Discussion Board
Welcome Guest! You can login or register. Login or Register.

Poll Question : Packers will win division because
Choice Votes Statistics
  ... they win it
1
8 %
  ... Lions and Bears shit themselves
11
91 %
  Total 12 100%
Guests can't vote. Try login or register.
2 Pages12>

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 8:38:21 AM(UTC)
Do you have more confidence in the Packers WINNING the division, or more confidence in the Lions and Bears LOSING the division to the Packers?
wpr  
#2 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 8:57:13 AM(UTC)
Option C Packers don't win the division.
nerdmann  
#3 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 10:27:45 AM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel said: Go to Quoted Post
Do you have more confidence in the Packers WINNING the division, or more confidence in the Lions and Bears LOSING the division to the Packers?


They'll all shit themselves.

Be interesting to sort it all out afterwarsds. We're the best team, but that doesn't mean we'll win.
El3ment12  
#4 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 11:09:45 AM(UTC)
For us to even be in the position we are in now, we needed the bears and lions to keep on losing, and they have. As unlucky as it was for Rodgers to go down, we are pretty fortunate that our division is so bad.

After the lions lost a game they led by 2 scores in 4 feet of snow, I would say I have more confidence in them losing it.
dhazer  
#5 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 11:57:15 AM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
Option C Packers don't win the division.


I agree 100 % we wont win the division. People you do remember our defense does suck right?
TheKanataThrilla  
#6 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 12:01:58 PM(UTC)
We need Aaron back for us to have a chance. We beat a sinking ship in our backyard by one point. A Cowboys team fighting for the playoffs will be a bigger challenge. As much as people like to bag on him Romo is still pretty good and him to Dez Bryant will be a nightmare for our awful pass defence. I have visions of Dallas 30 yard passes to Dez over the middle of the field all day long.
El3ment12  
#7 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 12:36:44 PM(UTC)
The cowboys weren't exactly great against the raiders, and Nick Foles threw 7 TDs against them.
dhazer  
#8 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 12:55:51 PM(UTC)
El3ment12 said: Go to Quoted Post
The cowboys weren't exactly great against the raiders, and Nick Foles threw 7 TDs against them.


So you use one game as a stat well how great is our defense

Passing yards a game

Packers - 3208

Raiders - 3256


And look at how we have been playing we made Christian Ponder and Eli Manning look like Peyton Manning and we won't even mention the great defensive performance we had against Stafford.


I see the Cowboys scoring 31 points atleast against us, granted 2 of those touchdowns will be on the ground (if not more)

Like I said if we start noodle arm it won't even be close, if Rodgers plays and at a high level it will be a shoot out
buckeyepackfan  
#9 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 1:03:02 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
I agree 100 % we wont win the division. People you do remember our defense does suck right?


RG T.J. Lang

On the win... “Our defense has been taking a lot of heat. Most of it, not rightfully so. Offensively, we’ve been struggling the last couple weeks. That’s no secret. We’re going three and out and those guys are on the field for 40 minutes. It’s tough. I think today we definitely took a step forward as an offense. And our defense played one of their better games of the year letting up 14 points and seven of those were off another turnover. They did a great job of keeping us energized as an offense with the way they played in the second half. I think we wouldn’t have won this game if they didn’t play the way they did"


Read more from Journal Sentinel: http://www.jsonline.com/...81741.html#ixzz2n0fWiixv
Follow us: @JournalSentinel on Twitter
cheeseheads123  
#10 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 1:07:16 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
So you use one game as a stat well how great is our defense

Passing yards a game

Packers - 3208

Raiders - 3256


And look at how we have been playing we made Christian Ponder and Eli Manning look like Peyton Manning and we won't even mention the great defensive performance we had against Stafford.


I see the Cowboys scoring 31 points atleast against us, granted 2 of those touchdowns will be on the ground (if not more)

Like I said if we start noodle arm it won't even be close, if Rodgers plays and at a high level it will be a shoot out


Christian Ponder also looked like Peyton Manning against that Cowboys defense
buckeyepackfan  
#11 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 1:40:35 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
So you use one game as a stat well how great is our defense

Passing yards a game

Packers - 3208

Raiders - 3256


And look at how we have been playing we made Christian Ponder and Eli Manning look like Peyton Manning and we won't even mention the great defensive performance we had against Stafford.


I see the Cowboys scoring 31 points atleast against us, granted 2 of those touchdowns will be on the ground (if not more)

Like I said if we start noodle arm it won't even be close, if Rodgers plays and at a high level it will be a shoot out


If You all don't quit all this "statistical masturbation" , you are going to have Mr. Doom and Gloom all over your asses!!!!!!

