Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline VinceLambeauStarr  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:11:05 AM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
Joined: 5/21/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 24
Looking at the defensive personnel on the roster, combining them with our current scheme and analyzing the players we have -: My question to you fine folk is, how close do you think this unit to being one of the better defenses in the NFL. The type of defense that doesn't need to be the absolute best, but can be relied upon to get that vital stop, interception and have those games where they overwhelm a lackluster offense.

My overall conclusion is, that with the loss of two/three key contributors in the last few years (Woodson, Collins and Jenkins) the defense has lost some of their playmaking identity, and as such is sort of at a crossroads with who they are and what they aim to achieve.

I don’t think there needs to be wholesale changes, i.e. Kansas City’s recent restructure. I do think though, that across the board there needs to subtle changes, along with one seismic one.

First off, i'll get it out the way - I think Capers needs to go NOW. It would be a different story if all of the defensive unit were inept but that isn't the case. It just isn't working and having a random fantastic week followed by three mundane weeks just oozes complacency. Fresh impetus could fire this unit to play according to their ability.

Defensive Line - Probably the strongest unit of the whole defense. Versatile enough to adapt to another scheme and relatively young. I don't think major changes here would benefit anyone. Probably want a replacement for Pickett.

Linebackers - We need better depth both outside and inside.

Secondary - Desperately missing a star. Before his decline, Woodson was that guy. Before his injury, Collins was capable of sheer brilliance at times. Williams is declining by the game.

In closing, I am of the opinion that coaching changes, plus one true superstud would somewhat resolve the defense' struggles.

How about you all?
Offline hardrocker950  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:55:59 PM(UTC)

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Member
Joined: 11/10/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 98
Applause Received: 122
I agree with this. Ever since Collins left - the secondary just hasn't been the same. Without Woodson, they have really slipped in coverage - if you can even call it "coverage." I really thought Tramon was going to be a big contributor, but as of late I don't see it. Some of the issues are the lack of talent at safety, but the schemes are just begging to be exploited. I rarely, actually never see them challenging receivers at the line - which would help slow down play development.

I think our DL and LBs are decent as far as our starters, and to a degree our backups. I believe a lot of the issues are the playcalling. I see little agression when they have 3rd and long - which is when the pressure needs to be strong. Rushing only 2-3 guys is not going to work when they are expecting a blitz - especially when it is always the same guys.

Capers being fired would not be a "knee jerk" move imo. The guy obviously is not willing to adjust the gameplan, nor is he going to change his playcalling to make up for the shortcomings in personnel. This is the definition of poor coaching and is unacceptable at the pro level. If I know better as a fan, then he HAS to know as a professional.
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:34:55 PM(UTC)

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,846
Applause Received: 910
hardrocker950 said: Go to Quoted Post
I agree with this. Ever since Collins left - the secondary just hasn't been the same. Without Woodson, they have really slipped in coverage - if you can even call it "coverage." I really thought Tramon was going to be a big contributor, but as of late I don't see it. Some of the issues are the lack of talent at safety, but the schemes are just begging to be exploited. I rarely, actually never see them challenging receivers at the line - which would help slow down play development.

I think our DL and LBs are decent as far as our starters, and to a degree our backups. I believe a lot of the issues are the playcalling. I see little agression when they have 3rd and long - which is when the pressure needs to be strong. Rushing only 2-3 guys is not going to work when they are expecting a blitz - especially when it is always the same guys.

Capers being fired would not be a "knee jerk" move imo. The guy obviously is not willing to adjust the gameplan, nor is he going to change his playcalling to make up for the shortcomings in personnel. This is the definition of poor coaching and is unacceptable at the pro level. If I know better as a fan, then he HAS to know as a professional.


They players are not in position. Plain and simple.

There are bad play calls on D too. But we can sit here and blame the players all we want. But who's teaching them? You never see Edgar Bennett's guys out of position. Why's that?
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:53:43 PM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 606
Applause Received: 416
You got it all wrong.

Capers' schemes and blitz packages are keeping the Packers from giving up even more on defense. The personnel - basically everybody other than Matthews is pretty mediocre. The weakness didn't seem so glaring with Rodgers enabling the Packers to outscore teams, but the D basically is what it is, and we have Ted Thompson to thank/blame for that.
Offline Laser Gunns  
#5 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:08:33 AM(UTC)

Rank: Member
United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 47
Applause Received: 311
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
You got it all wrong.

Capers' schemes and blitz packages are keeping the Packers from giving up even more on defense. The personnel - basically everybody other than Matthews is pretty mediocre. The weakness didn't seem so glaring with Rodgers enabling the Packers to outscore teams, but the D basically is what it is, and we have Ted Thompson to thank/blame for that.


