Green Bay Packers Forum
3 Pages123>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Zero2Cool  
#1 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 9:05:12 AM(UTC)
Shouldn't have surprised me but this did.

Zero2Cool attached the following image(s):
2013wr.png (28kb) downloaded 69 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Sponsor
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#2 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 9:11:25 AM(UTC)
Yeah, we have very good WRs. So do a lot of other teams. I would say ours, when healthy, are in the top 8 or 10 teams in the league. Better than that? I doubt it.
Online cheeseheads123  
#3 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:12:23 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, we have very good WRs. So do a lot of other teams. I would say ours, when healthy, are in the top 8 or 10 teams in the league. Better than that? I doubt it.

What teams would you take over the Packers?

1. Denver
2. Atlanta? If healthy?

Offline texaspackerbacker  
#4 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:45:35 AM(UTC)
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
What teams would you take over the Packers?

1. Denver
2. Atlanta? If healthy?



Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles
Online cheeseheads123  
#5 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:58:46 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles


Little confused on how you evaluate receiving cores. I just don't see the argument for any of those teams being stronger than the Packers.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 11/25/2013(UTC)
Offline GermanGilbert  
#6 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:11:19 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker said: Go to Quoted Post
Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles


Honestly I don't see any of those teams having a better #3 WR than James Jones is.

thanks Post received 1 applause.
nerdmann on 11/25/2013(UTC)
Offline Zero2Cool  
#7 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:23:05 AM(UTC)
GermanGilbert said: Go to Quoted Post
Honestly I don't see any of those teams having a better #3 WR than James Jones is.



or a better number four than Jarrett Boykin(hecatch)
Offline buckeyepackfan  
#8 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 2:59:08 PM(UTC)
When Healthy I wouldn't put ANY ONE TEAMs wr corpse , over Nelson, Cobb, Jones, and now Boykin(hecactch).

Without Cobb, I'll drop them to 3 or 4.



Offline mi_keys  
#9 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 4:16:41 PM(UTC)
cheeseheads123 said: Go to Quoted Post
Little confused on how you evaluate receiving cores. I just don't see the argument for any of those teams being stronger than the Packers.


That's where you are confusing yourself: the presumption that there is supposed to be any substance.
Offline steveishere  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:49:56 AM(UTC)
Jarrett Boykin has the 11th most WR yards in the league since he started getting significant snaps in week 6.
Offline hardrocker950  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:17:24 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
Jarrett Boykin has the 11th most WR yards in the league since he started getting significant snaps in week 6.


This says a lot. He was thrown into unknown territory, and has responded well - very well. I knew he could play, but I didn't expect this much production.
Offline steveishere  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:20:11 AM(UTC)
hardrocker950 said: Go to Quoted Post
This says a lot. He was thrown into unknown territory, and has responded well - very well. I knew he could play, but I didn't expect this much production.


With back up/3rd string/4th string QBs throwing to him too.
Offline Tezzy  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:29:29 AM(UTC)
steveishere said: Go to Quoted Post
With back up/3rd string/4th string QBs throwing to him too.


He has a 15.1 average. In the last 7 games he has 5+ catches in 5 of them. Production.
Offline sschind  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:32:20 AM(UTC)
buckeyepackfan said: Go to Quoted Post
When Healthy I wouldn't put ANY ONE TEAMs wr corpse , over Nelson, Cobb, Jones, and now Boykin(hecactch).

Without Cobb, I'll drop them to 3 or 4.





I wouldn't put a corpse over our guys even when they are hurt.[grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1]

Sorry, I couldn't resist. I know what you mean though and with the apparent emergence of Boykin it gives us some leeway with Jones. A 3 deep squad is nice but 4 is something few teams can even hope to have. It may be luxury we can't afford however.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
Zero2Cool on 11/26/2013(UTC)
Offline mi_keys  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:38:18 AM(UTC)
sschind said: Go to Quoted Post
I wouldn't put a corpse over our guys even when they are hurt.[grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1]

Sorry, I couldn't resist. I know what you mean though and with the apparent emergence of Boykin it gives us some leeway with Jones. A 3 deep squad is nice but 4 is something few teams can even hope to have. It may be luxury we can't afford however.


I hope we can. Jones has overcome his inconsistencies the last few seasons and he goes about his business the right way, as does the whole group. At a position dominated by divas and pricks, it's nice to have a group that across the board we can rely on and that is happy to contribute any way they can, whether that means they are blocking down field all game or reeling in 10 catches for 100+ and a few scores. I'd like to be able to keep them together, especially with what seems to be the likely end of Finley's career.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error


Recent Topics
15m / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / steveishere

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / DakotaT

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884


Tweeter