Change is Coming PACKERSHOME is going to be 10 years old later this season and for us to have another 10 years, things will have to change. Read Change is Coming for current issues that will be resolved.
Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline VinceLambeauStarr  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:11:05 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

Joined: 5/21/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 24
Looking at the defensive personnel on the roster, combining them with our current scheme and analyzing the players we have -: My question to you fine folk is, how close do you think this unit to being one of the better defenses in the NFL. The type of defense that doesn't need to be the absolute best, but can be relied upon to get that vital stop, interception and have those games where they overwhelm a lackluster offense.

My overall conclusion is, that with the loss of two/three key contributors in the last few years (Woodson, Collins and Jenkins) the defense has lost some of their playmaking identity, and as such is sort of at a crossroads with who they are and what they aim to achieve.

I don’t think there needs to be wholesale changes, i.e. Kansas City’s recent restructure. I do think though, that across the board there needs to subtle changes, along with one seismic one.

First off, i'll get it out the way - I think Capers needs to go NOW. It would be a different story if all of the defensive unit were inept but that isn't the case. It just isn't working and having a random fantastic week followed by three mundane weeks just oozes complacency. Fresh impetus could fire this unit to play according to their ability.

Defensive Line - Probably the strongest unit of the whole defense. Versatile enough to adapt to another scheme and relatively young. I don't think major changes here would benefit anyone. Probably want a replacement for Pickett.

Linebackers - We need better depth both outside and inside.

Secondary - Desperately missing a star. Before his decline, Woodson was that guy. Before his injury, Collins was capable of sheer brilliance at times. Williams is declining by the game.

In closing, I am of the opinion that coaching changes, plus one true superstud would somewhat resolve the defense' struggles.

How about you all?
Offline hardrocker950  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:55:59 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 11/10/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 123
Applause Received: 149
I agree with this. Ever since Collins left - the secondary just hasn't been the same. Without Woodson, they have really slipped in coverage - if you can even call it "coverage." I really thought Tramon was going to be a big contributor, but as of late I don't see it. Some of the issues are the lack of talent at safety, but the schemes are just begging to be exploited. I rarely, actually never see them challenging receivers at the line - which would help slow down play development.

I think our DL and LBs are decent as far as our starters, and to a degree our backups. I believe a lot of the issues are the playcalling. I see little agression when they have 3rd and long - which is when the pressure needs to be strong. Rushing only 2-3 guys is not going to work when they are expecting a blitz - especially when it is always the same guys.

Capers being fired would not be a "knee jerk" move imo. The guy obviously is not willing to adjust the gameplan, nor is he going to change his playcalling to make up for the shortcomings in personnel. This is the definition of poor coaching and is unacceptable at the pro level. If I know better as a fan, then he HAS to know as a professional.
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:34:55 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,928
Applause Received: 1,162
hardrocker950 said: Go to Quoted Post
I agree with this. Ever since Collins left - the secondary just hasn't been the same. Without Woodson, they have really slipped in coverage - if you can even call it "coverage." I really thought Tramon was going to be a big contributor, but as of late I don't see it. Some of the issues are the lack of talent at safety, but the schemes are just begging to be exploited. I rarely, actually never see them challenging receivers at the line - which would help slow down play development.

I think our DL and LBs are decent as far as our starters, and to a degree our backups. I believe a lot of the issues are the playcalling. I see little agression when they have 3rd and long - which is when the pressure needs to be strong. Rushing only 2-3 guys is not going to work when they are expecting a blitz - especially when it is always the same guys.

Capers being fired would not be a "knee jerk" move imo. The guy obviously is not willing to adjust the gameplan, nor is he going to change his playcalling to make up for the shortcomings in personnel. This is the definition of poor coaching and is unacceptable at the pro level. If I know better as a fan, then he HAS to know as a professional.


They players are not in position. Plain and simple.

There are bad play calls on D too. But we can sit here and blame the players all we want. But who's teaching them? You never see Edgar Bennett's guys out of position. Why's that?
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:53:43 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 489
You got it all wrong.

