Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Friday, July 26, 2013 7:18:30 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 84

Jason Wilde wrote:
GREEN BAY -- If Mike Neal's latest injury -- and yes, the Green Bay Packers hybrid defensive end/outside linebacker knows with his injury history, he will have doubters -- only sidetracks him briefly, then this could wind up being the end of his bad luck in that department.

That's because Neal, who was listed at 294 pounds on the Packers' official roster before camp began and was on the sheet at 285 pounds while he stood and watched Friday's training camp-opening practice, said he is actually weighing in at 275 pounds. And he admitted Friday that the never-ending work in the weight room that bulked him up to play defensive line may have been the reason he's been hurt so much.

Neal opened camp on the active/physically unable to perform list with a pulled abdominal muscle, and coach Mike McCarthy said he expects Neal to miss "a couple weeks" as a result.

Nevertheless, the weight loss and pseudo-position change could do Neal a world of good.

"Some people, you just look at them, they're just built completely different," Neal said. "I'd like to say that at 294 I was really explosive, and that's not really good because if you've got all that muscle, you're pulling too much on tendons and stuff like that. And I've had tendon and ligament injuries. I mean, I've looked at it and I know it's one of those things. You're 300 pounds, but you can move a little bit faster than them. But, you're doing a lot of pulling and yanking on stuff that you shouldn't. The loss of weight will definitely be better on my body.

"It's more natural for me to be this weight, I feel better at this weight, I think I utilize my abilities better at this weight. They've given me the option to play around with it and (said), 'Where do you feel comfortable at?' They told me I didn't have to lose any, but if I wanted to, they'd see how I moved. It was up to me, how I felt.""

Edited by moderator Saturday, July 27, 2013 2:09:01 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Online Mucky Tundra  
#2 Posted : Friday, July 26, 2013 7:33:26 PM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 1/11/2013(UTC)
Location: Murray, Kentucky

Applause Given: 309
Applause Received: 386

Cripes he only weighs 274? Since it seems he cut down on muscle mass, does he even have the size to play dline anymore?
May not have the best looking number...but it's the sexiest! -David Bakhtiari
UserPostedImage
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Friday, July 26, 2013 7:46:06 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,368
Applause Received: 600

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra Go to Quoted Post
Cripes he only weighs 274? Since it seems he cut down on muscle mass, does he even have the size to play dline anymore?


Datone is undersized too.

Hope Jolly's got something left.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Online Mucky Tundra  
#4 Posted : Saturday, July 27, 2013 1:04:10 AM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 1/11/2013(UTC)
Location: Murray, Kentucky

Applause Given: 309
Applause Received: 386

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Datone is undersized too.

Hope Jolly's got something left.


But isn't Neals calling card his strength? If he's lost mostly muscle is there anything left to his game? Well either way I hope he picks up a little bit of speed.

May not have the best looking number...but it's the sexiest! -David Bakhtiari
UserPostedImage
Offline PackerTraxx  
#5 Posted : Saturday, July 27, 2013 8:53:11 AM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 127

TT is trying to add D linemen, but it seems like he's drafting bobcats and trying to build them into mountain lions.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Offline DarkaneRules  
#6 Posted : Saturday, July 27, 2013 10:47:38 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 197
Applause Received: 323

Looking for more tweeners in size to improve the gap integrity against these more athletic QBs and skill players.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
thanks Post received 1 applause.
play2win on 7/29/2013(UTC)
Offline DoddPower  
#7 Posted : Saturday, July 27, 2013 1:27:28 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,862
Applause Received: 430

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Datone is undersized too.

Hope Jolly's got something left.


Datone is 6'4 and 284 pounds. JJ Watt is 6'5 289 pounds. Brett Keisel is 6'5 285 pounds. Justin Smith is 6'4 285 pounds. He's not "under-sized." He easily has the frame to add a little more weight if desired. He's certainly not "over-sized", but still. He's fine. The Packers need more athletes. Period. Josh Boyd and and Gilbert Pena will be the new "run-stuffer's if both make the roster, in addition to Pickett, Wilson, and to some extent, Raji (and/or perhaps Jolly).

I'm not concerned about Datone's size, at all.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 7/27/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#8 Posted : Sunday, July 28, 2013 9:40:19 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,869
Applause Received: 2,045

Originally Posted by: DoddPower Go to Quoted Post
Datone is 6'4 and 284 pounds. JJ Watt is 6'5 289 pounds. Brett Keisel is 6'5 285 pounds. Justin Smith is 6'4 285 pounds. He's not "under-sized." He easily has the frame to add a little more weight if desired. He's certainly not "over-sized", but still. He's fine. The Packers need more athletes. Period. Josh Boyd and and Gilbert Pena will be the new "run-stuffer's if both make the roster, in addition to Pickett, Wilson, and to some extent, Raji (and/or perhaps Jolly).

I'm not concerned about Datone's size, at all.


I'd like to add a certain fella who stood at 6' 4" 249 lbs racked up over 70 sacks while playing DE.


I think sometime we get too caught up in arm length, height, weight and forget that heart and intelligence play much larger roles.
UserPostedImage
Offline nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Sunday, July 28, 2013 10:47:23 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,368
Applause Received: 600

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool Go to Quoted Post
I'd like to add a certain fella who stood at 6' 4" 249 lbs racked up over 70 sacks while playing DE.


I think sometime we get too caught up in arm length, height, weight and forget that heart and intelligence play much larger roles.


Sounds like a great fit, for a 4-3.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DoddPower  
#10 Posted : Sunday, July 28, 2013 5:46:58 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,862
Applause Received: 430

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Sounds like a great fit, for a 4-3.


Either way, the few players I named are all 3-4 DE's, and there are many more I could have named that are very close to the exact size of Datone. Also, as I said, Datone has the frame to easily add more weight, if need be. But it's not necessary. He's size is a non-factor. Most 3-4 DE's aren't going to be Calais Cambell's, although I certainly wouldn't mind one of them on the Packers.
Offline play2win  
#11 Posted : Monday, July 29, 2013 5:44:16 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee

Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725

This is where Johnny Jolly makes this team. Neal may have gotten too much mass for his bone structure, etc., hence, the shift to OLB. I get it.

Datone & Boyd will flourish in this new D. Neal will be playing more situationally. That is my guess. Should be interesting. If he can become more of a rover with size in this 3-4, like James Harrison was in his prime, maybe we have something here with Mike Neal.

The increased weight clearly was adversely effecting his availability, with all those minor injuries.
Offline steveishere  
#12 Posted : Monday, July 29, 2013 7:15:38 AM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 43
Applause Received: 867

Originally Posted by: DoddPower Go to Quoted Post
Either way, the few players I named are all 3-4 DE's, and there are many more I could have named that are very close to the exact size of Datone. Also, as I said, Datone has the frame to easily add more weight, if need be. But it's not necessary. He's size is a non-factor. Most 3-4 DE's aren't going to be Calais Cambell's, although I certainly wouldn't mind one of them on the Packers.


According to the journal sentinel jones came to camp 10+ lbs heavier than his pro day weight

thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 7/29/2013(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#13 Posted : Monday, July 29, 2013 11:06:01 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 197
Applause Received: 323

Yep Jones weighed in at 295 for TC. The guy looks prototypical out there in pictures especially for starting out in sub-packages. He's the real deal guys.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
thanks Post received 2 applause.
nerdmann on 7/29/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 7/29/2013(UTC)
Offline Pack93z  
#14 Posted : Monday, July 29, 2013 11:33:59 AM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 383
Applause Received: 1,027

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules Go to Quoted Post
Yep Jones weighed in at 295 for TC. The guy looks prototypical out there in pictures especially for starting out in sub-packages. He's the real deal guys.


Personally, the opening days of camp are about the most overrated portion of the year.. even more so than OTA's. I am glad he is looking the part to start... but I want to see week 3 and the preseason.. then into the regular season.

Then, I will echo the sentiment that he looks like the real deal.. then he has to carry that over for a season or two.

Just like we are hearing little out of Lacy.. but it will not matter once the hitting starts.. it will be then where the reports, if silent, will become alarming.

I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline DoddPower  
#15 Posted : Monday, July 29, 2013 12:25:07 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,862
Applause Received: 430

Originally Posted by: Pack93z Go to Quoted Post
Personally, the opening days of camp are about the most overrated portion of the year.. even more so than OTA's. I am glad he is looking the part to start... but I want to see week 3 and the preseason.. then into the regular season.

Then, I will echo the sentiment that he looks like the real deal.. then he has to carry that over for a season or two.

Just like we are hearing little out of Lacy.. but it will not matter once the hitting starts.. it will be then where the reports, if silent, will become alarming.



Better they at least look the part at some point as opposed to not looking the part from the beginning.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
17m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

24m / Green Bay Packers Talk / coltonja

5h / Around The NFL / OlHoss1884

5h / Around The NFL / Cheesey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

6h / Random Babble / Cheesey

6h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / QCHuskerFan

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

29-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

28-Aug / Random Babble / Wade


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.