Green Bay Packers Forum
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Jakest3r  
#1 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:34:10 AM(UTC)
JSOnline said:
Matt Elam’s low hit on Packers receiver Randall Cobb irked some of his teammates and continues the discussion about clean hits.
Sponsor
Offline yooperfan  
#2 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 3:59:52 AM(UTC)
The hit on Cobb is a tough call.
The NFL is making it harder for the defensive players to make a tackle that doesn't have the chance of causing injury.
I think that forcing these guys to go low is going to increase the number of knee injuries around the league.

McMillen doesn't seem to want to accept responsibility for his poor play.
"I didn't get the call, it was the field", yada, yada, yada.
Offline musccy  
#3 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 4:47:45 AM(UTC)
yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
The hit on Cobb is a tough call.
The NFL is making it harder for the defensive players to make a tackle that doesn't have the chance of causing injury.
I think that forcing these guys to go low is going to increase the number of knee injuries around the league.


I don't care for the result but I don't have an issue with the hit. The league has put the defense in the position where they have to shift the window they target. Elam didnt spear him, or go for his head...these type of hits are an unfortunate inevitability in an effort to try to protect the head.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
yooperfan on 10/14/2013(UTC)
Offline nyrpack  
#4 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 6:40:48 AM(UTC)
i dont want anybody to get hurt , esp.. our team but you cant hit the head which is a good rule, so you go low to get the legs to tackle, im sorry i dont think it was a dirty play in the heat of battle !!
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#5 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 6:45:42 AM(UTC)
nyrpack said: Go to Quoted Post
i dont want anybody to get hurt , esp.. our team but you cant hit the head which is a good rule, so you go low to get the legs to tackle, im sorry i dont think it was a dirty play in the heat of battle !!


musccy said: Go to Quoted Post
I don't care for the result but I don't have an issue with the hit. The league has put the defense in the position where they have to shift the window they target. Elam didnt spear him, or go for his head...these type of hits are an unfortunate inevitability in an effort to try to protect the head.


yooperfan said: Go to Quoted Post
The hit on Cobb is a tough call.
The NFL is making it harder for the defensive players to make a tackle that doesn't have the chance of causing injury.
I think that forcing these guys to go low is going to increase the number of knee injuries around the league.

McMillen doesn't seem to want to accept responsibility for his poor play.
"I didn't get the call, it was the field", yada, yada, yada.



What happened to tackling the 3 feet or more of body above the knees, and below the shoulders like we teach kids and I would guess most of us were taught when we were young. This hit was inexcusable.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 10/14/2013(UTC)
Offline Bigbyfan  
#6 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 9:18:56 AM(UTC)
To be fair, it's easy for us to say how/where a defensive player should hit a ball carrier. Football, at the professional level, is so fast that a player has a split second to aim and hit a player. I have no problem with the hit by Elam. He went low (like the rules allow) and unfortunately it got Cobb directly on the knee.

This play is completely different than Merriweather launching himself head first into Lacy (and also Starks).
Online nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:06:34 PM(UTC)
EVERY WEEK, we lose a star player to a cheap shot.

It has to end.

If it doesn't then we need a couple goon type players to send a message that our players are going to be protected. You take a cheat shot at one of our guys, you're going to get hurt.

Clearly the officials are not going to protect our guys.
Offline gbguy20  
#8 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 2:16:10 PM(UTC)
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
EVERY WEEK, we lose a star player to a cheap shot.

It has to end.

If it doesn't then we need a couple goon type players to send a message that our players are going to be protected. You take a cheat shot at one of our guys, you're going to get hurt.

Clearly the officials are not going to protect our guys.


UserPostedImage
Offline beast  
#9 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 3:01:50 PM(UTC)


I have a problem with that hit, I understand that defenders have been put in a bad spot forcing them to go lower more often, but the defender look like he was aiming at Cobb knee well before the hit.

A low hit and/or mistakingly hitting someone knee is one thing, but purposely aiming for the knee is another.

I don't know which the defender did, but it looked like he was aiming there to me.
Online nerdmann  
#10 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 3:40:41 PM(UTC)
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
I have a problem with that hit, I understand that defenders have been put in a bad spot forcing them to go lower more often, but the defender look like he was aiming at Cobb knee well before the hit.

A low hit and/or mistakingly hitting someone knee is one thing, but purposely aiming for the knee is another.

I don't know which the defender did, but it looked like he was aiming there to me.


Fortunately (according to reports) he only broke the leg, knee appears to be intact.

KNOCK ON WOOD!
Online nerdmann  
#11 Posted : Monday, October 14, 2013 3:46:35 PM(UTC)
gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
UserPostedImage




Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
5m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

47m / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

28-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

26-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter