Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
5 Pages123>»
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:02:12 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,086
Applause Received: 2,610
Quote:
[img]http://cmsimg.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=U0&Date=20080923&Category=PKR07&ArtNo=80923162&Ref=AR&Profile=1058&MaxW=318&Border=0[/img]It didnt take long for the Ted Thompson haters to pounce.

Critics began lobbing missiles at the Packers general manager soon after Green Bay lost to the Dallas Cowboys on Sunday night.

The Packers first defeat, they proclaimed, was proof Thompson never should have traded Brett Favre.

Never mind the Cowboys dominated every phase of the game and the presence of Favre would have made little difference.

Never mind Favre was befuddled against essentially this same Cowboys defense last November.

Never mind the Cowboys overwhelming dominance in the trenches, and not new Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers, was the primary reason the Packers lost.

If anything, the Cowboys lopsided victory provided evidence Thompson made the correct call in putting the offense in the hands of Rodgers. If the Cowboys continue to play lights-out football like they did at Lambeau Field, then no one in the NFL is going to touch them. The Packers, with or without Favre at quarterback, would have little chance against such a superior opponent.

If it could be proven that the Packers Super Bowl chances rested solely on Favre, then the Thompson bashers would have good reason to gloat. However, based on early-season results, that is not the case.

The Packers are the youngest team in the NFL. Their brightest Super Bowl hopes may well arrive in the coming years when those youthful players, including Rodgers, reach maturity.

That in no way implies the Packers have thrown in the towel on 2008 by replacing Favre with Rodgers. Its too soon to make any lasting judgments, but so far, Rodgers compares favorably to Favre.

Rodgers has a slightly better rating (102.9 to 98.7), a slightly lower completion percentage (65 percent to 70 percent) and fewer interceptions (none to three).

The knock against Rodgers, according to some nitpickers, is he doesnt take enough chances and thus cant ignite the offense like Favre could.

Rodgers off-balance, make-something-happen touchdown pass to Korey Hall in a Week 1 victory over the Vikings contradicts that view. In addition, his ability to scramble has added a new dimension.

Its true the Packers bogged down in the red zone against the Cowboys and Rodgers was unable to elevate his team. But many quarterbacks will struggle against that same defensive buzz saw, as Favre did last season.

Rodgers ranks seventh in the NFL in quarterback ratings and has displayed grit and poise for someone with only three career NFL starts. Favre ranks a respectable 10th despite having to learn a new offense and adjust to different receivers.

Both quarterbacks are solid starters, which suggests it would have been a waste to have a player as talented as Rodgers riding the bench for a fourth consecutive season.

That Rodgers should be around for years to come only gives Thompson more evidence to defend his controversial offseason quarterback decision.
Sponsor
Offline Bigbyfan  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:08:12 PM(UTC)
Bigbyfan

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 45
Applause Received: 113
That is a good read.
Offline zombieslayer  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:53:59 PM(UTC)
zombieslayer

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: San Francisco
Applause Given: 778
Applause Received: 495
Quote:
Never mind the Cowboys overwhelming dominance in the trenches, and not new Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers, was the primary reason the Packers lost.


Very true. Blaming the loss on Aaron Rodgers is very narrow-minded. The Cows dominated this game.

Quote:
The knock against Rodgers, according to some nitpickers, is he doesnt take enough chances and thus cant ignite the offense like Favre could.


This is actually a legitimate criticism. BF has pulled rabbits out of hats many times in the past and still continues to do so. The Jets are downright awful, yet he manages to get them on the scoreboard. But it's done. BF is not coming back, and so far, Aaron Rodgers 's been pretty dang impressive for only 3 starts.

I said this at game 2 and will stand by it - at the end of the season, Aaron Rodgers has a better season than Peyton Manning. Watch.
Offline Roddyboy  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:04:16 PM(UTC)
Roddyboy

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
This article is total B.S. and filled with inaccuracies...

Now here is where I tear it to shreds.

1. "The presence of Favre would have made little difference".

Total opinion and conjecture, and not even very educated. Favre often was the deciding factor in Packer wins because he had the talent and the experience to improvise. He wasn't a "system QB", which is what Aaron Rodgers is.

2. Last year has nothing to do with this year.

3. "The Packers are the youngest team in the NFL. Their brightest Super Bowl hopes may well arrive in the coming years when those youthful players, including Rodgers, reach maturity.

That in no way implies the Packers have thrown in the towel on 2008 by replacing Favre with Rodgers. Its too soon to make any lasting judgments, but so far, Rodgers compares favorably to Favre."

These statements totally contradict one another. And if it's too soon to make any lasting judgements, why is this assclown making lasting judgements? "Compares favorably to Favre". That, in itself, is ludicrous. Apples and Oranges. Favre has been in the Jets O system for 1 month, Rodgers has been learning the Packer's system for 3 years. Also, Favre is performing just as well as Rodgers for having been in a system for such a short time. That is a testament to how good Favre is, according to Steve Young. I can assure you, if the situation was reversed, AROD would not be performing as well in New York.

Also, last year, when someone praised BF for doing well, many were quick to state that it was really Mike McCarthy 's system that was the reason and not BF. Well, wouldn't it then be Mike McCarthy 's system for Aaron Rodgers as well?

"Its true the Packers bogged down in the red zone against the Cowboys and Rodgers was unable to elevate his team. But many quarterbacks will struggle against that same defensive buzz saw, as Favre did last season."

This statement is down right ridiculous. Again, last year is not this year, and Donovan McNabb put up 37 points against the Cowboys and almost won, and McNabb is no Favre!

"That Rodgers should be around for years to come only gives Thompson more evidence to defend his controversial offseason quarterback decision."

All the more reason as to why Ted Thompson should have brought back BF this year! Rodgers isn't going anywhere. He's only played 2 games against weak teams, and this assclown is crowning him already. The Packers had their best shot at going to the SB this year with BF. Aaron Rodgers is not the guy who is going to take you there past Dallas, Philly, or the NY Giants.

End of story.
Offline Greg C.  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:18:06 PM(UTC)
Greg C.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/9/2008(UTC)
Location: Marquette, Michigan
Applause Received: 48
Roddyboy, I will reply to each of your points:

1. It is not total opinion and conjecture. It is based on last year's game against the Cowboys, in which Favre made poor decisions and put the team into a big hole early with interceptions.

2. Last year has a lot to do with this year, considering that the Packers have returned 20 of 22 starters to the lineup. The Cowboys are also pretty much the same team as last year.

3. If the Packers brightest hopes may arrive in the coming years, that does not mean that they have thrown in the towel this season. They were right in the thick of things last year, and there's no reason to think they won't be again this year.

I partly agree with you on the comparisons between Rodgers and Favre this season. They are in different situations on very different teams. But the important comparison is Rodgers this year to Favre last year, and it is looking pretty close so far. Considering how close it is, I'll take the young guy over the old guy any day. His career is on an upward arc, and he really wants to be here, as opposed to Favre, who didn't even make up his mind until late June, and wasn't entirely convincing even when he said he wanted to return.
Offline Cheesey  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:24:53 PM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 363
Applause Received: 546
Give up Greg.....reason doesn't work with Roddy.

Hey Roddy....you blast what the guy wrote, 1. "The presence of Favre would have made little difference".
Saying:
"Total opinion and conjecture, and not even very educated."

Uh....isn't that what YOU have done in every post? You constantly say how Favre is the only way we can win this year, yet ALL it is is your opinion. Not one PROOF to anything you say. Also your blaming Ted Thompson for BF not being here anymore. I have yet to see you put any blame on BF for that.
You see, i look at everything objectively, then make a decision. You should try it some time. You might be surprised.
Offline Roddyboy  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:26:23 PM(UTC)
Roddyboy

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Last year, BF wasn't even in the game for an entire half.

Also, if you recall, BF had many games last year that he came back in the 2nd half and won.

I don't think you can compare the two.

(Also, Mike McCarthy 's playcalling was alot different last year in that game.)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:26:54 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,086
Applause Received: 2,610
I think this is a decent read about Rodgers.
Offline Cheesey  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:28:49 PM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 363
Applause Received: 546
Yup....everythings different then last year.
So why do you keep comparing them???
There are also many games where BF threw INTS that cost us games.
That went on his whole career.
True....BF wasn't in the game a whole half last year. Yet got us in a deep hole by then.
Offline Zero2Cool  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:34:37 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,086
Applause Received: 2,610
I dunno. I liked Brett a lot, still do. I like Rodgers and will grow to like him more and more, I think.

I really wish everyone would stop TRYING to compare them. They play a different style QB than the other and its impossible to compare them.

No matter how many ways you try to compare an apple to an orange, you will always look silly and wrong. So why do it?
Offline Roddyboy  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:36:16 PM(UTC)
Roddyboy

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Yeah, right Cheesey...

(and Favre shouldn't be a first ballot HOF'er when he retires either, right?)

I'm sure you can think up alot of useless excuses and "reasons" that you think pose as facts to deny him.

Like, "He threw alot of interceptions". "He only won 1 SB"...and "He hasn't won another in 10 years"..

Laughing
Offline Roddyboy  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:37:33 PM(UTC)
Roddyboy

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I dunno. I liked Brett a lot, still do. I like Rodgers and will grow to like him more and more, I think.

I really wish everyone would stop TRYING to compare them. They play a different style QB than the other and its impossible to compare them.

No matter how many ways you try to compare an apple to an orange, you will always look silly and wrong. So why do it?


