Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#1 Posted : Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:16:12 AM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,304
Applause Received: 1,600
Rob Demovsky said:
GREEN BAY, Wis. -- Earlier, I identified some Green Bay Packers' players who helped themselves in Saturday's 19-7 preseason victory over the St. Louis Rams.

Here's a look at some players who hurt their chances:

Graham Harrell and Vince Young: If the Packers were hoping one of the backup quarterbacks would separate himself from the other, it didn't happen. While Harrell (5-of-10, 44 yards, 0 touchdowns, 0 interceptions, 62.1 rating)...

James Starks:
Giorgio Tavecchio:
Brandon Smith:



pretty much agree with these. Trouble is Coleman isn't jumping up to #2.
Sponsor
Offline Mucky Tundra  
#2 Posted : Sunday, August 18, 2013 7:19:36 PM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2015

Rank: Senior Member
United States
Joined: 1/11/2013(UTC)
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Applause Given: 475
Applause Received: 591
I'm surprised Lane Taylor isn't on the list. Had a real dumb penalty diving at a guys legs and I seem to recall a play or two where he totally wiffed on his guy.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 8/21/2013(UTC)
Offline PackerTraxx  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:32:52 AM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 23
Applause Received: 130
At least Harrell didn't look as bad as last week and if not for a couple of drops maybe have looked fairly good.
Offline Yerko  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:13:42 PM(UTC)
Yerko

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 10/15/2008(UTC)
Location: Chicago, IL
Applause Given: 176
Applause Received: 296
I think we can all agree that regardless of which #2 QB comes out on top, this team is truly screwed regardless.

IMO, Colt McCoy should have been jumped on back when he was up for trade bait. We wouldn't even have to worry about a #2 QB.

I believe he was had for a 6th round pick?
Offline steveishere  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:28:52 PM(UTC)
steveishere

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 53
Applause Received: 1,129
Yerko said: Go to Quoted Post
I think we can all agree that regardless of which #2 QB comes out on top, this team is truly screwed regardless.

IMO, Colt McCoy should have been jumped on back when he was up for trade bait. We wouldn't even have to worry about a #2 QB.

I believe he was had for a 6th round pick?


Colt McCoy looks awful. He might not even make 3rd string QB. I'd take VY over McCoy without question.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 8/21/2013(UTC)
Offline PackerTraxx  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:48:23 PM(UTC)
PackerTraxx

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/13/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 23
Applause Received: 130
Actually, as far as I'm concerned if Aaron went down for an extended time we would be screwed like most teams. At that point I'd just as soon take our lumps draft high and kick ass next year. I know that may not be the best way to think but injuries really dishearten me.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
DoddPower on 8/21/2013(UTC), play2win on 8/22/2013(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:47:27 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,168
Applause Received: 783
PackerTraxx said: Go to Quoted Post
Actually, as far as I'm concerned if Aaron went down for an extended time we would be screwed like most teams. At that point I'd just as soon take our lumps draft high and kick ass next year. I know that may not be the best way to think but injuries really dishearten me.


I maintain it might help the offense to some degree. Our backup QB, especially if it's Harrell, would likely have to play high percentage, fundamentally sound football.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
19m / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

50m / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

18-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra


Tweeter