Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
5 Pages<12345>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#21 Posted : Friday, June 28, 2013 5:50:31 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
macbob said: Go to Quoted Post
And for the Madden Football crowd, we had 27 passing plays and only 3 running plays in the entire first half, scoring all of 0 points.


So, would running more times like Benson did in the final drive have helped them score in the first half?
Offline nerdmann  
#22 Posted : Friday, June 28, 2013 6:25:32 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,416
Applause Received: 1,424
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
So, would running more times like Benson did in the final drive have helped them score in the first half?


Iirc,Lang came out and criticized the lack of running, stating that the DL was free to just "pin their ears back" and attack the QB.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#23 Posted : Friday, June 28, 2013 8:33:21 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Iirc,Lang came out and criticized the lack of running, stating that the DL was free to just "pin their ears back" and attack the QB.


Just choosing to run doesn't get any yards. You have to be able to actually run. And for that you need a RB that can run for more than -5 yards when you are trying to run out the clock.

Lang was absolutely right. The running game was awful. But giving the ball to Benson obviously wasn't the answer. Using the last drive of the Seattle game where we ran it 3 times for -3 yards and only because Kuhn got 2 as an example of running in spite of sucking at it.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#24 Posted : Friday, June 28, 2013 8:56:28 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
macbob said: Go to Quoted Post
And for the Madden Football crowd, we had 27 passing plays and only 3 running plays in the entire first half, scoring all of 0 points.


You could blame the sacks, you could blame the running game and you could blame the penalties.

At the rate they were gaining yards running the ball, taking 12 plays away from passing in exchange for 24 rushing yards may or may not have helped. I am going to lean towards not.

Running more in the second half was not the only adjustment they made.

In the first half they ran some "WCO running plays". Some of the running game falls under the passing plays category. The short dump off plays to the backs is a suplement to the running game and take its function in the West Coast Offense. For example, a shovel pass is counted as a pass, but is essentially a draw. The only difference is where the Back is when the QB tosses the ball. If he is behind the QB, it counts as a run. If he is not behind the QB, it counts as a pass. Even if it is the same play, the same kind of toss and the same function in the game.

It is designed to slow the pass rush down and get the ball to the backs in space so they can get the D reacting instead of attacking. Like a running play.

They probably did that because Benson was having so much trouble getting out of the backfield. And they had no one else.
Offline macbob  
#25 Posted : Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:40:49 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2013Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2016PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2012FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 374
Applause Received: 326
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
So, would running more times like Benson did in the final drive have helped them score in the first half?


Our 5 drives in the first half all ended in punts and went for a combined total of 82 yards. COMBINED. And since our 3 runs in that half gained 24 yards that meant we had all of 58 yards passing at half time.

In the second half we had 4 drives for 214 yards total offense, with drives of 70, 66, and 81 (that one drive itself only 1 yard less than our TOTAL offense in the first half). Our 4 drives ended in 2 FGs and a TD before that final 3 & out in the last two minutes.

In the 3rd quarter, Benson ran the ball 10 times for 49 yards and we scored 6 points on the two drives. We took the lead in the 4th Qtr for the first time on the only TD we scored in the game, a 1 yard run by Benson.

Abandoning the run in the first half made us one-dimensional and allowed the Seattle D to concentrate on our passing game, resulting in 58 yards passing and 82 yards COMBINED total offense at half time. Only 60 of our 214 yards in the second half were on the ground, but running the ball opened up our passing game by forcing the Seattle D to honor the run.

So yes, I'd say running the ball more in the first half would have helped us score. It would have been hard to do worse.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 6/29/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#26 Posted : Saturday, June 29, 2013 12:27:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,416
Applause Received: 1,424
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
Just choosing to run doesn't get any yards. You have to be able to actually run. And for that you need a RB that can run for more than -5 yards when you are trying to run out the clock.

Lang was absolutely right. The running game was awful. But giving the ball to Benson obviously wasn't the answer. Using the last drive of the Seattle game where we ran it 3 times for -3 yards and only because Kuhn got 2 as an example of running in spite of sucking at it.


Maybe. But I thought Benson was pretty good at getting what was there.

The Niners have an elite Dline. But that doesn't mean they don't have to play. Yeah, maybe they can hold our guy to 3 ypc, but that doesn't mean they don't have to TRY to do so.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 6/29/2013(UTC)
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#27 Posted : Saturday, June 29, 2013 4:29:39 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
macbob said: Go to Quoted Post
And for the Madden Football crowd, we had 27 passing plays and only 3 running plays in the entire first half, scoring all of 0 points.


I am not saying we shouldn't run. I am saying they couldn't.

The last drive had 3 runs and it wasn't any better than the first half. Choosing to run doesn't magically generate yards, first downs and points.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#28 Posted : Saturday, June 29, 2013 4:32:08 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Maybe. But I thought Benson was pretty good at getting what was there.

The Niners have an elite Dline. But that doesn't mean they don't have to play. Yeah, maybe they can hold our guy to 3 ypc, but that doesn't mean they don't have to TRY to do so.


It was actually 2 per carry.

If we lined up and needed 3 yards to get a first down, score or run out the clock,

we couldn't get it.

We have won a couple games without much running. Like the super bowl, for example.
Offline Dexter_Sinister  
#29 Posted : Saturday, June 29, 2013 5:24:30 PM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 6/12/2010(UTC)
Applause Given: 292
Applause Received: 266
macbob said: Go to Quoted Post
Our 5 drives in the first half all ended in punts and went for a combined total of 82 yards. COMBINED. And since our 3 runs in that half gained 24 yards that meant we had all of 58 yards passing at half time.

