Green Bay Packers Forum
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, August 14, 2013 7:46:00 PM(UTC)
JSOnline Blog said:
Green Bay --- The switch, initially, could have been interpreted as forced, as messing with a good thing.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Rios39 on 8/18/2013(UTC)
Sponsor
Offline play2win  
#2 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:04:05 AM(UTC)
He looks pretty damn good in those drills...
Offline yooperfan  
#3 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:37:24 AM(UTC)
I don't have a lot of faith in this move and I'm not counting on Mike Neal being there when the season opens.
It seems like the Packers are grasping at straws trying to find an opposite for Mathews.
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#4 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 8:07:17 AM(UTC)
yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't have a lot of faith in this move and I'm not counting on Mike Neal being there when the season opens.
It seems like the Packers are grasping at straws trying to find an opposite for Mathews.


He's gonna most likely backup Matthews and Perry. I'm actually pretty confident in Neals ability. The guy has always be athletic for a 3-4 DE. Now he's at an acceptable 275 which I am fine with at OLB. I bet he could surprise with his coverage too. I think if he can translate to the position we'll have some depth at OLB, that after the draft we thought we didn't have. He just needs to be healthy and he could be dynamic.

Imagine Matthews, Perry, Neal, and Jones on the field at the same time. Woo, wow that sounds a lot better than years past.
thanks Post received 3 applause.
play2win on 8/15/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 8/15/2013(UTC), nerdmann on 8/15/2013(UTC)
Offline beast  
#5 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:05:51 PM(UTC)
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
He's gonna most likely backup Matthews and Perry. I'm actually pretty confident in Neals ability. The guy has always be athletic for a 3-4 DE. Now he's at an acceptable 275 which I am fine with at OLB. I bet he could surprise with his coverage too. I think if he can translate to the position we'll have some depth at OLB, that after the draft we thought we didn't have. He just needs to be healthy and he could be dynamic.

Imagine Matthews, Perry, Neal, and Jones on the field at the same time. Woo, wow that sounds a lot better than years past.



I remember after the Packers drafted him, I went back and watched his combine video of the DL... I thought he looked like an over sized throwback LB who would be great against the run and questionible in coverage more so than a DT, which he played in college.

And honestly I was calling for them to put Neal at 3-4 OLB at times in 2011, the OLB other than Matthews and Perry have looked pretty bad to me... other than Zombo in 2010 but he got worse after his rookie seasn.



I find it very interesting that the Packers late round OLB draft picks seem to keep getting cut as rookies, while they keep picking up UDFA OLB which play well as rookies and then seem to take a step back in the years after that. I'm just wondering why that is.



Offline olds70supreme  
#6 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 2:19:59 PM(UTC)
Pretty nifty move put on Kuhn at the end there, who almost fell over.

It would be nice if Neal functioned well as a LB. Given his past experience he would then be able to provide depth at both LB and DL. He might not end up being great at either but it would be valuable to have a solid player to sub in and give CMIII, Perry, and the DL a breather.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 8/15/2013(UTC)
Offline beast  
#7 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 2:44:22 PM(UTC)
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
Pretty nifty move put on Kuhn at the end there, who almost fell over.

It would be nice if Neal functioned well as a LB. Given his past experience he would then be able to provide depth at both LB and DL. He might not end up being great at either but it would be valuable to have a solid player to sub in and give CMIII, Perry, and the DL a breather.


Also there were rumors about them going to a 3-3 dime package which I haven't heard about them doing in training camp, so the rumor could be false ...

But a pass rush passage of

DL: Daniels, Raji, Jones

LB: Perry, Matthews, Neal

should be a good pass rush unit ... at least on paper.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DarkaneRules on 8/15/2013(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#8 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:41:23 PM(UTC)
Look at him in pictures next to Matthews and Perry. He certainly looks the part. Interesting development. He was my biggest surprise last pre-season, so I really hope he stays healthy now!
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#9 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:52:24 PM(UTC)
Perry isn't looking half bad either. He just needs to develop pass rush moves, and he'll be a better player. Can't wait to see what a fully healthy Nick Perry can do. I'm rooting for him and Neal.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DarkaneRules on 8/15/2013(UTC), nerdmann on 8/15/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#10 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 4:32:52 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
Look at him in pictures next to Matthews and Perry. He certainly looks the part. Interesting development. He was my biggest surprise last pre-season, so I really hope he stays healthy now!


Losing some of that excessive muscle mass might help him stay healthier.

Knock on wood!
Offline Gaycandybacon  
#11 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 5:16:42 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Losing some of that excessive muscle mass might help him stay healthier.

Knock on wood!


Don't forget about Conditioning!

Even though before I thought he could be an every down player like Matthews is.
Offline macbob  
#12 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 6:17:55 PM(UTC)
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
Pretty nifty move put on Kuhn at the end there, who almost fell over.


Kuhn got pwn'd by Perry, too, a couple of plays earlier. He didn't look good in that video clip.
Offline DakotaT  
#13 Posted : Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:01:52 PM(UTC)
Neal should be moved to the 3rd outside linebacker spot to make room to keep Jolly. If all these guys stay healthy, we just might have one mean ass front seven for a change. That should coincide well with all the ballhawks we have in the secondary. Now if we can just get 100% effort out of Raji's fat ass, the D could be dangerous again.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 8/15/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#14 Posted : Friday, August 16, 2013 1:58:08 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Neal should be moved to the 3rd outside linebacker spot to make room to keep Jolly. If all these guys stay healthy, we just might have one mean ass front seven for a change. That should coincide well with all the ballhawks we have in the secondary. Now if we can just get 100% effort out of Raji's fat ass, the D could be dangerous again.


I'd like to see them make this move with Mike Daniels.

Dude's already an undersized DL. Plus his health is far more reliable.

But we shall see.
Offline Wade  
#15 Posted : Friday, August 16, 2013 4:21:54 PM(UTC)
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
Also there were rumors about them going to a 3-3 dime package which I haven't heard about them doing in training camp, so the rumor could be false ...

But a pass rush passage of

DL: Daniels, Raji, Jones

LB: Perry, Matthews, Neal

should be a good pass rush unit ... at least on paper.


Will this group be able to stop things up the middle, though? It doesn't matter if the edges can do their thing to the nth degree if the middle allows the quarterback to step up and run/throw passes up the middle.

I'm less worried about their ability to get outside pressure from people other than Matthews than I am about their ability to keep the middle unavailable consistently.

If we get the Raji of late 2010, it'll be fine. But will we get that Raji or the other one, the one that only needs the attention of one OL?

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
15m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool


Tweeter