliott is back
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Jayrone back on a one year 1.6 deal.
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Martellus Bennett Contract Details: New Packers TE has just $3.85M cap hit in 2017
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Packers have $28 under cap yet
hardrocker950 (13-Mar) : Walden would be a nice pickup...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
38m / Green Bay Packers Talk / blueleopard

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / FLORIDA PACKER88

2h / Announcements / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

8h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Nonstopdrivel

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

17-Mar / Around The NFL / Smokey

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines