Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline sschind  
#11 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 1:02:41 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 384
Applause Received: 808
Gaycandybacon said: Go to Quoted Post
Rodgers played pretty bad all game. I don't know why we're getting on him for not winning the game when the Bengals Defense had momentum stopping him throughout the game. Idc what the stats say. Could any other qb win that game with the Bengals D covering every single receiver and knocking down passes left and right with no solid protection?



That is a good point. Everyone blames the Packers offense and Rodgers but they forget that the defense gets paid to do what they do as well. I think a lot of it goes back on the fact that people feel better about the loss if they can claim our offense didn't get the job done as opposed to their defense did get the job done. It's our fault we lost, we didn't get beat.

We got beat by the 49ers and now we got beat by the Bengals.
Online warhawk  
#12 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 1:41:45 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 2
Applause Received: 290
Rodgers did not play well but if there is a positive that can come from it I would venture to say he will not allow it to happen again. Just his personality. He will take this performance to heart.

Over the balance of 16 games I am not worried about Arod.

I am worried about how our defense has a tendency to coast when we get a lead. There is this thing called momentum and I don't think some of the younger guys get it.

The pass D lapsed for awhile against the Redskins and then again this week. Yeah, we were killing the Redskins but it still happened. Once the Bengals D saw the O starting to move they became even more motivated and they had already done a pretty damn good job given the field position they were often left with.

In '10 there were games when the offense struggled but the D was there to make sure we walked off with a W. THIS week should have been a W. If our D had played as hard for 60 minutes as the Bengals D it would have been one.

I will be glad to see Burnett and Hayward back. We need them.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
GoPack1984 on 9/23/2013(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#13 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 3:18:17 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 334
Applause Received: 759
He was up and down but so was the team. We have to deal with the fact that right now we are not the best team in our division. Swallowing pride time I guess. In any case, I will give the Bengals D credit again, but in that last drive, I assume it is easy when the other team doesn't have a running back available... at all. The worst thing to be is predictable. No running back? You won't beat a great team missing an integral part of an offense like that.
Offline nerdmann  
#14 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 3:27:32 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,397
Applause Received: 1,418
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
That is a good point. Everyone blames the Packers offense and Rodgers but they forget that the defense gets paid to do what they do as well. I think a lot of it goes back on the fact that people feel better about the loss if they can claim our offense didn't get the job done as opposed to their defense did get the job done. It's our fault we lost, we didn't get beat.

We got beat by the 49ers and now we got beat by the Bengals.


Here's how they did it: Taking an illegal shot to Finley's head.

How do we defend that?
Offline sschind  
#15 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 8:48:10 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 384
Applause Received: 808
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Here's how they did it: Taking an illegal shot to Finley's head.

How do we defend that?



Let me guess, it was bullshit and we shit ourselves.
Offline nerdmann  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:48:12 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,397
Applause Received: 1,418
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Let me guess, it was bullsh!t and we sh!t ourselves.


We shit ourselves repeatedly to be sure.

But the illegal hit on Finley's head went uncalled, and that cannot continue.
Offline DoddPower  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:06:36 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2016FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2015

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 3,417
Applause Received: 941
Zero2Cool said: Go to Quoted Post
or threw it to the RB in the flat there and let let him fight for the first down.

I rather the Packers attack first downs than getting greedy so much. But then I'm also one of the people who says stay on the gas and put the game away.

If the RB wasn't there, I'd be okay with this being Jones fault. Since there's someone wide open and could most likely get the first down if the WR on the edge blocks... I think this is on Rodgers decision making.


The RB just doesn't look that open to me. I see a LB within range that would very likely close and lay the wood right as the RB caught the ball, if he caught it at all. I wouldn't expect that option to get a first down. Sure, the defender could miss, but Jones could have also had better position and caught the ball, but that didn't happen either. Overall, just a bad offensive play/good defensive play.
Offline sschind  
#18 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:09:43 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 384
Applause Received: 808
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
We sh!t ourselves repeatedly to be sure.

But the illegal hit on Finley's head went uncalled, and that cannot continue.


We see things very differently then as I didn't see anything wrong with the hit on Finley.
Offline nerdmann  
#19 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:29:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,397
Applause Received: 1,418
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
We see things very differently then as I didn't see anything wrong with the hit on Finley.


Even Pereira mentioned it. Defenseless player.

Three shots to the head in a row, uncalled. Lacy, Starks and Finley. Finally they did one against JJ iirc and it got called.
Offline steveishere  
#20 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:49:57 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 58
Applause Received: 1,757
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
We see things very differently then as I didn't see anything wrong with the hit on Finley.


You mean other than it being against the rules? You can't hit a receiver who is catching a pass in the head. It's as simple as that. The defender didn't hit Finley anywhere BUT his head.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 9/24/2013(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (16m) : Not if Matt Ryan puts up a 40 passer rating. :) The last two were unfavorable conditions. This is dome time.
Cheesey (24m) : Smokey, went to fire up the crock pot to slow cook some chicken gizzards, it burned out!
Zero2Cool (35m) : Aaron Rodgers' passer rating in his 4 career games at the Georgia Dome: 114.5, 136.8, 117.0, 125.5.
Zero2Cool (4h) : from Rob Reischel @robreischel
Zero2Cool (4h) : Rodgers has played in 2 NFC Championship games. QB ratings were 56.7 and 55.9. That's won't cut it Sunday
Porforis (5h) : Have to fill the 24/7 news cycle with something.
Smokey (5h) : True, Zero
Zero2Cool (5h) : Rodgers didn't draw it up, it was selected from options. Duh.
uffda udfa (7h) : Zeke Elliott tired of domestic violence investigation. NFL moving forward now.
Smokey (13h) : Did u fire up the crock pot ?
Smokey (13h) : Jolly good show ole chap ! LOL
Cheesey (13h) : Smokey! Darn spell check! LOL!
Cheesey (13h) : Hey smiley! Just saw your shout out! How bout them Packers!
Smokey (13h) : Hello Cheesey !
GoPack1984 (16h) : I hope not. Please be something like 41-28 Packers.
uffda udfa (16h) : I agree with Chmura. This looks like a double 40 burger.
uffda udfa (16h) : The hug on the sidelines?
uffda udfa (16h) : What seemed so emotional?
Zero2Cool (17h) : No, but I am curious why that seemed so emotional. I might be reading into it too much.
uffda udfa (17h) : Anyone ever get confused looking at Alex Van Pelt thinking it's MM?
uffda udfa (18h) : I hope they aren't going to dial it down believing in destiny .
Zero2Cool (19h) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (21h) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (16-Jan) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (16-Jan) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (16-Jan) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (16-Jan) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (16-Jan) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (16-Jan) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

29m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

16h / Fantasy Sports Talk / rabidgopher04

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12


Packers Headlines