Now Stop it!!!! You'll go blind!!!
[laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing] [laughing]
nerdmann  
#12 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 1:48:46 PM(UTC)
Cowboys will be coming off a short week. That will be an advantage for us.

They will have beaten Chicago on MNF, so they won't necessarily be hungry.

The officials will be on OUR side, because they always favor the worse team, to keep the game interesting.

However, if this D doesn't show up, we're totally screwed. Dallas isn't gonna drop two passes on purpose in the final drive to let us win.
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#13 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 2:57:45 PM(UTC)
What kind of a thread/poll is this anyway?

First of all, it will take some of both for the Packers to win the division - Lions and Bears shitting themselves as well as the Packers winning out.

Secondly, I don't believe you people - so many actually claiming and applauding the claim that the Packers WON'T win the division? sheesh!

If Aaron Rodgers is back, the Packers will be a solid favorite in all of the three games - with the possible exception of the Cowboys. Detroit plays a good Ravens team that has a lot of incentive to win. They better lose that one, because after that they play two teams with nothing to play for.
wpr  
#14 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 3:14:07 PM(UTC)
I guess it is wrong to express an opinion.

Sorry. (not really.)

The Aaron Rodgers I know will not be back this year. IF Rodgers even returns it will take him a while to get back into NFL caliber playing shape. That is not going to happen soon.

In the past 5 weeks this Packers team has played 2 of the weakest teams in the NFL. They tied one and beat the other by 1 point. What does that mean? This Packers team is one of the weakest teams in the NFL. Even in a weak division they will not win.
warhawk  
#15 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 9:04:09 PM(UTC)
dhazer said: Go to Quoted Post
So you use one game as a stat well how great is our defense

Passing yards a game

Packers - 3208

Raiders - 3256


And look at how we have been playing we made Christian Ponder and Eli Manning look like Peyton Manning and we won't even mention the great defensive performance we had against Stafford.


I see the Cowboys scoring 31 points atleast against us, granted 2 of those touchdowns will be on the ground (if not more)

Like I said if we start noodle arm it won't even be close, if Rodgers plays and at a high level it will be a shoot out


Well if you need another game the Bears D is just as lousy as the Packs and they are beating the living fudge out of the Boys right now.

DakotaT  
#16 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 9:20:09 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
I guess it is wrong to express an opinion.

Sorry. (not really.)

The Aaron Rodgers I know will not be back this year. IF Rodgers even returns it will take him a while to get back into NFL caliber playing shape. That is not going to happen soon.

In the past 5 weeks this Packers team has played 2 of the weakest teams in the NFL. They tied one and beat the other by 1 point. What does that mean? This Packers team is one of the weakest teams in the NFL. Even in a weak division they will not win.


All the Packers are accomplishing by winning right now is fucking up the opportunity to get the best center in the draft. But I'll join you jackasses on Sunday's chat rooting them on.
cheeseheads123  
#17 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 9:50:01 PM(UTC)
DakotaT said: Go to Quoted Post
All the Packers are accomplishing by winning right now is fucking up the opportunity to get the best center in the draft. But I'll join you jackasses on Sunday's chat rooting them on.


I knew you would come around =d> [grin1]
User is suspended until 4/29/2043 11:56:55 PM(UTC) texaspackerbacker  
#18 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 9:51:27 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
I guess it is wrong to express an opinion.

Sorry. (not really.)

The Aaron Rodgers I know will not be back this year. IF Rodgers even returns it will take him a while to get back into NFL caliber playing shape. That is not going to happen soon.

In the past 5 weeks this Packers team has played 2 of the weakest teams in the NFL. They tied one and beat the other by 1 point. What does that mean? This Packers team is one of the weakest teams in the NFL. Even in a weak division they will not win.


Don't worry, the "right to be wrong" is alive and well around here. I'm just saying, these crowd followers who are so quick to jump on a bandwagon of defeat are pretty LOW in my book.

You say that like it's a sure thing - the idea that Rodgers would be playing worse somehow if he does come back. At most, that is speculation.



wpr  
#19 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 10:16:58 PM(UTC)
TX sometimes you are so funny. Of course it is speculation. Everything on this board is speculation. Nary a one of us sits down and has tea and crumpets with Ted, Coach Mike or any of his staff including the doctors. None of the call us. None of them write us. They don't even tell the press the real inside story.

