Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
wpr  
#1 Posted : Sunday, October 6, 2013 4:03:36 PM(UTC)
JSOnline Blog said:
Green Bay --- After a win, this was the absolute last thing T.J. Lang wanted to hear. The Packers left guard knew Eddie Lacy was close to 100 yards.
But informed that the rookie running back had gained 99 yards, Lang cringed and ducked his head down in disgust.

“Ninety-nine?! Son of a...," said Lang, dropping a few choice words. "It was close. I didn’t know."



getting a running game will certainly help as the season wears on.
Mucky Tundra  
#2 Posted : Sunday, October 6, 2013 4:17:51 PM(UTC)
Bakhtiari GS 4
Sitton GS 4
Dietrich-Smith GS 4
Lang GS 4
Barclay GS 4

The more these guys start with another the better the ground game should get. It'd be nice to see nothing but 16s for this group at the end of the season.
nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Sunday, October 6, 2013 4:23:20 PM(UTC)
If it wasn't for that holding penalty!

Or that one late play where he got stuffed!

Dude's gonna be a good 'un.
Gaycandybacon  
#4 Posted : Sunday, October 6, 2013 5:06:15 PM(UTC)
The stats may not say it but we've really had 3 different runners on our team go over 100 yards. Great job Packers! We can win with this kind of production out of the run game!
sschind  
#5 Posted : Sunday, October 6, 2013 8:51:05 PM(UTC)
Several times during this game I was reacquainted with a feeling I haven't had with a Packers RB since Ahman Green. Lacy looked so close to busting a huge gain on several occasions. With Green I got that impression a lot, with Lacy it's only a matter of time.

Side note, If McCarthy knew Lacy was 1 yard shy of 100 do you think he would have given him the ball rather than have Rodgers take a knee? I think he would have. I was kind of hoping he would after the Lions called the timeout after the knee but I understand why he punted.
beast  
#6 Posted : Sunday, October 6, 2013 9:02:31 PM(UTC)


For the first time since Ahman Green in his prime, I asked myself the question of "Why are the Packers passing here?"

It happened some in the Bengals game where Rodgers seemed to be off and the running game was looking good. But I asked it a couple times in this game with 3rd and shorts they come up with a delayed pass play... and asked why did they just run it?


Of course the answer very well could be the front the defense was showing. I noticed the Lions seem to run a good bit of the "wide 9" which spreads out the DL making it easier for them to get one on one match-ups in the passing game and better angles to pass rush. But spreading them out like that makes it harder for them to defend the run and fill running lanes, though they have Suh and Fairly which are pretty good DTs so putting pressure on their very good DTs to step up and make plays to free up their DEs some more. And Packers were willing and able to run on them like that.
cheeseheads123  
#7 Posted : Sunday, October 6, 2013 10:14:14 PM(UTC)
Still didn't like how we didn't run on those early 3rd and 1s
play2win  
#8 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 5:16:59 AM(UTC)
All I can say, is it is very encouraging to know we have a really good running game, from a talent standpoint. Our OL looks to be playing well together to create lanes, and our RBs look very solid. Now, if only we can get our HC to trust that running the football and winning is sexy...
Mucky Tundra  
#9 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 9:36:14 AM(UTC)
Damn it now this is a glorious photo that I could get used to seeing! ThumpUp

UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins  
#10 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 9:45:05 AM(UTC)
Had Boykin not held, Lacy would have broken 100 yards.
DarkaneRules  
#11 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 9:55:26 AM(UTC)
The Packers used the Lions aggressiveness against them. It was a good game plan.
wpr  
#12 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 10:02:54 AM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
Several times during this game I was reacquainted with a feeling I haven't had with a Packers RB since Ahman Green. Lacy looked so close to busting a huge gain on several occasions. With Green I got that impression a lot, with Lacy it's only a matter of time.

Side note, If McCarthy knew Lacy was 1 yard shy of 100 do you think he would have given him the ball rather than have Rodgers take a knee? I think he would have. I was kind of hoping he would after the Lions called the timeout after the knee but I understand why he punted.


no Mike does nothing to try and get personal accolades for players and he does nothing to that would rile up the other team generally speaking.
sschind  
#13 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 8:08:47 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
no Mike does nothing to try and get personal accolades for players and he does nothing to that would rile up the other team generally speaking.


I disagree. First of all a run would not have riled up the the other team. It actually would have made more sense than taking the knee. If Lacy gains that yard we do not have to punt and Rodgers takes a knee on the next play.

Second, I think Mike McCarthy may have given Lacy the ball had he known he was only a yard short. McCarthy is big on having team support. You saw how bummed Lang was when he found out Lacy was a yard short. Had he gotten that yard the entire offense would have benefited. The OL knows what has been said about them not being able to run block. I know its only a yard but its a benchmark. 3 different 100 yard rushers in three weeks would have gone a long way to building up their confidence.

It's not like he would have been passing for a TD with 1 minute to go when you are up by 3 TDs already. That is out of Mike McCarthy character. Letting a RB have a chance at 100 yards by calling a play that 9 out of 10 coaches would have called anyway would make perfect sense and I think Mike McCarthy would have obliged.
nerdmann  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 4:37:26 AM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree. First of all a run would not have riled up the the other team. It actually would have made more sense than taking the knee. If Lacy gains that yard we do not have to punt and Rodgers takes a knee on the next play.

Second, I think Mike McCarthy may have given Lacy the ball had he known he was only a yard short. McCarthy is big on having team support. You saw how bummed Lang was when he found out Lacy was a yard short. Had he gotten that yard the entire offense would have benefited. The OL knows what has been said about them not being able to run block. I know its only a yard but its a benchmark. 3 different 100 yard rushers in three weeks would have gone a long way to building up their confidence.

It's not like he would have been passing for a TD with 1 minute to go when you are up by 3 TDs already. That is out of Mike McCarthy character. Letting a RB have a chance at 100 yards by calling a play that 9 out of 10 coaches would have called anyway would make perfect sense and I think Mike McCarthy would have obliged.


Mike and Aaron are big on statistics.
wpr  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 5:27:01 AM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree. First of all a run would not have riled up the the other team. It actually would have made more sense than taking the knee. If Lacy gains that yard we do not have to punt and Rodgers takes a knee on the next play.

Second, I think Mike McCarthy may have given Lacy the ball had he known he was only a yard short. McCarthy is big on having team support. You saw how bummed Lang was when he found out Lacy was a yard short. Had he gotten that yard the entire offense would have benefited. The OL knows what has been said about them not being able to run block. I know its only a yard but its a benchmark. 3 different 100 yard rushers in three weeks would have gone a long way to building up their confidence.

It's not like he would have been passing for a TD with 1 minute to go when you are up by 3 TDs already. That is out of Mike McCarthy character. Letting a RB have a chance at 100 yards by calling a play that 9 out of 10 coaches would have called anyway would make perfect sense and I think Mike McCarthy would have obliged.


Mike is all about the win period. If they lined up to run for 1 yard how would the Lions know that was their goal? Dirty Suh could have gone in and cut someone at the knees and ended up with a serious knee injury. With Aaron taking a knee that kept the Lions from hitting hard.
wpr  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 5:33:28 AM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Mike and Aaron are big on statistics.


if that is so why did they run the ball the last 4 times? BUSTED. Lets Box!
steveishere  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 5:44:44 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
if that is so why did they run the ball the last 4 times? BUSTED. Lets Box!


and sit Rodgers on the bench for a game when he had a shot at the TD record.
PackFanWithTwins  
#18 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 8:48:16 AM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I disagree. First of all a run would not have riled up the the other team. It actually would have made more sense than taking the knee. If Lacy gains that yard we do not have to punt and Rodgers takes a knee on the next play.


Not correct. It was 3rd & 7 when Rodgers took the knee. So Lacy would have needed to get at least 7 in order to not punt.
sschind  
#19 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 10:54:41 PM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins said: Go to Quoted Post
Not correct. It was 3rd & 7 when Rodgers took the knee. So Lacy would have needed to get at least 7 in order to not punt.


Sorry, my mistake, I was thinking of the 1 yard needed for the 100 and got it mixed up with the distance needed.

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (35m) : Vince Lombardi, on protesters, from 1970: ‘They have a right to say what they want, and it behooves us to listen.’
uffda udfa (49m) : Kyle Murphy to IR for Ulrick John
Zero2Cool (4h) : Bass Pro's $4 billion acquisition of Cabela's is complete, but it leaves a small western Nebraska town in suspense:
Zero2Cool (5h) : "Aaron Rodgers is keeping Mike McCarthy employed the same way AJ Green keeps Andy Dalton employed.” - @LeBatardShow
Zero2Cool (6h) : King, Kendricks and Bennett.
gbguy20 (7h) : which packers sat during the anthem?
Porforis (17h) : Noooo, not Goode!
Zero2Cool (21h) : The #Packers place Brett Goode on IR and re-sign LS Taybor Pepper
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers signing Ulrick John to active roster off Cardinals practice squad today, according to a source
Porforis (21h) : Agreed. HOW ABOUT THEM PACKERS?!
greengold (21h) : i.e. keep politics out of football!
greengold (21h) : Let the players who want to honor the flag along with the vast majority of fans do so. Don't celebrate those who don't.
greengold (21h) : Rule, practice, suggestion? Whatever supposedly changed in 2009. Go back to the way it was. Let the players who want to honor the flag an
Zero2Cool (21h) : Roethlisberger regrets Steelers' decision to skip anthem
Zero2Cool (21h) : Chmura: "#Packers by 10-14. The Bears already played their good game. I have absolutely no fear for Thursday's game."
Zero2Cool (22h) : The NFL Rulebook does not mention the anthem.
Zero2Cool (22h) : There is no rule.
greengold (22h) : The NFL needs to enforce the rule or get rid of the rule.
greengold (22h) : Players stood for the National Anthem long before 2009. There just was no *rule* requiring them to stand.
steveishere (22h) : How many fans are in the restroom taking a dump or in line for nachos during anthem. Same people probably mad at players
Porforis (23h) : Yup.
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : You know why
Porforis (25-Sep) : NFL players weren't even on the field for the anthem until 2009 - Why all of a sudden is not participating such a big deal?
Zero2Cool (25-Sep) : Former Seahawks/Packers HC Mike Holmgren on President Trump: “He’s uninformed”.
steveishere (25-Sep) : Funny how you were apparently fine with seeing guys who abuse women or do/sell drugs out there but god forbid they kneel lol
steveishere (25-Sep) : you had 1 foot out the door since Favre left anyways... bye
dhazer (25-Sep) : well so much for watching Packer games, I saw the 3 sitting on the bench and i turned the channel to the race, No more NFL games for me
beast (25-Sep) : Who are the longshots? Jags? Saints? Redskins? and who?
SINCITYCHEEZE (25-Sep) : Buckeye closing in on 4 Longshots in Pickem today....Son you need to hook me up we could make a killing on some parlays next weekend. Lol
beast (25-Sep) : Bears ran it 60% of the time...
beast (24-Sep) : Bears tried hard to give it away, but Steelers couldn't take it
Mucky Tundra (24-Sep) : Lot of injuries :(
Zero2Cool (24-Sep) : OUT for the Packers: WR Randall Cobb S Kentrell Brice CB Davon House LB Jake Ryan LB Nick Perry T David Bakhtiari DT Mike Daniels
beast (24-Sep) : Ravens/Jags must be a FF nightmare, as ol' TEs who never score, had 4 of the 6 TDs
beast (24-Sep) : Bears beating Steelers at halftime.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2017 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 7:30 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 8 @ 3:25 PM
at Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 15 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Monday, Nov 6 @ 7:30 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
RAVENS
Sunday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
at Steelers
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 10 @ 12:00 PM
at Browns
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Saturday, Dec 23 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 12:00 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5m / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

12m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

3h / Around The NFL / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Porforis

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

Headlines