Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.
4 Pages<1234>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Cheesey  
#41 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 6:04:49 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Am I alone in finding it almost impossible to read these posts with all the heads in them? I'm not trying to be a smart aleck. I just can't stand all those heads.

I guess we need to give you a.......(are you ready for this???).........HEADS UP next time!!! :thumbright: :thumbleft:
zombieslayer  
#42 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 6:08:42 PM(UTC)
I personally like the heads, and wish we had heads for DD & GJ as well.

It seriously gives a more "human" aspect to the posts. When I followed football as a kid, I only knew what James Lofton looked like. Everyone else, you only saw their faces, partially covered by the helmet so you didn't see that much unless you had their football card (which I had several of James Lofton, my favorite football player). Heck, Lynn Dickey could probably walk down the street and I wouldn't recognize him.

That of course changed with the internet, cable, etc., things we didn't have when I was a kid.
MassPackersFan  
#43 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 6:11:47 PM(UTC)
The heads aren't any worse than reading the initials.
WhiskeySam  
#44 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 6:23:30 PM(UTC)
Two points, my initial comment was that getting drilled by the Cowboys and justifying going with Rodgers have no bearing on one another. That doesn't say anything bad about Rodgers. It simply says this loss has nothing to do with whether that decision was justified. I see this as an overeager journalist trying to make a point with no facts to support it.

Regarding the Favre-Rodgers comparison, again I didn't say anything negative about Rodgers. I just thought it telling that a guy trying to make a story out of whole cloth didn't use one of the key stats people view for QBs: TD passes, which favored Favre. Personally, I think it's a wash. Favre has more TD passes, but more interceptions. Rodgers has more yards but a lower completion percentage. Given how close their QB ratings are, I would think it's obvious that both QBs have played well this season. And yes, I ignored Rodgers' rushing TDs because that has more to do with McCarthy's goal-line strategy than Rodgers' QB performance.
Greg C.  
#45 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 6:35:18 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
And yes, I ignored Rodgers' rushing TDs because that has more to do with McCarthy's goal-line strategy than Rodgers' QB performance.


I agree with your post except for this last bit. Rodgers' ability and willingness to run the QB sneak is a significant weapon for our offense. Favre either did not want to run sneaks or McCarthy didn't want to risk getting him injured, and I believe that's part of the reason why the Packer offense was at or near the bottom of the league in short yardage situations last year.

Edit: Ah, I knew this thread was destined for the Brett Favre ghetto.
longtimefan  
#46 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:16:10 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
And yes, I ignored Rodgers' rushing TDs because that has more to do with McCarthy's goal-line strategy than Rodgers' QB performance.


I agree with your post except for this last bit. Rodgers' ability and willingness to run the QB sneak is a significant weapon for our offense. Favre either did not want to run sneaks or McCarthy didn't want to risk getting him injured, and I believe that's part of the reason why the Packer offense was at or near the bottom of the league in short yardage situations last year.

Edit: Ah, I knew this thread was destined for the Brett Favre ghetto.


1st and goal pass for a td or a 1st and goal q/b sneak WTF is the difference damn

Point is the q/b had to make it happen, and it is points HE helped to create
Zero2Cool  
#47 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:18:56 PM(UTC)
If we are talking about a pass for a TD on the 1 vs a QB sneak. I think there's a large difference.

QB's like to have a little room for their targets to roam a bit. With being on the one yard line there's 20 so plus guys running around in a 50 yard by 11 yard space. or 11 by 50.. whatever you get the point.

With a QB sneak its about attitude and will and who wants it more. Will your OL push harder than the DL? Will you (the QB) find the hole and risk your ass and shove yourself in?
WhiskeySam  
#48 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:42:56 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
And yes, I ignored Rodgers' rushing TDs because that has more to do with McCarthy's goal-line strategy than Rodgers' QB performance.


I agree with your post except for this last bit. Rodgers' ability and willingness to run the QB sneak is a significant weapon for our offense. Favre either did not want to run sneaks or McCarthy didn't want to risk getting him injured, and I believe that's part of the reason why the Packer offense was at or near the bottom of the league in short yardage situations last year.

Edit: Ah, I knew this thread was destined for the Brett Favre ghetto.


Yeah, took me a minute to find this again. Anyway, QB sneaks at the goal line says more about the coach's strategy or his lack of confidence in his running backs than a QB's ability. If Rodgers had scrambled for a TD, I'd count those because that speaks to his ability to create plays from nothing. Goal line sneaks says to me either the coach thinks he can surprise the D with a quick push or he has no healthy running backs so he's willing to risk his QB taking a shot.
longtimefan  
#49 Posted : Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:11:10 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
And yes, I ignored Rodgers' rushing TDs because that has more to do with McCarthy's goal-line strategy than Rodgers' QB performance.


