Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#1 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:02:30 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,461
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,830
Applause Received: 1,364

LombardiAve wrote:
I remember a few years back thinking I would trade all of the Packers draft picks (the actual draft picks) for Adrian Peterson. With the trade deadline looming, and rumors of Adrian Peterson on the trading block, and for entertainment purposes only, we ask if you would you consider trading 23-year-old Green Bay Packers rookie running back Eddie Lacy (83 carries//352 yards/ 4.2 ave, 2 touchdowns) for Minnesota superstar Adrian Peterson 115 carries/511 yards/4.4 ave., 5 touchdowns)?


why?
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Sponsor
Offline steveishere  
#2 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:14:40 PM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Posts: 1,623
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 42
Applause Received: 856

Don't know why there are so many "No" votes. That's ridiculous, AP would absolutely tear it up in this offense. The guy is averaging 3.3 yards per carry this year AFTER CONTACT. He'd make a Superbowl run a heck of a lot easier.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#3 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:17:03 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,777
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 184
Applause Received: 312

The younger the better. I'll pass with hesitation.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Offline DakotaT  
#4 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:18:45 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 7,336
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 633
Applause Received: 1,311

Hell to the no! Peterson has been rode hard and put up wet.
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 3 applause.
nerdmann on 10/27/2013(UTC), Pack93z on 10/28/2013(UTC), wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Offline Wade  
#5 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:23:48 PM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: All Pro

Posts: 5,785
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance

Applause Given: 638
Applause Received: 655

No. No. And again, no.

The Packers do not need an all-world back to provide "balance".

Peterson is getting up there in RB mileage.

And, IIRC, he has had two serious injuries (one in college, one in pros) already.

I was not a fan of the Lacy pick (as, I expect you will recall, Wayne). But looks like I was wrong.

And even if Lacy turns out to be a one-year wonder, trading for Peterson makes no sense to me.

If the Packers want to make a "blockbuster" trade (which, of course, Ted does not), go for an OL.

FWIW
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 10/27/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:30:40 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,731
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,863
Applause Received: 2,029

Adrian Peterson is 28 years old.
2013: $11.25 million,
2014: $11.75 million,
2015: $12.75 million,
2016: $14.75 million,
2017: $15.75 million
2018: Free Agent


Eddie Lacy is 22 years old and is locked into a salary friendly contract for four seasons.
Signed a four-year, $3.392 million contract. The deal included an $847,208 signing bonus.


You bring on Adrian Peterson for who? What two or three players to eliminate for a RB nearing 30 years old? Peterson isn't going to win the Packers any games. You don't lock up 8 figures in a player that's not going to win you games.

Packers are getting similar production with a younger RB who's costing MILLIONS less.

UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
thanks Post received 3 applause.
Pack93z on 10/28/2013(UTC), hardrocker950 on 10/28/2013(UTC), wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:35:52 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 7,049
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,358
Applause Received: 597

Originally Posted by: DakotaT Go to Quoted Post
Hell to the no! Peterson has been rode hard and put up wet.


Lacy's more consistent.

Peterson is good, but his thing is to break off a long run every now and then, after getting stuffed a number of times. Besides I agree, Lacy's much younger.

I think Lacy and Franklin are special.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline nerdmann  
#8 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:37:31 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 7,049
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,358
Applause Received: 597

Originally Posted by: Wade Go to Quoted Post
No. No. And again, no.

The Packers do not need an all-world back to provide "balance".

Peterson is getting up there in RB mileage.

And, IIRC, he has had two serious injuries (one in college, one in pros) already.

I was not a fan of the Lacy pick (as, I expect you will recall, Wayne). But looks like I was wrong.

And even if Lacy turns out to be a one-year wonder, trading for Peterson makes no sense to me.

If the Packers want to make a "blockbuster" trade (which, of course, Ted does not), go for an OL.

FWIW


Go for a C.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Offline sschind  
#9 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:56:58 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

United States
Posts: 961
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN

Applause Given: 112
Applause Received: 408

No. For all the reasons stated.
I respect your right to have your opinion but that doesn't mean I agree with it or respect you for having it.
Offline DakotaT  
#10 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 3:11:12 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 7,336
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 633
Applause Received: 1,311

Originally Posted by: Wade Go to Quoted Post


I was not a fan of the Lacy pick (as, I expect you will recall, Wayne). But looks like I was wrong.



Yeah, you're wrong about a lot of shit, I just like all the effort you put into your essays. Big Grin
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 3 applause.
Zero2Cool on 10/27/2013(UTC), wpr on 10/27/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 10/27/2013(UTC)
Offline go.pack.go.  
#11 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 3:26:10 PM(UTC)
go.pack.go.

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,743
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 44

No, I wouldn't do it. Like said before, we don't need a RB like Peterson to have balance. Lacy is great for our offense, especially having Franklin to back him up.
Signature made by me
UserPostedImage
SUPERBOWL XLV CHAMPS!!!!
Offline wpr  
#12 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 3:58:46 PM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,461
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,830
Applause Received: 1,364

Originally Posted by: steveishere Go to Quoted Post
Don't know why there are so many "No" votes. That's ridiculous, AP would absolutely tear it up in this offense. The guy is averaging 3.3 yards per carry this year AFTER CONTACT. He'd make a Superbowl run a heck of a lot easier.


I guess all the posts above list the reasons why there are so many nos.
"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Offline beast  
#13 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:45:55 PM(UTC)
beast

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Posts: 2,641
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 170
Applause Received: 259

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Go for a C.



I keep reading some talk about getting a Center... but is D-Smith really that bad?

Why not just resign D-Smith?

Also Mike McCarthy said Lang can play Center (which I haven't seen or heard of him talking a snap for sure yet, but I'll trust Mike McCarthy on this one) and they're trying to teach Barclay to play Center (and maybe Sherrod or Bulaga can take RT from Barclay).
America's team Of the people by the people for the people Packer People
UserPostedImage
~ madeby ~ pack93z ~
Offline DakotaT  
#14 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:50:06 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 7,336
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 633
Applause Received: 1,311

Originally Posted by: beast Go to Quoted Post
I keep reading some talk about getting a Center... but is D-Smith really that bad?

Why not just resign D-Smith?

Also Mike McCarthy said Lang can play Center (which I haven't seen or heard of him talking a snap for sure yet, but I'll trust Mike McCarthy on this one) and they're trying to teach Barclay to play Center (and maybe Sherrod or Bulaga can take RT from Barclay).


EDS has gotten better, but I want to see what the Tretter kid has next training camp. Barclay really shouldn't be starting, he's more of a serviceable utility lineman.
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 10/27/2013(UTC)
Offline DoddPower  
#15 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:28:12 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Posts: 2,743
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 1,833
Applause Received: 428

If both Peterson and Lacy cost the same, then sure, I'd prefer Peterson. Peterson is a better running back than Lacy, at this point, and likely will be for at least a couple more seasons. But the reality is they do not cost the same, which makes my vote an easy "no." Not worth the cap hit and the consequences of such.

It would be fun to watch though!
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / evad04

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Around The NFL / Laser Gunns

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dexter_Sinister

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Dexter_Sinister

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

17h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20-Aug / Random Babble / DakotaT

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / voiceofreason

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / mi_keys

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.