Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#1 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:00:55 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Posts: 2,535
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 389
Applause Received: 224

I start this thread as a sequel or whatever to my blame Ted Thompson thread. Position by position, how do the Packers stack up against the rest of the league?

QB: Obviously in the top four along with Brady, Brees, and P. Manning. IMO, Rodgers is #1 even among those.

RB: Prior to this year, we were probably in the bottom ten, maybe bottom five. Now with Lacy, I would rank us top ten, maybe top five. Considering age, I can't think of any RB I'd rather have, although right now a few may be better. (I'd take Melvin Gordon over even Lacy, though).

WR: I said in the WR thread, we are probably top 8 or 10 - not higher than that because all our WRs are better because of Rodgers. Nelson might be top 5 or 6; Cobb might be top 10 or 12; Jones top 15 or 20.

TE: Assuming Finley is gone by injury/free agency or both going forward, I would think the Packers are in the lower half, maybe lower ten. There are a lot of decent TEs out there.

O-LINE: The Pits - that's not just a description of the job; It's a description of the quality of ours. Lower ten for sure, maybe lower five. Maybe it gets better if by some miracle, Sherrod plays like a first rounder next season. Bulaga has been adequate at best when healthy - NOT what you expect from a first rounder. Consider three things: 1. the way Aaron Rodgers and now his replacements NEVER get time, and basically have to run for their lives and 2. the way our running game even with Lacy can't do much of anything when not set up by passes - when they just have to line up and get the job done, they don't. 3. the way a lot of teams have rebuilt quality lines with apparent ease.

D-LINE: I see light at the end of the tunnel with Daniels, Datone Jones, and maybe Worthy, and hopefully moving Neal back there. We still are in the lower half, though, and with Raji and Pickett still playing the bulk of the snaps, we are bottom five - moving to mid-range if we lose the big fatties (keep Jolly, though).

OLB: Clay Matthews and Who? Matthews alone probably puts the Packers in the top half of the league. However, I'm getting less and less optimistic about Perry not being a bust. I certainly don't think he is the bookend for Matthews you would expect from a #1 pick.

ILB: Hawk has played better this season than in the past, and Brad Jones hasn't been as bad as I expected. Still, neither is anywhere near what you would call a "playmaker". I would say bottom ten overall.

CORNER: We may be better overall there than any time since the Lombardi era. Just the same, a lot of other teams have found good corners too these days. I'd put the Packers in the top ten. Top five? Maybe if Shields matures before Tramon fades too much and House continues to improve.

SAFETY: Disappointing is the best word. Burnett has been OK, but not quite what I was hoping. McMillian I had high hopes for but he has flopped. I kinda like Jennings, but he is just above minimum NFL-quality. I think Hyde will end up there, and maybe we draft somebody fairly high. For now, we are bottom ten.

PUNTER/KICKER: Masthay has been great; There seem to be a lot of great punters now, though, in the league. Crosby? Middle of the pack, I guess. At his best, there are at least 8 or 10 better kickers in the league, and he ain't always at his best. Combine the two, and I'd say top 10 or 12 in the league.

It's my contention that other than QB, the overall team is mid-range at best, maybe in the lower half. I'd be interested to read how those who think Ted Thompson is so great would rate the team position by position.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Sponsor
Offline Zero2Cool  
#2 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:06:17 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 25,669
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,845
Applause Received: 2,001

Sacks

OLB Matthews, Clay 6
DL Daniels, Mike 5.5
ILB Hawk, A.J. 5
ILB Jones, Brad 3.5
DL Jones, Datone 3
OLB Neal, Mike 3
OLB Perry, Nick 3



UserPostedImage
Click here and find the LATEST Packers News!
Offline GermanGilbert  
#3 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:19:27 AM(UTC)
GermanGilbert

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 594
Joined: 11/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 30
Applause Received: 80

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
WR: I said in the WR thread, we are probably top 8 or 10 - not higher than that because all our WRs are better because of Rodgers. Nelson might be top 5 or 6; Cobb might be top 10 or 12; Jones top 15 or 20.