Can't believe it.. But I agree with TPB on something.

Our front 7 is making 1on1 blocking look the the great fucking wall. Nobody is winning those.



Offline nerdmann  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 4:32:08 AM(UTC)

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,846
Applause Received: 910
RajiRoar said: Go to Quoted Post
Can't believe it.. But I agree with TPB on something.

Our front 7 is making 1on1 blocking look the the great f*cking wall. Nobody is winning those.





Bullshit.

We were what, 3rd in the league in rushing D until two weeks ago? Ted is a genius the way he stocks this team. What other team could even have half these injures and still have any hope whatsoever?

It's just for whatever reason, guys in the back are out of position and the guys in the front aren't on the field.
Offline play2win  
#7 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:11:33 AM(UTC)

Rank: Registered
United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee
Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 724
Do the Packers put a waiver claim in for Ed Reed? I don't see how that could hurt. Doubt highly we would get him, but I would love to see that happen.

Having a better presence at S opposite Burnett would help immensely. Clearing up the Hayward issue would help too. Get someone who has a healthy set of legs under him in there. Hyde and House looked to be coming along very well together in our secondary prior to Hayward's attempted comeback.

As for Capers, I think looking for a change in that guard midseason is wishful thinking, and I am with you on it. I think a change would shake up this defense, and make them more accountable. I just don't think McCarthy works that way.

They have to do something though, because the attrition through injury at LB has adversely affected our options running the 3-4. We have a boatload of healthy, able DL, ready to play. A scheme switch to a 4-3 might help the D overall. CJ Wilson, Josh Boyd and Jerel Worthy have yet to see the field of play. Why not give them a go? Those are the things I would like to see changed now to get our D playing better.

If we do implement a scheme change, Capers might be just the guy to make it successful, so, I would hesitate to run him out of town. I'm hot and cold on that. Dom Capers is a highly accomplished DC. He didn't have the tools he needed up front the past couple of years. Now, he has them, IMO, but the back end of our D is in some flux. We still need that major upgrade at S, two seasons after the loss of Collins. Maybe the help comes in the form of Sean Richardson. Maybe Ed Reed...
Offline hardrocker950  
#8 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:23:40 AM(UTC)

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2014

Rank: Member
Joined: 11/10/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 98
Applause Received: 122
play2win said: Go to Quoted Post
Do the Packers put a waiver claim in for Ed Reed? I don't see how that could hurt. Doubt highly we would get him, but I would love to see that happen.

Having a better presence at S opposite Burnett would help immensely. Clearing up the Hayward issue would help too. Get someone who has a healthy set of legs under him in there. Hyde and House looked to be coming along very well together in our secondary prior to Hayward's attempted comeback.

As for Capers, I think looking for a change in that guard midseason is wishful thinking, and I am with you on it. I think a change would shake up this defense, and make them more accountable. I just don't think McCarthy works that way.

They have to do something though, because the attrition through injury at LB has adversely affected our options running the 3-4. We have a boatload of healthy, able DL, ready to play. A scheme switch to a 4-3 might help the D overall. CJ Wilson, Josh Boyd and Jerel Worthy have yet to see the field of play. Why not give them a go? Those are the things I would like to see changed now to get our D playing better.


Ya, I saw that Houston let Reed go. I have to guess he has dropped off - I haven't really been following Houston, so I can only speculate. Although our safety personnel leaves a lot to be desired, I'm not sure he is what we need. Along with that, it would be shocking if Ted even considered a FA safety because...well - we are talking about TT. Ed is getting old in NFL years - so the only way I even see it as a possibility is a low end contract.
Online steveishere  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:26:08 AM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)
Applause Given: 56
Applause Received: 1,253
I think it's highly questionable whether Ed Reed would be a "better" presence. It's not like Houston has some great prospects at that position that just bumped him off the roster. He got released because he's been bad.
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:58:04 AM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2015

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas
Applause Given: 606
Applause Received: 416
The good side of Ted Thompson is he doesn't grab a lot of has-beens. I don't think he goes after Reed, and I'm satisfied that way.

As for Capers schemes and the relative success against the run game early on, Capers ain't just about blitz packages; He is good at designing a D to stop whatever he sees as the primary threat. The problem is, without adequate personnel, that opens up something else.

What do you prefer, a bland D that doesn't stop much of anything - which basically is what we had before Capers? Or a chess game that may work out and shut down whatever the opponent does best or may flop and let lesser threats hit us hard? When we had Rodgers playing, this question wasn't all that critical - win 45-17 or win 45-31? Who cares, a win is a win. But without that high-powered O from Rodgers, it makes all the difference.

I'd still rather have what Capers gives us instead of what came before. And the WORST thing would be to fire him and keep the same D without his brains behind it.
Online DarkaneRules  
#11 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 8:29:56 AM(UTC)

Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 263
Applause Received: 446
I hope no one is suggesting firing Capers in season. Let the season play out and have faith the entire personnel and coaching staff will be evaluated by Mark and Ted.

I see a 3-4 defense right now decimated with injury at its most crucial position: Outside Linebacker. We have one healthy OLB who was just drafted and is very raw, Nate Palmer. The best players we have to set the edge: one has a club on his hand and the other has a defective foot.

On the back-end, I see players in position more often than not, they are just not making the plays. Right now we do not have a difference maker at CB or Safety. Morgan seems to be regressing to as well. This was a shock to me and completely unacceptable. We were counting on him to continue improving.

We need to get pressure up front. We cannot get that without at least one effective OLB. This is on the players. We cannot change the scheme just because a position has been decimated with injury. It is playmaking there that is the problem not the scheme.

Same goes with the backend. We need these guys to make plays. They will make more if we get more pressure. We need to upgrade the safety position, Morgan needs to play better, and at least one CB needs to step up and make up for the average play of the other guys.
Offline nerdmann  
#12 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:23:47 AM(UTC)

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,846
Applause Received: 910
DarkaneRules said: Go to Quoted Post
I hope no one is suggesting firing Capers in season. Let the season play out and have faith the entire personnel and coaching staff will be evaluated by Mark and Ted.

I see a 3-4 defense right now decimated with injury at its most crucial position: Outside Linebacker. We have one healthy OLB who was just drafted and is very raw, Nate Palmer. The best players we have to set the edge: one has a club on his hand and the other has a defective foot.

On the back-end, I see players in position more often than not, they are just not making the plays. Right now we do not have a difference maker at CB or Safety. Morgan seems to be regressing to as well. This was a shock to me and completely unacceptable. We were counting on him to continue improving.

We need to get pressure up front. We cannot get that without at least one effective OLB. This is on the players. We cannot change the scheme just because a position has been decimated with injury. It is playmaking there that is the problem not the scheme.

Same goes with the backend. We need these guys to make plays. They will make more if we get more pressure. We need to upgrade the safety position, Morgan needs to play better, and at least one CB needs to step up and make up for the average play of the other guys.


I see a 3-4 that has never had a dominant OLB on the other side of Clay, in all these years.

And as for the back end, they leave guys uncovered.

Capers was on the hot seat to start the season. His D was looking very good, but now it's begun to shit itself again, badly. Time to make a case for tenure, or we go get Lovey Smith. Jim Bates will be the backup plan. lol
Offline DoddPower  
#13 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:39:11 AM(UTC)

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

Rank: Veteran Member
United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA
Applause Given: 2,643
Applause Received: 685
nerdmann said: Go to Quoted Post
I see a 3-4 that has never had a dominant OLB on the other side of Clay, in all these years.

And as for the back end, they leave guys uncovered.

Capers was on the hot seat to start the season. His D was looking very good, but now it's begun to sh!t itself again, badly. Time to make a case for tenure, or we go get Lovey Smith. Jim Bates will be the backup plan. lol


Yeah, to me, it's not just about this season or the excuses that one could find for Capers. There's more than enough evidence to show that he's nothing more than an average defensive coordinator, and very often absolutely horrible, especially when it matters most against top tier teams. I don't see how that can be good enough, but perhaps I would be a more hard-ass boss than Ted Thompson and/or Mike McCarthy.
Offline nerdmann  
#14 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 10:01:02 AM(UTC)

Rank: Select Member
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 3,846
Applause Received: 910
DoddPower said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, to me, it's not just about this season or the excuses that one could find for Capers. There's more than enough evidence to show that he's nothing more than an average defensive coordinator, and very often absolutely horrible, especially when it matters most against top tier teams. I don't see how that can be good enough, but perhaps I would be a more hard-ass boss than Ted Thompson and/or Mike McCarthy.


Dom can at least do it with smoke and mirrors when he needs to. That's something that Bob Sanders could never do.

