You are not logged in. Join Free! | Log In Thank you!    

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Share
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Mucky Tundra  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:25:18 AM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 675
Joined: 1/11/2013(UTC)
Location: Murray, Kentucky

Applause Given: 217
Applause Received: 269

JerseyAl wrote:
The Green Bay Packers announced on Monday that running back Michael Hill was signed off of the team's practice squad and to the 53-man roster.  Hill fills the roster spot that was vacated when the Packers released receiver/kick returner Jeremy Ross following the team's loss to the Cincinnati Bengals. Hill spent most of this year's training camp [...]


I wondered this as well when I heard that they signed a RB to the roster.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:34:06 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,371
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 348
Applause Received: 209

Hopefully it's just a precaution, but last week showed that you need plenty of RBs on the active roster. With the hyper-caution about concussions, as well as the probable increase in leg injuries partially resulting from the emphasis on no hits to the head, a team can go from plenty of RBs to none in just a few plays. I'd even go so far as to cross-train several other position players as RBs at least minimally.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline sschind  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:43:12 AM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 756
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 78
Applause Received: 312

Just caught a blurb from Tyler Dunne last night and he said he expected Starks to miss 3-4 weeks. He didn't say, or at least I didn't catch, what he based it on.
I fully respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 10/1/2013(UTC)
Offline yooperfan  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 7:44:33 AM(UTC)
yooperfan

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,713
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan

Applause Given: 476
Applause Received: 225

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
Just caught a blurb from Tyler Dunne last night and he said he expected Starks to miss 3-4 weeks. He didn't say, or at least I didn't catch, what he based it on.


Cut him.
There is no use for a player that spends most of his time in the rehab room.

Offline hardrocker950  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:05:09 AM(UTC)
hardrocker950

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 259
Joined: 11/10/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 57
Applause Received: 53

Originally Posted by: yooperfan Go to Quoted Post
Cut him.
There is no use for a player that spends most of his time in the rehab room.



At this point that is hard to argue. Having a guy on IR on a regular basis hurts our roster. Cutting Starks would open a roster spot, but could give us issues in our depth at RB if he isn't going to miss more than a couple weeks.

I like the guy, but I am tired of seeing him in the injury report every season.Brick wall
"I enjoy being just one of 53 on the team." - Aaron Rodgers
Offline Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:16:44 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

United States
Posts: 25,225
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,739
Applause Received: 1,790

He's typically only good for a handful of games consecutively. Slap him with the IR to return deal and gradually bring him back for the playoff push.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline Cheesey  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:50:04 AM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Posts: 8,552
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 159
Applause Received: 326

It's a shame that Starks can't stay healthy.
When he is (on the rare occasion) he has shown that he has talent.
UserPostedImage
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 11:59:57 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 2,371
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 348
Applause Received: 209

I'm not as negative on Starks and the whole injury thing as I was previously. When it seemed like he was our only decent RB or whatever, then, yeah, it was a big deal when he was so disgustingly prone to injury. But now, with Lacy and Franklin, he can miss 3-4 weeks if that turns out to be true, then come in and play hard in mid-season, giving the others a little bit of a break or if one of them gets injured, and if he gets hurt again, no big deal - maybe he'd be back just in time for the late season run. Taking up a roster spot really isn't that big a deal, especially considering there are inactives out of the 53 each week anyway.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 12:46:54 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,514
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,105
Applause Received: 470

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
I'm not as negative on Starks and the whole injury thing as I was previously. When it seemed like he was our only decent RB or whatever, then, yeah, it was a big deal when he was so disgustingly prone to injury. But now, with Lacy and Franklin, he can miss 3-4 weeks if that turns out to be true, then come in and play hard in mid-season, giving the others a little bit of a break or if one of them gets injured, and if he gets hurt again, no big deal - maybe he'd be back just in time for the late season run. Taking up a roster spot really isn't that big a deal, especially considering there are inactives out of the 53 each week anyway.


Starks can start.

And I don't mean, "if there's nobody better on the team." What I mean is, he can beat NFL defenses consistently.

But Lacy and Franklin are better.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF 2.1.0 | YAF © 2003-2014, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.178 seconds.