In the second half we had 4 drives for 214 yards total offense, with drives of 70, 66, and 81 (that one drive itself only 1 yard less than our TOTAL offense in the first half). Our 4 drives ended in 2 FGs and a TD before that final 3 & out in the last two minutes.

In the 3rd quarter, Benson ran the ball 10 times for 49 yards and we scored 6 points on the two drives. We took the lead in the 4th Qtr for the first time on the only TD we scored in the game, a 1 yard run by Benson.

Abandoning the run in the first half made us one-dimensional and allowed the Seattle D to concentrate on our passing game, resulting in 58 yards passing and 82 yards COMBINED total offense at half time. Only 60 of our 214 yards in the second half were on the ground, but running the ball opened up our passing game by forcing the Seattle D to honor the run.

So yes, I'd say running the ball more in the first half would have helped us score. It would have been hard to do worse.


The 3 runs in the first half included a 20 yard run by Cobb. Leaving Benson with 2 per.

Whenever Benson got the ball, he got little or nothing. Including the dump off passes.

On the TD scoring drive, other than the TD run, Benson had 2 runs for -3 yards in the other 16 plays. You can give him credit for the TD run, but giving him any credit for the running game making being the difference is total BS.

You are saying the only adjustment they made in the second half was running the ball. Not in protecting Rodgers better.

Running in the 4th quarter didn't help us generated a critical first down. So you can say "if" all you want to conjecture how effective more running might have been. But when they really needed the yards, running DID let them down. No ifs about it.
Offline nerdmann  
#30 Posted : Saturday, June 29, 2013 11:01:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,416
Applause Received: 1,424
Dexter_Sinister said: Go to Quoted Post
I am not saying we shouldn't run. I am saying they couldn't.

The last drive had 3 runs and it wasn't any better than the first half. Choosing to run doesn't magically generate yards, first downs and points.


Part of the running game is cumulative. You have to wear a defense down. Normally this comes with Time of Possession, if your coach is even concerned about that sort of thing.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
yooperfan on 6/30/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 6/30/2013(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
5 Pages<12345>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : Stop putting words in other peoples mouth. Worry about YOU, no one else. Move on.
Smokey (4h) : Fine wpr, U2 has your's and the other's permission to piss on any member at any time. woof
Zero2Cool (4h) : But we can assume if someone doesn't know, they can ask, or perform an internet search. Move on.
Smokey (5h) : Potential NFL Draftees and Players are asked to take it to score how smart they are .
Smokey (5h) : Wonderlic is a cognitive ability test, usually administered to new employees.
Smokey (5h) : It should not just be assumed that everyone knows what,"Wonderlic" is .
Zero2Cool (5h) : Most players don't care about wonderlic. Some agents prep players. Not reasonable standard.
beast (6h) : We shouldn't judge. ..
uffda udfa (6h) : He has a rep for keen football intelligence. Some guys just don't come across as bright.
uffda udfa (6h) : What thing should we judge intelligence on? Wonderlic is out to you. How he sounds is out.. what is criteria?
uffda udfa (6h) : Are you taking issue with him not being particularly bright? Based on what?
beast (6h) : It's sad your judging a person brightness on such shallow things...
shield4life (16h) : Resign Nick Perry
uffda udfa (20h) : Need some strong sharp passionate voices on D. Daniels gives great quotes.
uffda udfa (20h) : Nick Perry seems to be the team leader as he was giving pregame speeches that seemed very uninspiring.
uffda udfa (20h) : Morgan and his 14 wonderlic. Ever hear him talk? Man, not a bright guy at all.
uffda udfa (20h) : Burnett needs to be replaced. That's our leader? Or one of them? No, thanks.
beast (21h) : For the secondary, I think Burnett/Haha are the leaders.
Smokey (22h) : GB needs a new motto : DEFENSE RULES ! , is intended to change the direction of the Packers focus moving forward .
Smokey (22h) : Thank You Zero.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Great reading a thread and seeing "defense rules" spammed in them all. Great reading material.
Smokey (22h) : DEFENSE RULES !
Zero2Cool (23h) : Think you need to defensive leaders. Front Seven and Secondary. We seem to lack both. Daniels is closest.
beast (23h) : Packers players had a right to complain when they were being bullied by Mike Daniels... just talking about Packers ;-) jk
Zero2Cool (23h) : It was the 26th largest margin since 1940. Feels much worse
Zero2Cool (23h) : thought it was biggest margin of victory in Conf Championship, I was mistaken.
Smokey (23-Jan) : Wow ! The Packers got disrespected too !
Smokey (23-Jan) : Hello ?
uffda udfa (23-Jan) : Can't. MM burned them all.
Smokey (23-Jan) : go pack go ?
wpr (23-Jan) : Smokey AND Uffda, you both ca be placed in a timeout. Stop it.
Smokey (23-Jan) : go pack go :)
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : STOP! Talk Packers or STFU. K thanks. :-)
uffda udfa (23-Jan) : Ranting about everyone to stop talking Wolf while talking cooking appliances.
uffda udfa (23-Jan) : I told you the truth. It upset you. U were hypocritical.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

33m / Green Bay Packers Talk / FLORIDA PACKER88

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Football Familiarity / mojaveson

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mojaveson

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower


Packers Headlines