Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages«<2

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
TOPackerFan  
#61 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:04:37 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
On the sideline route, it was Williams.


I thought it was more on Rouse. Williams looked like he thought he was getting help over the top, which was unfortunate because Rouse was jogging directly sideways, about 5 yards behing Austin.
Zero2Cool  
#62 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:05:29 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are we talking about the same play? You're saying Collins was supposed to have single man coverage on a WR on that play? Most of what I'm talking about happened pre-snap or right after the snap.



Who knows?

I'm talking about the play where we had safety help on Owens with Woodson as primary defender and Collins slid over to help cover Owens as the slot WR ran down near the hash marks and angled in which is about when Collins realized he was giving triple coverage to Owens leaving #19 open in the middle of the field.
Zero2Cool  
#63 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:05:54 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
On the sideline route, it was Williams.


I thought it was more on Rouse. Williams looked like he thought he was getting help over the top, which was unfortunate because Rouse was jogging directly sideways, about 5 yards behing Austin.


Possibly, but that WR did push off a bit on Williams.
MassPackersFan  
#64 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:10:32 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are we talking about the same play? You're saying Collins was supposed to have single man coverage on a WR on that play? Most of what I'm talking about happened pre-snap or right after the snap.



Who knows?

I'm talking about the play where we had safety help on Owens with Woodson as primary defender and Collins slid over to help cover Owens as the slot WR ran down near the hash marks and angled in which is about when Collins realized he was giving triple coverage to Owens leaving #19 open in the middle of the field.


Probably the same play. Who is defender #3 who you don't mention? Another CB? They basically took advantage of our game plan to have Woodson on Owens at all times and a safety over the top by creating confusion about who was covering who. I remember seeing another CB (probably Williams but I'm not sure) pointing at the WR's as they bunched and going with Owens. Woodson also sort of went with Owens. Collins, who was getting read to provide deep support on Owens was left trying to run back to the man who had no CB on him.
Zero2Cool  
#65 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:13:10 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Are we talking about the same play? You're saying Collins was supposed to have single man coverage on a WR on that play? Most of what I'm talking about happened pre-snap or right after the snap.



Who knows?

I'm talking about the play where we had safety help on Owens with Woodson as primary defender and Collins slid over to help cover Owens as the slot WR ran down near the hash marks and angled in which is about when Collins realized he was giving triple coverage to Owens leaving #19 open in the middle of the field.


Probably the same play. Who is defender #3 who you don't mention? Another CB? They basically took advantage of our game plan to have Woodson on Owens at all times and a safety over the top by creating confusion about who was covering who. I remember seeing another CB (probably Williams but I'm not sure) pointing at the WR's as they bunched and going with Owens. Woodson also sort of went with Owens. Collins, who was getting read to provide deep support on Owens was left trying to run back to the man who had no CB on him.


Collins is/was defender #3. Obviously the two who were covering him were Woodson and whomever else was at Safety I would presume to be the obvious answer since it was said that we had Woodson trailing Owens with a safety over the top.
MassPackersFan  
#66 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:30:22 PM(UTC)
Checked it out again. Woodson and I think Tramon Williams are up to the line covering the two WR's on that side. Some motion towards the middle (behind Owens) by Austin creates confusion right at the snap. Williams starts running with Owens down the right sideline when he was initially lined up on Austin, before Austin crossed with TO. Woodson ends up covering nobody. Collins runs over to tackle Austin.
DGB454  
#67 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:50:53 PM(UTC)
Driver had a few catches didn't he? I think I remember a few. Ha had a drop though. He did OK.
Zero2Cool  
#68 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 7:08:57 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Checked it out again. Woodson and I think Tramon Williams are up to the line covering the two WR's on that side. Some motion towards the middle (behind Owens) by Austin creates confusion right at the snap. Williams starts running with Owens down the right sideline when he was initially lined up on Austin, before Austin crossed with TO. Woodson ends up covering nobody. Collins runs over to tackle Austin.



Good recap.

I wonder if Woodson was supposed to be shadowing Owens no matter what and Williams thought he should be the help over the top instead of the safety?

The motion looked like it got the best of Woodson there.

I'd have to say from just quickly looking at the play again I put the fault not on Collins, but on Woodson.

I think Collins was supposed to be the cover on top of Owens while Woodson was shallow and Williams was supposed to be man to man on Austin.


I'll post a video of it when I get back home. I have some family matters to tend to and I'll be back with a video.
TheEngineer  
#69 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:29:10 PM(UTC)
There's a quote somewhere that it was in fact partially Woodson's fault, who should have sllid over to cover Austin while Collins was deep on Owens. I think it's on one of the JS Online articles.
Zero2Cool  
#70 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:57:54 PM(UTC)
[video width=640 height=480]http://packershome.com/videos/Packers.Cowboys.9.21.08.c_EDIT0000.AVI[/video]


There's the play. They didn't give us a good replay, jerks. But now I think it was on Woodson, not Collins.
Zero2Cool  
#71 Posted : Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:05:46 PM(UTC)
At the :35 mark you see Collins hand a little. I think he should have floated to the inside. But thats easy to say now that know whats happened lol
MassPackersFan  
#72 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:46:09 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Checked it out again. Woodson and I think Tramon Williams are up to the line covering the two WR's on that side. Some motion towards the middle (behind Owens) by Austin creates confusion right at the snap. Williams starts running with Owens down the right sideline when he was initially lined up on Austin, before Austin crossed with TO. Woodson ends up covering nobody. Collins runs over to tackle Austin.



Good recap.

I wonder if Woodson was supposed to be shadowing Owens no matter what and Williams thought he should be the help over the top instead of the safety?

The motion looked like it got the best of Woodson there.

I'd have to say from just quickly looking at the play again I put the fault not on Collins, but on Woodson.

I think Collins was supposed to be the cover on top of Owens while Woodson was shallow and Williams was supposed to be man to man on Austin.


I'll post a video of it when I get back home. I have some family matters to tend to and I'll be back with a video.


My guess would be Woodson was supposed to be covering TO all the time and sort of ignored Williams' call for a switch. Give Dallas credit - they took advantage of our gameplan.
Packnic  
#73 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:27:47 PM(UTC)
I think its funny that people are anything but excited about Aaron Rodgers.

It was Aarons 3rd start. against the best team in the NFL and we lost by 11.


If thats as bad as it gets, color me excited.
zombieslayer  
#74 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:39:08 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I think its funny that people are anything but excited about Aaron Rodgers.

It was Aarons 3rd start. against the best team in the NFL and we lost by 11.


If thats as bad as it gets, color me excited.


Packnic - Didn't think of it that way.

With all due respect to R.P., I think that's what he was trying to say but you said it better.
ILikeThePackers39  
#75 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 1:44:54 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I think its funny that people are anything but excited about Aaron Rodgers.

It was Aarons 3rd start. against the best team in the NFL and we lost by 11.


If thats as bad as it gets, color me excited.



Couldn't agree with you more. Given the various possibilities, I thought he did damn well -- I didn't see anything worse than holding on the ball too long in some situations, but I still say the lack of Martin and JJ had more to do with that than some lack of ability on Rodgers' part.

As I said previously, I was pleased with his performance. Wasn't awesome, but it could have been so much worse. Instead, he stayed cool in a tough situation and did nothing to hurt the team.
Zero2Cool  
#76 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:02:28 PM(UTC)
Well, on NFL Live Mark Schereth or whatever says it was Collins fault. I don't know, I think it was Woodson. I don't know though.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages«<2
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (23m) : Bahahahhaha
Zero2Cool (31m) : In Madden.
Zero2Cool (32m) : Packers made a trade!!
beast (1h) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (4h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (4h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (4h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (4h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (4h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (4h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (5h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (6h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (6h) : Packers
Smokey (6h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (6h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (6h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (6h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (6h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (6h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (7h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (10h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (10h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (10h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (11h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (11h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Zero2Cool (11h) : @AndrewBrandt Yes. The best GMs will leverage desperate teams tonight.
Zero2Cool (11h) : Today's Birthdays: StoicFire (30)
Zero2Cool (12h) : The Parlor is better than The Room.
beast (23h) : I believe the Packers seriously want to trade up (if they can find a price they like), I'm guessing for Fitzpatrick or James (though one guy said Ward). But could also be one of the ILBers (Smith or E
Smokey (25-Apr) : Rumors are not money in the bank deals.
gbguy20 (25-Apr) : pft reporting packers trying to trade up
Porforis (25-Apr) : You're just a little chicken. Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep Cheep
Nonstopdrivel (25-Apr) : I don't want to talk about it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

38m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Random Babble / Cheesey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Random Babble / Cheesey

Headlines