But that said almost no one who plays a professional sport and sits for any length of time comes back in perfect condition. Almost none of them plays at the same level they did before the injury. Certainly not that same season. Some never get it all back. It don't take mush of a genius to assume Aaron will have issues especially in the cold weather he will now have to deal with.
DoddPower  
#20 Posted : Monday, December 9, 2013 10:21:53 PM(UTC)
wpr said: Go to Quoted Post
But that said almost no one who plays a professional sport and sits for any length of time comes back in perfect condition. Almost none of them plays at the same level they did before the injury. Certainly not that same season. Some never get it all back. It don't take mush of a genius to assume Aaron will have issues especially in the cold weather he will now have to deal with.


I do agree with your overall premise, but even an Aaron Rodgers at 80% of his potential game is enough to make the Packers competitive and possibly beat a team like the Cowboys. Did you see what the Bears just did to them?

Rss Feed
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : lol by .01 not what i thought
Zero2Cool (1h) : he's faster than Montgomery
uffda udfa (17h) : Packers re-sign Christine Michael
Smokey (18h) : Easier said than fixed .
Nonstopdrivel (19h) : The web version lists who started the thread; the mobile version lists who last updated it.
Nonstopdrivel (19h) : Also, there's a weird disparity between the web version and online version of this site.
Nonstopdrivel (19h) : ;-)
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : Packers wanted D. Ware in 2005. Thank you Cowboys!
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : lol Rourke
Nonstopdrivel (21-Mar) : I HATE HATE HATE the way all threads get marked as read after viewing a few of them in one session. It's obnoxious.
Smokey (21-Mar) : Check out this site, NFLdraftscout.com , a great resource site.
Smokey (20-Mar) : Jared Cook signs with Raiders .
Smokey (20-Mar) : I did watch SB 45 on YouTube the other night, very eye opening .
Smokey (20-Mar) : Watching Spring Training Baseball, Nationals vs Yankees, very interesting .
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : B1G making some noise in that bracket
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : The more join, the more talk, the better. including John
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : no forum should need one person, we have others, speak up!
gbguy20 (19-Mar) : slow forum needs more uffda
Smokey (19-Mar) : There's always next year .
Smokey (18-Mar) : Virginia is still in it !
Smokey (18-Mar) : On Wisconsin
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Down goes Villanova!! Badgers!!!
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Might have went into your SPAM or JUNK folder??
yooperfan (18-Mar) : Funny I never got the invite
wpr (17-Mar) : Ignoring the Signing Bonus, Jones' base is only $725K above the vet min
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Not many seem interested, but I did invite those from last year.
dhazer (16-Mar) : no bracket challenge Kevin?
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Blame twitter on the /home page here lol
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Datone Jones Vikings deal $3.75M, $1.6M signing bonus, $1.5M salary, $31,250 per game active, $150K workout bonus, $1.25M sacks-pt incentive
Zero2Cool (16-Mar) : Nope. I don't care to read up on Vikings players. :-)
Bnoble (15-Mar) : Anyone see any numbers on Jones deal?
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Datone to Minnesota.
musccy (14-Mar) : A more $ than I'd prefer, but still glad Elliott is back
uffda udfa (14-Mar) : Jayrone back on a one year 1.6 deal.
Zero2Cool (13-Mar) : Martellus Bennett Contract Details: New Packers TE has just $3.85M cap hit in 2017
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2016 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 11 @ 12:00 PM
at Jaguars
Sunday, Sep 18 @ 7:30 PM
at Vikings
Sunday, Sep 25 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Oct 2 @ 12:00 AM
BYE
Sunday, Oct 9 @ 7:30 PM
GIANTS
Sunday, Oct 16 @ 3:25 PM
COWBOYS
Thursday, Oct 20 @ 7:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Oct 30 @ 3:25 PM
at Falcons
Sunday, Nov 6 @ 3:25 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Nov 13 @ 12:00 PM
at Titans
Sunday, Nov 20 @ 7:30 PM
at Redskins
Monday, Nov 28 @ 7:30 PM
at Eagles
Sunday, Dec 4 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Dec 11 @ 3:25 PM
SEAHAWKS
Sunday, Dec 18 @ 12:00 PM
at Bears
Saturday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Jan 1 @ 7:30 PM
at Lions
Think About It
Think About It
Recent Topics
1h / Announcements / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / PackFanWithTwins

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Smokey

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

16h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Smokey

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Nonstopdrivel

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / yooperfan

17-Mar / Around The NFL / Smokey

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / gbguy20

17-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

Headlines