Green Bay Packers Forum

Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline sschind  
#1 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 3:57:52 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

United States
Joined: 3/5/2013(UTC)
Location: SE WISCONSIN
Applause Given: 383
Applause Received: 808
I was at basketball games all afternoon so I didn't see the game but in looking at the scoring summary all I can think of is why do you go for 2 when an extra point puts you down by 9.

I get that if we make the 2 point we are down by only 8 but that means we have to make another 2 pointer for the tie.

1 score vs 2 I guess I can understand it but I still don't agree with it. There was still plenty of time left. Essentially you are saying "I have no confidence at all in our defense" which may be justified but you don't come out and admit it.

I know, I know, hindsight is 20/20 but I still don't agree with the call.
Offline Cheesey  
#2 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:01:13 PM(UTC)
Rank: Select Member

United States
Joined: 7/28/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 795
Applause Received: 931
I can see why they did it. At the time, our
offense wasn't moving the ball very well.
Flynn was a big shot in the arm.
Offline nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:03:01 PM(UTC)
Rank: Preferred Member

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6,395
Applause Received: 1,417
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I was at basketball games all afternoon so I didn't see the game but in looking at the scoring summary all I can think of is why do you go for 2 when an extra point puts you down by 9.

I get that if we make the 2 point we are down by only 8 but that means we have to make another 2 pointer for the tie.

1 score vs 2 I guess I can understand it but I still don't agree with it. There was still plenty of time left. Essentially you are saying "I have no confidence at all in our defense" which may be justified but you don't come out and admit it.

I know, I know, hindsight is 20/20 but I still don't agree with the call.


It's controversial, given that there was more than 8 minutes remaining, but I didn't have a problem with it at the time.

Queens were running wild on the ground with Peterson and Gerhart (11 fucking yards/carry) so they were gonna drain major clock. Similar situation as being under 8 minutes.
thanks Post received 2 applause.
Cheesey on 11/24/2013(UTC), wpr on 11/25/2013(UTC)
Offline gbguy20  
#4 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:10:15 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 459
Applause Received: 495
Look, at the time, going for 2 was the right choice. In the end, it screwed us.

When we scored it looked like there would only be time for 1 more possession, so we had to make it a 1 possession game, which is why we went for 2.

Missing the 2 point conversion would put us in no worse position than had we just kicked the extra point to begin with. Kicking the extra point or missing the 2 point conversion would still make it a 2 possession game. So there was no harm in going for it and cutting it down to 1 possession.

As it turns out there was plenty of time and had we known that we would have kicked the extra point, scored another td and kicked another extra point, then the field goal would have been the game winner instead of game tying.

You cannot fault McCarthy for this, it was without question the right choice. With how our games had ended the last 2 weeks why would McCarthy ever even fathom that he would have time enough for 2 possessions. He did what he thought was his only choice to TIE the game. And he knew that going for it would not put him in any worse position. He made the right choice.
thanks Post received 3 applause.
cheeseheads123 on 11/24/2013(UTC), nerdmann on 11/24/2013(UTC), wpr on 11/25/2013(UTC)
Offline DarkaneRules  
#5 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:35:19 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 334
Applause Received: 759
No regrets. Next game is all I care about now.
Offline K_Buz  
#6 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 4:52:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/17/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 6
Applause Received: 47
I like to find fault with any McCarthy decision, but I can't with the call to go for two. I think I would have ran Lacey up the middle given he was a beast, but that doesn't change what I thought of the call to go for 2.
Offline gbguy20  
#7 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 5:06:39 PM(UTC)
Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)
Applause Given: 459
Applause Received: 495
If you guys are going to question a decision today, don't question the call for 2. Question the decision to throw the ball on 3rd down at the goal line in overtime instead of handing it to lacy.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#8 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 5:30:59 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 334
Applause Received: 759
Too many plays in that game to go over. I will leave that to the coaches and writers. I think we can all say that given the NFC North situation that a tie was better than a loss.
Online beast  
#9 Posted : Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:19:15 PM(UTC)
Rank: Veteran Member

Joined: 10/5/2008(UTC)
Applause Given: 564
Applause Received: 701
Mike McCarthy went for it, because it would of been an 8 point game if they had got it. But I was against it and said so before the play.

My general rule for two point plays, is don't go for them unless they

1) Tie the game

2) Put you in a 3 or 7 point lead

3) Put you in a 3 or 7 point trail.

(maybe 4 if the game is over and the points don't matter)

Other wise they effect the 3 pointers, just like Mike McCarthy call did. Took the 3 points from being a winner ot making the just a tier.

gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
Missing the 2 point conversion would put us in no worse position than had we just kicked the extra point to begin with..


ummm yes it did. It made getting 10 points, a tie instead of a win. That is a worse position.


gbguy20 said: Go to Quoted Post
You cannot fault McCarthy for this, it was without question the right choice. With how our games had ended the last 2 weeks why would McCarthy ever even fathom that he would have time enough for 2 possessions. He did what he thought was his only choice to TIE the game. And he knew that going for it would not put him in any worse position. He made the right choice.


without question? I questioned it very much at the time. I can't blame him for trying, but it without question was NOT the right choice.

And I promise you Mike McCarthy wasn't thinking his only option was a tie...
Offline Zero2Cool  
#10 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 6:12:00 AM(UTC)
Rank: Premier Member

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2015Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2016ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI
Applause Given: 2,492
Applause Received: 4,023
I liked the aggressiveness of going for two, but the Packers red zone offense is terrible this year. Even with Aaron Rodgers it was bad. So getting into the end zone twice on consecutive plays? I wanted the extra point. The only time I think you go for two is when you need it to tie the game and there's not much time left.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (32m) : Jason Wilde: Packers "feel like a team of destiny"
uffda udfa (2h) : They'll need all the Julio Joneses they can get.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Chmura: "I'll tell you this: Atlanta's going to score 40 points. They are. The #Packers are going to have to score 41."
Zero2Cool (7h) : Damn-Falcons coach Dan Quinn tells reporters that WR Julio Jones (foot) will be limited this week but will be “ready to rock” on Sunday.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers defense has a red zone INT in each of the last 3 games... Hyde with two of them. (One being the clutch 4thQ INT vs DET in Week 17)
Zero2Cool (9h) : Randall Cobb, Damarious Randall, Quentin Rollins, James Starks, Clay Matthews, Ty Montgomery & Jared Cook. OUT
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the Falcons week 8.
Zero2Cool (10h) : There is no emphasis, it's just a little bit of info. Take it or leave it. No harm.
Smokey (10h) : Zero, I believe that you and some others place too much emphasis upon data. no harm intended.
Zero2Cool (10h) : It’s the 1st time since 1970 all 4 conference championship teams finished the regular season on winning streaks of 4+ games
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : Salt mine. Love it.
TheKanataThrilla (10h) : The refs kept that game close. We should have blown them out early.
DarkaneRules (10h) : Hyde and Gunter are special and I'm hopeful D Ran gets back to where he can be
mi_keys (11h) : That whole forum is a salt mine. It's beautiful.
Zero2Cool (11h) : Burnett's back up, Kentrell Brice lead team in tackles.
uffda udfa (16h) : Hilarious reading below. I like Carter. Only guy who gets it.
uffda udfa (16h) : http://boards.dallascowboys.com/topic/71647-so-we-are-supposed-to-believe/#entry3978081
uffda udfa (17h) : Great news.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Jordy has "legitimate hope" to play, per @RobDemovsky.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers had one call on defense if called, no issue, wans't called. I didn't watch OL so dunno. I watched WR's
Zero2Cool (21h) : Dallas OL had some holds weren't called and 2 defensive holds, not called.
uffda udfa (21h) : I think the Pi vs just a holding call is a legit complaint. Terrible call.
GoPack1984 (21h) : Dallas can't complain about the officials. They got away with so many defensive holding calls.
uffda udfa (21h) : Dallas radio postgame: Dallas wins 7 out of 10 times.
uffda udfa (21h) : Brice led Pack w/ 6 tackles including the hardest of the game.
uffda udfa (21h) : Post game show said same thing. Everyone wondering how it didn't stay left.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Tornado warning forces players, fans to stay put at AT&T Stadium
Zero2Cool (21h) : Skip:More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like meant to be
Zero2Cool (21h) : @RealSkipBayless: More I see winning FG, more I see a very weird thing: It hooked hard left, then straightened out. Obviously no wind. Like
uffda udfa (22h) : I don't believe Dallas is better than us. When Aaron is on we're the best.
beast (22h) : The huddle penalty was an odd one. Without Burnett and Nelson.
uffda udfa (22h) : Cowboys radio team initially called Crosby GW NO GOOD. Lol.
DarkaneRules (22h) : we beat an arguably better team at their place without morgan burnett. still can't believe it
uffda udfa (22h) : Re emphasized we aren't the better team. Sour grapes are sweet to me.
uffda udfa (22h) : Complaining of PI call and huddle penalty.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions

Think About It
Think About It

Recent Topics
now / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

52m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Rick12

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

5h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

6h / Around The NFL / Smokey


Packers Headlines