Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
nerdmann  
#1 Posted : Friday, June 21, 2013 11:33:19 AM(UTC)
Jersey Al

I'm going to go with John Kuhn. Pickett will make it through the year, then retire after the Superbowl.

JJ is a valuable commodity, especially now with DD and GJ gone. As for Tramon, this will be his comeback year. If that arm's ever gonna be healed it is now. Otherwise, it is what it is.
OlHoss1884  
#2 Posted : Friday, June 21, 2013 12:29:56 PM(UTC)
If there was a bona fide FB on the roster (I think one of the UFA's is) Kuhn would be in trouble, but for my money it will be Green or Starks. I don't think they both make the roster and I would be surprised if they tried to keep them both through camp when either might have a chance to hook up with another team if they get an early shot at doing so.

Dexter_Sinister  
#3 Posted : Friday, June 21, 2013 1:14:20 PM(UTC)
Starks.

Green has only really had one injury.

Starks has only played 22 games in 3 years.
wpr  
#4 Posted : Friday, June 21, 2013 1:55:42 PM(UTC)
I cut both Kuhn and Starks from my final 53 so Ted better do it too.
as were Harrell and Ross along with a few other bit players.
Laser Gunns  
#5 Posted : Friday, June 21, 2013 2:21:32 PM(UTC)
Gotta go with Kuhn.
MintBaconDrivel  
#6 Posted : Friday, June 21, 2013 4:02:30 PM(UTC)
JerseyAl said:
Packers fans have seen a lot of big names and sentimental favorites either cut or allowed to sign elsewhere in free agency over the last two seasons. The most recent casualty was Desmond Bishop. The inside linebacker's exit came after guys like Greg Jennings, Charles Woodson, Tom Crabtree and Scott Wells were given their walking [...]
nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Friday, June 21, 2013 4:18:44 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post


Hahaha, beat you to this one!

Seriously, when I was posting it, I was just ASSUMING you were doing so at the same time, only faster!
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Friday, June 21, 2013 8:12:49 PM(UTC)
It damn well better NOT be Tramon Williams. Most of the other names in the article and previous posts with the possible exception of James Jones who isn't going anyplace until after next season, wouldn't be missed - by me anyway, but DON'T cut Tramon.

Starks has to be the most likely one to go in the short term.

beast  
#9 Posted : Saturday, June 22, 2013 8:06:32 PM(UTC)

Does Sherrod count?

I think Mike McCarthy put 3 guys in order of when they're getting healthy and Sherrod was last. (might not be remembering that right). Yes he was a 1st round pick, but he's got to stay healthy.


Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
Starks.

Green has only really had one injury.

Starks has only played 22 games in 3 years.



One injury that took him out two years. At the end of last season he lost all of his burst and didn't look good.

Green 16 games over two years... avg. of 8 games per year.

Starks 22 games over three years avg. of 7.3333 games per year. That's not a big difference.

Starks 19 games over the last two years... avg. of 9.5 games per year.


Then again Bishop and Starks had the trade rumors... and Bishop is gone. but Stark is already on the field. Another injury and he's gone.

But I say the the best person win... and who knows... Harris could be the one gone and the top other 4 stay. No way to call this one (yet)..... though I think Harris (if healthy) has a good shot at staying.
DarkaneRules  
#10 Posted : Sunday, June 23, 2013 9:39:12 AM(UTC)
Sherrod should definitely count. He has been pretty unreliable due to his very unfortunate leg injury and his timetable for completing his recovery is still up in the air.

RB/FB has 8 players in total on our roster so obviously that the first place you are looking as far as cuts go. Starks has a huge uphill battle considering his competition and his productivity since 2011 has been inconsistent at best.
DarkaneRules  
#11 Posted : Sunday, June 23, 2013 9:58:18 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
It damn well better NOT be Tramon Williams. Most of the other names in the article and previous posts with the possible exception of James Jones who isn't going anyplace until after next season, wouldn't be missed - by me anyway, but DON'T cut Tramon.

Starks has to be the most likely one to go in the short term.



Well that DEFINITELY will not be happening this year. He is the starter and Hayward is good and all but he is not ready for that role just yet nor is Mr. House. That is not the position to be cutting from the top of right now.

That position may belong to the defensive line if Raji doesn't stay consistent enough to warrant his new extended deal. If not then of course a younger player stepping up in the year ahead will determine if we can afford to let him go or if another player has to be cut to keep him.
Dexter_Sinister  
#12 Posted : Sunday, June 23, 2013 3:47:11 PM(UTC)
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Does Sherrod count?

