Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Mucky Tundra  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:25:18 AM(UTC)
JerseyAl said:
The Green Bay Packers announced on Monday that running back Michael Hill was signed off of the team's practice squad and to the 53-man roster.  Hill fills the roster spot that was vacated when the Packers released receiver/kick returner Jeremy Ross following the team's loss to the Cincinnati Bengals. Hill spent most of this year's training camp [...]


I wondered this as well when I heard that they signed a RB to the roster.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:34:06 AM(UTC)
Hopefully it's just a precaution, but last week showed that you need plenty of RBs on the active roster. With the hyper-caution about concussions, as well as the probable increase in leg injuries partially resulting from the emphasis on no hits to the head, a team can go from plenty of RBs to none in just a few plays. I'd even go so far as to cross-train several other position players as RBs at least minimally.
sschind  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:43:12 AM(UTC)
Just caught a blurb from Tyler Dunne last night and he said he expected Starks to miss 3-4 weeks. He didn't say, or at least I didn't catch, what he based it on.
yooperfan  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 7:44:33 AM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Just caught a blurb from Tyler Dunne last night and he said he expected Starks to miss 3-4 weeks. He didn't say, or at least I didn't catch, what he based it on.


Cut him.
There is no use for a player that spends most of his time in the rehab room.

hardrocker950  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:05:09 AM(UTC)
yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
Cut him.
There is no use for a player that spends most of his time in the rehab room.



At this point that is hard to argue. Having a guy on IR on a regular basis hurts our roster. Cutting Starks would open a roster spot, but could give us issues in our depth at RB if he isn't going to miss more than a couple weeks.

I like the guy, but I am tired of seeing him in the injury report every season.](*,)
Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:16:44 AM(UTC)
He's typically only good for a handful of games consecutively. Slap him with the IR to return deal and gradually bring him back for the playoff push.
Cheesey  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:50:04 AM(UTC)
It's a shame that Starks can't stay healthy.
When he is (on the rare occasion) he has shown that he has talent.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 11:59:57 AM(UTC)
I'm not as negative on Starks and the whole injury thing as I was previously. When it seemed like he was our only decent RB or whatever, then, yeah, it was a big deal when he was so disgustingly prone to injury. But now, with Lacy and Franklin, he can miss 3-4 weeks if that turns out to be true, then come in and play hard in mid-season, giving the others a little bit of a break or if one of them gets injured, and if he gets hurt again, no big deal - maybe he'd be back just in time for the late season run. Taking up a roster spot really isn't that big a deal, especially considering there are inactives out of the 53 each week anyway.
nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 12:46:54 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
I'm not as negative on Starks and the whole injury thing as I was previously. When it seemed like he was our only decent RB or whatever, then, yeah, it was a big deal when he was so disgustingly prone to injury. But now, with Lacy and Franklin, he can miss 3-4 weeks if that turns out to be true, then come in and play hard in mid-season, giving the others a little bit of a break or if one of them gets injured, and if he gets hurt again, no big deal - maybe he'd be back just in time for the late season run. Taking up a roster spot really isn't that big a deal, especially considering there are inactives out of the 53 each week anyway.


Starks can start.

And I don't mean, "if there's nobody better on the team." What I mean is, he can beat NFL defenses consistently.

But Lacy and Franklin are better.
Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (11m) : welcome back ted lol over react much? HAHAHA SIT DOWN
packerfanoutwest (1h) : go to the chat room
gbguy20 (1h) : at least stay in the teens
gbguy20 (1h) : Fucking Bullshit
Cheesey (1h) : Welcome back, Ted.
Bigbyfan (2h) : Of course the Bears would be the ones to take my guy...
isocleas2 (2h) : Interesting
isocleas2 (2h) : Ward at #4
Zero2Cool (3h) : Bahahahhaha
Zero2Cool (3h) : In Madden.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers made a trade!!
beast (4h) : Na, they're going to trade this year's 1st to the Patriots for two 1st round picks (one next year and one this year).
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers might draft Saquon Barkley
beast (6h) : He's actions said, he's going to tease the #1 pick choice as long as he can
Zero2Cool (7h) : How so? What did he say?
beast (7h) : John Dorsey is just messing with people now... which QB he'll take... I partly love it, partly annoyed by it.
Zero2Cool (7h) : You can make your NFL Pick's (Fantasy > NFL Pick'em)
Smokey (7h) : bye week is not listed in this forum's posting.
Zero2Cool (7h) : You don't follow the Pacers, do you?
gbguy20 (8h) : i must be missing something with the bye week comment
Smokey (9h) : Order your Pizza, Now !
Smokey (9h) : Packers
Smokey (9h) : Yes there is a bye week in the Pacers 2018 Schedule.
Zero2Cool (9h) : no charges? so the bomb was a dud??
Zero2Cool (9h) : No charges for WR Davis over LAX bomb joke
Cheesey (9h) : THE WRATH OF KHAN!!
Zero2Cool (9h) : damn caps
Zero2Cool (9h) : yEEHAW!!
Smokey (9h) : "DRAFT CHAT" Baby !
packerfanoutwest (12h) : Packers first pick will be lining up on with the defense
beast (13h) : If Packers trade up, they're grabbing James (or an ILB or CB) ;-P
beast (13h) : Sounds like Khan is moving the team to London in time.
packerfanoutwest (13h) : Here's an idea. Start a thread on who can pick the Packers #1 pick. Just make the pick only. No other comments.
Zero2Cool (14h) : This is NOT good
Zero2Cool (14h) : Shad Khan: I’m buying Wembley to keep the Jaguars stable in both London and Jacksonville
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2018 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 9 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Sep 16 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Sep 23 @ 12:00 PM
Redskins
Sunday, Sep 30 @ 12:00 PM
BILLS
Sunday, Oct 7 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Monday, Oct 15 @ 7:15 PM
49ERS
Sunday, Oct 28 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Nov 4 @ 7:20 PM
Patriots
Sunday, Nov 11 @ 12:00 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Nov 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Sunday, Nov 25 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Dec 2 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Dec 9 @ 12:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Dec 16 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Dec 23 @ 12:00 PM
Jets
Sunday, Dec 30 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

36m / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

7h / Random Babble / Cheesey

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Bigbyfan

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

24-Apr / Around The NFL / dhazer

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines