Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 5:17:51 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3,143
Applause Received: 1,515

CheeseheadTV wrote:
Nick Perry and Mike Neal have done little in the way of putting pressure on opposing quarterbacks so far this season.


let me write this down. It is something brand new that we have not heard in the past 3-4 years.
UserPostedImage

"Will you follow me, one last time?" Thorin Oakenshield
Offline yooperfan  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 5:27:47 AM(UTC)
yooperfan

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan

Applause Given: 632
Applause Received: 290

The search continues.
Stay tuned for next years "news".
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 6:23:12 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 481
Applause Received: 292

I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Dulak on 10/2/2013(UTC)
Offline olds70supreme  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 6:24:02 AM(UTC)
olds70supreme

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/10/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 42

It seems early to start howling about this based on the small sample size. The first two games of the season were against quarterbacks where the focus seemed to be containment rather than pressure. We basically only have one game (Bengals) to decipher what the pass rush is like. If we get to the middle of the season and are still seeing similar results then I would agree we haven't solved the pass rush issue.
blank
Offline Dulak  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:05:20 AM(UTC)
Dulak

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)

Applause Given: 159
Applause Received: 103

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job.


somebody ... give em all a try - heck they had brad jones in for awhile and he sucked - I think the only reason he got some sacks in because CM3 and was jenkins still on our team then? - were beating the line up.

Offline nerdmann  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:54:06 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Most Valuable Player

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,705
Applause Received: 663

Originally Posted by: olds70supreme Go to Quoted Post
It seems early to start howling about this based on the small sample size. The first two games of the season were against quarterbacks where the focus seemed to be containment rather than pressure. We basically only have one game (Bengals) to decipher what the pass rush is like. If we get to the middle of the season and are still seeing similar results then I would agree we haven't solved the pass rush issue.


Exactly.

Plus, Detoilet's T's suck.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 12:13:58 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio

Applause Given: 350
Applause Received: 457

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job.


So in other threads you have expressed your dislike of Hawk and B. Jones. I think you have said you would prefer them not being on the team.

Now you want Mulumba to start.

Hell let's just go all the way with this.

This weeks starting 4 lbr's, Mulumba, Barrington, Lattimore and Palmer.

Damn now that's a lineup not to worry about.

Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall
Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers"
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Thursday, October 3, 2013 10:55:48 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 481
Applause Received: 292

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan Go to Quoted Post
So in other threads you have expressed your dislike of Hawk and B. Jones. I think you have said you would prefer them not being on the team.

Now you want Mulumba to start.

Hell let's just go all the way with this.

This weeks starting 4 lbr's, Mulumba, Barrington, Lattimore and Palmer.

Damn now that's a lineup not to worry about.

Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall Brick wall


Of course Matthews would need to be included, but other than that, yeah, I'd be fine with it. There'd be a short period of transition, I suppose, but talent-wise, those guys all would be upgrades over the other LBs - Perry possibly being the exception - the jury is still out on him, but I really think Mulumba in his brief opportunites has shown more than Perry ever showed.

And those plow horses currently at ILB just drag down the whole defense.

I actually like Francois better than Lattimore, though.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#9 Posted : Thursday, October 3, 2013 11:20:20 AM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio

Applause Given: 350
Applause Received: 457

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
Of course Matthews would need to be included, but other than that, yeah, I'd be fine with it. There'd be a short period of transition, I suppose, but talent-wise, those guys all would be upgrades over the other LBs - Perry possibly being the exception - the jury is still out on him, but I really think Mulumba in his brief opportunites has shown more than Perry ever showed.

And those plow horses currently at ILB just drag down the whole defense.

I actually like Francois better than Lattimore, though.


Thankfully YOU don't make the decisions.

That will be a fine lineup in another 2 years, when they are ready, for now you will have to live with the experienced plow horses that seem to be doing a pretty good job.

WHY DON'T YOU START UDFA AND LATE RND DRAFT PICKS?
Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers"
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / porky88

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packman82

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

22-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / macbob

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / Since69

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

20-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

19-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann