Green Bay Packers Forum

Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#1 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 5:42:16 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Select Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3,284
Applause Received: 1,581

Rob Demovsky wrote:
GREEN BAY, Wis. -- The Green Bay Packers did not hesitate to try multiple backup quarterbacks this preseason. They went from Graham Harrell to Vince Young to B.J. Coleman before finally settling on 33-year-old Seneca Wallace, who was signed on Sept. 2. But they don't appear interested in shaking things up behind Aaron Rodgers again -- not even to re-sign their former backup Matt Flynn, who was released by the Oakland Raiders on Monday. "Personally, I'm very happy with the quarterback room, the way it looks, the people in it," Packers coach Mike McCarthy said Monday.
UserPostedImage
Sponsor
Offline yooperfan  
#2 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 5:48:43 PM(UTC)
yooperfan

Rank: Senior Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan

Applause Given: 769
Applause Received: 384

I'm terribly disappointed.
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#3 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 5:53:57 PM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan

Rank: Senior Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2012Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Lima, Ohio

Applause Given: 404
Applause Received: 497

Next year he will be back.

Enjoy the ride – It kicks and just keeps on kickin’. "Stats are for Losers"
Offline nerdmann  
#4 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 7:07:49 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3,002
Applause Received: 731

Hey may still want a chance to start somewhere.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DoddPower  
#5 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 10:31:33 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,234
Applause Received: 568

That article didn't do much to convince me of anything. Seemed like lip service to me. I can't imagine the Packers not having interest in Flynn, although I can understand why it wouldn't work out. Coming to the Packers basically solidifies his role as a career backup. If he goes somewhere else, perhaps the Bills, Browns, etc., he at least has a chance. I can't blame him for wanting to start.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#6 Posted : Monday, October 7, 2013 11:38:48 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 223
Applause Received: 373

The ship has sailed for me. I would be fine with Wallace. Not sure why most fans don't like Wallace, but hey, everyone's got an opinion.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Offline Dulak  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 2:13:22 AM(UTC)
Dulak

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/19/2009(UTC)
Location: London, UK (from kenosha)

Applause Given: 189
Applause Received: 112

Money ... does flynn want to go back to backupQB money? he still has a chance to start somewhere ... maybe
IMO its his last chance - not looking good for him - but think about this -

With that one detroit game he acquired 12 million bucks just from that one game ... cant complain ...

I never thought he was that good; IMO our receivers make our QBs look even better - cept for the 1st 1/2 of sundays detroit game - geez noone could catch.

Offline musccy  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 4:47:11 AM(UTC)
musccy

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 5/7/2009(UTC)
Location: Pennsylvania

Applause Given: 328
Applause Received: 318

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules Go to Quoted Post
The ship has sailed for me. I would be fine with Wallace. Not sure why most fans don't like Wallace, but hey, everyone's got an opinion.


When you've been a nomad all your career and are now in your mid 30s you're not going to excite many people with your abundance of upside and potential.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
yooperfan on 10/8/2013(UTC)
Offline steveishere  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 7:01:06 AM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: Senior Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 50
Applause Received: 1,063

The Flynn on the Raiders looked nothing like the one on the Packers. Whether he's injured or his confidence is shot he didn't look like a player I'd want on the Packers at all.
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 7:07:43 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 511
Applause Received: 331

I preferred Vince Young over either Wallace or Flynn.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline yooperfan  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, October 8, 2013 7:16:07 AM(UTC)
yooperfan

Rank: Senior Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Silver: 2014

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)
Location: Ishpeming Michigan

Applause Given: 769
Applause Received: 384

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
I preferred Vince Young over either Wallace or Flynn.


Vince Young has been a head case his entire career.
I think the Packers found that hadn't changed and his mediocre talent was not worth the headache.

Offline DoddPower  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, October 9, 2013 1:27:48 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: Veteran Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,234
Applause Received: 568

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules Go to Quoted Post
The ship has sailed for me. I would be fine with Wallace. Not sure why most fans don't like Wallace, but hey, everyone's got an opinion.


I don't have a problem with Wallace, but I think I'd like both he and Flynn on the roster. Whoever looks better in practice each week gets the nod as the number 2 QB. Perhaps one shows they're truly better than the other, and the other gets released.

I just personally think Flynn is the better backup QB for the Packers.

Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

50m / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rockmolder

28-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

28-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / porky88

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / shield4life

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

26-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra


Tweeter