Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline wpr  
#1 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:02:30 PM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,285
Applause Received: 1,586
LombardiAve said:
I remember a few years back thinking I would trade all of the Packers draft picks (the actual draft picks) for Adrian Peterson. With the trade deadline looming, and rumors of Adrian Peterson on the trading block, and for entertainment purposes only, we ask if you would you consider trading 23-year-old Green Bay Packers rookie running back Eddie Lacy (83 carries//352 yards/ 4.2 ave, 2 touchdowns) for Minnesota superstar Adrian Peterson 115 carries/511 yards/4.4 ave., 5 touchdowns)?


why?
Sponsor
Offline steveishere  
#2 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:14:40 PM(UTC)
steveishere

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 51
Applause Received: 1,109
Don't know why there are so many "No" votes. That's ridiculous, AP would absolutely tear it up in this offense. The guy is averaging 3.3 yards per carry this year AFTER CONTACT. He'd make a Superbowl run a heck of a lot easier.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#3 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:17:03 PM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 231
Applause Received: 391
The younger the better. I'll pass with hesitation.
Online DakotaT  
#4 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:18:45 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 747
Applause Received: 1,520
Hell to the no! Peterson has been rode hard and put up wet.
thanks Post received 3 applause.
nerdmann on 10/27/2013(UTC), Pack93z on 10/28/2013(UTC), wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Offline Wade  
#5 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:23:48 PM(UTC)
Wade

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 8/1/2009(UTC)
Location: nowhere of importance
Applause Given: 759
Applause Received: 755
No. No. And again, no.

The Packers do not need an all-world back to provide "balance".

Peterson is getting up there in RB mileage.

And, IIRC, he has had two serious injuries (one in college, one in pros) already.

I was not a fan of the Lacy pick (as, I expect you will recall, Wayne). But looks like I was wrong.

And even if Lacy turns out to be a one-year wonder, trading for Peterson makes no sense to me.

If the Packers want to make a "blockbuster" trade (which, of course, Ted does not), go for an OL.

FWIW
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 10/27/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:30:40 PM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Premier Member
United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,047
Applause Received: 2,500
Adrian Peterson is 28 years old.
2013: $11.25 million,
2014: $11.75 million,
2015: $12.75 million,
2016: $14.75 million,
2017: $15.75 million
2018: Free Agent


Eddie Lacy is 22 years old and is locked into a salary friendly contract for four seasons.
Signed a four-year, $3.392 million contract. The deal included an $847,208 signing bonus.


You bring on Adrian Peterson for who? What two or three players to eliminate for a RB nearing 30 years old? Peterson isn't going to win the Packers any games. You don't lock up 8 figures in a player that's not going to win you games.

Packers are getting similar production with a younger RB who's costing MILLIONS less.
thanks Post received 3 applause.
Pack93z on 10/28/2013(UTC), hardrocker950 on 10/28/2013(UTC), wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:35:52 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,146
Applause Received: 772
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
Hell to the no! Peterson has been rode hard and put up wet.


Lacy's more consistent.

Peterson is good, but his thing is to break off a long run every now and then, after getting stuffed a number of times. Besides I agree, Lacy's much younger.

I think Lacy and Franklin are special.
Offline nerdmann  
#8 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:37:31 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,146
Applause Received: 772
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post
No. No. And again, no.

The Packers do not need an all-world back to provide "balance".

Peterson is getting up there in RB mileage.

And, IIRC, he has had two serious injuries (one in college, one in pros) already.

I was not a fan of the Lacy pick (as, I expect you will recall, Wayne). But looks like I was wrong.

And even if Lacy turns out to be a one-year wonder, trading for Peterson makes no sense to me.

If the Packers want to make a "blockbuster" trade (which, of course, Ted does not), go for an OL.

FWIW


Go for a C.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/15/2014(UTC)
Offline sschind  
#9 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:56:58 PM(UTC)
sschind

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 176
Applause Received: 526
No. For all the reasons stated.
Online DakotaT  
#10 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 3:11:12 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 747
Applause Received: 1,520
Wade said: Go to Quoted Post


I was not a fan of the Lacy pick (as, I expect you will recall, Wayne). But looks like I was wrong.



Yeah, you're wrong about a lot of shit, I just like all the effort you put into your essays. [grin1]
thanks Post received 3 applause.
Zero2Cool on 10/27/2013(UTC), wpr on 10/27/2013(UTC), DoddPower on 10/27/2013(UTC)
Offline go.pack.go.  
#11 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 3:26:10 PM(UTC)
go.pack.go.

Rank: Registered
Joined: 11/12/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 1
Applause Received: 44
No, I wouldn't do it. Like said before, we don't need a RB like Peterson to have balance. Lacy is great for our offense, especially having Franklin to back him up.
Offline wpr  
#12 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 3:58:46 PM(UTC)
wpr

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2014FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

Rank: Select Member
United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,285
Applause Received: 1,586
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
Don't know why there are so many "No" votes. That's ridiculous, AP would absolutely tear it up in this offense. The guy is averaging 3.3 yards per carry this year AFTER CONTACT. He'd make a Superbowl run a heck of a lot easier.


I guess all the posts above list the reasons why there are so many nos.
Offline beast  
#13 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:45:55 PM(UTC)
beast

Rank: Veteran Member
Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 321
Applause Received: 368
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
Go for a C.



I keep reading some talk about getting a Center... but is D-Smith really that bad?

Why not just resign D-Smith?

Also Mike McCarthy said Lang can play Center (which I haven't seen or heard of him talking a snap for sure yet, but I'll trust Mike McCarthy on this one) and they're trying to teach Barclay to play Center (and maybe Sherrod or Bulaga can take RT from Barclay).
Online DakotaT  
#14 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:50:06 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Honored Member
Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 747
Applause Received: 1,520
beast said: Go to Quoted Post
I keep reading some talk about getting a Center... but is D-Smith really that bad?

Why not just resign D-Smith?

Also Mike McCarthy said Lang can play Center (which I haven't seen or heard of him talking a snap for sure yet, but I'll trust Mike McCarthy on this one) and they're trying to teach Barclay to play Center (and maybe Sherrod or Bulaga can take RT from Barclay).


EDS has gotten better, but I want to see what the Tretter kid has next training camp. Barclay really shouldn't be starting, he's more of a serviceable utility lineman.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 10/27/2013(UTC)
Offline DoddPower  
#15 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:28:12 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 2,326
Applause Received: 584
If both Peterson and Lacy cost the same, then sure, I'd prefer Peterson. Peterson is a better running back than Lacy, at this point, and likely will be for at least a couple more seasons. But the reality is they do not cost the same, which makes my vote an easy "no." Not worth the cap hit and the consequences of such.

It would be fun to watch though!
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
46m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

49m / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

57m / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

29-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

27-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra


Tweeter