Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Mucky Tundra  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:25:18 AM(UTC)
Mucky Tundra

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 1/11/2013(UTC)
Location: Murray, Kentucky

Applause Given: 309
Applause Received: 385

JerseyAl wrote:
The Green Bay Packers announced on Monday that running back Michael Hill was signed off of the team's practice squad and to the 53-man roster.  Hill fills the roster spot that was vacated when the Packers released receiver/kick returner Jeremy Ross following the team's loss to the Cincinnati Bengals. Hill spent most of this year's training camp [...]


I wondered this as well when I heard that they signed a RB to the roster.
May not have the best looking number...but it's the sexiest! -David Bakhtiari
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:34:06 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 402
Applause Received: 232

Hopefully it's just a precaution, but last week showed that you need plenty of RBs on the active roster. With the hyper-caution about concussions, as well as the probable increase in leg injuries partially resulting from the emphasis on no hits to the head, a team can go from plenty of RBs to none in just a few plays. I'd even go so far as to cross-train several other position players as RBs at least minimally.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline sschind  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 6:43:12 AM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 113
Applause Received: 411

Just caught a blurb from Tyler Dunne last night and he said he expected Starks to miss 3-4 weeks. He didn't say, or at least I didn't catch, what he based it on.
I respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 10/1/2013(UTC)
Offline yooperfan  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 7:44:33 AM(UTC)
yooperfan

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan

Applause Given: 539
Applause Received: 247

Originally Posted by: sschind Go to Quoted Post
Just caught a blurb from Tyler Dunne last night and he said he expected Starks to miss 3-4 weeks. He didn't say, or at least I didn't catch, what he based it on.


Cut him.
There is no use for a player that spends most of his time in the rehab room.

Offline hardrocker950  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:05:09 AM(UTC)
hardrocker950

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 11/10/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 63
Applause Received: 58

Originally Posted by: yooperfan Go to Quoted Post
Cut him.
There is no use for a player that spends most of his time in the rehab room.



At this point that is hard to argue. Having a guy on IR on a regular basis hurts our roster. Cutting Starks would open a roster spot, but could give us issues in our depth at RB if he isn't going to miss more than a couple weeks.

I like the guy, but I am tired of seeing him in the injury report every season.Brick wall
"I enjoy being just one of 53 on the team." - Aaron Rodgers
Offline Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 8:16:44 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,866
Applause Received: 2,038

He's typically only good for a handful of games consecutively. Slap him with the IR to return deal and gradually bring him back for the playoff push.
UserPostedImage
Offline Cheesey  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:50:04 AM(UTC)
Cheesey

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 162
Applause Received: 348

It's a shame that Starks can't stay healthy.
When he is (on the rare occasion) he has shown that he has talent.
UserPostedImage
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 11:59:57 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 402
Applause Received: 232

I'm not as negative on Starks and the whole injury thing as I was previously. When it seemed like he was our only decent RB or whatever, then, yeah, it was a big deal when he was so disgustingly prone to injury. But now, with Lacy and Franklin, he can miss 3-4 weeks if that turns out to be true, then come in and play hard in mid-season, giving the others a little bit of a break or if one of them gets injured, and if he gets hurt again, no big deal - maybe he'd be back just in time for the late season run. Taking up a roster spot really isn't that big a deal, especially considering there are inactives out of the 53 each week anyway.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline nerdmann  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 1, 2013 12:46:54 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,362
Applause Received: 599

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
I'm not as negative on Starks and the whole injury thing as I was previously. When it seemed like he was our only decent RB or whatever, then, yeah, it was a big deal when he was so disgustingly prone to injury. But now, with Lacy and Franklin, he can miss 3-4 weeks if that turns out to be true, then come in and play hard in mid-season, giving the others a little bit of a break or if one of them gets injured, and if he gets hurt again, no big deal - maybe he'd be back just in time for the late season run. Taking up a roster spot really isn't that big a deal, especially considering there are inactives out of the 53 each week anyway.


Starks can start.

And I don't mean, "if there's nobody better on the team." What I mean is, he can beat NFL defenses consistently.

But Lacy and Franklin are better.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
20m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dexter_Sinister

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

18h / Around The NFL / Cheesey

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.