I think Mike McCarthy put 3 guys in order of when they're getting healthy and Sherrod was last. (might not be remembering that right). Yes he was a 1st round pick, but he's got to stay healthy.





One injury that took him out two years. At the end of last season he lost all of his burst and didn't look good.

Green 16 games over two years... avg. of 8 games per year.

Starks 22 games over three years avg. of 7.3333 games per year. That's not a big difference.

Starks 19 games over the last two years... avg. of 9.5 games per year.


Then again Bishop and Starks had the trade rumors... and Bishop is gone. but Stark is already on the field. Another injury and he's gone.

But I say the the best person win... and who knows... Harris could be the one gone and the top other 4 stay. No way to call this one (yet)..... though I think Harris (if healthy) has a good shot at staying.


You can't count Greens injury twice.

You count him out last year and you count his games where he played hurt because we had no other RBs.

Flanigan lost 2 years to injury his rookie year and came back to be a keystone of the Packers line.

No matter how you spin it. Starks keeps getting injured. Green was injured once.

beast  
#13 Posted : Monday, June 24, 2013 10:15:03 AM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
You can't count Greens injury twice.

You count him out last year and you count his games where he played hurt because we had no other RBs.

Flanigan lost 2 years to injury his rookie year and came back to be a keystone of the Packers line.

No matter how you spin it. Starks keeps getting injured. Green was injured once.




Green got injured. Then he got healthy. Then the same injury flared up took him out again.

That's twice. One injury, two seasons.

The fact is Starks and Green have both kept getting injured every NFL season they've been in, so far the Packers haven't been able to count on ether staying healthy.
nerdmann  
#14 Posted : Monday, June 24, 2013 11:55:43 AM(UTC)
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Green got injured. Then he got healthy. Then the same injury flared up took him out again.

That's twice. One injury, two seasons.

The fact is Starks and Green have both kept getting injured every NFL season they've been in, so far the Packers haven't been able to count on ether staying healthy.


I'm not faulting a guy who tried to come back too soon, because we didn't have enough depth at his position.
Zero2Cool  
#15 Posted : Monday, June 24, 2013 12:10:55 PM(UTC)
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Green got injured. Then he got healthy. Then the same injury flared up took him out again.

That's twice. One injury, two seasons.

The fact is Starks and Green have both kept getting injured every NFL season they've been in, so far the Packers haven't been able to count on ether staying healthy.


I guess you could say the same thing for James Starks. His injury just "flared" up again .... and again ... and again.
beast  
#16 Posted : Monday, June 24, 2013 12:48:45 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
I guess you could say the same thing for James Starks. His injury just "flared" up again .... and again ... and again.


I thought they were different injuries and not flare ups but like I said they've both been injured every single season they've been in the NFL so far.
Dexter_Sinister  
#17 Posted : Monday, June 24, 2013 4:48:36 PM(UTC)
The same injury flaring up is the same injury.

Wow, does that even need to be said?

That is along the lines of don't use a hair dryer in the shower.
OlHoss1884  
#18 Posted : Monday, June 24, 2013 5:02:59 PM(UTC)
I suppose the real question about who the Packers will cut next is What do the Vikings still need?
Dexter_Sinister  
#19 Posted : Monday, June 24, 2013 5:15:00 PM(UTC)
OlHoss1884 said: Go to Quoted Post
I suppose the real question about who the Packers will cut next is What do the Vikings still need?

Mad Sad Smile OhMyGod Woot [roflmao]

Thanks for cheering me up.

beast  
#20 Posted : Tuesday, June 25, 2013 5:34:05 AM(UTC)
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
The same injury flaring up is the same injury.


Yes it's the same injury but you're using logic is over simplifying it by implying that means it's any better.

QB Brett Favre got lots of injuries but didn't miss a game.

DT Harrell got a couple injuries, mainly his back injury which kept flaring up year after year after year... but by your standards it's only one injury. So Favre got injured a lot more often.


That (while extreme) proves it's not by the number of injuries.


You did bring up a great way to look at it in games and years.

Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
Starks has only played 22 games in 3 years.


And facts are career wise Green has averaged 8 games a season while Starks averages 7.333 which isn't a huge difference.

In the last two years Green has averaged 8 games a season while Starks averages 9.5 games a season.


It's about available and playing level... not number of injuries...and the fact is their available has been about the same (poor).

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
wpr (17m) : looks great.
Zero2Cool (6h) : avatars aren't displaying
Zero2Cool (6h) : plain look
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1h / Announcements / dhazer

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Feb / Community Welcome! / wpr

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

19-Feb / Around The NFL / uffda udfa

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Barfarn

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / warhawk

Headlines