But his unit has shit itself in grand fashion the past two weeks, when we needed them most. And it isn't the first time they have done so. His guys continuously let WRs run uncovered.
Offline Mucky Tundra  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, November 13, 2013 10:41:18 AM(UTC)

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2015

Rank: Senior Member
United States
Joined: 1/11/2013(UTC)
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Applause Given: 499
Applause Received: 618
To echo some the people who agree Capers needs to go, it's not so much as a recent thing as things that continually happen. I feel that there's enough talent on D (save for the black hole at S since Collins was lost) but for whatever reason isn't properly used/not motivated properly/whatever. Regardless of whoever is charge of the D next year I wouldn't mind having Greene as Assistant DC or something so that way when someone half asses it or misses a tackle they can hear an ear full when they get back to the sideline. Not only that, but a "kick-ass" DC/assistant DC would play off McCarthy's more mellow demeanor.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
uffda udfa (6h) : Incredible! Wilde's 53 man roster doesn't even have Datone Jones as "IN"...he's "looking good". Sad, a 3rd year 1st rounder isn't a lock f
Smokey (10h) : Attention Guests: Come join us here in the Forum ! A great place to post !
Smokey (10h) : 3rd Qtr/ Jax 17 Det 13
uffda udfa (27-Aug) : Guion suspension upheld...lost for 3 games
uffda udfa (27-Aug) : He works boundary...great body control...great feet...goes deep...runs well...is strong. Jordy Clone, maybe.
uffda udfa (27-Aug) : Tell me he doesn't remind you of 87...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zPZNolFvPI
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : Only thing that matters : 40 Yrd Dash: 4.54
uffda udfa (27-Aug) : Butler is 6'2 215...Hmmm, wonder what TT has in mind. Ha.
uffda udfa (27-Aug) : TT went out and got us Jordy's replacement...James Butler...not even a camp invite.
uffda udfa (27-Aug) : I knew what you were saying and I loved it! From a production standpoint it was worse than college radio. It had Aaron which made it worth
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : I wouldn't know good radio if it sat on my face, but I know what I find informational and worthwhile. Tuesday with Aaron, was both.
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : I am saying my zero experience in radio > your whatever years. :D Bahahahahah
uffda udfa (27-Aug) : Ha! Yeah, I only was involved in making good radio for 8 years. Don't know a thing.
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : Yeah, I'm not surprised I know good radio better than you. Not a big deal, you have your strengths, radio isn't one.
uffda udfa (27-Aug) : We have very different tastes. I worked in radio for many years. Thought the show was so much worse than it needed to be.
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : NFL Pick'em v2.0 is here!
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : Wilde was great choice and if not for Jason's rapport with Aaron, never would have happened.
uffda udfa (26-Aug) : I never caught it live...listened to podcast a few times. Wilde was the wrong guy for that show.
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : That was poorly worded, my mistake. I was regular, it was great peak into his life. Planned meetings around it lol
uffda udfa (26-Aug) : As for Tuesday's with Aaron I did listen, but I wasn't a regular.
Smokey (26-Aug) : Anyone seen Polargrizzz lately, he's AWOL !
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : If you listened to them, Aaron urged them to go past the 10 minutes. Jason would be an idiot to cut it off.
uffda udfa (26-Aug) : The contract stated 10 minutes but the show always went longer. Sounds like 540 took advantage and perhaps he got sick of it.
uffda udfa (26-Aug) : As for Aaron's radio show, sounds like he just didn't want to do it and they took too much of his time. Was only supposed to be 10 minutes.
Smokey (26-Aug) : Don't worry, be WR happy !
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : WR!!
uffda udfa (25-Aug) : LeRoy Butler and Finley want TT to add a WR. Silverstein wrote a piece on it, including Rison mention. Let's get this!
uffda udfa (25-Aug) : The WHY is the big story, but that hasn't come out yet.
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : noooooooooooooooooooo!
Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : Aaron is done? Why????
uffda udfa (25-Aug) : If you liked "Tuesday's with Aaron" he's not doing it this year. He's done.
Zero2Cool (23-Aug) : Tolzien being evaluated for concussion. What?
hardrocker950 (23-Aug) : wow... what a joke
dhazer (23-Aug) : Cheese heads are everywhere donot be sureprised ifor we are louder
Zero2Cool (23-Aug) : And you're wearing a Ben jersey... sad!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

Road To Super Bowl 50
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 7:30 PM
SEAHAWKS
Monday, Sep 28 @ 7:30 PM
CHIEFS
Sunday, Oct 4 @ 3:25 PM
at 49ers
Sunday, Oct 11 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
CHARGERS
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 AM
- BYE -
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Broncos
Sunday, Nov 8 @ 12:00 PM
at Panthers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 12:00 PM
at Vikings
Thursday, Nov 26 @ 7:30 PM
BEARS
Thursday, Dec 3 @ 7:25 PM
at Lions
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Sunday, Dec 20 @ 3:05 PM
at Raiders
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 3:25 PM
at Cardinals
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
52m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / RainX

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / RainX

28-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / RainX

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey


Tweeter