PackersHome
»
Lambeau Field
»
Green Bay Packers Talk
»
Packers OLBs Not Named Clay Matthews Offering Virtually No Pass Rush
Rank: Select Member
 Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC) Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581
|
CheeseheadTV wrote: Nick Perry and Mike Neal have done little in the way of putting pressure on opposing quarterbacks so far this season. let me write this down. It is something brand new that we have not heard in the past 3-4 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 767
Applause Received: 383
|
The search continues.
Stay tuned for next years "news".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC) Location: Texas Applause Given: 511
Applause Received: 331
|
I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job. |
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What. |
 Post received 1 applause.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Rookie
Joined: 8/10/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 44
|
It seems early to start howling about this based on the small sample size. The first two games of the season were against quarterbacks where the focus seemed to be containment rather than pressure. We basically only have one game (Bengals) to decipher what the pass rush is like. If we get to the middle of the season and are still seeing similar results then I would agree we haven't solved the pass rush issue. |
blank |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)
Applause Given: 189
Applause Received: 112
|
Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker  I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job. somebody ... give em all a try - heck they had brad jones in for awhile and he sucked - I think the only reason he got some sacks in because CM3 and was jenkins still on our team then? - were beating the line up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 2,998
Applause Received: 731
|
Originally Posted by: olds70supreme It seems early to start howling about this based on the small sample size. The first two games of the season were against quarterbacks where the focus seemed to be containment rather than pressure. We basically only have one game (Bengals) to decipher what the pass rush is like. If we get to the middle of the season and are still seeing similar results then I would agree we haven't solved the pass rush issue. Exactly. Plus, Detoilet's T's suck. |
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.” |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 404
Applause Received: 494
|
Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job. So in other threads you have expressed your dislike of Hawk and B. Jones. I think you have said you would prefer them not being on the team. Now you want Mulumba to start. Hell let's just go all the way with this. This weeks starting 4 lbr's, Mulumba, Barrington, Lattimore and Palmer. Damn now that's a lineup not to worry about. ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) |
Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers" |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC) Location: Texas Applause Given: 511
Applause Received: 331
|
Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan So in other threads you have expressed your dislike of Hawk and B. Jones. I think you have said you would prefer them not being on the team.
Now you want Mulumba to start.
Hell let's just go all the way with this.
This weeks starting 4 lbr's, Mulumba, Barrington, Lattimore and Palmer.
Damn now that's a lineup not to worry about.
](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) Of course Matthews would need to be included, but other than that, yeah, I'd be fine with it. There'd be a short period of transition, I suppose, but talent-wise, those guys all would be upgrades over the other LBs - Perry possibly being the exception - the jury is still out on him, but I really think Mulumba in his brief opportunites has shown more than Perry ever showed. And those plow horses currently at ILB just drag down the whole defense. I actually like Francois better than Lattimore, though. |
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 404
Applause Received: 494
|
Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Of course Matthews would need to be included, but other than that, yeah, I'd be fine with it. There'd be a short period of transition, I suppose, but talent-wise, those guys all would be upgrades over the other LBs - Perry possibly being the exception - the jury is still out on him, but I really think Mulumba in his brief opportunites has shown more than Perry ever showed.
And those plow horses currently at ILB just drag down the whole defense.
I actually like Francois better than Lattimore, though. Thankfully YOU don't make the decisions. That will be a fine lineup in another 2 years, when they are ready, for now you will have to live with the experienced plow horses that seem to be doing a pretty good job. WHY DON'T YOU START UDFA AND LATE RND DRAFT PICKS? |
Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers" |
|
|
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest
|
PackersHome
»
Lambeau Field
»
Green Bay Packers Talk
»
Packers OLBs Not Named Clay Matthews Offering Virtually No Pass Rush
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.