I agree with your post except for this last bit. Rodgers' ability and willingness to run the QB sneak is a significant weapon for our offense. Favre either did not want to run sneaks or McCarthy didn't want to risk getting him injured, and I believe that's part of the reason why the Packer offense was at or near the bottom of the league in short yardage situations last year.

Edit: Ah, I knew this thread was destined for the Brett Favre ghetto.


Yeah, took me a minute to find this again. Anyway, QB sneaks at the goal line says more about the coach's strategy or his lack of confidence in his running backs than a QB's ability. If Rodgers had scrambled for a TD, I'd count those because that speaks to his ability to create plays from nothing. Goal line sneaks says to me either the coach thinks he can surprise the D with a quick push or he has no healthy running backs so he's willing to risk his QB taking a shot.


Okay I see your point now..

but it brings up this point...

Grant or any rb gets a one yard or even a half yard td, can we use same argument and NOT include those in his final numbers?
WhiskeySam  
#50 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 1:38:50 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
And yes, I ignored Rodgers' rushing TDs because that has more to do with McCarthy's goal-line strategy than Rodgers' QB performance.


I agree with your post except for this last bit. Rodgers' ability and willingness to run the QB sneak is a significant weapon for our offense. Favre either did not want to run sneaks or McCarthy didn't want to risk getting him injured, and I believe that's part of the reason why the Packer offense was at or near the bottom of the league in short yardage situations last year.

Edit: Ah, I knew this thread was destined for the Brett Favre ghetto.




Yeah, took me a minute to find this again. Anyway, QB sneaks at the goal line says more about the coach's strategy or his lack of confidence in his running backs than a QB's ability. If Rodgers had scrambled for a TD, I'd count those because that speaks to his ability to create plays from nothing. Goal line sneaks says to me either the coach thinks he can surprise the D with a quick push or he has no healthy running backs so he's willing to risk his QB taking a shot.


Okay I see your point now..

but it brings up this point...

Grant or any rb gets a one yard or even a half yard td, can we use same argument and NOT include those in his final numbers?


Grant's job is to pound the ball and grind out tough yards. That's not Rodgers' job. The fact we're relying on Rodgers at the goal line says we're either trying to take the defense by surprise, or the coach doesn't think Grant or any other running back can get the job done. This is where I like to see a TJ Duckett or Brandon Jacobs style runner just pound it in rather than see our QB sneaking and potentially taking unnecessary hits, but that's just my personal preference.
longtimefan  
#51 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 2:23:36 AM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
And yes, I ignored Rodgers' rushing TDs because that has more to do with McCarthy's goal-line strategy than Rodgers' QB performance.


I agree with your post except for this last bit. Rodgers' ability and willingness to run the QB sneak is a significant weapon for our offense. Favre either did not want to run sneaks or McCarthy didn't want to risk getting him injured, and I believe that's part of the reason why the Packer offense was at or near the bottom of the league in short yardage situations last year.

Edit: Ah, I knew this thread was destined for the Brett Favre ghetto.




Yeah, took me a minute to find this again. Anyway, QB sneaks at the goal line says more about the coach's strategy or his lack of confidence in his running backs than a QB's ability. If Rodgers had scrambled for a TD, I'd count those because that speaks to his ability to create plays from nothing. Goal line sneaks says to me either the coach thinks he can surprise the D with a quick push or he has no healthy running backs so he's willing to risk his QB taking a shot.


Okay I see your point now..

but it brings up this point...

Grant or any rb gets a one yard or even a half yard td, can we use same argument and NOT include those in his final numbers?


Grant's job is to pound the ball and grind out tough yards. That's not Rodgers' job. The fact we're relying on Rodgers at the goal line says we're either trying to take the defense by surprise, or the coach doesn't think Grant or any other running back can get the job done. This is where I like to see a TJ Duckett or Brandon Jacobs style runner just pound it in rather than see our QB sneaking and potentially taking unnecessary hits, but that's just my personal preference.

Aaron Rodgers has 2 rushing tds in 3 games, maybe that will be part of HIS JOB too?
longtimefan  
#52 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 2:26:08 AM(UTC)
Not trying to be an aho;le..just triyng to understand your points
WhiskeySam  
#53 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 1:01:38 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Not trying to be an aho;le..just triyng to understand your points


If our goal line offense all season is going to be Rodgers sneaking, we've got big problems in the running game.
Zero2Cool  
#54 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 1:06:17 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
Not trying to be an aho;le..just triyng to understand your points


If our goal line offense all season is going to be Rodgers sneaking, we've got big problems in the running game.