Capers' schemes and blitz packages are keeping the Packers from giving up even more on defense. The personnel - basically everybody other than Matthews is pretty mediocre. The weakness didn't seem so glaring with Rodgers enabling the Packers to outscore teams, but the D basically is what it is, and we have Ted Thompson to thank/blame for that.
Offline Laser Gunns  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:08:33 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 49
Applause Received: 338
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
You got it all wrong.

Capers' schemes and blitz packages are keeping the Packers from giving up even more on defense. The personnel - basically everybody other than Matthews is pretty mediocre. The weakness didn't seem so glaring with Rodgers enabling the Packers to outscore teams, but the D basically is what it is, and we have Ted Thompson to thank/blame for that.


Can't believe it.. But I agree with TPB on something.

Our front 7 is making 1on1 blocking look the the great fucking wall. Nobody is winning those.



Offline nerdmann  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 4:32:08 AM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 4,928
Applause Received: 1,162
RajiRoar said: Go to Quoted Post
Can't believe it.. But I agree with TPB on something.

Our front 7 is making 1on1 blocking look the the great f*cking wall. Nobody is winning those.





Bullshit.

We were what, 3rd in the league in rushing D until two weeks ago? Ted is a genius the way he stocks this team. What other team could even have half these injures and still have any hope whatsoever?

It's just for whatever reason, guys in the back are out of position and the guys in the front aren't on the field.
Offline play2win  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:11:33 AM(UTC)
Rank: Registered

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
Do the Packers put a waiver claim in for Ed Reed? I don't see how that could hurt. Doubt highly we would get him, but I would love to see that happen.

Having a better presence at S opposite Burnett would help immensely. Clearing up the Hayward issue would help too. Get someone who has a healthy set of legs under him in there. Hyde and House looked to be coming along very well together in our secondary prior to Hayward's attempted comeback.

As for Capers, I think looking for a change in that guard midseason is wishful thinking, and I am with you on it. I think a change would shake up this defense, and make them more accountable. I just don't think McCarthy works that way.

They have to do something though, because the attrition through injury at LB has adversely affected our options running the 3-4. We have a boatload of healthy, able DL, ready to play. A scheme switch to a 4-3 might help the D overall. CJ Wilson, Josh Boyd and Jerel Worthy have yet to see the field of play. Why not give them a go? Those are the things I would like to see changed now to get our D playing better.

If we do implement a scheme change, Capers might be just the guy to make it successful, so, I would hesitate to run him out of town. I'm hot and cold on that. Dom Capers is a highly accomplished DC. He didn't have the tools he needed up front the past couple of years. Now, he has them, IMO, but the back end of our D is in some flux. We still need that major upgrade at S, two seasons after the loss of Collins. Maybe the help comes in the form of Sean Richardson. Maybe Ed Reed...
Offline hardrocker950  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:23:40 AM(UTC)
Rank: Member

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2014

Joined: 11/10/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 123
Applause Received: 149
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Do the Packers put a waiver claim in for Ed Reed? I don't see how that could hurt. Doubt highly we would get him, but I would love to see that happen.

Having a better presence at S opposite Burnett would help immensely. Clearing up the Hayward issue would help too. Get someone who has a healthy set of legs under him in there. Hyde and House looked to be coming along very well together in our secondary prior to Hayward's attempted comeback.

As for Capers, I think looking for a change in that guard midseason is wishful thinking, and I am with you on it. I think a change would shake up this defense, and make them more accountable. I just don't think McCarthy works that way.

They have to do something though, because the attrition through injury at LB has adversely affected our options running the 3-4. We have a boatload of healthy, able DL, ready to play. A scheme switch to a 4-3 might help the D overall. CJ Wilson, Josh Boyd and Jerel Worthy have yet to see the field of play. Why not give them a go? Those are the things I would like to see changed now to get our D playing better.


Ya, I saw that Houston let Reed go. I have to guess he has dropped off - I haven't really been following Houston, so I can only speculate. Although our safety personnel leaves a lot to be desired, I'm not sure he is what we need. Along with that, it would be shocking if Ted even considered a FA safety because...well - we are talking about TT. Ed is getting old in NFL years - so the only way I even see it as a possibility is a low end contract.
Offline steveishere  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:26:08 AM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 57
Applause Received: 1,409
I think it's highly questionable whether Ed Reed would be a "better" presence. It's not like Houston has some great prospects at that position that just bumped him off the roster. He got released because he's been bad.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:58:04 AM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 670
Applause Received: 489
The good side of Ted Thompson is he doesn't grab a lot of has-beens. I don't think he goes after Reed, and I'm satisfied that way.

As for Capers schemes and the relative success against the run game early on, Capers ain't just about blitz packages; He is good at designing a D to stop whatever he sees as the primary threat. The problem is, without adequate personnel, that opens up something else.

What do you prefer, a bland D that doesn't stop much of anything - which basically is what we had before Capers? Or a chess game that may work out and shut down whatever the opponent does best or may flop and let lesser threats hit us hard? When we had Rodgers playing, this question wasn't all that critical - win 45-17 or win 45-31? Who cares, a win is a win. But without that high-powered O from Rodgers, it makes all the difference.

I'd still rather have what Capers gives us instead of what came before. And the WORST thing would be to fire him and keep the same D without his brains behind it.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool: Dom Capers, full defensive staff expected to return to Packers
uffda udfa: Peyton Manning in the movies: https://vimeo.com/21710095
Zero2Cool: thank ya sir
uffda udfa: Best looking site out there!
Zero2Cool: You welcome!
Cheesey: THANK YOU again for all you do.
Cheesey: You do all the work, while some think they don't have to honor your few rules.
Cheesey: Kevin, you KNOW how much I appreciate this site.
uffda udfa: Nope. Too much pressure for them.
Zero2Cool: NFL MVP's don't seem to win the Super Bowl the same year, do they?
Zero2Cool: Panthers played uninspired and predictable, actually (and sadly) reminded me of the Packers. :(
Zero2Cool: Thanks 68md, good to know some notice and appreciate.
Zero2Cool: Holding a different or less than popular view is perfectly fine. You fail to understand this even though I repeatedly tell you. It's annoyin
uffda udfa: Good night, Smokey.
Smokey: good night uffda.
uffda udfa: Wonder how Colts fans feel, and Mr. Irsay?
uffda udfa: Today, anyway.
Smokey: DEFENSE DOES WIN CHAMPIONSHIPS TT !
uffda udfa: Carolina will never be back to a SB under Cam Newton.
uffda udfa: Denver D just dominated the current MVP and the former this year.
uffda udfa: Cam for LVP in the SB. No character.
uffda udfa: Newton is a wuss. MVP? LOL.
uffda udfa: #VonFire
uffda udfa: People who have passion and expectations aren't A words. Accepting less than the best doesn't make you not one either.
uffda udfa: Sorry, Kevin...maybe you called Dakota an A word and not me? Had to be one of us.
uffda udfa: Marshawn Lynch announced his retirement in a cool way via twitter. What could've been in Green Bay, Marshawn!
uffda udfa: It's okay... you called me the "A" word. All because I don't tickle the ears. I get it.
uffda udfa: So someone like Buck deserves privileges because he's a better fan than me due to his flattering opinions?
68md: wet blanket ? He works his ass off to keep the place going for you ?
Smokey: Zero, Why are you such a wet blanket host ? A real SB "Chat" should have been a priority for this site. Wet Blanket strikes again.
Zero2Cool: BTW, I'm not saying you're an asshole. I'm stating a fact, that's all.
Zero2Cool: You don't get it. You confuse right and privilege. Assholes don't deserve privileges. Get it, got it, good.
uffda udfa: Talib playing a Burfict half so far.
uffda udfa: You have an R rated section on a Packers board. I think moving the guys you really don't want rocking the boat to their own forum is a great
uffda udfa: I think the same was likely said at KFAN when it was suggested they have a Packers show. I believe they still have it. I used to produce it
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

Road To Super Bowl 50
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 3:25 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 7:30 PM
VIKINGS

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
16m / Announcements / DakotaT

30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / FLORIDA PACKER88

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

8-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

7-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey


Tweeter