Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Laser Gunns  
#16 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 1:14:29 PM(UTC)

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 47
Applause Received: 311
GOOD!

the spot will go to either a RB or WR with return ability.

Joe McKnight fits the bill, and was had a workout recently.

but I just can't see us not having 5 WR on the roster,

I don't think Johnson or Dorsey have experience as returners, so they will stay on the PS. Ted may have to go outside Wisconsin to pick up a guy.
Offline wpr  
#17 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 2:02:38 PM(UTC)

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,311
Applause Received: 1,606
Pack93z said: Go to Quoted Post
Chris Rainey works out for the Chiefs, runs in the low 4.3s.... kid was a dynamic open space player for the Gators in college.

He has some legal issues..


so you are saying he is not Packer People? Pass. ;P
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 9/23/2013(UTC)
Online texaspackerbacker  
#18 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 2:44:11 PM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 607
Applause Received: 417
Rainey sounds good to me, but so far he has no link to the Packers at all - work out or whatever. McKnight also sounds good, and he did work out. I don't know anything about Hill. What is he - speed back, power runner, shifty?

With a strong chance of both Lacy and Starks coming back for the Detroit game in addition to Franklin, I don't think it is automatic they sign a RB. I still hope they don't use Cobb as the primary returner.
Offline sschind  
#19 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 3:04:33 PM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member
United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 227
Applause Received: 613
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Rainey sounds good to me, but so far he has no link to the Packers at all - work out or whatever. McKnight also sounds good, and he did work out. I don't know anything about Hill. What is he - speed back, power runner, shifty?

With a strong chance of both Lacy and Starks coming back for the Detroit game in addition to Franklin, I don't think it is automatic they sign a RB. I still hope they don't use Cobb as the primary returner.


I agree about Cobb but one can't help but wonder if our W/L situation might be different (3-0 perhaps) had we left the duties up to him and done away with Ross from the start. I have to think that the only reason we stuck with Ross was because no one else stepped up and Mike McCarthy did not want to risk Cobb. A little less caution may have resulted in a win or two. Of course it may have resulted in 2 losses anyway along with the loss of a huge part of our offense as well. Its all water under the bridge now though.

Online nerdmann  
#20 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 3:30:51 PM(UTC)

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,852
Applause Received: 910
Joe Thomas, baby!
Offline Bigbyfan  
#21 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 5:58:35 PM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 59
Applause Received: 157
The Packers almost have to sign a WR to replace him. Like someone already said, I cannot see the Packers only keeping 4 receivers on the roster.
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#22 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 6:07:07 PM(UTC)

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 583
Bigbyfan said: Go to Quoted Post
The Packers almost have to sign a WR to replace him. Like someone already said, I cannot see the Packers only keeping 4 receivers on the roster.


I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.
Online nerdmann  
#23 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:12:54 PM(UTC)

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,852
Applause Received: 910
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.


Is Bostick that much of a drop off at WR compared to Ross?
Offline DakotaT  
#24 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:16:43 PM(UTC)

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 781
Applause Received: 1,574
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
so you are saying he is not Packer People? Pass. ;P



[-x

[mfing]
Offline wpr  
#25 Posted : Monday, September 23, 2013 7:42:57 PM(UTC)

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,311
Applause Received: 1,606
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
[-x

[mfing]


love you man. at least you read my posts. [happy]
Offline play2win  
#26 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:33:11 AM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Is Bostick that much of a drop off at WR compared to Ross?


I can't imagine how....
Offline Zero2Cool  
#27 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:39:51 AM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,139
Applause Received: 2,879
Makes room for Josh Cribbs!!!
Offline Bigbyfan  
#28 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 2:36:31 PM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 59
Applause Received: 157
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't know, unlike years past, they are not running empty nearly as often. And when they do, it is more TE involvement. Even if they don't get a WR, they still have 7 receiving options, not including RB.


What happens if 1 or 2 of our receivers get injured in a game? Do we just throw out any plays that require 3 receivers? You can't just throw a tightend over there and expect the same results. Tightends have enough to worry about memorizing their plays, doubt they know the routes of every receiver on every play. Also there's a difference between having a receiver run a certain route as planned, and having a tightend try to duplicate the same results. Going into a game with only four receivers is a bad move.

Offline steveishere  
#29 Posted : Tuesday, September 24, 2013 3:00:03 PM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 56
Applause Received: 1,253
Bigbyfan said: Go to Quoted Post
What happens if 1 or 2 of our receivers get injured in a game? Do we just throw out any plays that require 3 receivers? You can't just throw a tightend over there and expect the same results. Tightends have enough to worry about memorizing their plays, doubt they know the routes of every receiver on every play. Also there's a difference between having a receiver run a certain route as planned, and having a tightend try to duplicate the same results. Going into a game with only four receivers is a bad move.



If they lose 2 WRs they are going to do less 3+ WR stuff whether there's a Ross on the roster or not. They've been doing 95+% of their work with just 3 so far. Being shorthanded by 1 mostly useless WR for a single game won't make much difference.
Offline cheeseheads123  
#30 Posted : Monday, September 30, 2013 9:59:05 AM(UTC)

Rank: Member
Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 83
Applause Received: 164
Any news yet on a replacement?
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Smokey (3m) : Why be a guest, come join us today !
Zero2Cool (28m) : Hyde is the injury I'm most concerned about. Cobby fine.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

Road To Super Bowl 50
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

44m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / SINCITYCHEEZE

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

29-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / RainX


Tweeter