If we are on the goal line, a QB sneak is the best way to score.

You're QB is one - two yards off the line, your RB is five - seven yards deep.

As long as your OL gets a lower pad level than the DL and pushes tough, your QB should easily sneak in there for a TD. Hopefully the QB isn't an idiot and tries to go over the top.

A QB sneak on the goal line is higher probability of scoring than handing off to a RB. The time it takes the RB to get to the line you will have a LB or two maybe a safety as well jumping over the top ready to smack his ass.
zombieslayer  
#55 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 1:10:20 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post

If our goal line offense all season is going to be Rodgers sneaking, we've got big problems in the running game.


That's what I'm thinking.

I also don't like the QB sneak. Aaron Rodgers took a shot in the back on one of his QB sneaks that I don't like to see happen again. Sure, he was unfazed, but still...

RBs are built to withstand pounding, QBs are not. Don't we have a RB that can pound the ball for a hard-earned yard? If not, Ted Thompson better get on the phone and make some calls.
WhiskeySam  
#56 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 1:27:35 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post

If our goal line offense all season is going to be Rodgers sneaking, we've got big problems in the running game.


That's what I'm thinking.

I also don't like the QB sneak. Aaron Rodgers took a shot in the back on one of his QB sneaks that I don't like to see happen again. Sure, he was unfazed, but still...

RBs are built to withstand pounding, QBs are not. Don't we have a RB that can pound the ball for a hard-earned yard? If not, Ted Thompson better get on the phone and make some calls.


Agreed, and it's not only the body type, but QBs don't wear the pads RBs do.
zombieslayer  
#57 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 3:30:52 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post
" said: Go to Quoted Post

If our goal line offense all season is going to be Rodgers sneaking, we've got big problems in the running game.


That's what I'm thinking.

I also don't like the QB sneak. Aaron Rodgers took a shot in the back on one of his QB sneaks that I don't like to see happen again. Sure, he was unfazed, but still...

RBs are built to withstand pounding, QBs are not. Don't we have a RB that can pound the ball for a hard-earned yard? If not, Ted Thompson better get on the phone and make some calls.


Agreed, and it's not only the body type, but QBs don't wear the pads RBs do.


Didn't think of that.
Good call.
Greg C.  
#58 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 6:59:20 PM(UTC)
Gaining one yard is not something to be taken for granted, as the Packers proved over the past couple years, when Favre ran a total of one QB sneak and the team's short-yardage stats were abysmal. Many games are decided by a team's inability to gain one yard.

When you need a yard, you get that yard any way you can. QB's are in more danger while passing the ball than they are on QB sneaks anyway. Plus, even the threat of a QB sneak is bound to open up running lanes, as it forces the defense to cover another option.

I think that most QB's and their O-linemen love the QB sneak. It's quick, simple, and effective, and it gives the QB a chance to be a tough guy. Toward the end, Favre was being treated too much like a fragile piece of china.
Zero2Cool  
#59 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 7:20:09 PM(UTC)
WTF you pricks!

I added some insightful comment\s and you just ignore them to argue???

I hate you all and now I'm going to ban myself!!!


--- for those who took this seriously, i was kidding ---
WhiskeySam  
#60 Posted : Friday, September 26, 2008 9:32:24 PM(UTC)
" said: Go to Quoted Post
WTF you pricks!

I added some insightful comment\s and you just ignore them to argue???

I hate you all and now I'm going to ban myself!!!


--- for those who took this seriously, i was kidding ---


LOL sorry, I'm posting from airports while I travel today and missed your post. I agree with you to an extent, but if you have a bulldozer like Earl Campbell or Larry Csonka, you give them the ball every single time.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : welcome back ted lol over react much? HAHAHA SIT DOWN
packerfanoutwest (5h) : go to the chat room
gbguy20 (5h) : at least stay in the teens
gbguy20 (5h) : Fucking Bullshit
Cheesey (5h) : Welcome back, Ted.
Bigbyfan (5h) : Of course the Bears would be the ones to take my guy...
isocleas2 (6h) : Interesting
isocleas2 (6h) : Ward at #4
Zero2Cool (6h) : Bahahahhaha
Zero2Cool (6h) : In Madden.
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers made a trade!!
beast (7h) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (10h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (10h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (10h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (10h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (11h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (11h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (11h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (12h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (12h) : Packers
Smokey (12h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (12h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (12h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (13h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (13h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (13h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (13h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (16h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (16h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (17h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (17h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

11h / Random Babble / Cheesey

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines