Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 5:17:51 AM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,303
Applause Received: 1,600
CheeseheadTV said:
Nick Perry and Mike Neal have done little in the way of putting pressure on opposing quarterbacks so far this season.


let me write this down. It is something brand new that we have not heard in the past 3-4 years.
Sponsor
Offline yooperfan  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 5:27:47 AM(UTC)
yooperfan

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan
Applause Given: 849
Applause Received: 405
The search continues.
Stay tuned for next years "news".
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 6:23:12 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 531
Applause Received: 373
I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Dulak on 10/2/2013(UTC)
Offline olds70supreme  
#4 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 6:24:02 AM(UTC)
olds70supreme

Rank: Rookie
Joined: 8/10/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 18
Applause Received: 44
It seems early to start howling about this based on the small sample size. The first two games of the season were against quarterbacks where the focus seemed to be containment rather than pressure. We basically only have one game (Bengals) to decipher what the pass rush is like. If we get to the middle of the season and are still seeing similar results then I would agree we haven't solved the pass rush issue.
Offline Dulak  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 7:05:20 AM(UTC)
Dulak

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)
Applause Given: 203
Applause Received: 113
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job.


somebody ... give em all a try - heck they had brad jones in for awhile and he sucked - I think the only reason he got some sacks in because CM3 and was jenkins still on our team then? - were beating the line up.

Offline nerdmann  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:54:06 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,168
Applause Received: 783
olds70supreme said: Go to Quoted Post
It seems early to start howling about this based on the small sample size. The first two games of the season were against quarterbacks where the focus seemed to be containment rather than pressure. We basically only have one game (Bengals) to decipher what the pass rush is like. If we get to the middle of the season and are still seeing similar results then I would agree we haven't solved the pass rush issue.


Exactly.

Plus, Detoilet's T's suck.
Online buckeyepackfan  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, October 2, 2013 12:13:58 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 445
Applause Received: 532
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
I really wish they'd give Mulumba a shot at Perry's job.


So in other threads you have expressed your dislike of Hawk and B. Jones. I think you have said you would prefer them not being on the team.

Now you want Mulumba to start.

Hell let's just go all the way with this.

This weeks starting 4 lbr's, Mulumba, Barrington, Lattimore and Palmer.

Damn now that's a lineup not to worry about.

](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Thursday, October 3, 2013 10:55:48 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 531
Applause Received: 373
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
So in other threads you have expressed your dislike of Hawk and B. Jones. I think you have said you would prefer them not being on the team.

Now you want Mulumba to start.

Hell let's just go all the way with this.

This weeks starting 4 lbr's, Mulumba, Barrington, Lattimore and Palmer.

Damn now that's a lineup not to worry about.

](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)


Of course Matthews would need to be included, but other than that, yeah, I'd be fine with it. There'd be a short period of transition, I suppose, but talent-wise, those guys all would be upgrades over the other LBs - Perry possibly being the exception - the jury is still out on him, but I really think Mulumba in his brief opportunites has shown more than Perry ever showed.

And those plow horses currently at ILB just drag down the whole defense.

I actually like Francois better than Lattimore, though.
Online buckeyepackfan  
#9 Posted : Thursday, October 3, 2013 11:20:20 AM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio
Applause Given: 445
Applause Received: 532
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Of course Matthews would need to be included, but other than that, yeah, I'd be fine with it. There'd be a short period of transition, I suppose, but talent-wise, those guys all would be upgrades over the other LBs - Perry possibly being the exception - the jury is still out on him, but I really think Mulumba in his brief opportunites has shown more than Perry ever showed.

And those plow horses currently at ILB just drag down the whole defense.

I actually like Francois better than Lattimore, though.


Thankfully YOU don't make the decisions.

That will be a fine lineup in another 2 years, when they are ready, for now you will have to live with the experienced plow horses that seem to be doing a pretty good job.

WHY DON'T YOU START UDFA AND LATE RND DRAFT PICKS?
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Wade

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

17-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dulak

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey


Tweeter