Maybe I misunderstood you, but how can a team be ranked 8th to 10th if the 3rd guy on the team is in the top 15 to 20 in the league? That means your 3rd WR is better than the #1 guy of half of the NFL teams.
blank
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#4 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:31:15 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Posts: 2,535
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 389
Applause Received: 224

Originally Posted by: GermanGilbert Go to Quoted Post
Maybe I misunderstood you, but how can a team be ranked 8th to 10th if the 3rd guy on the team is in the top 15 to 20 in the league? That means your 3rd WR is better than the #1 guy of half of the NFL teams.


Good Point, but I think there are 8 - 10 teams around with at least as good a situation as the Packers have, all things considered.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline wpr  
#5 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:34:44 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Posts: 12,352
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,751
Applause Received: 1,319

GB stacks up right in the middle at 15th.
Code:

Seattle Seahawks 	10 	1 	0 	.909 	
Denver Broncos 	     9 	2 	0 	.818 	
Kansas City Chiefs 	9 	2 	0 	.818 	
New Orleans Saints 	9 	2 	0 	.818 	
Carolina Panthers 	8 	3 	0 	.727 	
New England Patriots 8 3 	0 	.727 	
Arizona Cardinals 	7 	4 	0 	.636 	
Cincinnati Bengals 	7 	4 	0 	.636 	
Indianapolis Colts 	7 	4 	0 	.636 	
San Francisco 49ers 	6 	4 	0 	.600 	
Chicago Bears 		6 	5 	0 	.545 	
Dallas Cowboys 	        6 	5 	0 	.545 	
Detroit Lions 		6 	5 	0 	.545 	
Philadelphia Eagles 	6 	5 	0 	.545 	
Green Bay Packers 	5 	5 	1 	.500 	
Baltimore Ravens 	5 	6 	0 	.455 	
Miami Dolphins 	        5 	6 	0 	.455 	
New York Jets 		5 	6 	0 	.455 	
Pittsburgh Steelers 	5 	6 	0 	.455 	
San Diego Chargers 	5 	6 	0 	.455 	
St. Louis Rams 		5 	6 	0 	.455 	
Tennessee Titans 	5 	6 	0 	.455 	
Buffalo Bills 		4 	7 	0 	.364 	
Cleveland Browns 	4 	7 	0 	.364 	
New York Giants 	4 	7 	0 	.364 	
Oakland Raiders 	        4 	7 	0 	.364 	
Washington Redskins 	3 	7 	0 	.300 	
Tampa Bay Bucs 	3 	8 	0 	.273 	
Minnesota Vikings 	2 	8 	1 	.227 	
Atlanta Falcons 		2 	9 	0 	.182 	
Houston Texans 	2 	9 	0 	.182 	
Jacksonville Jaguars 	2 	9 	0 	.182 	

"You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." Chesty Puller



UserPostedImage

Offline QCHuskerFan  
#6 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:41:41 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 220
Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)

Applause Given: 64
Applause Received: 100

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
Good Point, but I think there are 8 - 10 teams around with at least as good a situation as the Packers have, all things considered.



I would be interested in knowing your 8 teams as good as or better. Even with the Rodgers influence, I may have the Packers in the top 2.

Denver would be in the top 3. But if you discount the Pack for having Rodgers, doesn't the same argument work for Denver?

blank
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#7 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:46:51 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 220
Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)

Applause Given: 64
Applause Received: 100

QB- Top 3
RB- Top 10
WR- Top 3
TE- Middle
OL- Top 1/2 (#5 rushing and #5 passing team doesn't happen by accident)

DL- Bottom 1/2
LB- Middle
CB- Top 10 in potential, Bottom 5 in performance
S- Bottom 5-10

Specialists- Top 10
blank
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#8 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 10:49:08 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Posts: 2,535
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 389
Applause Received: 224

Originally Posted by: QCHuskerFan Go to Quoted Post
I would be interested in knowing your 8 teams as good as or better. Even with the Rodgers influence, I may have the Packers in the top 2.

Denver would be in the top 3. But if you discount the Pack for having Rodgers, doesn't the same argument work for Denver?



Yeah, but Denver isn't in my top three. They are about equal to the Packers in WRs IMO.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline DarkaneRules  
#9 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:20:44 AM(UTC)
DarkaneRules

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

Posts: 1,683
Joined: 8/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 163
Applause Received: 276

I just go by the eye test more often than not. My view of this team is that they are currently below average. Out of 32 teams, I would rank them around 15 - 20 area.
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#10 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:21:15 AM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 220
Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)

Applause Given: 64
Applause Received: 100

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
Yeah, but Denver isn't in my top three. They are about equal to the Packers in WRs IMO.



I would agree that they are about equal.

So who are your top 8?
blank
Offline nerdmann  
#11 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 11:44:59 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Posts: 6,917
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,304
Applause Received: 577

Haha, Bulaga "adequate at best." lol
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline dhazer  
#12 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 5:12:48 PM(UTC)
dhazer

Rank: Pro Bowl

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2013Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2009PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2013

Posts: 3,897
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 45
Applause Received: 191

Originally Posted by: QCHuskerFan Go to Quoted Post
I would agree that they are about equal.

So who are your top 8?


Are you talking at this minute or when are all healthy?

1- Atlanta
2- Arizona
3- Chicago
4- Detroit
5 - Giants
6- Dallas
7- Bengals
8 - Packers
UserPostedImage

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be :)
Offline QCHuskerFan  
#13 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 6:25:26 PM(UTC)
QCHuskerFan

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Posts: 220
Joined: 12/30/2010(UTC)

Applause Given: 64
Applause Received: 100

Originally Posted by: dhazer Go to Quoted Post
Are you talking at this minute or when are all healthy?

1- Atlanta
2- Arizona
3- Chicago
4- Detroit
5 - Giants
6- Dallas
7- Bengals
8 - Packers


One of my main definitions of quality is depth. The Packers, even without Rodgers and with 2 of the WR having missed games due to injury, have 4 WR with at least 29 catches. I will contend that we don't have a major#1 like Johnson, Fitzgerald, or Marshall.

Atlanta- Definitely top 5
Arizona- Only have 3 receivers in double digits. Maybe 8th?
Chicago- Their #4 receiver has 1 catch. This team only has 2 viable WR options. Not top 8 in my opinion.
Detroit- Again, a team with only 3 real options, but 1 may be the greatest ever.
Giants- Again, 3 pretty good options.
Dallas- 4 decent WR. Top 5, probably
Bengals- Only 3 WR with more than single digit catches.
Packers- A #1A in Nelson, 3 others that have more than 29 catches. Top 3-5

Denver- 3 WR with more than 55 catches. No #4, but most productive 3 WR in league. Top 5

blank
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#14 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 6:58:55 PM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Posts: 2,535
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 389
Applause Received: 224

Originally Posted by: dhazer Go to Quoted Post
Are you talking at this minute or when are all healthy?

1- Atlanta
2- Arizona
3- Chicago
4- Detroit
5 - Giants
6- Dallas
7- Bengals
8 - Packers


Sounds pretty reasonable. I posted this in the other thread earlier:

Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles - in addition to the Falcons and Broncos which somebody else mentioned.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Offline steveishere  
#15 Posted : Monday, November 25, 2013 7:11:20 PM(UTC)
steveishere

Rank: 2nd Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2013

Posts: 1,568
Joined: 7/28/2012(UTC)

Applause Given: 39
Applause Received: 807

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
Sounds pretty reasonable. I posted this in the other thread earlier:

Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles - in addition to the Falcons and Broncos which somebody else mentioned.



It might be reasonable if you guys would bother to back up what you are saying with some reasonable explanations instead of just saying shit and acting like your word is law. Come on then give us your list and some reasons to back it up.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
9m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

15m / Green Bay Packers Talk / musccy

17m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Yerko

26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / uffda udfa

41m / Fantasy Sports Talk / macbob

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

7h / Announcements / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / OlHoss1884

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.