Zero. I hate to remind you of this.

But weren't you the guy who posted an article just a few minutes ago comparing BF and Aaron Rodgers ???
Offline Zero2Cool  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:47:28 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,086
Applause Received: 2,610
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
I dunno. I liked Brett a lot, still do. I like Rodgers and will grow to like him more and more, I think.

I really wish everyone would stop TRYING to compare them. They play a different style QB than the other and its impossible to compare them.

No matter how many ways you try to compare an apple to an orange, you will always look silly and wrong. So why do it?


Zero. I hate to remind you of this.

But weren't you the guy who posted an article just a few minutes ago comparing BF and Aaron Rodgers ???


I hate to remind you of this, but I could have sworn the article's title was about even a loss justifies faith in Aaron Rodgers.

If you don't have anything to add about Aaron Rodgers, go to the Brett Favre section and post some more love towards your guy.
Offline brnt247  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:24:51 PM(UTC)
brnt247

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)
This team could only be worse with Favre at the helm right now. He wouldn't have beaten the Cowboys and the most he could do is win against both the Vikings and Lions. The Jets don't even have that bad of a team around Favre, so that really isn't an excuse. Favre has thrown plenty of awful passes this year and Aaron hasn't really thrown any.
Offline gbpfan  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:55:09 PM(UTC)
gbpfan

Rank: Registered
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Location: milwaukee
Applause Received: 3
i usually don't like to quibble i like brett and you may think the reporter is wrong in comparisons but you need to look at the whole picture first you need to get over that brett isnt here and move on,witch it seems youhave not,you make it sound like brett is the team brett had good players around him,then you talk mcnabb well he is a vet and a healthy one they always play each other same division kinda like when we play the bears,we have a good team and a-rod his showing us he can play the only thing he doesnt have right now is moxie and i think it is coming the guy will be a good q.b with a good o-line after all it is team not i
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages123>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (11h) : woohoo
gbguy20 (5-May) : i think its fixed now :)
Zero2Cool (5-May) : lol
gbguy20 (4-May) : century link is a bunch of idiots
gbguy20 (4-May) : definitely my end.
gbguy20 (4-May) : *to get my last post to go thru
gbguy20 (4-May) : Is the problem with this site on my end or your end? Everytime I try to post the "Connection resets" it took me 20 minutes to get my lost t
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Nice, thanks!
gbguy20 (4-May) : no i've seen it the right way all along. I just wanted to let you know it looks good.
Zero2Cool (4-May) : thanks btw
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Did you just try it on larger resolution now? Hit CTRL F5, tweaked something earlier lol
gbguy20 (4-May) : the site looks fantastic on a larger resolution. zero, you have done a fantastic job with this site.
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Probably 1024x768 which is fine, I was just curious.
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Oh, so you only see one column, instead of three? You have your screen set to small resolution.
texaspackerbacker (3-May) : too answer your question, long overdue, Z2C, it comes in at the bottom of posts next to "Recent Topics" and just above the 2015 schedule and
Zero2Cool (3-May) : No reason to single someone out like that. And every one is loooooooooose
greengold (3-May) : How to respond to a thread titled "Packers doomed to loose."? It's uffda without spelling or punctuation.
Zero2Cool (3-May) : It's up to coaches to make rookies into something.
beast (3-May) : I think I remember fans giving an F for Rodgers draft as well
Smokey (3-May) : TT's Draft rates F-
beast (2-May) : And the race to sign UDFA is officially on!
Zero2Cool (2-May) : Finally, folks are USING the REPORT feature. THANK YOU. Makes it soo much easier and more efficient.
Smokey (2-May) : Through 3 rounds, GB=F- draft grade
Smokey (2-May) : Z2C, you live in GB, please punch TT in the nose for me. Please !
Smokey (2-May) : AHHHHH !!
Mucky Tundra (1-May) : tbh i'd be more concerning about his weight than him blazing up
Zero2Cool (1-May) : More than just the weed/weight. Off some boards. Problematic to pick.
Zero2Cool (1-May) : andy Gregory's issues: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000488780/article/concern-exists-on-gregory-handling-pro-footballs-mental-rigors
dhazer (1-May) : so what tweener will we draft tonight?
Cheesey (1-May) : Happy B-day Sincity!
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Denzel Perryman falling to Packers at #62 = goodpoop
uffda udfa (1-May) : Dawson's Creek and his 4.9 40 is coming to GB in R2
uffda udfa (1-May) : DL and LB are WEAK but do you want TT trying to fix it?
Smokey (1-May) : Round 2, let us hope for better !
Smokey (30-Apr) : Yes ! The Chat Room is very OPEN !!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2015 Schedule
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Recent Topics
16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mi_keys

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackerTraxx

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Gilligan

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter